Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Friday, Feb 3rd 2012


The Third Way Arrives in Montreuil

trinity-door_1.JPG

Every so often last year I would take the Metro line 9 out to its terminus in Montreuil – a suburb just east of the confines of Paris – to teach, at the town hall, one of the mayoral staff, a rather reluctant student, who needed to brush up on his English for the many trips he takes every year to the various cities that have connections with the town, in countries as diverse as Brazil, Portugal, Israel, Mali, Kenya, China and Vietnam.

Montreuil is one of the last remaining banlieues rouges, those suburban towns that ring the capital, which, for much of the past eighty years have been – or were – strongholds of the Parti Communiste Français. It is also one of the most celebrated, having been home to a number of Communist luminaries in exile, such as Hô Chi Minh, who lived there in his youth, and who is commemorated in the town’s Hô Chi Minh museum. Portuguese Communist leader Álvaro Cunhal spent many of the Salazar years living under an assumed name in Montreuil, his true identity known only to one or two apparatchiks in the PCF. After his return to Portugal following the Carnation Revolution in 1974, Cunhal’s former neighbours were shocked to see his face beamed across their television screens, as he tried, unsuccessfully, to effect his country’s passage from Fascism to Stalinism.

The town’s population has traditionally been working class, with a large immigrant contingent that dates back to before France’s post-war wave of African and Maghrebin immigration. The most militant of French trade unions, the Confédération Générale du Travail (affiliated to the PCF), has its headquarters just on the border between Montreuil and the capital, and ‘Porte de Montreuil’ has become a synonym for the voice of the far-left in times of industrial unrest. But, like many other working-class towns and neighbourhoods the world over, Montreuil is currently experiencing a gentrification of sorts, as middle-class people squeezed out of the increasingly-expensive Parisian property market, have moved in. The town is particularly popular with artists, attracted as much by affordable studio space as by cheaper housing. A measure of the new demographics is the fact that Dominique Voynet, the Green Party’s candidate in the last Presidential election, is tilting at Mayor Jean-Pierre Brard’s seemingly impregnable regime, in next month’s municipal elections. Were Voynet to take the Town Hall, she would be the first non-communist mayor since 1935.

All very well, you might ask, but what does this have to do with film? Not much with the movies themselves, though Georges Méliès, one of the founding fathers of cinema, had his first studio in the town and filmed his first short here too. Montreuil’s only cinema, established in 1961, now bears his name and it is the subject of a David-versus-Goliath fight that has managed to pit two pillars of the French left against one another.

The Cinéma Méliès programmes almost exclusively arthouse films, many of which are rarely screened elsewhere in France, let alone in working-class suburbs of the capital. Films showing at the moment include Hana Makhmalbaf’s Iranian-Afghan drama Buddha Collapsed out of Shame and the German Oscar-nominated holocaust drama The Counterfeiters. In 2002, the municipality took over the running of the cinema and it has since subsidised it to the tune of 200,000 per year. The cinema’s plans to extend the premises, adding three new screens – which will also receive public funding – has been challenged in court by two of the behemoths of French film exhibition, UGC and MK2. The two claim that the funding, without any contingent condition of profitability, is providing unfair competition to their own cinemas, UGC’s multiplex in Rosny-sous-Bois, just east of Montreuil and MK2’s cinemas at Place de Nation and Place de Gambetta in the east of Paris. The cinema’s management have rightly pointed out the hypocrisy of MK2, considering that the latter is currently in receipt of funding from the city of Paris for four of its cinemas and it also received 1.25 million for its flagship multiplex beside the Bibliothèque Nationale François Mitterand. As for UGC their concerns of their takings being affected are absurd to say the least, given that their Rosny-sous-Bois multiplex, which welcomes two million cinemagoers per year compared to the Méliès’ 200,000, shows only mainstream films dubbed into French, hardly the same target audience as its smaller ‘rival’.

The opinion of many is that the real target of the suit is not the Méliès but municipal funding for non-commercial cinemas throughout France. Certainly the bullying attitude of the two bigger cinemas is unseemly and has been condemned on both the left and the right of the political spectrum, and the Méliès was supported, in an open letter in Libération last September, by seventy illustrious filmmakers, from France and abroad, among them David Lynch, the Dardenne brothers, Hou Hsiao-Hsien and Abbas Kiarostami. UGC will be familiar to many people in Ireland as they have a large multiplex in the Parnell Centre in Dublin, though MK2’s involvement is more enigmatic, not least because they too are beneficiaries of public funding.

MK2 was founded in the early 1970s, by Marin Karmitz, a Romanian-born director and producer, who at the time, like many of his ilk, was an avowed Maoist. He opened his first cinema in Bastille in 1974 and has since had an astute eye for opening cinemas in unfashionable parts of Paris, ahead of imminent gentifrication. The company is also heavily involved in production and distribution, having produced films by Truffaut, Godard, Chabrol, Kieslowski, Kiarostami and, more recently Gus Van Sant. Karmitz, given his leftist credentials – which he has not completely renounced – has been the main target of the protests, led by the firebrand Mayor Brard. A protest was staged outside the MK2 Bibliothèque on the 26th of January during which Brard was arrested for, bizarrely, biting a security guard. Karmitz has since stepped into the ring, condemning Brard’s public disorder, saying that ‘attacking a place of culture in the name of culture, putting in danger the security of employees and spectators, shows a complete contempt for the conventions of democracy’. He also bridled at being compared (along with UGC) to a shark attacking a goldfish (representing the Méliès, of course) in a newspaper ad, allegedly funded by the city of Montreuil. ‘After thirty years of supporting films that nobody else would go near, I’m not going to sit back and let myself be compared to a shark,’ he fumed.

Karmitz is entitled to such indignation as he has been a tireless promoter of excellent cinema throughout his career, though his once-small company is now a major player in the world of French cinema, and, even if he doesn’t desire it, smaller, sometimes more diverse, cinemas are suffering as a result. The key to MK2’s involvement in the suit against the Méliès may be the commercial alliance entered into with UGC last summer. MK2 were previously involved in a subscription scheme with the number one and number two cinema chains Pathé and Gaumont, which collapsed after a very public dispute. The only recourse for MK2 was to join the rival UGC Carte Illimitée scheme, which provides unlimited movies for a fee of 19 per month. Such subscription schemes have themselves been criticised by smaller cinema operators as unfair competition and a parliamentary bill four years ago forced the big players to open them up to a number of independent cinemas. One imagines that MK2 approached UGC cap-in-hand and the payback is Karmitz’s involvement in the rather ugly bullying of a small independent cinema.

Except, when Jean-Pierre Brard is in the picture, there is a formidable counterweight. Brard is a French communist very much of the old school – intransigent and authoritarian - and he has been in office since 1984; though returned at every election, his tenure does have a ring of a Third World presidency about it. He has been denounced by Clémentine Autain, a rising star of the PCF (possibly the only one) and former aide to Mayor of Paris Bertrand Delanoë, as ‘autocratic’ following his blocking her candidature for the Montreuil municipal elections. Voynet, who enters the mayoral election with the Greens at 29% of the vote, and with large support from the Socialists, has compared Montreuil today to Ceausescu’s Romania, saying that everything, down to a housing demand, must pass through Brard. Voynet, for her part, also opposes the legal action taken by UGC and MK2 but she says that she would prefer the three screens to be established instead in the less privileged area of Upper Montreuil, and for there to be a diversity of mainstream and arthouse programming. The Third Way arrives in Montreuil.

The photo Trinity Door from the Photo Walk post is provided courtesy of Claire Wilson of Gingerpixel.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: seanachie

    Feb 26th 2008 at 18:02

    Erratum:

    A rather embarrassing mistake there: Stefan Ruzowitzky’s film The Counterfeiters (Die Fälscher), which has just won the Oscar for Best Foreign film, is Austrian, and not German. All the more embarrassing given that I saw it last week. And there was me whining about the world’s media referring to Daniel Day-Lewis as ‘British’…

  2. Comment by: Donagh

    Feb 27th 2008 at 09:02

    Lucky you corrected it Seanachie, before we got the inevitable flood of comments from all our Austrian readers ;)

  3. Comment by: seanachie

    Mar 17th 2008 at 18:03

    An update on the Montreuil municipal elections: Dominique Voynet took the Town Hall comfortably, with 54% of the vote, ending Jean-Pierre Brard’s 24-year tenure and over seventy years of Communist rule in the city. Contrary to the impression I gave above, her Socialist Party support was from renegade members, the official PS line being to support Brard (though I imagine many within the party are secretly rejoicing). I can’t see UGC or MK2 backing down in court though.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »
  • Is Ireland really the role model for austerity? | Stephen Kinsella | Cambridge Journal of Economics

    Abstract
    This paper describes the causes and consequences of Ireland’s economic crisis in the context of the policy solution implemented to contain that crisis: protracted fiscal austerity. I describe the causes of the recent crisis in Ireland and look at the logic of austerity with a simple model. I compare the current crisis to the crisis of the 1980s, when fiscal austerity was touted as the trigger for the Celtic Tiger. I discuss the measures implemented to date in the current crisis, tracing their effects on sectors of Ireland’s macroeconomy. I show that Ireland is not the role model for austerity policies.

    =======
    The full content of the January 2012 issue of the Cambridge Journal of Economics is available free online here. It is a special issue on the theme “Austerity: Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?”

    Contents
    Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?
    Lawrence King, Michael Kitson, Sue Konzelmann, and Frank Wilkinson

    Financial crisis and global imbalances: its labour market origins and the aftermath
    Pasquale Tridico

    Dangerous interconnectedness: economists’ conflicts of interest, ideology and financial crisis
    Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth and Gerald A. Epstein

    Commentary: Contradictions of austerity
    Alex Callinicos

    The great austerity war: what caused the US deficit crisis and who should pay to fix it?
    James Crotty

    The end of the UK’s liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the coalition government’s policy during the austerity crisis
    Damian Grimshaw and Jill Rubery

    Iceland’s rise, fall, stabilisation and beyond
    Robert H. Wade and Silla Sigurgeirsdottir

    Commentary: Dire consequences: the conservative recapture of America’s political narrative?
    David Coates

    A note on America’s 1920–21 depression as an argument for austerity
    Daniel Kuehn

    US government deficits and debt amid the great recession: what the evidence shows
    Robert Pollin

    Fiscal deficits, economic growth and government debt in the USA
    Lance Taylor, Christian R. Proaño, Laura de Carvalho, and Nelson Barbosa

    The tragedy of UK fiscal policy in the aftermath of the financial crisis
    Malcolm Sawyer

    Is Ireland really the role model for austerity?
    Stephen Kinsella

    The macroeconomic stabilisation effects of Social Security and 401(k) plans
    Teresa Ghilarducci, Joelle Saad-Lessler, and Eloy Fisher

    The basic paradigms of EU economic policy-making need to be changed
    Kazimierz Laski and Leon Podkaminer

    Building faith in a common currency: can the eurozone get beyond the Common Market logic?
    Pascal Petit

    The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: the lost Keynesian legacy
    Robert Boyer

    Russia: austerity and deficit reduction in historical and comparative perspective
    Vladimir Popov

    Commentary: Austerity and fraud under different structures of technology and resource abundance
    Jing Chen and James Galbraith

    No comments »
  • The Newsfakers | Patrick Cockburn

    I enjoyed this nuanced article by Patrick Cockburn about journalism, accuracy, modern media, blogging, black propaganda and the use of social media by authoritarian regimes and advanced capitalist ‘democratic’ ones too. It also reminded me of this excellent review of Net Delusion by Oliver Farry that we published a while back.

    “So technical advances have made it more difficult for governments to hide repression. But these developments have also made the work of the propagandist easier. Of course, people who run newspapers and radio and television stations are not fools. They know the dubious nature of much of the information they are conveying. The political elite in Washington and Europe was divided for and against the US invasion of Iraq, making it easier for individual journalists to dissent. But today there is an overwhelming consensus in the foreign media that the rebels are right and existing governments wrong. For institutions such as the BBC, highly unbalanced coverage becomes acceptable.

    Sadly, al-Jazeera, which has done so much to shatter state control of information in the Middle East since it was set up in 1996, has become the uncritical propaganda arm of the Libyan and Syrian rebels.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors