Skip to content

Monday, Feb 8th 2010


The Truth About Irish Wages

donncha_o_caoimh_postbox_smaller1.JPG

The new union UNITE (the merged ATGWU and AMICUS unions) has just published a report on Irish wages that is sure to prove controversial. It flatly contradicts the prevailing consensus that Irish wages are somehow ‘high’, that Irish wage growth is high relative to our EU trading partners, and that these ‘high’ wages are one of the root causes of our deteriorating competitiveness. In removing these arguments from the table, the trade union movement will be doing all of us a considerable favour, not just because it strengthens the arguments for wage increases, but also because it will focus our attention on the real reasons behind our economic troubles, reasons that have little to do with the employers’ claims.

The report is simplicity itself.  It merely looked up the facts. Using the international databases that compile cross-country comparisons, it reveals the following:

  • The OECD: In this measurement of the total private sector, Irish wages rank in the bottom half of the EU-15, lying 11th and falling nearly 11% behind the average EU wage.
  • EU AMECO: In this database, maintained by the EU’s Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate, Irish industrial wages lie 11th as well, nearly 7% behind the EU-15 average.
  • The US Bureau of Labor Statistics: The American database shows that Irish manufacturing wages are over 17% below the EU-15 average (and an incredible 42% below Norway’s average manufacturing wage).

Though these measurements use different methodologies, it is interesting that they tell the same story:  Irish wages are below the EU-15 average. But the report goes beneath these headline figures to unearth even more consensus-busting data on Irish wages.

First, the document, using the OECD measurement, shows that when Ireland is compared with its peer group-the wealthiest ten European countries, of which Ireland is one-our average wage falls a massive 25% behind the EU top-ten average. And when you factor in living costs, by applying purchasing power parities (the ‘how-much-bread-€1-buys-in-each-country’ measurement), Irish wages end up being not that much higher than in Spain. In the EU-15 table, they fall from a nominal 11% behind the average to a real fall of over 20%.

On just about any measurement you want to use, Irish private-sector employees are relatively low waged when compared with their EU counterparts. So where did this idea that Irish wages are somehow inhibiting our competitiveness come from? UNITE takes this issue head on. It shows how employers’ organisations and government ministers use a clever sleight-of-hand, mixing percentages and wage increases to first bewilder, then distort.

Yes, Irish wages have been increasing faster than most European wages in percentage terms, but that’s the catch: The percentages are high but the increases are working off a lower base. For instance, take two employees, one earning €10,000 and the other earning €20,000. If they both receive a €500 wage increase, it calculates as a 5% increase for the low earner and a 2.5% increase for the higher earner. The wage increase is the same but the percentages are different.

So, when an Irish worker receives a 28% wage increase over the last six years while a Belgian worker gets a 19% increase over that same period, we might jump to the conclusion that Irish wages are increasing at an ‘uncompetitive’ rate.  But look behind the numbers and we see that both workers received the same amount, about €1,500.  So the Irish employer is no worse off in terms of cost increases (at least with wages) than the Belgian employer. Indeed, the Irish employer still has the advantage of paying lower wages.

Irish employers enjoy not only the advantage of paying relatively low wages, however.  They also benefit from a generous (that is, low) social security-or PRSI-contribution regime. Irish employers pay one of the lowest rates in the EU. While the average EU employer pays approximately 20% social security levy, Irish employers pay half that, 10.2%.  Were our Employers’ PRSI levies pegged at the EU average, they would have to be doubled. It’s win-win for Irish employers.

So is there a causal link between wage levels and economic competitiveness? Employers and government ministers would like to convince us there is. However, that insistence on an iron law could backfire on them, because UNITE shows that in the EU-15 there are nine countries that rank higher than Ireland in the World Economic Summit’s Global Competitiveness Index, and all those countries have wage levels above those pertaining here. In fact, Denmark, which is the highest-ranked EU country, has an average wage some 32% higher than Ireland.  So, if there are those who want to suggest a causal link between wage levels and competitiveness, they will have to contend with the evidence, namely, that higher-wage economies are more competitive than lower-waged ones.

‘The Truth About Irish Wages’ constitutes a fundamental assault on the economic consensus that dominates debate today-that Irish workers are ‘pricing themselves out of the market’, that ‘high wages’ are undermining our competitiveness, and other such misinformed and unsubstantiated assertions. And it’s not as if these facts are somehow secret or only penetrable with an army of analysts. Anyone can go on to the OECD database or the EU AMECO website or quickly surf the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. It’s all there for enterprising journalists or commentators to take a few minutes to look up.

But UNITE’s report is not just about wages. It is about the fundamental premise of social partnership, that wage moderation can be compensated for by tax cuts. This premise is already being questioned by ICTU’s David Begg, and, with the Exchequer deficit nearly out of control, is probably not repeatable-not in today’s economic climate. So Irish workers are taking two hits: first, low wages, and second, the lack of a social wage which can only be paid out of high taxation. High taxation, in turn, can only be built on the framework of high wages. So we’re in a vicious cycle downwards.

And for pointing that out, we should be grateful to UNITE. Whatever about the emperor’s au naturel perambulations, it’s good to see a trade union commenting on the tattered apparel that Irish employees are forced to don.

The photo above was taken by Donncha O’Caoimh and is titled An Chead Bhailiu Eile.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: D_D

    Apr 16th 2008 at 16:04

    Great Report. Great article.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY

    SOCIOLOGY LECTURE SERIES 2010

    Prof James Wickham

    Head of School of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Financial markets and social power - the new inequalities of turbo-capitalism

    Wednesday 10 February 2010

    7.00- 9.30 pm

    Synge lecture theatre, Arts Building, TCD

    A L L   W E L C O M E

    No comments »
  • Kevin Doogan - Not all that is solid | New Humanist

    Analysis of global foreign direct investment patterns also reveals two interesting and counter-intuitive trends. FDI expands during boom periods and contracts during recessions. To blame job losses on capital migration is questionable. Secondly the lion's share of overseas investment goes to the rich rather than poor countries. Between 1980 and 2006 the developed economies' share of global FDI inward stock has grown from 56 per cent to 70 per cent, consolidating their position as the prime target for overseas investment. In other words capital moves abroad to access rich markets rather than exploit cheap labour. This shows that fears of exporting jobs are not related to the actuality of capital relocation but to the threat of jobs going overseas. Research in America, where fears of overseas job loss have a much higher profile than in Europe, shows that companies use the threat of corporate relocation in order to maintain the compliance of trade unions during contract negotiations.

    10 comments »
  • Patrick Cockburn | The Case Against Tony Blair

    The case against Tony Blair has revolved too much around his good faith and too little around his competence. The placards held up by protestors on Friday as he gave evidence should have read “sucker” and “dope” rather than “Bliar”.

    Amateurs have a fluency denied to professionals because they see no “ifs” and “buts” which would interrupt the flow of their argument. Books proving that Bacon wrote Shakespeare are often highly articulate and have great narrative pace because their authors see all facts pointing to the same inevitable conclusion.

    It is this mixture of amateurism and evangelical conviction which made Blair such a lethally inept leader before and during the war in Iraq. His greatest weakness was not so much that he adjusted facts to support his policies, but that he had so little grasp of the facts in the first place.

    1 comment »
  • Victor Grossman | Oskar Lafontaine and the Troubled German Left

    While German politicians stared at the calendar, wondering nervously what the May 9th elections will bring in the biggest state, North Rhine-Westphalia, with its 18 million people, media attention suddenly switched to a personal drama within the party called Die Linke (The Left). A few years ago this party or its predecessors were getting laughed off the political map. But what is happening today in that party could re-draw the whole map.

    No comments »
  • Henry A. Giroux’s tribute to Howard Zinn | Howard Zinn: A Public Intellectual Who Mattered

    "I grew up in Providence, Rhode Island, and rarely met or read any working-class intellectuals. After reading James Baldwin, hearing William Kunstler and Stanley Aronowitz give talks, I caught a glimpse of what it meant to occupy such a fragile, contradictory and often scorned location. But reading Howard gave me the theoretical tools to understand more clearly how the mix of biography, cultural capital and class location could be finely honed into a viable and laudable politics.

    Later, as I got to know Howard personally, I was able to fill in the details about his working-class background and his intellectual development. We had grown up in similar neighborhoods, shared a similar cultural capital and we both probably learned more from the streets than we had ever learned in formal schooling. There was something about Howard's fearlessness, his courage, his willingness to risk not just his academic position, but also his life, that marked him as special."

    No comments »
  • ONE | Drop Haitian Debt

    As Haiti rebuilds from this disaster, please work to secure the immediate cancellation of Haiti’s $1 billion debt and ensure that any emergency earthquake assistance is provided in the form of grants, not debt-incurring loans. Sign the petition.

    No comments »
  • CIA Man Retracts Claim on Waterboarding | Foreign Policy

    John Kiriakou, the former CIA operative who affirmed claims that waterboarding quickly unloosed the tongues of hard-core terrorists, says he didn't know what he was talking about.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | Haiti and the ‘Devil’s Curse’

    Excellent 12 minute news segment from the Real News on Haiti’s history of poverty, which includes a critical examination of how mainstream media is reporting this history without mentioning the impact that various foreign interventions has had on the country.

    According to Peter Hallward, author of Damming the Flood: Haiti, Aristide, and the Politics of Containment Haiti’s poverty can be explained as a series of foreign responses to the independence and strength of the Haitian people, but since the media doesn’t acknowledge this, they are forced to propose weakness and bad luck as the sources of Haiti’s poverty.

    No comments »
  • k-punk: Spectres of revolution

    Mark Fisher, author of Capitalist Realism, is talking about "Revolution" :
    "So let's be clear. I'm very far from saying that nothing can ever change. There has been some discussion of whether Capitalist Realism is a pessimistic book. For me, it isn't pessimistic, but it is negative. The pessimism is already embedded in everyday life - it is what Zizek would call the "spontaneous unreflective ideology" of our times. Identifying the embedded, unreflective pessimism is an act of negativity which, I hope, can make some contribution to denaturalizing that pessimism (which, by its very nature, does not identify itself as such, and is covered over by a compulsory positivity which forbids negativity). Far from nothing ever changing, something already has changed, massively - the bank crisis was an event without a subject, whose implications are yet to be played out. The terrain - the crashed present, littered with the ideological rubble of failed projects - is there to be fought over."

    No comments »
  • UK company law is terrorism’s friend | Prem Sikka | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

    Over the years, I have conducted many investigations into dubious corporate practices for newspapers, radio and television programmes and the trail always leads to tax havens, which hold no public information about the individuals behind those companies. The registered address is about the only publicly available information. One building in the Cayman Islands, a UK overseas territory, is the registered address of 18,857 corporations. British Virgin Islands, another UK overseas territory, with a population of 23,000 has more than 813,000 registered companies, the highest number per capita in the world. These companies rarely carry out any trade in their locales, but facilitate secrecy to their owners.

    No comments »

Link Archives »