Skip to content

Saturday, Jul 4th 2009


Sugar is a Socialist Issue

a100_0_cake.jpg

In case there are other people who have not read the book ‘Sugar Blues’ by William Dufty - originally published in 1976 - it can surely be highly recommended. Dufty was an ardent exponent of trade unionism who died in 2002 at the age of 86. He is also known for his interest in an aspect of life that has been thoroughly colonised by capitalism: human health and well-being - particularly as it relates to nutrition. Arguably, one of the most powerful weapons of self determination that we have at our disposal is our ability to choose what we put into our own bodies. Only up to a point as things stand however, because the information that is needed for us to make informed choices is deliberately being held back in many instances and/or distorted so as to encourage people to believe that the food they are consuming is safe when in fact much of it is laced with additives, chemicals and toxins - and denatured by production processes that strip away vital nutrition for no other reason than to prolong profit-enhancing shelf life. Additionally, the vast majority of us no longer have any control over the means of production of something so fundamental to our health and happiness. Trillions of dollars of profit are made by those who benefit from this enforced state of affairs.

Throughout much of his life, William Dufty campaigned to promote to restore the empowerment of the individual over care and control of his or her own health. ‘Sugar Blues’ is brilliantly written, is pacy, punchy, interesting - highly entertaining and hugely informative. The history of sugar is the history of western politics to a large degree - a commodity soaked in the blood of the salve trade and the focus of appalling capitalist corruption. Dufty describes how the American Food and Drug Administration came to represent the vested interests who were profiteering out of adulterated and sickening foods including those of the sugar lobby - and how those who tried to expose the scientific truth were silenced - even to the extent of shutting down, in the early part of the 20th century, a government appointed watchdog organisation that had begun to flex its muscles against toxic additives and chemicals in food.

The monumental scandal described at the heart of the book is the truth it tells about refined sugar itself - a poison that is now routinely added to so much of our food that epidemics of illness and disease are needlessly affecting billions of people - while the medical establishment stays largely silent and complicit about a substance that it knows full well is atrociously bad for human health. Refined sugar or sucrose (not to be confused with glucose, a different type of sugar which the body manufactures itself from healthy whole foods - though the sugar lobby continually conflates the two substances by referring to both as ’sugar’ - to disguise the true nature of white sugar) - acts as a slow poison in the human body. Over time it affects both mental and physical well-being. Aside from alternative medical practitioners who have long understood the evil that is refined sugar, orthodox medical practitioners are increasingly pointing to sugar as the source of many degenerative and other illnesses. Basically, sugar wallops virtually every system in the body. Consumption of sugar has been increasing in direct correlation to increases in the incidence of coronary heart disease, cancers, diabetes and a whole array of now familiar medical conditions commonest among sugar-saturated societies. As Dufty said, it is not just that sugar has no food value; it is positively bad for you. For example, in one test people who ate nothing over a period of 9 days stayed healthier and stronger than those who ate only sugar. It’s unlikely by now that many people don’t know that sugar is bad for them - but just how bad is another matter.

It’s also insidiously present in our diets. Among the many hidden sources of sugar in our foods, it might surprise some people to know that flue dried tobacco (the most commonly smoked kind) has a sugar ’sauce’ added to it to help the tobacco stay alight. In countries where this sort of tobacco is smoked by a majority of smokers, lung cancers far exceed the incidence in countries where air dried, unadulterated tobacco is used. Even when the amount of tobacco smoked is less.

As is often the case with exploitation, it is the most vulnerable and the poorest who pay the highest price for the deception of the corporate food lobby. In the fight against the capitalist-driven food scandal, knowledge is everything. If you haven’t already, ‘Sugar Blues’ could be a good place to make a start on taking control of your own health and out of the hands of the food industry barons.

Image is taken by Claire Wilson of Ginger Pixel photo blog and appeared in the post Chocolate Love Fest.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Democracy Derailed in Honduras | The Nation

    Greg Grandin on the need for the US to avoid the "Haiti Option" which linked US support for Aristide to the forced implementation of IMF and WB policies in Haiti. Support for Zelaya to return him to office should be provided without conditions. "It seems like what the United States might be angling for in Honduras could be the "Haiti Option." In 1994 Bill Clinton worked to restore Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide after he was deposed in a coup, but only on the condition that Aristide would support IMF and World Bank policies. The result was a disaster, leading to deepening poverty, escalating polarization and, in 2004, a second coup against Aristide, this one fully backed by the Bush White House."

    No comments »
  • The Dublin Consensus

    Sli Eile of Progressive Economy responds to Sarah Carey’s article today in the Irish Times and talks about the dominance of the Dublin Consensus (following the notion of the Washington Consensus). Carey says the debate is over - ICTU should choose ‘patriotism and pragmatism’, sell ’spending cuts and tax increases’ to their members and get it over with. Sli Eile says that we have to move away from marginal issues - such as Carey’s focus on job subsidies - and confront the real issues:

    1. Domestic fiscal stimulus versus profound fiscal deflation for 2009-2012/13
    2. Skills, innovation and growing the indigenous economy on world markets versus business as usual depending on FDI and a relatively protected and cosseted non-traded sector (as in price controls, costs and rigid work practices in the case of the public and civil service)
    3. Corporate governance change versus cosmetic name change
    4. Finding another way of dealing with banking rather than bleeding the whole country with a blanket cheque to recapitalise the failed (with the bail-out of Anglo-Irish ultimately costing more than an entire year’s education budget)

    This is where the real debate needs to be reclaimed and the Dublin Consensus challenged.”

    1 comment »
  • Honduras Photoshow

    Some photos of how the new Honduras government likes to protect its constitution against a 'survey'.

    No comments »
  • Barack Obama’s Recent 55 Minute Speech to the American Medical Association

    As mentioned in Gerry Burke’s piece published today on Irish Left Review.

    No comments »
  • Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker

    The explosive trend in American medical costs seems to have occurred here in an especially intense form. Our country’s health care is by far the most expensive in the world. In Washington, the aim of health-care reform is not just to extend medical coverage to everybody but also to bring costs under control. Spending on doctors, hospitals, drugs, and the like now consumes more than one of every six dollars we earn.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | The Military Coup in Honduras

    See also Hugh Green on the Leader of opposition, President of the Congress (and now interim President) Roberto Micheletti’s resistance to sign the Bolivarian Alliance of The Americas (ALBA) treaty which would strengthen economic links with ’socialist’ countries in Latin America. The IMF has problems with this because of the “economic repercussions which the aforementioned incorporation will have and its consequences with its old partner the United States”.

    No comments »
  • PROMISSORY NOTES: From Crises to Commons

    No comments »
  • Honduras Coup: Check out the false resignation letter

    Incakolanews has an image of the ‘resignation’ letter of Manuel Zelaya, the ousted president of Honduras. It’s dated the 25th of June. As they say themselves: “There’s more chance that Michael Jackson signed this piece of BS than Manuel Zelaya”.

    No comments »
  • Why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting

    Morad Farhadpour and Omid Mehrgan, translators and philosophers based in Tehran on why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting:

    “June 2009 Election was a decisive opportunity for this people to declare itself, in the figure of Mousavi, who from the beginning insisted on people’s dignity as a true political right. But why him? Why not, say, Karroubi, the other reformist candidate? Has Mousvai, now the leader of the mass movement, appeared on the scene in a purely contingent way? Has he by mere chance, by force of circumstances, as it were, become the leading figure, the reform-freedom-democracy incarnate? The answer is positively negative. To elucidate this, we have to draw attention to the tradition from which he has emerged and to which he has repeatedly referred during his electoral campaign. As we said before, this tradition is rooted in 1979 Revolution and has been revived in the 2th of Khordad Movement — whereas, Karroubi’s ‘politics’ was based on a subjectless process in which different identity groups would present their demands to the almighty state and act as its passive, divided, depoliticized supporters.”

    No comments »
  • Government on the Ropes after Election Defeat | The Socialist Party Analysis

    Kevin McLoughlin of the Socialist Party provides an analysis of the party’s performance in the local and European elections on Indymedia.

    “It wasn’t that 50,510 voters fully endorsed socialism but, there is no doubt that everyone who voted for Joe, knew well that they were voting for a socialist. In the exit poll, when asked why they had voted for Joe Higgins, 48% said because of his personality/personal qualities; 29% because of his policies and 18% because he was the Socialist Party candidate. The poll also indicated that, of those made redundant over the last six months who voted, 32.4% voted for Joe Higgins.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »