Skip to content

Saturday, Jul 4th 2009


Corporate Schadenfreude

a100_0_68_jimflavin.jpg

There is plenty in the news today about Jim Flavin’s decision to step down as executive chairman of DCC, on the foot of :

a new legal manoeuvre against the company by the official enforcer of corporate law, Paul Appleby, who wants the High Court to appoint inspectors to investigate how it sold a major stake in fruit importer Fyffes in 2000.

Appleby’s action comes after the elite of corporate investment decided that it could no longer ignore the Supreme Court decision last summer that Flavin was guilty of insider trading. Is it possible that the Irish Association of Investment Managers (IAIM) got wind of Appleby’s proposed actions and decided that it had to appear to do something?

Flavin’s defense in the Supreme Court case, and the line provided by DCC up until last Tuesday, was that Flavin’s actions were an ‘unwitting breach of civil law’.

Jim Flavin has been in business a long time, and like other big movers he is purposefully circumspect in his dealings and extremely private, but he is still widely known as a very shrewd, and indeed ruthless, business man. The defense is also a complete joke considering that as a result of the sale of Fyffe stock in 2000, just before a profit warning, DCC netted a gob smacking €85 million. Although some of this was lost in litigation with Fyffes, it is no wonder that the directors of DCC were sticking by Flavin to the last.

What is clear is that, from the establishment’s point of view, Flavin’s financial manoeuvres were too blatant, especially if more was to come to light following the legal action of the director of Corporate Enforcement, which even without the statement from IAIM was going to be news this week. Effectively, by behaving in such an egregious manner he was spoiling it for all the other scalpers. It is not in their interest, after all, for the public to know just how things really work in Ireland, where a very small number of influential people control so much. If we are to look a little closer at the people behind this we would see that they are, in fact, very influential indeed.

Fyffes, who won the civil case against DCC in the Supreme Court is, of course, largely controlled by the mega-rich McCann family. Writing in Dublin Opinion back in March when Bertie Ahern’s close associate Tom Collins was talking to the Mahon Tribunal, I outlined how the McCann family benefited from the purchase and the sale to the State shortly after, of the Oldbridge Estate. Since then it has since been turned into The Battle of the Boyne site, and was the choice location for Bertie Ahern’s swansong photo-op with Ian Paisley, which seemed carefully choreographed to coincide with his retirement from politics.

The curious circumstances of the purchase, literally months before Minister for Foreign Affairs at the time David Andrews announced that it intended to buy the site is an example of how the McCann family themselves enjoyed a bit of ‘insider trading’. What was most startling about that situation is that the McCann family, which had set up a company called Deepriver Ltd specifically to buy the property, was able to pass the tax bill accrued from the profits of the sale on to the Office of Public Works.

As Judy Corcoran reported in the Irish Independent in 2006:

“In 1997, the Battle of the Boyne site was bought for €3.4m by the McCann family, who control Fyffes, the giant fruit import company. They formed a separate company to own the land, Deepriver Ltd, of which Tim Collins had 12.5 per cent of the shares.

A month after the McCann transaction was completed, the then Minister for Foreign Affairs, David Andrews, announced that the Government planned to develop the Battle of the Boyne site as part of the peace process.

Negotiations to purchase the site on behalf of the State began, and were concluded in 2000, at a cost to the taxpayer of just under €10m.

That tax bill of almost €1m was instead paid by the OPW when it wound up Deepriver some years later.”

There is also the curious relationship between Jim Flavin and the McCann family. Flavin at the time of the sale of Fyffes stock was a director of the banana-based business and it would seem that his relationship with the McCanns was quite good. If we are to accept the notion that acrimonious court battles lead to personal animosity between the parties then we have only been taken in the soap opera aspect of this case.

Usually such situations are seen simply as business, and while particular parties love winning and hate losing there is little to suggest that relations between the McCanns ‘soured’ as a result of the litigation.

That this protracted case between Fyffes and DCC is just business can be seen from this 2002 Sunday Business Post article by Kathleen Barrington, which points to reports that the McCann’s were very happy with Jim Flavin’s plans to sell their stock just before a profit warning was issued.

“Several stories that appeared in the media last weekend had one thing in common: they quoted DCC sources as saying that champagne corks popped at a meeting between Flavin and the McCanns ahead of his proposed sale of his shares in Fyffes.

The meeting was held in the Great Southern Hotel on February 3, 2000, the day before DCC sold the bulk of its 10 per cent shareholding in Fyffes; the balance was sold on February 15.

A picture can be worth a thousand words and the cracking open of a bottle of champagne strongly suggested that back in February 2000, the McCanns were happy that Flavin was selling his stake.

It was apparently the McCanns who bought the champagne prompting Flavin to wonder if they were also celebrating getting rid of the man they had come to consider as “a thorn in their side”.”

Considering that Jim Flavin has found himself in the media spotlight having shunned it for so long, wishing no doubt to continue his financial scalping without anyone noticing, the 2002 profile is worth reading. And while the fall from grace is not so great, we the little people can enjoy our moment of schadenfreude as the DCC bear slips on the Fyffes banana skin.

Photo by Eric Luke, courtesy of the Irish Times.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Tomaltach

    May 28th 2008 at 12:05

    Good post. God, corporate (and political) Ireland reeks!

  2. Comment by: Donagh

    May 28th 2008 at 12:05

    Thanks Tomaltach. You’re right, but I wish you weren’t. Of course, Flavin and DCC are now the subject of an investigation by corporate enforcement, whatever that is. The only possible censure as a result of that, however, is Flavin being struck off as a director, which, if it ever happens, is a long way off.

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. May 28th 2008

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Democracy Derailed in Honduras | The Nation

    Greg Grandin on the need for the US to avoid the "Haiti Option" which linked US support for Aristide to the forced implementation of IMF and WB policies in Haiti. Support for Zelaya to return him to office should be provided without conditions. "It seems like what the United States might be angling for in Honduras could be the "Haiti Option." In 1994 Bill Clinton worked to restore Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide after he was deposed in a coup, but only on the condition that Aristide would support IMF and World Bank policies. The result was a disaster, leading to deepening poverty, escalating polarization and, in 2004, a second coup against Aristide, this one fully backed by the Bush White House."

    No comments »
  • The Dublin Consensus

    Sli Eile of Progressive Economy responds to Sarah Carey’s article today in the Irish Times and talks about the dominance of the Dublin Consensus (following the notion of the Washington Consensus). Carey says the debate is over - ICTU should choose ‘patriotism and pragmatism’, sell ’spending cuts and tax increases’ to their members and get it over with. Sli Eile says that we have to move away from marginal issues - such as Carey’s focus on job subsidies - and confront the real issues:

    1. Domestic fiscal stimulus versus profound fiscal deflation for 2009-2012/13
    2. Skills, innovation and growing the indigenous economy on world markets versus business as usual depending on FDI and a relatively protected and cosseted non-traded sector (as in price controls, costs and rigid work practices in the case of the public and civil service)
    3. Corporate governance change versus cosmetic name change
    4. Finding another way of dealing with banking rather than bleeding the whole country with a blanket cheque to recapitalise the failed (with the bail-out of Anglo-Irish ultimately costing more than an entire year’s education budget)

    This is where the real debate needs to be reclaimed and the Dublin Consensus challenged.”

    1 comment »
  • Honduras Photoshow

    Some photos of how the new Honduras government likes to protect its constitution against a 'survey'.

    No comments »
  • Barack Obama’s Recent 55 Minute Speech to the American Medical Association

    As mentioned in Gerry Burke’s piece published today on Irish Left Review.

    No comments »
  • Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker

    The explosive trend in American medical costs seems to have occurred here in an especially intense form. Our country’s health care is by far the most expensive in the world. In Washington, the aim of health-care reform is not just to extend medical coverage to everybody but also to bring costs under control. Spending on doctors, hospitals, drugs, and the like now consumes more than one of every six dollars we earn.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | The Military Coup in Honduras

    See also Hugh Green on the Leader of opposition, President of the Congress (and now interim President) Roberto Micheletti’s resistance to sign the Bolivarian Alliance of The Americas (ALBA) treaty which would strengthen economic links with ’socialist’ countries in Latin America. The IMF has problems with this because of the “economic repercussions which the aforementioned incorporation will have and its consequences with its old partner the United States”.

    No comments »
  • PROMISSORY NOTES: From Crises to Commons

    No comments »
  • Honduras Coup: Check out the false resignation letter

    Incakolanews has an image of the ‘resignation’ letter of Manuel Zelaya, the ousted president of Honduras. It’s dated the 25th of June. As they say themselves: “There’s more chance that Michael Jackson signed this piece of BS than Manuel Zelaya”.

    No comments »
  • Why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting

    Morad Farhadpour and Omid Mehrgan, translators and philosophers based in Tehran on why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting:

    “June 2009 Election was a decisive opportunity for this people to declare itself, in the figure of Mousavi, who from the beginning insisted on people’s dignity as a true political right. But why him? Why not, say, Karroubi, the other reformist candidate? Has Mousvai, now the leader of the mass movement, appeared on the scene in a purely contingent way? Has he by mere chance, by force of circumstances, as it were, become the leading figure, the reform-freedom-democracy incarnate? The answer is positively negative. To elucidate this, we have to draw attention to the tradition from which he has emerged and to which he has repeatedly referred during his electoral campaign. As we said before, this tradition is rooted in 1979 Revolution and has been revived in the 2th of Khordad Movement — whereas, Karroubi’s ‘politics’ was based on a subjectless process in which different identity groups would present their demands to the almighty state and act as its passive, divided, depoliticized supporters.”

    No comments »
  • Government on the Ropes after Election Defeat | The Socialist Party Analysis

    Kevin McLoughlin of the Socialist Party provides an analysis of the party’s performance in the local and European elections on Indymedia.

    “It wasn’t that 50,510 voters fully endorsed socialism but, there is no doubt that everyone who voted for Joe, knew well that they were voting for a socialist. In the exit poll, when asked why they had voted for Joe Higgins, 48% said because of his personality/personal qualities; 29% because of his policies and 18% because he was the Socialist Party candidate. The poll also indicated that, of those made redundant over the last six months who voted, 32.4% voted for Joe Higgins.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »