Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010


August 16th Morning: The Recession Diaries

badcapitalist.JPG What a trooper - Denis O’Brien riding shotgun through the radioactive land that is our economy to bring us the good news of recovery and redemption. The masses have waited and are not disappointed. The band plays in the main square, the children toss rose petals on the pot-holed ground and the town elders don their ceremonial robes. For Denis O’Brien carries with him the proclamation of the New Totalitarians. And he will be heard.Ah, the New Totalitarians; like the Soviet-style bureaucrats of old, they, too, believe in a command economy - but now commanded by financial and global capital. It’s the same ’sit-down-and-shut-up’ attitude to democracy, with some slight differences: there is no Gulag here. Unlike the old command societies, though, where a cadre who missed the tractor quota got exiled, today the failed executives get golden handshakes. Mr. O’Brien believes there is nothing that cannot be done by the private sector - and god help anyone who interferes with the myopic and relentless pursuit of private profit.

Yes, Denis O’Brien has prescriptions for the economy. His is the last in a series of opinion pieces the Irish Times published last week from leading ‘entrepreneurs’. They certainly saved the best for last. Let’s take a whirlwind tour through Mr. O’Brien’s insights.

First, Mr. O’Brien takes the town elders to task for ‘talking down’ the economy, for creating a ‘panic environment’.

‘Personal or corporate investment is as much about confidence as it is about capital.’

I could spend a number of posts on this mushy waffle. Suffice it to say that since 2001 ‘investors’ were confident enough - investing €50 billion in property, mostly overseas. Contrast that with the meager €1 billion invested in Irish business. The fact is that ‘investors’ look for the best return and rarely is the best return in indigenous enterprises, especially in their start-up or developmental phases. Now that domestic and overseas property is taking a hit, the investment is drying up (though I read that some ‘entrepreneurs’ are selling Iraq as the new property investment destination - good grief!). The main investors - pension funds - don’t really bother with indigenous enterprise - never have, except for banks and property. And most of us don’t have the beans to invest in high-tech companies here at home. What is Mr. O’Brien going on about? It’s not about confidence, nor even about capital; it’s about directing, nay, coercing, investment into productive activities.

Second, Mr. O’Brien calls for cutting public expenditure by 5%. We have one of the lowest levels of expenditure in the EU but never mind that. What should we cut? Education (to hell with the knowledge economy)? Health (go back to herbal cures)? Public transport (you got legs, don’t ya)? Here’s the killer - indigenous enterprise relies to a considerable extent on state-aid and grants. Cut that? Just what we need as we enter a recession. The one body - the State - that has the capacity to increase resources and invest them into productive activity, creating jobs and wealth, and Mr. O’Brien wants to cut it. Why does he think this can work? Apparently, he was talking with some Minister in Latvia and they’re considering cutting public expenditure. Oh, geez, QED.

Third, Mr. O’Brien wants to privatise a shed-load of public activities. He lists them but it would have saved newspaper space if he just listed those activities which he wouldn’t privatise. Why is he suggesting this? Because Eircom is such a poster-child for privatisation. Even since it was pirated, Eircom’s assets have been sweated until they have no more glands. I can’t even count how many owners it has had. And now one of our most vital infrastructures is subject to the financial whims of some Down Under homeboys who are obsessed with the share price of their equity fund and can’t even spell Eircom.

Yes, privatisation has been a roaring success. Greencore? What a shining example of corporate governance. Aer Lingus? It was within a hair’s breadth of being bought out by a competitor, thus creating a monopoly (and I thought privatisation was about creating competition). Irish Ferries? They introduced a new form of industrial relations - firing practically every one of their employees (and using taxpayers’ subsidies to do it with). Privatise ESB? The last time the private sector ran electricity there were 125 private companies - and only 12% of buildings were electrified. Yes, Mr. O’Brien, asset sweating, fraud allegations, monopoly markets, mass lay-offs and no lights - what a way to run an efficient and dynamic economy.

Here’s a little story: I came across an archived article which suggested that Mr. O’Brien’s E-Power company was going to take on the might of the ESB in the electricity market. I laughed so loud the neighbours called the Guards. When they arrived and I told them the whole story they couldn’t stop laughing either. Mr. O’Brien’s E-Power didn’t ‘compete’ with the ESB. The ESB was required by the Energy Regulator to ’sell’ electricity to Mr. O’Brien at a discount. He turned around and sold on the electricity to large industrial users. How could he make money out of this? Because the ESB’s tariff was set high enough by the Regulator to allow Mr. O’Brien to turn a profit. How much electricity did Mr. O’Brien’s company generate? Nada. It was all a paper transaction. Neat, eh? That’s the way to build a dynamic economy (post-mortem note: E-Power died because it couldn’t get any more cheap ESB power).

Mr. O’Brien has a few more suggestions such as Dermot Desmond and Bernard McNamara running hospitals, publicly subsidising low-cost mortgages to get the property sector up and running again (yes, to repair the damage of a property bubble you just start another bubble) and real cuts in wages. Now, not all his proposals are off-the-wall - he shows some insight when discussing the disabled. But by and large Mr. O’Brien’s prescriptions should be given the treatment they deserve.

Yes, the masses have not been disappointed. That’s because they’ve been working in the real world, trying to get to grips with the real problems in our economy and society. They’ve been waiting alright - but for someone to give them a good laugh, to break the drudgery. And Mr. O’Brien hasn’t failed them. Even the cats and dogs have suspended traditional hostilities to fall around each other laughing, wiping the tears from their whiskers and their snouts.

The New Totalitarians deserve no less.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

This article is, however, being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Aug 21st 2008

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »
  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »
  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »
  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »
  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »
  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »
  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »
  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »
  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »