Skip to content

Saturday, Jul 4th 2009


August 20th Morning: The Recession Diaries

The Irish Times leader writer is in an upbeat mood - or, at least, sliver-lining gazing.  With the prices of oil and basic food commodities falling, this hopefully will take some of the inflationary pressure out of the European economy and thus allow interest rates to be cut.  This hopefully will facilitate a pick-up in business activity all the good things that flow from that.  A lot of hopefullys but hopefully some of these hopefullys might start happening.

This is part of the ‘hold-on-we’ll-get-through-this’ school - a kind of temporary closing of the shutters against the transient economic storms.  If achieved, then we have the sunny days of the ESRI’s Mid-Term Review to look forward to, which projected medium-term growth returning to the balmy levels of 4 percent for a long-time afterwards.  Never mind that the report had so many caveats in it (’if the right policies are implemented’, ‘if we adopt appropriate policies’): the ESRI didn’t spell out what those policies were.  What a tease - describing us the Promised Land but not giving us a map.

But let’s assume those rates for some time in the near future - a steady 4 percent.  What does this portend for our economic climate?  Mixed. Very mixed. What we may be facing into is more growth but which will result in less increases in employment.

Let’s look at some of the numbers:

In happier times - in the years of 1995 to 2005, GNP growth averaged 6.5 percent.  Employment grew by an average 4.1 percent.  So we were getting a lot of job bang for our growth buck - employment growing at nearly 2/3 of overall growth.

However, this will change.  Between 2015 and 2025, the ESRI is benchmarking (if we get those unspecified policies right) an annual average growth of 3.6 per cent.  Okay, not as good as previous but we’d give our collective right arm for that growth now.  Employment, though, will grow by only 1.1 percent.  That’s considerably less than a third of overall growth.

We shouldn’t be too surprised.  Back in the 1980s the IDA were announcing new projects which would employ 300 people, 400 people and more.  Now the projects they announce have more modest job numbers.  That’s because they are, rightly, targeting high-tech, high-skilled, high valued-added enterprises. The quality of these jobs is high, but the numbers are unsurprisingly low.

What about the vaunted services sector - the new export engine?  Back in 1996, €1 million worth of service exports translated into over 700 jobs. In 2006, €1 million service exports supported 292 jobs.  And most of those jobs will be in Dublin, creating considerable regional imbalances.

Again, none of this is surprising. We know this is coming down the road - less jobs with growth and less jobs with service exports.  Do we have the policies to prevent a two-tier labour market whereby relatively few people have good jobs while the rest scramble over the remainders? To redistribute wealth from our export sectors to create well-paying jobs in the non-traded sector?

Simply, no.  Because such strategies would to even out the market will require substantial tax increases, wealth redistribution and an active public sector.  And these are, at present, no go areas.

So all those ‘hopefullys’ may not materialise, except for a few with the educational and skill advantages. The future is upon us and we’re still pining for yesterday.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Democracy Derailed in Honduras | The Nation

    Greg Grandin on the need for the US to avoid the "Haiti Option" which linked US support for Aristide to the forced implementation of IMF and WB policies in Haiti. Support for Zelaya to return him to office should be provided without conditions. "It seems like what the United States might be angling for in Honduras could be the "Haiti Option." In 1994 Bill Clinton worked to restore Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide after he was deposed in a coup, but only on the condition that Aristide would support IMF and World Bank policies. The result was a disaster, leading to deepening poverty, escalating polarization and, in 2004, a second coup against Aristide, this one fully backed by the Bush White House."

    No comments »
  • The Dublin Consensus

    Sli Eile of Progressive Economy responds to Sarah Carey’s article today in the Irish Times and talks about the dominance of the Dublin Consensus (following the notion of the Washington Consensus). Carey says the debate is over - ICTU should choose ‘patriotism and pragmatism’, sell ’spending cuts and tax increases’ to their members and get it over with. Sli Eile says that we have to move away from marginal issues - such as Carey’s focus on job subsidies - and confront the real issues:

    1. Domestic fiscal stimulus versus profound fiscal deflation for 2009-2012/13
    2. Skills, innovation and growing the indigenous economy on world markets versus business as usual depending on FDI and a relatively protected and cosseted non-traded sector (as in price controls, costs and rigid work practices in the case of the public and civil service)
    3. Corporate governance change versus cosmetic name change
    4. Finding another way of dealing with banking rather than bleeding the whole country with a blanket cheque to recapitalise the failed (with the bail-out of Anglo-Irish ultimately costing more than an entire year’s education budget)

    This is where the real debate needs to be reclaimed and the Dublin Consensus challenged.”

    1 comment »
  • Honduras Photoshow

    Some photos of how the new Honduras government likes to protect its constitution against a 'survey'.

    No comments »
  • Barack Obama’s Recent 55 Minute Speech to the American Medical Association

    As mentioned in Gerry Burke’s piece published today on Irish Left Review.

    No comments »
  • Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker

    The explosive trend in American medical costs seems to have occurred here in an especially intense form. Our country’s health care is by far the most expensive in the world. In Washington, the aim of health-care reform is not just to extend medical coverage to everybody but also to bring costs under control. Spending on doctors, hospitals, drugs, and the like now consumes more than one of every six dollars we earn.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | The Military Coup in Honduras

    See also Hugh Green on the Leader of opposition, President of the Congress (and now interim President) Roberto Micheletti’s resistance to sign the Bolivarian Alliance of The Americas (ALBA) treaty which would strengthen economic links with ’socialist’ countries in Latin America. The IMF has problems with this because of the “economic repercussions which the aforementioned incorporation will have and its consequences with its old partner the United States”.

    No comments »
  • PROMISSORY NOTES: From Crises to Commons

    No comments »
  • Honduras Coup: Check out the false resignation letter

    Incakolanews has an image of the ‘resignation’ letter of Manuel Zelaya, the ousted president of Honduras. It’s dated the 25th of June. As they say themselves: “There’s more chance that Michael Jackson signed this piece of BS than Manuel Zelaya”.

    No comments »
  • Why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting

    Morad Farhadpour and Omid Mehrgan, translators and philosophers based in Tehran on why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting:

    “June 2009 Election was a decisive opportunity for this people to declare itself, in the figure of Mousavi, who from the beginning insisted on people’s dignity as a true political right. But why him? Why not, say, Karroubi, the other reformist candidate? Has Mousvai, now the leader of the mass movement, appeared on the scene in a purely contingent way? Has he by mere chance, by force of circumstances, as it were, become the leading figure, the reform-freedom-democracy incarnate? The answer is positively negative. To elucidate this, we have to draw attention to the tradition from which he has emerged and to which he has repeatedly referred during his electoral campaign. As we said before, this tradition is rooted in 1979 Revolution and has been revived in the 2th of Khordad Movement — whereas, Karroubi’s ‘politics’ was based on a subjectless process in which different identity groups would present their demands to the almighty state and act as its passive, divided, depoliticized supporters.”

    No comments »
  • Government on the Ropes after Election Defeat | The Socialist Party Analysis

    Kevin McLoughlin of the Socialist Party provides an analysis of the party’s performance in the local and European elections on Indymedia.

    “It wasn’t that 50,510 voters fully endorsed socialism but, there is no doubt that everyone who voted for Joe, knew well that they were voting for a socialist. In the exit poll, when asked why they had voted for Joe Higgins, 48% said because of his personality/personal qualities; 29% because of his policies and 18% because he was the Socialist Party candidate. The poll also indicated that, of those made redundant over the last six months who voted, 32.4% voted for Joe Higgins.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »