Skip to content

Friday, Nov 21st 2008


August 26th Morning: The Recession Diaries

a1_collectivefarmers_stalinportrait.jpg

Enough is enough is enough. Our telecommunications industry is being turned into dog meat and we are powerless. The current owners, the home boys Down Under at Babcock & Brown, have seen their share price plummet by 90 percent over the last year, they’ve dumped their top executives, they’re groaning under debt and nobody seems to be able to understand their company structures anymore (Emmet Oliver described it as having ‘mind-expanding complexity’.)

Up to recent, Eircom officials have been claiming it’s business as usual. Yeah, right. ‘Sources’ report that B&B have made contact with financiers about off-loading Eircom, though this won’t be easy given that

(a) the company is saddled with €4.2 billion (yeah, that’s right - €4.2 billion),

(b) it has the highest debt-to-equity ratio of any European telecom company, and

(c) the credit crunch is going to make it difficult for interested parties - if there are any - to put together the money.

To top all that off, ComReg has just issued a pretty damning report on Eircom’s operation - saying that its performance is in serious decline. Waiting times for business and residential hook-ups, as well as reported faults, have all deteriorated. Broadband? You don’t want to go there.

Should anyone be surprised? Eircom has been feasted on by asset-sweaters and short-termist owners ever since Fianna Fail sold the thing off. It has had five different owners in nine years (and this promotes long-term investment strategies … how?). Does anyone really believe that B&B will take our economic interests into account when they negotiate a new sale? They’ll take the best offer and run like hell.

So what should be done (besides putting Mary O’Rourke, the architect of the privatisation, into the stocks and forcing her to apologise to each and every citizen in the Republic)? There’s no sense in asking the Left. They’ll just come up with their usual knee-jerk response about nationalising Eircom, taking it into public control, blah, blah, blah. That’s their response to everything.

No, let’s ask the ‘real economists’, people who understand the complexity of open and liberal markets. Let’s ask the High Priest of neo-liberalism, Dan McLaughlin, who hangs out at the temple of the Bank of Ireland; and one of his anointed acolytes, Jim Power, currently sacrificing statist goats over at Friends First. They’ll know the correct and market-practical steps to take. What do they say?

‘Two economists have joined with a trade union leader in calling for Econ to be re-nationalised by allowing the state’s National Pension Reserve Fund to invest in the company’s network.’

Uh, er, ehm . . . re-nationalised? I know this call was from 2006, just prior to B&B buying up the company, but hey.

‘‘It [Eircom] has been treated to a series of owners who extracted money to the detriment of capital expenditure,” said Power. ‘‘What is needed is a mechanism to ensure that the company is run on a commercial basis. By allowing the pension fund to invest that would be guaranteed.” McLaughlin said: ‘‘One solution is to buy back Eircom into state hands. The government would be getting it back cheaper than they sold it for and then run it like the private equity houses would do. There is a lot to be said for buying Eircom back . . . .”

If that doesn’t spin my ideological weather-vane: two leading neo-liberals calling for nationalising one particular commanding height of the economy. The comrades over at the Socialist Worker couldn’t have penned it better.

But actually it isn’t all that strange. Unless one is completely blinded by dogma, some things make sense. Take Cumann na Gael - our most right-wing Government ever. They were so antagonistic to state interference they’d let people starve in the ditches just to get their budget numbers right. But when it came to electrification, they took the pragmatic course. In the late 1920s there were over 100 private electricity suppliers (talk about a ‘competitive market’). And yet only 12 percent of buildings had electricity. So the Government set up the ESB (and were denounced as Bolsheviks) and got the job done. Sometimes dogma and reality don’t mix.

And the State (i.e. the public, the taxpayers, the citizenry) would be getting a good deal to boot. Last year Eircom reported profits of €680 million. This year its profit is expected to be €750 million.

So there you have it: Left and Right united around a common cause. To develop our infrastructure, to use our national savings to invest to our economic advantage, to modernise and competitive-ise - in three simple words:

BUY BACK EIRCOM.

As slogans go, it sounds good to me.

(Watch out for further posts in the ‘Mess With My Ideological Head’ series: Business Men and Women Really Hate Competition, The Corporate Sector Demands More Public Subsidies, How the Right’s Spendthrift Ways are Bankrupting the Economy’).

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Damian O\'Broin

    Aug 26th 2008 at 13:08

    What about TAKE BACK EIRCOM - sounds even better! Could we get it for a euro do you think?

    Interestingly, Babcock and Brown share the same acronym as B&B Enterprises, the development company set up as a legal front by the two drug lords in The Wire, Stringer Bell and Avon Barksdale. But I’m sure that’s where the similarities end.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Subscribe to ILR

ILR Full Content Feed

Latest Links

  • The Oil Crunch | Business | The Guardian

    "The energy watchdog, the International Energy Agency, is warning for the first time that oil output could pass its peak as power shifts from "super-majors" to national companies controlled by producer states. It highlights a potential oil-supply crunch. The unprecedented wake-up call comes as the European commission says in a report due out tomorrow that while oilfields decline, the balance of supply and demand will become "increasingly tight, possibly critically so"."

    It adds: "The need to address climate change will require a massive switch to high-efficiency, low-carbon energy technologies."

    No comments »
  • Gavyn Davies: Deflation is now a more serious threat than inflation |

    Yet another thoughtful piece which shows just how adrift mainstream political and economic thinking in Ireland is from the ideas being touted to deal with our unprecedented economic crisis. Davies advocates PRINTING MORE MONEY. And cites the chair of the US Federal Reserve to back him up. How about it Mr. Lenihan?

    No comments »
  • The Iraq Math War

    This Mother Jones article tells the story of Les Roberts and Gilbert Burnham whose Iraq Mortality Survey was published in the Lancet in 2004. The article notes that since the White House slammed it as 'junk' despite approving of other Roberts and Burnham mortality surveys which used the same methods in Kosovo and elsewhere the survey continues to be labelled as 'controversal'.

    No comments »
  • James Wood: Victory Speech

    James Wood waxing lyrical about Obama's victory speech; 'a good night out for the English language.'

    No comments »
  • What a Long, Strange Trip It’s Been

    Bill Ayers' account of his cameo role in the US elections just past. It tallies pretty accurately with Obama's.

    No comments »
  • Mike Davis | Casino Capitalism, Obama, and Us

    "Let me confess that, as an aging socialist, I suddenly find myself like the Jehovah's Witness who opens his window to see the stars actually falling out of the sky. Although I've been studying Marxist crisis theory for decades, I never believed I'd actually live to see financial capitalism commit suicide. Or hear the International Monetary Fund warn of imminent "systemic meltdown." "

    No comments »
  • The American Void: Simon Critchley | Harper’s Magazine

    We must believe, but we can’t believe. Perhaps this is the tragedy that some of us see in Obama: a change we can believe in and the crushing realization that nothing will change.

    No comments »
  • Rick Wolff, “Policies to “Avoid” Economic Crises”

    While conservative and liberal policies do little to solve crises, the debate between them has largely succeeded in excluding anti-capitalist analyses of economic crises from public discussion.

    No comments »
  • America the Liberal

    John Judis argues that 2008 may mark an historic leftward realignment in America, akin to 1930 and 1896, that could pave the way for an enduring Democratic majority over the next several decades. Will the Obama presidency seize the moment?

    No comments »
  • New Left Review - David Harvey: The Right to the City

    Read this while Stevie Wonder's 'Living in the City' is playing in the background

    "We live in an era when ideals of human rights have moved centre stage both politically and ethically. A great deal of energy is expended in promoting their significance for the construction of a better world. But for the most part the concepts circulating do not fundamentally challenge hegemonic liberal and neoliberal market logics, or the dominant modes of legality and state action. We live, after all, in a world in which the rights of private property and the profit rate trump all other notions of rights. I here want to explore another type of human right, that of the right to the city."

    No comments »

Links Archives »