Skip to content

Friday, Nov 21st 2008


September 3rd Morning: The Recession Diaries


peanuts.jpgIBEC’s Turlough O’Sullivan has an unfortunate ideological quirk but it is treatable.  It seems he can’t say the words ‘low-paid’ without inserting ’so-called’ before them.  In fact, he has trouble using the actual words ‘low-paid’, only managing to say ‘lower-paid’. Still, his condition dictates that he still inserts ’so-called’ before them.  Mark Hennessy describes this condition in an article on the resurection of the pay talks:

‘However, he (Turlough) again ruled out any possibility that employers could grant above-par pay rises to lower-paid workers, or “so-called lower-paid workers”, as he described them.’

Ah, so-called.  I think its incumbent upon all of us to assist Turlough in dealing with his quirk.  It will be a difficult therapy, but one which we will all benefit from.

Let’s dispense with the use of ‘lower-paid’; is a no-brainer.  All of us are lower-paid compared to someone else.  Even Michael O’Leary is ‘lower-paid’ compared to other CEOs.  The question is - does ‘lower-paid’ ever descend into ‘low-paid’ and, therefore, into unacceptable living conditions.

We are fortunate to have a working definition of ‘low-pay’ from the OECD.  They calculate it as two-thirds of the median wage.  The median wage is different from the ’average’ wage.  The former calculates the wage level at which 50 percent of employees are above that level and 50 percent below.

So how does Ireland fare in the European low-pay stakes?  Badly.  Very badly.  The recent OECD employment database shows that Ireland is the second highest when it comes to low-pay, just behind the UK (our partner in the Anglo-American economic model in Europe).  According to the OECD, nearly 18 percent, or one-in-five employees, are officially low-paid.  Compare that to Belgium (7.3) or Finland (7.0) or Sweden (6.4).  We should be getting a trophy or something.

Again, we’re fortunate that our own CSO covers this topic.  In 2006, the median wage was €15.39 per hour.  50 percent of all employees earned below this amount.  Using the OECD’s definition, therefore, anyone earning below €10.16 per hour is officially ‘low-paid’.  But this only tells part of the story.

In the private sector, over 22 percent of employees are officially low-paid.  But this clearly underestimates the numbers, for the CSO excludes agricultural, fishery and forestry workers - a small category but one which is full of low-paid and minimum wage workers.  It also excludes enterprises with less than three workers - and the smaller the workplace the lower the wage.

If one included these categories, we would probably find the level of low-paid inching up towards 25 percent - or one-in-four.  That’s a big, big number of people to overlook, ignore or dismiss (about 275,000).

Let’s get beyond percentages and talk hard Euros and cents.  Nearly one-in-four employees in the private sector earns, on a full-time basis, €20,580 per year.  After tax and PRSI they are expected to pay housing costs, ESB and gas, food, transport costs, the odd shirt and skirt; lord help them if they have children, get sick, or have to look after a family member.   This is not so-called, this is real-called.

And just in case you think that once you get out of the low-pay bracket you are in clover, 50 percent of private sector workers earn less than €29,000 on a full-time basis.  That’s substantially less than the average industrial wage.  That may not be official low-pay, but it ain’t great.

And it’s getting worse.  Patricia Callan of the Small Firms Association is going around assuring everyone that private sector employers are putting it up to their workers and cutting their pay.  This will not doubt assist Ireland’s triumphant rise up the European low-paid league tables.

So hopefully this will help Turlough over his ideological quirk.  But I doubt bare numbers are sufficient.  He could, of course, try living on this income for a month but there’s little chance of that.  So let’s all surround him in a fraternal embrace and repeat very very slowly: loooow (as in woe) paaaiiid (as in made), loow paaiid, low paid, low paid, low paid.  Repeat these words and these words only (no adjectives like ’so-called’, ‘alleged’, ‘’supposed’, ’suspected’).  Just loooow paaaaiiiid.

Say it long enough and he’ll get the hang of it and start saying it himself.  Then we can welcome Turlough O’Sullivan back to the real world.

NOTE:  For an excellent study of low-pay in the retail sector, see Mandate’s End Low Pay.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Subscribe to ILR

ILR Full Content Feed

Latest Links

  • The Oil Crunch | Business | The Guardian

    "The energy watchdog, the International Energy Agency, is warning for the first time that oil output could pass its peak as power shifts from "super-majors" to national companies controlled by producer states. It highlights a potential oil-supply crunch. The unprecedented wake-up call comes as the European commission says in a report due out tomorrow that while oilfields decline, the balance of supply and demand will become "increasingly tight, possibly critically so"."

    It adds: "The need to address climate change will require a massive switch to high-efficiency, low-carbon energy technologies."

    No comments »
  • Gavyn Davies: Deflation is now a more serious threat than inflation |

    Yet another thoughtful piece which shows just how adrift mainstream political and economic thinking in Ireland is from the ideas being touted to deal with our unprecedented economic crisis. Davies advocates PRINTING MORE MONEY. And cites the chair of the US Federal Reserve to back him up. How about it Mr. Lenihan?

    No comments »
  • The Iraq Math War

    This Mother Jones article tells the story of Les Roberts and Gilbert Burnham whose Iraq Mortality Survey was published in the Lancet in 2004. The article notes that since the White House slammed it as 'junk' despite approving of other Roberts and Burnham mortality surveys which used the same methods in Kosovo and elsewhere the survey continues to be labelled as 'controversal'.

    No comments »
  • James Wood: Victory Speech

    James Wood waxing lyrical about Obama's victory speech; 'a good night out for the English language.'

    No comments »
  • What a Long, Strange Trip It’s Been

    Bill Ayers' account of his cameo role in the US elections just past. It tallies pretty accurately with Obama's.

    No comments »
  • Mike Davis | Casino Capitalism, Obama, and Us

    "Let me confess that, as an aging socialist, I suddenly find myself like the Jehovah's Witness who opens his window to see the stars actually falling out of the sky. Although I've been studying Marxist crisis theory for decades, I never believed I'd actually live to see financial capitalism commit suicide. Or hear the International Monetary Fund warn of imminent "systemic meltdown." "

    No comments »
  • The American Void: Simon Critchley | Harper’s Magazine

    We must believe, but we can’t believe. Perhaps this is the tragedy that some of us see in Obama: a change we can believe in and the crushing realization that nothing will change.

    No comments »
  • Rick Wolff, “Policies to “Avoid” Economic Crises”

    While conservative and liberal policies do little to solve crises, the debate between them has largely succeeded in excluding anti-capitalist analyses of economic crises from public discussion.

    No comments »
  • America the Liberal

    John Judis argues that 2008 may mark an historic leftward realignment in America, akin to 1930 and 1896, that could pave the way for an enduring Democratic majority over the next several decades. Will the Obama presidency seize the moment?

    No comments »
  • New Left Review - David Harvey: The Right to the City

    Read this while Stevie Wonder's 'Living in the City' is playing in the background

    "We live in an era when ideals of human rights have moved centre stage both politically and ethically. A great deal of energy is expended in promoting their significance for the construction of a better world. But for the most part the concepts circulating do not fundamentally challenge hegemonic liberal and neoliberal market logics, or the dominant modes of legality and state action. We live, after all, in a world in which the rights of private property and the profit rate trump all other notions of rights. I here want to explore another type of human right, that of the right to the city."

    No comments »

Links Archives »