Is a Muslamic Insult to the Memory of Jesus!

, , Leave a comment



feet_first.jpg

Is the Sort of Thing You Might Espect in Iran!

A dead German artist called Martin Kippenberger is been blamed for making a big insult to Christianity with his sculpture which I picture above only to show you its depths of depravity: if you have sighted children in the room you should avert their eyes or blindfold them before they look; if you have blind children in the room you should stop pulling faces at them and pay attention.

This is a sculpture called Feet First and it depict, inaccurately, a frog being crucified in the manner of Our Lord God Jesus Christ King of Kings. I say inaccurately because, if you look closely, you will see that the frog have got an egg in one hand and a mug of beer in the other, and we know from the Bible that this is not how Jesus was crucified: He was a wine drinker and he was allergic to eggs. The sculpture was being on show in the city of Bolzano in Italy at the local museum, despite complaints from the president of the regional government and from the false pope himself, who said in a letter that the sculpture “wounds the religious sentiments of so many people who see in the cross the symbol of God’s love.” And not just Christians, but also, for instance, fans of Spartacus or Sebastian Horsley, who was also having themselves crucified and now find their actions made to look stupid by being compared to a frog.

Of course, the president of the museum that show the sculpture make all the usual rubbish comments about freedom of speech and the need for art to be kept independent of political pressure and to be allowed to insult people’s beliefs, but there is no escuse for blashphemy and therefore the artist should be arrested and put on trial and found guilty and killed for this disgraceful work. Is all well and good if some perverted deviant want to do his art in the privacy of his own home or if the museum is privately owned and nobody public is allowed in unless they pay to be insulted, but when a museum is receiving funds from the taxpayer, which is you (although not me), then it have an obligation only to exhibit art which people wants, and they don’t want crucifixes dipped in uringe or a man with a bullwhip up his rectum or a cross with a frog on. I know. I have ask them!

However, before we rush to judgment, let us take a closer look at this so-called work of art, because I think there is more to it than meet the eyes. Do you remember when that newspaper in Denmark printed the photos of Mohammed with a bomb on his head and masturbating over a dead child’s body? There was a big kerfuffle from the Muslamics all around the world when they heard about it, even though none of them spoke Danish. This sculpture make me think that it is the work of the Iranian intellgience services in revenge. After all, ask yourself, where do all the frogs’ legs in Paris’s restaurants come from? Iran! Which religion would regard it as an insult to imply that the saviour consumed alcohol? Muslam! Who is opposed to representations of human beings in art? The Abstract Espressionists! But also Muslamics. Who eat a lot of eggs? Intellgient people. Therefore all the signs point out to that this is a conspiracy from the Muslamics in response to the Danish cartoon pictures to undermine morale in Christendom while at the same time pretending that it was the work of a dead German. QVC!

We must organize demonstrations inmediately outside the embassies of the Iran, Taliban, Pakistan, India, Philipines and any other Muslamic coutries we can think of, just in case. They cannot be allowed to get away with this. Write today to your European TD or better still to Geroge W. Bush and insist that he bomb Tehran to show them that we will not tolerate insults to our profoundest beliefs to be displayed in taxpayer-funded galleries. Is a matter of principle. Show the Muslamics we are not to be folled with!

Latest posts by Manuel Estimulo (see all)

 

Leave a Reply

(*) Required, Your email will not be published