Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010


The Appalling State of Irish Maternity Services

The state of the Ireland’s maternity services is deeply unsatisfactory. In August of last year, in considerable frustration and anger at the lack of any cohesive action to make improvements, I wrote to the Irish Times (letter) to describe the situation. By budget time, it was already known that several large maternity hospitals had had their busiest month of August ever, and the number of bookings was increasing so that 2008 would be busier still. Senior clinicians at the maternity hospitals were all extremely worried that mortality rates, maternal as well as perinatal, would inevitably rise. In introducing the budget, the Ministers of Health and Finance recognised that there was indeed an emerging problem. The result was that not an extra red cent was voted for the maternity services. In December, the Irish Times published a very powerful editorial which stated:

“The lives of mothers and infants are being put at risk because of staff shortages and inadequate facilities at our maternity hospitals. What should be a time of joy and celebration for families may be blighted as a result of funding deficiencies and official inaction.  It is an appalling situation. Unless these shortcomings are addressed as a matter of urgency, the situation will worsen as our population continues to expand.”

Still no action.

This week (Irish Times report), Padraic Flanagan’s testimony to the inquest on the death of his wife, Evelyn, allegedly because of obstetric haemorrhage after the birth of their second child at Castelbar General Hospital in October last year, sadly echoes this statement. “What should have been a joyous occasion for us all has turned into the most tragic of our lives with repercussions that will last for years,” he said.

Obstetricians regard maternal deaths from haemorrhage as mostly avoidable.  The UK Healthcare Commission inquiry into a series of maternal deaths, several from haemorrhage, at Northwick Park Hospital in London between 2002 and 2004 found that inadequate staffing and an excessive reliance on locum staff were contributory factors.

The Increase in Births

The number of babies born in Ireland in 2007 was over 72,000, an increase of 12.5% on 2006, and a 38% increase on the 52,000 births in 1997.  The high birth rate is the result of demographic changes - immigration of healthy young people into the country and the large number of people in their twenties and thirties in the population.  The last peak in births was in the late seventies and early eighties - the babies born then are having their own families now.  It is possible, with some immigrants returning home, that there may be a small decrease in 2009, but the greater likelihood is that the current high birth rate will continue for another decade.  Some 75,000 babies will be delivered in 2008 with basically the same inadequate facilities that existed for the 52,000 born in 1997.

Capacity Issues

The problems in the maternity services relate to the inadequate capacity of largely out of date hospitals.  There are both staffing and infrastructural deficits.  The first new maternity hospital in many decades was opened by the Minister in Cork in the spring of 2007.  Cork University Maternity Hospital, after many years in planning, was supposed to have a capacity of 7000 births per annum: by the end of its first twelve months in operation, it had already delivered 8500 babies.  The Limerick hospital is designed for 3000-3500 births - this year we will have 5500.  The three Dublin maternity hospitals will each deliver close to 9000 babies this year.

Consultants

Ireland has about 100 consultant obstetricians, 2.2 per 100,000 population; this is by far the worst ratio in the EU, where the next worst is the Netherlands with 4.5 per 100,000 (Eurostat data).  The situation is even worse than that because Ireland has the highest number of births per 1000 in the EU.  Switzerland has 1000 obstetricians for roughly the same number of births as Ireland.  Similarly, the number of consultant neonatologists is very poor.  We rely heavily on the services of junior doctors in training and locum consultants to bridge the gap.

Free Standing Maternity Hospitals

Four of the country’s largest maternity units, the National Maternity Hospital (Holles St), the Coombe, the Rotunda and Mid-Western Regional in Limerick are free standing hospitals on sites remote from general hospitals.  They do not have direct access to the highly specialised services required by some mothers, particularly ICU.  These buildings are all out of date.  The masters of the three Dublin maternity hospitals and the consultants in Limerick are very anxious to relocate their hospitals on to the sites of general hospitals because of issues of patient safety - the transfer by ambulance of critically ill mothers to ICU is a particular concern.  The four hospitals occupy valuable sites the sale of which would go a long way towards the cost of relocating them.

Neonatal Intensive Care Units

All of the country’s major neonatology units are under extreme pressure and are frequently closed because they are already full.  Desperate staff  spend hours phoning around to find ICU cots for babies likely to be born prematurely when their own unit is packed.  Neonatal transport and retrieval facilities are poorly developed.

Crowding and Lack of Privacy

Single-patient rooms are a minimum standard for all obstetrical hospitals according to American Institute of Architects 2006 guidelines.  France has adopted a single-patient room standard for all new hospital construction for the last 20 years.  In Limerick, five public patients share a single crowded room with one toilet and shower.  Some hospitals have even larger public wards.  Privacy is only for private patients.

Inequality

With the ratio of consultants to mothers so low (each consultant is responsible for an appalling average of 700 annual deliveries), the service offered is just about ‘consultant-led’, rather that consultant delivered.  We rely heavily on junior doctors in training.  In this highly unsatisfactory supply and demand situation, only private patients and the highest risk public patients get access to consultants.

Reports Gathering Dust

The HSE commissioned the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to compile a report on the future of maternity services in Ireland.  It was published in 2006.  Among a large number of recommendations, it called for a large increase in the number of obstetricians.  It is gathering dust.  The KPMG report on the maternity services in Dublin is still awaited more than a year after it was completed.  It will have nothing to say about services outside of Dublin, where the majority of births take place.

It is beyond belief that this rich country cannot provide women having babies with a reasonable standard of maternity care.  It is even further beyond belief that the members of the government can recognise that there is an emerging crisis and take no action whatsoever.  What are they there for?  They should be ashamed of themselves.

Dr Gerry Burke, FRCOG, is a consultant obstetrician & gynaecologist in Limerick’s Regional and Maternity Hospitals. He is also a member of the Labour Party.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Tomaltach

    Sep 26th 2008 at 11:09

    Excellent article. I think it is absolutely fantastic to have someone on the inside who knows prepared to speak out and agitate in this way.

    I have to say our recent experience in Holles St was an eye opener and much of what Dr Gerry Burke writes rings true. The facility is utterly inappropriate for a modern maternity hospital. I was shocked to see mothers in labour arrive into a foyer that resembles the door of a warehouse. But our prenatal visits were telling too - utter chaos, left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing, pregnant mothers quining down stair cases and in a prefab. Shocking. And on one occasion we gave the same information FIVE times. Each time, as if we had just arrived. Thankfully we had a safe birth and many of the staff were wonderful. But overall, as Gerry says, in a rich developed country, this is a disgrace.

  2. Comment by: Balor

    Sep 29th 2008 at 14:09

    In defence of Holles St, they have recently upgraded the foyer. Hope it looks and feels better on your next visit Tomhaltach.
    But this article is spot on. I have some inside experience of the maternity services in Dublin and the energy-sapping, enthusiasm-draining, bureaucratic foot-dragging that local managements have to put up with from the Department of Health and the HSE has to be experienced to be believed.
    To take Holles St as an example - the Hospital management and staff know that the building is not suitable for 21st century maternity services. They want to move to the campus of St Vincents in Elm Park. But that may or may not happen in the next 20 years - the latest hold-up from HSE is a report they commissioned from Price Waterhouse or somesuch on the future of maternity services in Dublin. That report will have to be analysed and parsed and shelved pending the next report before anything happens.
    In the meantime though, over the last several years Holles St has been in negotiation with the Dept and the HSE about an upgrade of existing facilities to the tune of 16-20 million. Several sets of architects and engineers drawings have been commissioned and paid for, but each time it has to be batted back and forth within the bureaucracy. So the private architect and engineering companies have gotten paid but work has still to start on basic improvements to bring the place up to some kind of minimum standard.
    Cue mega frustration among all and sundry working in the place.
    Which does not excuse for one moment the fact that Tomhaltach and partner had to give the same info FIVE times.
    And that’s just maternity services…

  3. Comment by: kate cooper college student

    Oct 31st 2008 at 15:10

    I think the lack of maternity services is awful…esp in west cork! places like bantry and castletownbare must drives hours before getting near the hospital, it takes minutes for some emergencies to save mother and infants. there is a hospital in bantry why not make it a maternity hospital?? imploy more nurses and midwifes for that area?? there would be a drop in the numbers for cuh and it would save lives. I just hope they correct it before more lives are lost …

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Sep 24th 2008

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »
  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »
  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »
  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »
  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »
  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »
  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »
  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »
  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »