Skip to content

Saturday, Jul 4th 2009


October 14th After the Budget: The Recession Diaries


a1_a2.jpgYou gottahand it to Fianna Fail.  A tax package that costs those on low incomes more than those on higher incomes, cutbacks on the newly-made unemployed (that’ll teach them to price themselves out of the market), bigger class sizes, more costs the sicker you get; over the next few days as people peer into the details of the budget there’ll be more outrages to reveal.  But, no, that isn’t the genius of Fianna Fail I’m referring to.  Rather, it’s the seemingly impossible task of both driving up borrowing costs while at the same time reducing demand in the economy.  Seemingly impossible for mere mortal governments, that is.   But not for our Fianna Fail:  no contradiction is too extreme, no insult too insulting (how would you feel if you were an ICTU negotiator, struggling to get an extra 0.5% for the low-paid, only to see it disappear in a 1% levy puff?), no awkward agency so well established that it can’t be eradicated (now we won’t have to hear the Combat Poverty Agency moaning about so many poor people).  God bless Fianna Fail, the people’s party.

The real trick is to prolong the recession while at the same time ensuring that the state will be burdened with even higher borrowing levels when we come out of it.  In this respect, Fine Gael, ever the accountants’ party, is the more honest:  more spending cuts, more job lay-offs, more economic decline but, at least, less borrowing.   With Fianna Fail, we’ll rack up over €20 billion in borrowing over two years and still end up with economic decline, exacerbated by taking billions out of the economy through tax increases and spending cuts, leaving society with less money circulating.  Brilliant.

Is there another way out of this?  Yes.  Would it be difficult?  Yes.  It would require a forensic intervention to maintain demand and jobs in critical sectors, while extracting money out of unproductive sectors:  protecting low and middle incomes while impacting on higher incomes, property and unproductive private spending/investment.  It would require a radical transformation of the Pension Reserve Fund to allow it to invest in commercial, long-term infrastructural development.  It would require promoting those ‘public’ aspects of services (e.g. national schools), to the detriment of the ‘private’ aspects of services (e.g. private fee-paying schools’ subsidies).

All this would require a crafty set of strategies that hinge on the one absolute imperative to begin to create the groundwork for the development of a strong indigenous enterprise base that can take advantage of any upswing in the economies of our trading partners.  I use the words ‘begin’ and ‘groundwork’ intentionally; this is not something that would reap benefits in the short-term.  But hope and confidence are tangibles that can bring people through a difficult period.  What is Fianna Fail’s take on ‘hope’ and ‘confidence’?  A pathetic proposal to provide start-up companies with a three-year remission on corporation and capital gains tax (don’t Ministers know that start-up companies rarely make enough in the early stages to be even paying such tax?).

Not only does Fianna Fail deepen the recession in a most regressive way, mortgaging our future to higher debt; they provide no foundation for pulling us out of the recession.  The latest Davy Report does their usual glass-half-empty thing:  GNP falling by over 3 percent, investment and consumer spending spiraling downwards at an ever faster rate, unemployment rising to close to 9 percent; the real killer is exports.  Davy projects a rise in exports of 1.5 percent in 2009.  Going further, one can only bet this will come primarily from the multi-national sector which means that a huge proportion of that incoming wealth will be repatriated. In other words, our economy will receive little benefit (apart from maintaining jobs in those sectors).

So the real question is: how are we going to pull ourselves out?   Fianna Fail has no answers, no hope, no strategy, no bloody idea.  All they can give us are fantasy projections going forward: the economy returning to growth in 2010, with growth of nearly 4 percent by 2011; and with that our fiscal problems are solved.  Yeah, right.  As one Department of Finance official told me shortly after the Minister finished his budget statement - ‘We can always hope for more emigration.’  Back to the old standby when Irish governments get into fiscal trouble.

So over the next few days, when commentators, Opposition spokespersons and social organisations start delving into the details to reveal more horrors, just keep an eye on the medium-term:  Fianna Fail has not only deflated our economy, it has deflated our hopes for a way out.  And in the meantime has fiddled numbers beyond recognition to any resembling planet Ireland.

At the dead end of the no-hope room, what a party we will have with Fianna Fail.

__________________________

The above photo appeared originally in Red Mum’s photostream and shows an important notice in a local hall in County Offally.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

This article is, however, being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Oct 15th 2008

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Democracy Derailed in Honduras | The Nation

    Greg Grandin on the need for the US to avoid the "Haiti Option" which linked US support for Aristide to the forced implementation of IMF and WB policies in Haiti. Support for Zelaya to return him to office should be provided without conditions. "It seems like what the United States might be angling for in Honduras could be the "Haiti Option." In 1994 Bill Clinton worked to restore Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide after he was deposed in a coup, but only on the condition that Aristide would support IMF and World Bank policies. The result was a disaster, leading to deepening poverty, escalating polarization and, in 2004, a second coup against Aristide, this one fully backed by the Bush White House."

    No comments »
  • The Dublin Consensus

    Sli Eile of Progressive Economy responds to Sarah Carey’s article today in the Irish Times and talks about the dominance of the Dublin Consensus (following the notion of the Washington Consensus). Carey says the debate is over - ICTU should choose ‘patriotism and pragmatism’, sell ’spending cuts and tax increases’ to their members and get it over with. Sli Eile says that we have to move away from marginal issues - such as Carey’s focus on job subsidies - and confront the real issues:

    1. Domestic fiscal stimulus versus profound fiscal deflation for 2009-2012/13
    2. Skills, innovation and growing the indigenous economy on world markets versus business as usual depending on FDI and a relatively protected and cosseted non-traded sector (as in price controls, costs and rigid work practices in the case of the public and civil service)
    3. Corporate governance change versus cosmetic name change
    4. Finding another way of dealing with banking rather than bleeding the whole country with a blanket cheque to recapitalise the failed (with the bail-out of Anglo-Irish ultimately costing more than an entire year’s education budget)

    This is where the real debate needs to be reclaimed and the Dublin Consensus challenged.”

    1 comment »
  • Honduras Photoshow

    Some photos of how the new Honduras government likes to protect its constitution against a 'survey'.

    No comments »
  • Barack Obama’s Recent 55 Minute Speech to the American Medical Association

    As mentioned in Gerry Burke’s piece published today on Irish Left Review.

    No comments »
  • Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker

    The explosive trend in American medical costs seems to have occurred here in an especially intense form. Our country’s health care is by far the most expensive in the world. In Washington, the aim of health-care reform is not just to extend medical coverage to everybody but also to bring costs under control. Spending on doctors, hospitals, drugs, and the like now consumes more than one of every six dollars we earn.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | The Military Coup in Honduras

    See also Hugh Green on the Leader of opposition, President of the Congress (and now interim President) Roberto Micheletti’s resistance to sign the Bolivarian Alliance of The Americas (ALBA) treaty which would strengthen economic links with ’socialist’ countries in Latin America. The IMF has problems with this because of the “economic repercussions which the aforementioned incorporation will have and its consequences with its old partner the United States”.

    No comments »
  • PROMISSORY NOTES: From Crises to Commons

    No comments »
  • Honduras Coup: Check out the false resignation letter

    Incakolanews has an image of the ‘resignation’ letter of Manuel Zelaya, the ousted president of Honduras. It’s dated the 25th of June. As they say themselves: “There’s more chance that Michael Jackson signed this piece of BS than Manuel Zelaya”.

    No comments »
  • Why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting

    Morad Farhadpour and Omid Mehrgan, translators and philosophers based in Tehran on why mass protest in Iran is true politics worth supporting:

    “June 2009 Election was a decisive opportunity for this people to declare itself, in the figure of Mousavi, who from the beginning insisted on people’s dignity as a true political right. But why him? Why not, say, Karroubi, the other reformist candidate? Has Mousvai, now the leader of the mass movement, appeared on the scene in a purely contingent way? Has he by mere chance, by force of circumstances, as it were, become the leading figure, the reform-freedom-democracy incarnate? The answer is positively negative. To elucidate this, we have to draw attention to the tradition from which he has emerged and to which he has repeatedly referred during his electoral campaign. As we said before, this tradition is rooted in 1979 Revolution and has been revived in the 2th of Khordad Movement — whereas, Karroubi’s ‘politics’ was based on a subjectless process in which different identity groups would present their demands to the almighty state and act as its passive, divided, depoliticized supporters.”

    No comments »
  • Government on the Ropes after Election Defeat | The Socialist Party Analysis

    Kevin McLoughlin of the Socialist Party provides an analysis of the party’s performance in the local and European elections on Indymedia.

    “It wasn’t that 50,510 voters fully endorsed socialism but, there is no doubt that everyone who voted for Joe, knew well that they were voting for a socialist. In the exit poll, when asked why they had voted for Joe Higgins, 48% said because of his personality/personal qualities; 29% because of his policies and 18% because he was the Socialist Party candidate. The poll also indicated that, of those made redundant over the last six months who voted, 32.4% voted for Joe Higgins.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »