Skip to content

Tuesday, Feb 9th 2010


October 22nd Lunchtime: The Recession Diaries

a1_lowestbranch.JPGWhere stands the debate on the unusustainability of ‘universalism’ now?  The Government has stated that only 5% of over-70s have incomes exceeding €36,400 (€72,800 for a couple) and the cost of providing them a medical card would be €10 - €15 million.  Unsustainable?  It amounts to pennies.  In fact, it amounts to less than pennies because (a) there is a cost to not providing a medical card (e.g. drug repayment scheme, administration of means-test, etc.), and (b) the cost is gross, not net: doctors receive the payment and pay income tax on it.  So:  5% and minuscule cost; wasn’t that a great little debate?Other debates are rearing their collective heads.  Education cuts is one.  And the impact of the 1% levy.  P. O’Neill over at Irishelection.com points out the inequity of the levy’s threshold:

‘ . . . if you make €17,540, your income levy is zero. If you make €17,541, your income levy is €175.40. Lesson: don’t work for that extra euro.’

It’s called a ’step-effect’ or an income trap: where an increase in gross income leads to a decrease in net income. In the case of the income levy that’s because the threshold exempts people earning below €17,540 - not earnings below that amount. This is not an isolated phenomenon in our tax/levy/social welfare code.  In fact it’s choc-a-block with these income traps.  Here’s a sampling:

  • The 2 percent Health Levy:  if you earn €26,000 or below, you pay nil.  If you earn €26,001 you pay the 2 percent on the full amount (€520).  That’s a big hit.
  • The PRSI Exemption Threshold:  if you earn €18,304 you are exempt from the 4 percent PRSI contribution.  Exceed that amount and you pay the levy on all income exceeding €6,604 (though this is phased in through in marginal relief, so the impact is not immediate).
  • Family Income Supplement:  The is a real killer.  It is linked to thresholds with payments equal to 60 percent of the difference between net income and the threshold.  Here’s a crude example: a family on €24,000 with one child will get €900 per year.  However, if there income goes up €1,500 they will lost that entire amount.
  • Rent Supplement:  Here’s another stinger.  This is a complicated means-tested programme that primarily benefits those on social welfare (though in some circumstances part-time workers may be eligible).  In 2006, someone on unemployment assistance would receive €79 per week in Rent Supplement.  But: get a full-time job, even if on the minimum wage, and you lose the whole amount.

There are a plethora of benefits and income supports that are withdrawn as income rises - sometimes only marginally: medical card, back-to-work allowance, back-to-school allowance, etc.  This can create some bizarre situations whereby it is financially more rational to remain unemployed or part-time or working for less money.  So much for the vaunted ‘incentive to work’ that we get lectured about.

Let’s take one small example:  a lone parent with one child working on the minimum wage (38 hours).  Just focusing the tax/levy aspect she would be paying no tax and no levies.  In addition, she would receive €97 a week in Family Income Supplement.  Her weekly income would be €425.

Let’s say she gets a job offer - one that pays €26,500.  Understandably, she would be quite excited - after all, it’s a 55 percent wage increase.  However, she starts wading through the bottom line.   Through tax credits, she won’t be in the income tax net.  But:

  • She’ll be liable for PRSI, Health and Income levy
  • More worrying, she’ll lose the Family Income Supplement

With the new job, what’s the take-home pay?  €479.  That’s an increase of €54 per week.  So: she gets a gross wage increase of €180 per week but only keeps €54.  That’s a marginal tax rate of 70 percent.  Paddy the speculator-plasterer, on six figures a year, only faces a marginal tax rate of 45.5 percent.

The one thing that comes through all this is that it’s people on low incomes who are most affected by income and poverty traps.  For instance, the income levy rises to 2 percent on incomes over €100,000.  But unlike the threshold that operates at the low end (whereby all income below is levied), the 2 percent only applies to income in excess of €100,000.

That’s equity the Fianna Fail-way.  That’s incentivising work.  That’s sharing the pain.  Makes one want to stand up in the bus and start singing Amhrán na bhFiann.

NOTE:  For an exhaustive study on poverty and income traps arising from the interaction of the tax and social welfare codes, go to ‘Out of the Traps’, written by the European Anti-Poverty Network and OPEN - the lone parent social organisation.  Though the numbers refer to 2005, the processes and operation remain the same.  Here’s their follow-up on the 2006 Budget.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY

    SOCIOLOGY LECTURE SERIES 2010

    Prof James Wickham

    Head of School of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Financial markets and social power - the new inequalities of turbo-capitalism

    Wednesday 10 February 2010

    7.00- 9.30 pm

    Synge lecture theatre, Arts Building, TCD

    A L L   W E L C O M E

    No comments »
  • Kevin Doogan - Not all that is solid | New Humanist

    Analysis of global foreign direct investment patterns also reveals two interesting and counter-intuitive trends. FDI expands during boom periods and contracts during recessions. To blame job losses on capital migration is questionable. Secondly the lion's share of overseas investment goes to the rich rather than poor countries. Between 1980 and 2006 the developed economies' share of global FDI inward stock has grown from 56 per cent to 70 per cent, consolidating their position as the prime target for overseas investment. In other words capital moves abroad to access rich markets rather than exploit cheap labour. This shows that fears of exporting jobs are not related to the actuality of capital relocation but to the threat of jobs going overseas. Research in America, where fears of overseas job loss have a much higher profile than in Europe, shows that companies use the threat of corporate relocation in order to maintain the compliance of trade unions during contract negotiations.

    10 comments »
  • Patrick Cockburn | The Case Against Tony Blair

    The case against Tony Blair has revolved too much around his good faith and too little around his competence. The placards held up by protestors on Friday as he gave evidence should have read “sucker” and “dope” rather than “Bliar”.

    Amateurs have a fluency denied to professionals because they see no “ifs” and “buts” which would interrupt the flow of their argument. Books proving that Bacon wrote Shakespeare are often highly articulate and have great narrative pace because their authors see all facts pointing to the same inevitable conclusion.

    It is this mixture of amateurism and evangelical conviction which made Blair such a lethally inept leader before and during the war in Iraq. His greatest weakness was not so much that he adjusted facts to support his policies, but that he had so little grasp of the facts in the first place.

    1 comment »
  • Victor Grossman | Oskar Lafontaine and the Troubled German Left

    While German politicians stared at the calendar, wondering nervously what the May 9th elections will bring in the biggest state, North Rhine-Westphalia, with its 18 million people, media attention suddenly switched to a personal drama within the party called Die Linke (The Left). A few years ago this party or its predecessors were getting laughed off the political map. But what is happening today in that party could re-draw the whole map.

    No comments »
  • Henry A. Giroux’s tribute to Howard Zinn | Howard Zinn: A Public Intellectual Who Mattered

    "I grew up in Providence, Rhode Island, and rarely met or read any working-class intellectuals. After reading James Baldwin, hearing William Kunstler and Stanley Aronowitz give talks, I caught a glimpse of what it meant to occupy such a fragile, contradictory and often scorned location. But reading Howard gave me the theoretical tools to understand more clearly how the mix of biography, cultural capital and class location could be finely honed into a viable and laudable politics.

    Later, as I got to know Howard personally, I was able to fill in the details about his working-class background and his intellectual development. We had grown up in similar neighborhoods, shared a similar cultural capital and we both probably learned more from the streets than we had ever learned in formal schooling. There was something about Howard's fearlessness, his courage, his willingness to risk not just his academic position, but also his life, that marked him as special."

    No comments »
  • ONE | Drop Haitian Debt

    As Haiti rebuilds from this disaster, please work to secure the immediate cancellation of Haiti’s $1 billion debt and ensure that any emergency earthquake assistance is provided in the form of grants, not debt-incurring loans. Sign the petition.

    No comments »
  • CIA Man Retracts Claim on Waterboarding | Foreign Policy

    John Kiriakou, the former CIA operative who affirmed claims that waterboarding quickly unloosed the tongues of hard-core terrorists, says he didn't know what he was talking about.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | Haiti and the ‘Devil’s Curse’

    Excellent 12 minute news segment from the Real News on Haiti’s history of poverty, which includes a critical examination of how mainstream media is reporting this history without mentioning the impact that various foreign interventions has had on the country.

    According to Peter Hallward, author of Damming the Flood: Haiti, Aristide, and the Politics of Containment Haiti’s poverty can be explained as a series of foreign responses to the independence and strength of the Haitian people, but since the media doesn’t acknowledge this, they are forced to propose weakness and bad luck as the sources of Haiti’s poverty.

    No comments »
  • k-punk: Spectres of revolution

    Mark Fisher, author of Capitalist Realism, is talking about "Revolution" :
    "So let's be clear. I'm very far from saying that nothing can ever change. There has been some discussion of whether Capitalist Realism is a pessimistic book. For me, it isn't pessimistic, but it is negative. The pessimism is already embedded in everyday life - it is what Zizek would call the "spontaneous unreflective ideology" of our times. Identifying the embedded, unreflective pessimism is an act of negativity which, I hope, can make some contribution to denaturalizing that pessimism (which, by its very nature, does not identify itself as such, and is covered over by a compulsory positivity which forbids negativity). Far from nothing ever changing, something already has changed, massively - the bank crisis was an event without a subject, whose implications are yet to be played out. The terrain - the crashed present, littered with the ideological rubble of failed projects - is there to be fought over."

    No comments »
  • UK company law is terrorism’s friend | Prem Sikka | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

    Over the years, I have conducted many investigations into dubious corporate practices for newspapers, radio and television programmes and the trail always leads to tax havens, which hold no public information about the individuals behind those companies. The registered address is about the only publicly available information. One building in the Cayman Islands, a UK overseas territory, is the registered address of 18,857 corporations. British Virgin Islands, another UK overseas territory, with a population of 23,000 has more than 813,000 registered companies, the highest number per capita in the world. These companies rarely carry out any trade in their locales, but facilitate secrecy to their owners.

    No comments »

Link Archives »