Skip to content

Wednesday, Jan 7th 2009


October 22nd Lunchtime: The Recession Diaries

a1_lowestbranch.JPGWhere stands the debate on the unusustainability of ‘universalism’ now?  The Government has stated that only 5% of over-70s have incomes exceeding €36,400 (€72,800 for a couple) and the cost of providing them a medical card would be €10 - €15 million.  Unsustainable?  It amounts to pennies.  In fact, it amounts to less than pennies because (a) there is a cost to not providing a medical card (e.g. drug repayment scheme, administration of means-test, etc.), and (b) the cost is gross, not net: doctors receive the payment and pay income tax on it.  So:  5% and minuscule cost; wasn’t that a great little debate?Other debates are rearing their collective heads.  Education cuts is one.  And the impact of the 1% levy.  P. O’Neill over at Irishelection.com points out the inequity of the levy’s threshold:

‘ . . . if you make €17,540, your income levy is zero. If you make €17,541, your income levy is €175.40. Lesson: don’t work for that extra euro.’

It’s called a ’step-effect’ or an income trap: where an increase in gross income leads to a decrease in net income. In the case of the income levy that’s because the threshold exempts people earning below €17,540 - not earnings below that amount. This is not an isolated phenomenon in our tax/levy/social welfare code.  In fact it’s choc-a-block with these income traps.  Here’s a sampling:

  • The 2 percent Health Levy:  if you earn €26,000 or below, you pay nil.  If you earn €26,001 you pay the 2 percent on the full amount (€520).  That’s a big hit.
  • The PRSI Exemption Threshold:  if you earn €18,304 you are exempt from the 4 percent PRSI contribution.  Exceed that amount and you pay the levy on all income exceeding €6,604 (though this is phased in through in marginal relief, so the impact is not immediate).
  • Family Income Supplement:  The is a real killer.  It is linked to thresholds with payments equal to 60 percent of the difference between net income and the threshold.  Here’s a crude example: a family on €24,000 with one child will get €900 per year.  However, if there income goes up €1,500 they will lost that entire amount.
  • Rent Supplement:  Here’s another stinger.  This is a complicated means-tested programme that primarily benefits those on social welfare (though in some circumstances part-time workers may be eligible).  In 2006, someone on unemployment assistance would receive €79 per week in Rent Supplement.  But: get a full-time job, even if on the minimum wage, and you lose the whole amount.

There are a plethora of benefits and income supports that are withdrawn as income rises - sometimes only marginally: medical card, back-to-work allowance, back-to-school allowance, etc.  This can create some bizarre situations whereby it is financially more rational to remain unemployed or part-time or working for less money.  So much for the vaunted ‘incentive to work’ that we get lectured about.

Let’s take one small example:  a lone parent with one child working on the minimum wage (38 hours).  Just focusing the tax/levy aspect she would be paying no tax and no levies.  In addition, she would receive €97 a week in Family Income Supplement.  Her weekly income would be €425.

Let’s say she gets a job offer - one that pays €26,500.  Understandably, she would be quite excited - after all, it’s a 55 percent wage increase.  However, she starts wading through the bottom line.   Through tax credits, she won’t be in the income tax net.  But:

  • She’ll be liable for PRSI, Health and Income levy
  • More worrying, she’ll lose the Family Income Supplement

With the new job, what’s the take-home pay?  €479.  That’s an increase of €54 per week.  So: she gets a gross wage increase of €180 per week but only keeps €54.  That’s a marginal tax rate of 70 percent.  Paddy the speculator-plasterer, on six figures a year, only faces a marginal tax rate of 45.5 percent.

The one thing that comes through all this is that it’s people on low incomes who are most affected by income and poverty traps.  For instance, the income levy rises to 2 percent on incomes over €100,000.  But unlike the threshold that operates at the low end (whereby all income below is levied), the 2 percent only applies to income in excess of €100,000.

That’s equity the Fianna Fail-way.  That’s incentivising work.  That’s sharing the pain.  Makes one want to stand up in the bus and start singing Amhrán na bhFiann.

NOTE:  For an exhaustive study on poverty and income traps arising from the interaction of the tax and social welfare codes, go to ‘Out of the Traps’, written by the European Anti-Poverty Network and OPEN - the lone parent social organisation.  Though the numbers refer to 2005, the processes and operation remain the same.  Here’s their follow-up on the 2006 Budget.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Subscribe to ILR

ILR Full Content Feed

Latest Links

  • LRB | Sara Roy: If Gaza falls . . .

    Sara Roy provides lots of detail about the effective blockade by Israel into Gaza since Nov 5.
    "Israel’s siege of Gaza began on 5 November, the day after an Israeli attack inside the strip, no doubt designed finally to undermine the truce between Israel and Hamas established last June. Although both sides had violated the agreement before, this incursion was on a different scale. Hamas responded by firing rockets into Israel and the violence has not abated since then. Israel’s siege has two fundamental goals. One is to ensure that the Palestinians there are seen merely as a humanitarian problem, beggars who have no political identity and therefore can have no political claims. The second is to foist Gaza onto Egypt. That is why the Israelis tolerate the hundreds of tunnels between Gaza and Egypt around which an informal but increasingly regulated commercial sector has begun to form. The overwhelming majority of Gazans are impoverished and officially 49.1 per cent are unemployed."

    No comments »
  • Mass uprising of Greece’s youth, by Valia Kaimaki

    Why did Greek youth take to the streets? Kaimaki asks. Because, he says, for 'the first time since the second world war young people have no hope of a better life than their parents. But there is also a failure of trust in politicians and all state institutions, particularly the police'.

    But the political movement known as the 700 euro generation, which is supported by 60% of the population, is now being exported or finding convergence elsewhere. The reason? Simply because the existence of a young generation who do not have the prospects of a better life than their parents is not unique to Greece.

    No comments »
  • The Irish Economy’s Rise Was Steep, and the Fall Was Fast - NYTimes.com

    "Irish banks, unlike those in the United States, didn’t dole out that many subprime loans. Rather, they lent furiously to big property developers who themselves were liberated to build pell-mell by government-imposed tax breaks." The New York Times on Ireland's property bust

    No comments »
  • Joseph Massad: The Gaza Ghetto Uprising

    Since 2006, Arab regimes, neoliberal Arab intellectuals, as well as the Palestinian Collaborationist Authority (PCA) in Ramallah have reached an understanding that only Israel will be able to save them from Hizballah and Hamas, both organizations constituting a threat to the open alliance Arab regimes have with the US and Israel against Iran and all progressive forces in the region. These were not closely guarded secret hopes, but strategies that were openly discussed in private meetings, which often spilled into the public realm. […] A veritable open alliance now exists between the Palestinian Collaborationist Authority, Arab regimes, and Israel with the support of neoliberal Arab intellectuals, wherein Israel is subcontracted to decimate the Hamas government — the only democratically elected government in the entire Arab world.

    No comments »
  • Norman Finkelstein | Israel seeking Arab obeisance

    Finkelstein says that getting rid of Hamas in Gaza is not the objective of the current conflict. Instead it is to show the international community, including Iran that it will not accept a two-state settlement. It wants to be able to continue its control of the West Bank.
    "Finkelstein: The Hamas leadership in recent years has signaled that it is willing to negotiate a two-state settlement according to the June 1967 border and also the resolution of the refugee question. That means that Hamas has signaled to do what the international community has wanted Israel to do over the past 30 years.
    Israel rejects such a two-state settlement because it wants to continue its control of the West Bank. So for Israel a moderate Palestinian means the one who rejects all the terms proposed by the international community, a Palestinian who rejects the position of Hamas. For Israel a moderate Palestinian is a Palestinian who is willing to do whatever Israel wants. "

    No comments »
  • YouTube - Rocky Road To Dublin Peter Lennon Documentary

    Peter Lennon's 1967 documentary that was effectively banned for decades from RTE. An angry exposé of the stifling de facto theocracy then in place, it competed at Cannes in 1968 but was denied a prize when Godard and Truffaut's protest led to the festival being suspended. Godard's regular director of photography Raoul Coutard shot the film. Lennon was also a close friend of Samuel Beckett.

    No comments »
  • Steve Early | Is Obama Backing Off a Crucial Pledge to Labor? Bait and Switch on the Employee Free Choice Act”

    "While running for office, Obama said he strongly backed the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), a long overdue labor law reform measure that should be part of his promised economic stimulus plan. However, when Obama introduced his top economic advisors on Nov. 25 and talked about steps to "jolt" the economy in January, EFCA was not part of the package. More disturbingly, his new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, declined to say whether the White House would support EFCA when he was questioned about it at a Wall Street Journal-sponsored "CEO Council" earlier in November."

    No comments »
  • red mum | Facebook organised vigil tomorrow: Wednesday, Dec 10

    If you are in Dublin on Wednesday, December 10th at 6.30pm please come along to Dail Eireann where a candlelit vigil (part of the ongoing campaign calling on Harney to reinstate the HPV vaccine) is taking place. If you are in Cork on Wednesday at 6.30pm the vigil will be taking place at Daunts Square. More details here: http://redmum.blogspot.com/2008/12/facebook-organised-vigil-happening-next.html

    No comments »
  • The Real News Network - Bailouts and stimulus are not enough

    Leo Panitch says that the banks should be a public utility. As it is they can only function in the long term with the mechanism of government as a lender of last resort. Asked why banks haven't been allowed to go to the wall, Panitch says that it is a class issue. It would mean revolution. He cites an editorial in the Financial Times which argued recently that if the banks don't start lending again they'll have to be completely nationalised.

    No comments »
  • Recession Is Shaping Up to Be the Worst Since the 1940s - NYTimes.com

    Oh merde: "This recession, which officially began in December 2007, now appears virtually certain to be the longest downturn — and possibly most severe — since the end of World War II, as evidenced last week by a demoralizing rat-a-tat of grim reports on jobs, sales and public confidence."

    No comments »

Links Archives »