Skip to content

Tuesday, Feb 9th 2010


The legacy of the Progressive Democrats… a more competitive left in Irish politics. Unfortunately

There is a blunt irony to the fact that as the Progressive Democrats leave the political stage, their socio-economic and political project largely made void by the financial events of this Summer, the competitive aspect of their project seems to have been transferred almost without modification to the leftish parties. The most striking aspect of the fall of the Progressive Democrats has been largely unmentioned in the media, perhaps unsurprisingly, but it is central to a dynamic that we saw at work at successive elections across the past decade. That dynamic is one of coalition.

Simply put it has been impossible to put together governments with less than two parties for some decades. This should be good for the left, since it affords - in theory - the opportunity to shape, or blunt, the policies of the coalition partner.

However, from the point of view of the left, those coalitions invariably included the Progressive Democrats thereby giving a particularly hard edged economically liberal hue to those governments. This was reined in somewhat by the logic and nature of Fianna Fáil as a governing party with its attendant need to address its cross-class coalitions, but only somewhat. And it has also meant that alternative coalitions have had to grapple with the potential necessity of incorporating the Progressive Democrats should the numbers be insufficient for two parties. The nadir of this process was reached in 2007 when the only possible alternative to Fianna Fáil would have required almost all other TDs acting in concert to prevent them attaining power. Such an ideological framework would have stymied even the most cunning of politicians, which is - perhaps - why Bertie Ahern promptly set about fashioning his own version of this although on a slightly lesser scale. That that coalition lasted as long as it has, only fracturing - and then only at the margins - under the pressure of Budget number 2 and a remarkably cloth-eared performance by both our Taoiseach and Finance Minister is testament to his cunning.

a1_a2_a1_gardai_protest.jpg

But now we face a new reality, that of a period where the only significant smaller parties are those of the left and this has consequent ramifications to government formation in the Republic of Ireland. With the demise of our not entirely radical and now completely redundant party of the right the way would appear to be open to the Labour Party, Sinn Féin and the Green Party to attain power. But not together, or at least not yet.

I suggest that because it is impossible to see a situation where all three parties would act collectively in the near future. That the Green Party is in government is an obvious obstacle to further progress on that front. They may be willing to work in the future with other left or progressive parties, but who is to say that three and a half years or so from now they’re not unwilling to return to a Fianna Fáil led coalition? Indeed who else might have them if the bitterness already expressed by portions of the left towards them increases, particularly in the wake of the Budget? As for the other two parties, for historical reasons the relationship between Labour and Sinn Féin was largely non-existant until this Dáil term.This has improved slightly, but no reasonable observer would suggest that they have normalised.

Why should this be a surprise? I saw the workings of Democratic Left from the inside during the period before the mid-1990s coalition with Fine Gael and Labour. One of the most notable aspects of that, to me at least, was the way in which Fine Gael was the primary port of call in terms of process led (i.e. Dáil centred) politics. Now, there were two obvious reasons for that. Firstly Labour was in coalition with Fianna Fáil and therefore out of the game. Secondly Democratic Left was - arguably - in more direct competition with Labour than any other party, regardless of the coalition status of the latter. For Democratic Left to win Labour had to fail. And vice versa. Added to this was an history borne of the 1970s and 1980s where Labour and the Workers’ Party had fought the political equivalent of trench warfare in working class constituencies and in the trade union movement to capture every stray vote that remained after the true hegemon of the working class Fianna Fáil had finished with them. Any of us at the merger conference at the end of the 1990s will remember that at least some of the Democratic Left faces were more gloomy than they might otherwise have been expected to be, and although the progress of Labour after that point has been actually quite impressive in terms of managing the merged party some of those old irritations, animosities and divergent ambitions still remain to this day.

Therefore it is reasonable to propose that there is nothing particularly odd about competing parties of the left being… well, competitive, and that competition leading to a sharp and sometimes corrosive rhetoric that can be destructive of any collective action. The varying political weights of those parties is also a factor. The Labour party is a behemoth in contrast to Sinn Féin in terms of Oireachtas representation, a fact that has its own intrinsic dynamic - although nationally the Sinn Féin vote is often equal to that of Labour.

a1_a2_a1_student_protest.jpg

Then let’s consider what few examples of left parties nominally working together. The best and most recent one is, of course, the Technical Group which although an unlikely construct encompassing elements as diverse as Michael Lowry on one side through to Joe Higgins and the Socialist Party on the other did manage to survive the 29th Dáil more or less intact. But those who had the opportunity to observe it closely will attest that they never saw anything much more than a working relationship evolve between Sinn Féin and the Green Party, the two largest leftish components. And note that the Technical Group was an entity that eschewed any political element and was essentially a means to ensure that Dáil and Seanad facilities were provided on an equitable basis to its constituent elements, none of which alone had the necessary 7 TDs to be entitled to full party facilities. So one might have though that was a relatively neutral environment within which at least some communication could have developed.

Perhaps it is possible to ascribe this coolness between Sinn Féin and the Green Party to their respective political cultures. With the former some of the habits developed over long years as a genuinely oppositional force in Irish society have lingered, a certain corps d’esprit, a degree of aloofness, the embattled character that comes from being a minority within a minority on the left. For those of us from a Workers’ Party background some of these characteristics are readily identifiable. But a major distinction was, and is, a soft-pedalling of a strong class analysis. It is there, in parts. But, its traction on their high policy and political positioning, as demonstrated by their contortions over taxation in the run-up to last years election, is less strong than might be hoped. By contrast the Green Party has eschewed the ‘left’ label on perhaps one too many occasions. Their culture is one that is not clearly rooted in class but more - where social policy is concerned - in good intentions. Fine as far as it goes, but as the Budget demonstrates that may not be very far at all.

a1_a2_a1_education2_protest1.jpg

How much more difficult to construct an alliance above and beyond the process led basis of the Technical Group. And how much more difficult again to do so when the centrality of the individual leftish parties to coalition building generates a competitive aspect to government formation that was largely lacking during the last decade and a half. After all, the upshot of the Progressive Democrats and Fianna Fáil sharing power meant that the only alternative was coalition with Fine Gael. And while on certain axes that might well be a more progressive option than the former on others it was by no means definitely so.

And here is another thought. If a left alliance was to coalesce, surely it should have been in the past number of years, when coalition with Fianna Fáil was all but impossible since the Progressive Democrats had staked out that territory as their own. Yet if the relationship between the Green Party and Sinn Féin was - at best - correct, it is hard to see how it was better, or worse, with the Labour Party.

I could argue that there was an opportunity lost, but in reality there was no opportunity to be had until the Peace Process had developed significantly and both Sinn Féin and the Green Party embedded themselves, more or less successfully as parties with a degree of permanence.

All told it is not then easy to be starry eyed about the prospects for future collective action on any serious level.

a1_a2_a1_greyprotest2_protest.jpg

And there is an odd little counterintuitive aspect of this. Because one of the sticks that the centre-right parties had over the years was the prospect of cutting a deal with the Progressive Democrats. Sure, it wasn’t that great a stick, but it allowed them to pitch further right than they might otherwise have done. Or to put it another way it operated on the level of ‘deal with us or we’ll look more closely at the other guy on our right…’. Well, that excuse is now parked, and that means that on an individual basis we should be moving into a situation where in coalition government more of a left programme can be implemented. Ironically this is being seen on a small scale within the current coalition where the Green Party is convinced that the centrifugal forces that have seen Joe Behan and Finian McGrath spin away over the Budget, and wounded Mary Harney - perhaps irrevocably, has by contrast left them with much greater leverage over Fianna Fáil in the next three and a half years. The truth of this analysis of theirs remains to be seen. An alternative interpretation is that they are forced into an even closer embrace with Fianna Fáil for fear of electoral annihilation at the next election, a possibility Fianna Fáil will adeptly play up. Still, were Harney to eventually rejoin Fianna Fáil, or choose the wilderness of Independent status (and as an aside, I’m trying to recall when was the last time that an Independent TD was a Minister) that would essentially seal this as an exclusively Fianna Fáil/Green Party coalition in every sense. But as we can see that fact alone does not mean that this is a ‘left’ coalition, and for it to become so would require some serious heavy lifting by the Green Party. The Medical Cards debacle does not auger well for the prospect of them burning political capital in that way any time soon.

So the balance sheet is mixed. The prospect of left and/or progressive parties being in government alone with a larger partner has increased considerably. The prospect of left unity, or even working alliances, diminished yet further. I’ve always been one to believe that a varied left is a good thing. Multiple parties can address different electoral groups and constituencies in a way which single party, as we saw with the Labour Party prior to the arrival of the Workers’ Party simply couldn’t. But the necessity of working alliances is near self-evident if a genuinely left alternative, however mild, can be put before the Irish people.

Incidentally this isn’t restricted to the Republic. In the North the current system of power-sharing almost guarantees the inclusion of parties which are at least rhetorically wedded to some degree of leftist thinking. Of course in actual political action we have seen a rather different outcome.

However, it is worth noting that the situation in 2012 or at any election earlier than that might throw up further variables. Firstly the number and character of Independents could be such that it would permit a pool of centre-right politicians which the larger parties could draw upon in order to retain a more markedly centre-right complexion. Considering the variegated nature of the Technical Group in the 29th Dáil this is far from unlikely. Such TDs as Paddy McHugh and James Breen were unlikely radicals whose political homes were clearly in the big battalions from which they had originally come. Had they been returned it is likely that eventually they would have come to some arrangement with the Government. The same is equally true of Michael Lowry in this Dáil or Jackie Healey-Rae. Even as a small component of a government, or as importantly an element of their support such TDs could have a significant blocking function. And that assumes that their numbers are relatively low, something that is far from certain at this point.

Moreover if one studies the track record of Independents in recent times, those of the centre and centre right tend to be assimilated in larger political homes, whereas those of the left tend to lose their seats (granted there are one or two exceptions). And the recent travails of Finian McGrath who has moved from Technical Group to Government supporting TD and recently broken off his deal will probably make a Government of any stripe uneasy about trying to cut deals with those beyond a broadly defined ‘gene-pool’ of FF/FG leaning TDs.

The solution to all this? Well, I don’t see one, other than attempting to make linkages on the left which might generate some sense of a shared goal. Even a set of basic goals that all formations could agree on would be a step forward. But does anyone genuinely believe that the respective party leaderships would agree on that? And the core problem remains that even should this government fall there will be other parties ready to step into the breach. Just as Labour and Sinn Féin were willing to do last time out and will next time should the chance arise.

a1_a2_a1_education_protest.jpg

So, yes, we can be certain that all future governments will have a left complexion to a greater or lesser degree, but whether that left complexion will make a qualitative difference to such governments or spell a fundamental shift in the nature of Irish politics is very much open to question. I’m highly doubtful. Perhaps others are more optimistic.

Notes

Red Mum has been taking photos of each of the recent protests against the budget cuts in health and education. These photos also appeared in her excellent post on the protests. More are available on her flickr account, including last night’s protest against education cuts organised by the teacher’s unions.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

This article is, however, being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Nov 9th 2008

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY

    SOCIOLOGY LECTURE SERIES 2010

    Prof James Wickham

    Head of School of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Financial markets and social power - the new inequalities of turbo-capitalism

    Wednesday 10 February 2010

    7.00- 9.30 pm

    Synge lecture theatre, Arts Building, TCD

    A L L   W E L C O M E

    No comments »
  • Kevin Doogan - Not all that is solid | New Humanist

    Analysis of global foreign direct investment patterns also reveals two interesting and counter-intuitive trends. FDI expands during boom periods and contracts during recessions. To blame job losses on capital migration is questionable. Secondly the lion's share of overseas investment goes to the rich rather than poor countries. Between 1980 and 2006 the developed economies' share of global FDI inward stock has grown from 56 per cent to 70 per cent, consolidating their position as the prime target for overseas investment. In other words capital moves abroad to access rich markets rather than exploit cheap labour. This shows that fears of exporting jobs are not related to the actuality of capital relocation but to the threat of jobs going overseas. Research in America, where fears of overseas job loss have a much higher profile than in Europe, shows that companies use the threat of corporate relocation in order to maintain the compliance of trade unions during contract negotiations.

    10 comments »
  • Patrick Cockburn | The Case Against Tony Blair

    The case against Tony Blair has revolved too much around his good faith and too little around his competence. The placards held up by protestors on Friday as he gave evidence should have read “sucker” and “dope” rather than “Bliar”.

    Amateurs have a fluency denied to professionals because they see no “ifs” and “buts” which would interrupt the flow of their argument. Books proving that Bacon wrote Shakespeare are often highly articulate and have great narrative pace because their authors see all facts pointing to the same inevitable conclusion.

    It is this mixture of amateurism and evangelical conviction which made Blair such a lethally inept leader before and during the war in Iraq. His greatest weakness was not so much that he adjusted facts to support his policies, but that he had so little grasp of the facts in the first place.

    1 comment »
  • Victor Grossman | Oskar Lafontaine and the Troubled German Left

    While German politicians stared at the calendar, wondering nervously what the May 9th elections will bring in the biggest state, North Rhine-Westphalia, with its 18 million people, media attention suddenly switched to a personal drama within the party called Die Linke (The Left). A few years ago this party or its predecessors were getting laughed off the political map. But what is happening today in that party could re-draw the whole map.

    No comments »
  • Henry A. Giroux’s tribute to Howard Zinn | Howard Zinn: A Public Intellectual Who Mattered

    "I grew up in Providence, Rhode Island, and rarely met or read any working-class intellectuals. After reading James Baldwin, hearing William Kunstler and Stanley Aronowitz give talks, I caught a glimpse of what it meant to occupy such a fragile, contradictory and often scorned location. But reading Howard gave me the theoretical tools to understand more clearly how the mix of biography, cultural capital and class location could be finely honed into a viable and laudable politics.

    Later, as I got to know Howard personally, I was able to fill in the details about his working-class background and his intellectual development. We had grown up in similar neighborhoods, shared a similar cultural capital and we both probably learned more from the streets than we had ever learned in formal schooling. There was something about Howard's fearlessness, his courage, his willingness to risk not just his academic position, but also his life, that marked him as special."

    No comments »
  • ONE | Drop Haitian Debt

    As Haiti rebuilds from this disaster, please work to secure the immediate cancellation of Haiti’s $1 billion debt and ensure that any emergency earthquake assistance is provided in the form of grants, not debt-incurring loans. Sign the petition.

    No comments »
  • CIA Man Retracts Claim on Waterboarding | Foreign Policy

    John Kiriakou, the former CIA operative who affirmed claims that waterboarding quickly unloosed the tongues of hard-core terrorists, says he didn't know what he was talking about.

    No comments »
  • The Real News | Haiti and the ‘Devil’s Curse’

    Excellent 12 minute news segment from the Real News on Haiti’s history of poverty, which includes a critical examination of how mainstream media is reporting this history without mentioning the impact that various foreign interventions has had on the country.

    According to Peter Hallward, author of Damming the Flood: Haiti, Aristide, and the Politics of Containment Haiti’s poverty can be explained as a series of foreign responses to the independence and strength of the Haitian people, but since the media doesn’t acknowledge this, they are forced to propose weakness and bad luck as the sources of Haiti’s poverty.

    No comments »
  • k-punk: Spectres of revolution

    Mark Fisher, author of Capitalist Realism, is talking about "Revolution" :
    "So let's be clear. I'm very far from saying that nothing can ever change. There has been some discussion of whether Capitalist Realism is a pessimistic book. For me, it isn't pessimistic, but it is negative. The pessimism is already embedded in everyday life - it is what Zizek would call the "spontaneous unreflective ideology" of our times. Identifying the embedded, unreflective pessimism is an act of negativity which, I hope, can make some contribution to denaturalizing that pessimism (which, by its very nature, does not identify itself as such, and is covered over by a compulsory positivity which forbids negativity). Far from nothing ever changing, something already has changed, massively - the bank crisis was an event without a subject, whose implications are yet to be played out. The terrain - the crashed present, littered with the ideological rubble of failed projects - is there to be fought over."

    No comments »
  • UK company law is terrorism’s friend | Prem Sikka | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

    Over the years, I have conducted many investigations into dubious corporate practices for newspapers, radio and television programmes and the trail always leads to tax havens, which hold no public information about the individuals behind those companies. The registered address is about the only publicly available information. One building in the Cayman Islands, a UK overseas territory, is the registered address of 18,857 corporations. British Virgin Islands, another UK overseas territory, with a population of 23,000 has more than 813,000 registered companies, the highest number per capita in the world. These companies rarely carry out any trade in their locales, but facilitate secrecy to their owners.

    No comments »

Link Archives »