Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Friday, Feb 3rd 2012


The Wire: ‘Every Villain Has Their Reasons’

SPOILER ALERT: The following article contains spoilers galore, so it’s best not to read it unless you’ve followed The Wire to the very end.

There have been few television shows that have enjoyed a posthumous fame as great as The Wire. Generally ignored by the public and the Emmys ever since its debut in early 2002, the show seemed to be of interest only to critics, who had been unstinting in their praise since day one. The plaudits eventually paid off and some traction with viewers was gained by the time the fourth and fifth seasons came around. Though The Wire did have a loyal cult following on cable, the vast majority of people came to it by word of mouth, and, as is often the case these days, few actually watched an episode in the course of one of its season’s runs. And though it is far from the first show to have been downloaded illegally in huge numbers, it is probably the first to have been propagated largely through illicit channels, given that outside the US, its programming on any sort of television was erratic. The fact that the show is now making tidy sums in DVD sales, being snapped up by people that ‘stole’ it initially, shows that file-sharing, rather than being merely a black hole of lost revenue, is also an invaluable means of distribution that will eventually bear fruit.

I first came to it shortly after the final season finished and I watched it straight through in a few weeks. Friend after friend had been raving about it and eventually the tipping point came, since then I’ve probably been responsible for another dozen people to start watching it. People are still watching it for the first time and I know many that have gone back to the very beginning to take it all again, to winnow some previously hidden nuggets out of the show’s exceptionally rich detail, to marvel at the dialogue that taught viewers far beyond Baltimore how to speak like street-corner drug dealers, hard-nosed detectives and Democratic party machine politicians, or simply just to lose themselves in an experience that is thoroughly addictive.

Policemen and gangsters alike have praised the show for its realism, and the most striking thing about it is its intelligence. In an era where the overwhelming majority of Hollywood films, even those aimed at a supposedly intelligent audience, have an embarrassingly infantile narrative tone, a television show that never stoops to talking down to its audience is refreshing. David Simon and his co-creator Ed Burns have an impressive track record having worked on Homicide and The Corner before, but it is their previous career experience, as Baltimore Sun crime reporter and policeman-turned-public school teacher respectively, that has grounded them in the reality of Baltimore life. Simon said that he wanted to avoid the type of clichéd cop show where the policeman lift the shroud on yet another murder victim and mutter ‘what a waste.’ The cops in The Wire are unsentimental but not uncaring, and they are also magnificently flawed human beings, none more so than the ultimate maverick Detective Jimmy McNulty, played by Trinity graduate Dominic West. In fact it’s interesting how many critical events in the series are brought about by simple human error, such as a failure to file a report on the Double G’s murder in the second season, allowing the gang to do away with the cocaine that would have incriminated them. Such a regularity of error could come across as mechanical but not in a show where institutional failure is a recurring theme. It’s part of the show’s dramatic fabric.

Though the political commentary in The Wire is usually implicit, the show can be read as a text that bridges the Bush and Obama eras. David Simon said that he was initially prompted to make a show whose scope far outreaches the crime series he had previously been involved in after witnessing the institutional corruption and failure of American corporations such as Enron and WorldCom, both of which happened in the months following 9/11, and which, one would imagine ought to have served as a warning sign for the much greater collapse seven years later.

The show’s loose structure, which focuses on a different institution in each of its five seasons, all of which are struggling to keep afloat in the contemporary world. The Baltimore Police Department is at the mercy both of a political obsession with the war on drugs and its own endemic incompetence. The longshoreman unions at the Baltimore docks are suffering from a drop-off in commercial traffic; the public schools are locked in a cycle of crime, poverty and ineffectiveness compounded by indifference in City Hall. The Democratic Party Machine – the only one that effectively exists in Baltimore – is oiled by corruption and back scratching. When an idealistic but ruthless newcomer such as Thomas Carcetti comes on the scene, he is stymied by the crippling deficits left over from his predecessors, by political power-playing in the Police Department and by the horse-trading that so often requires one needy institution to be expediently sacrificed to keep another one onside.

Even the city’s enterprising gangs, busy at keeping the city’s murder rate at nearly one per day, are themselves caught up in a torridly Darwinian struggle that thrusts new players forward with bewildering rapidity. If crime as an analogy for business has become so common in American film and TV to have been petrified into empty truism, in The Wire at least it seems to reflect the protean, miasmic nature of contemporary capital. Long-established hoods such as Proposition Joe, a man of his own qualified code of honour, find themselves supplanted by more brutal and savvier outfits such as the Barksdales – who might be viewed as an-all-grasping Microsoft-style oligopoly, unwilling to go along with Prop Joe’s co-operative. But almost as quickly as the Barksdales rise, they are replaced by the uppity of Marlo Stanfield, a man whose staggering business success takes a back seat to his own satisfaction at mastering The Game. Marlo is Google to Barksdale’s Microsoft and his ingenious ways of outwitting (up to a point) of the teams of police wire-tap units out to trap him carry the echo of a successful start-up. The delicious irony is that Marlo’s method is a fusion of old-style cell tactics – few people in the gang know the contacts of anyone else and even payphone communication is abjured – and modern technology – Marlo’s smart-phone pictures of a clock face are the code by which the location of his drops and meetings across the city are co-ordinated. Of course, the police catch up with Marlo eventually by hook or by crook, even if he has managed to escape to a more ‘legit’ business environment by now. But unlike the late Stringer Bell before him, Marlo has no real appetite for going straight and in the show’s final episode, he’s back on the street, strutting with a savage abandon that will probably see him gunned down, now unprotected by his psychotic henchman and woman Chris and Snoop and his previous meticulous caution. And if there is to be any winner to be discerned in this crime/business paradigm it is the discreet, supranational, super-efficient operation run by the Greek, who, despite his advanced years is consummately modern, unencumbered by any notions of prestige or misplaced honour. The Greek can also up sticks and flee town, and return whenever he sees fit, something the provincial, hidebound Baltimore gangs are incapable of doing.

The Wire is an extended riff on Jean Renoir’s famous maxim ‘every villain has their reasons’, and even the most sociopathic, most venal characters are shown to act according to very logical impulses of self-advancement or self-preservation. Given David Simon’s jaundiced view of the police which he retains from his time at the Baltimore Sun, and which he recently exercised in a Washington Post article, it is surprising that the police in the show are broadly sympathetic. The villainous cops are largely minor figures, disposed of as the show goes by, and even the more negative aspects of more prominent members of Baltimore’s finest are explained away by either intense political pressure (Rawls) or forensic expediency (McNulty and Lester Freamon in the final season). Of course, Simon might have reasonably assumed that an over-scrupulous attention to police misdeeds might skew the show’s focus, losing track of other equally important strands of the city’s narrative. It is not to explain away police brutality, corruption or incompetence but simply to place it in the context of wider contingencies. And of course, shade and nuance are oxygen for good drama.

Though the show began its run in the run-up to the Iraq war the war and the Bush administration’s machinations are referred to only obliquely. McNulty and Daniels are frustrated by their efforts to bring the Barksdale and then Stanfield cases to federal level because, post 9/11, the FBI are only interested in terrorism or, at a push, corruption. The war steps in briefly in the fifth season in the form of the homeless veteran whose story Scottie Templeton doctors and thus sets the alarm bells ringing about his veracity and, by extension, the Baltimore Sun’s tolerance of it. But other than that the war is conspicuous by its absence; there are no kids from the projects signing up (I’m not sure if this reflects reality in Baltimore) and the war is rarely mentioned even in passing conversation. One is tempted to think the war may be the elephant in the sitting room, as Bernard McLaverty said  the Troubles were for the people of Northern Ireland. For a show of such a Balzacian scope it is remarkable that one of the defining events of the American decade is largely ignored. Maybe Simon thought it less relevant to Baltimore than another, more enduring, and equally disastrous war, the war on drugs. Or maybe he was simply storing up his ideas for his next show, Generation Kill, which is exclusively about the war.

To get back to the bridge between the Bush and Obama eras, the show, though far from being a neat analogy, provides a few interesting references to reality. There is no Republican administration to be supplanted in the impregnably Democratic Baltimore. Thomas Carcetti’s tilting at the incumbency of Clarence Royce is based on reality where Martin O’Malley, a young Irish-American politician unexpectedly divided the African-American vote and took City Hall on a platform of change. He does of course then go on, like O’Malley, to take the Governor’s Mansion from the GOP after only two years of mayoralty, something uncannily similar to Obama’s trajectory. Carcetti, of course, like any other newly elected leader, soon encounters the compromises necessary to keep his administration afloat and it is an intricate tapestry of compromises that finally saves his skin and leaves everyone, bar the fallen-from-grace Irving Burrell, happy at the very end of season five.

There is also something in Carcetti’s election that is reminiscent of the Obama breakthrough, and which offers the glimpse of an improvement in racial relations that one suspects is to be merely cosmetic. The Baltimore of The Wire, a city that is, as in reality, 60% black, appears have left its racist past behind, which gave us the tale of Hattie Carroll and William Zantzinger, (and which Simon wrote about recently in the New Yorker). There are very few explicit, egregious incidents of racism, even on the part of the police, which is a well-integrated force. Such is the sense of Obama’s America, where a sufficient number of Americans have cast aside historical racial suspicions to elect a black man. It is also an America where racism has been sublimated, public discourse being now policed by a politically correct consensus that owes as much to a historically puritanical strain as it does to racial emancipation. The reality of The Wire though is one where black people make up a disproportionate amount of those on welfare, drug addicts and dealers and the prison population. Which is, of course, still the reality of America under Obama. In fact it is interesting how much of the detail from the show’s depiction of West Baltimore is similar to Obama’s fine memoir Dreams from my Father; the area, like the southside Chicago of Obama’s book, is being crushed under the weight of unemployment, drugs and gun crime, with the only centres of civic support being provided by the local churches and quixotically benevolent individuals like ex-con boxing coach Cuttie, cop-turned-teacher Roland Pryzbylewski and the former drug addict Walon, played by Steve Earle. The area is also experiencing the wave of ‘black flight’ where upwardly-mobile African-American families move to the suburbs escaping the crime and poverty, a phenomenon also noted by Obama in 1980s Chicago and a case of class trumping race, suggesting in turn that the former is by far the greater taboo in American society.

Obama proclaimed himself early in his campaign to be a fan of the show, naming Omar, rather audaciously, as his favourite character. A number of cast members later repaid the favour by recording an internet commercial urging young voters to vote for him in North Carolina. The new president even stopped by Baltimore three days before his inauguration, delivering an address from the steps of City Hall, as he followed Abraham Lincoln’s route from Philadelphia to the capital. And then to cap it all off, back in Obama’s state of  Illinois deposed  Governor Rod Blagojevich summoned the spirit of the shamelessly roguish Senator Clay Davis in a doomed effort to save his political career. The gap between The Wire and real life was briefly wafer thin.

Many have suggested that The Wire’s bleakness prevented it from ever gaining a foothold with audiences. It’s certainly one of a number of credible hypotheses and Simon was grateful for the enlightened patronage of HBO that allowed the show to continue despite low ratings. Simon can hardly be accused of being a bright-eyed optimist, but his cynicism never descends into nihilism. Mark Bowden called him the ‘angriest man in TV’ when the depiction of the Baltimore Sun news room rattled some cages more than scenes of crippling poverty and neglect ever could. But Simon maintains his calm for the most part. The show ends with some people saved, and some damned and some, notably McNulty, somewhere in between. But it is unlikely that, even under the more principled stewardship of Cedric Daniels, the Baltimore Police Department is going to have the will, or the means, to place public service above bureaucratic concerns. In a way it is only those in the show that are possessed of almost super-hero-like disregard for consequences such as Omar and McNulty, that are capable of providing anything like a bulwark against the onslaught of violence, intimidation and anomie. All it takes is a small dose of moral sense to do it. Omar and McNulty are the true radicals in the show and, I imagine, closest to Simon’s heart too.

When watching Hollywood films these days, I’m usually struck by how anaemic and simplistic they are compared to The Wire (and other TV crime shows). Such films to suffer by comparison were Ridley Scott’s American Gangster and Body of Lies and Martin Scorsese’s The Departed. Scott and Scorsese felt impelled to garnish their drama with sociological footnotes, as if they were unsure their tale, ‘the thing itself’, as Hamlet would say, were strong enough to propel itself forward. James Gray is one of the few American filmmakers to resist the tendency to ‘sociologize’ and his films are richer, more robust for all that. Just like The Wire, where we don’t need to be told in voiceover how certain immigrant communities grabbed America by the scruff of the neck, nor do we need to hear street children quoting Hawthorne and Joyce. In fact, the references to the outside world in The Wire are notable for their goofishness: at one point the wire-tap unit says that Le Havre is a port in Brittany, McNulty rejects Bushmills at a party because it’s ‘Protestant’ whiskey (and his beloved Jameson isn’t?) and the cops wake their dead colleagues with the Pogues’ rousing ‘Body of an American’, without realising that it’s a caustic piss-take of self-righteous Irish Americans. All are mistakes, easy mistakes to make, just like those that people make in real life. And the Greeks probably aren’t even Greek, either.

Everyone, like Barack Obama, has their own favourite character from this finest of cop shows. My own favourites are usually the minor players, like Cuttie, Gus Haynes the City Desk editor of the Baltimore Sun who smells a rat in Templeton’s reporting, and Michael Lee the smart, pragmatic runaway who protects his younger brother and turns to crime as the only way to self-preservation. But the one that stood out for me, was the flawed tragic hero, Union leader Frank Sobotka, who gets in over his head with the Greeks, having been thrust into crime by economic necessity, who rails against the cops, the establishment, union-busting Ronald Reagan but who finally sacrifices himself and ends up in Baltimore Bay. His final words to ‘The Greek’ are ‘don’t hurt my guys’. Of course his guys end up wrecked anyway once the port closes. But a heroic portrayal of an unapologetic old lefty in an American TV show tickled my heart…

All five seasons of HBO’s The Wire, “rapped” up in 5 minutes.

An excerpt from Season 5

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: bboyle

    Mar 13th 2009 at 01:03

    Seanachie,

    The ‘Protestant’ whiskey reference to Bushmills vs. Jamesons, believe it or not, reeks of versimilitude. I’ve heard that comment from my fellow Irish Americans since I was old enough to sip one. As to the “Body of an American”, give us credit for entertaining some irony. Cheers.

  2. Comment by: Seanachie

    Mar 13th 2009 at 12:03

    @bboyle:

    I have heard the ‘Protestant whiskey’ thing before too, but this underlines my point, that The Wire’s writers are content to furnish their dialogue with ‘authentic’ misconceptions rather than force the narrative with weighty socio-historical pronouncements as is the case with many contemporary Hollywood screenwriters. And the show is a lot better than that. Error is woven into the show’s fabric, making it all the more credible.

    As for ironic interpretations of ‘Body of an American’, sure, why not? Some will get the joke, some won’t, and more won’t care.

    Cheers in return!

  3. Comment by: Seanachie

    Mar 13th 2009 at 12:03

    Oops, reading the second paragraph of that last comment again, it seemed a bit dismissive. No offence intended!

  4. Comment by: Wednesday

    Mar 14th 2009 at 07:03

    And the Greeks probably aren’t even Greek, either.

    That’s explicitly acknowledged at one point, I think towards the end of Season Two.

    On the issue of project kids joining the army, the absence of any sign of this strikes me as realistic. For one thing recruitment of African Americans in general has been declining for some time (there was much hand-wringing about this a few years ago). Secondly, while the military has recruited a lot of working class kids based on the almost unique opportunities it provides them for education and secure employment, that only matters to kids who are looking for education and secure employment. It’s made clear that most of The Wire’s youths don’t fall into that category (and indeed they wouldn’t even fall into the “working class” stratum; “underclass” is the term that would be used). Which is not to say there aren’t any, but I wouldn’t think it would be a significant enough number to require references to it in the programme.

    And yes, there is very definitely a perception amongst Irish-Americans that Bushmills is “Protestant whiskey”! I’ve heard this loads of times.

  5. Comment by: Seanachie

    Mar 14th 2009 at 14:03

    @ Wednesday

    I missed the bit about the Greeks but it confirms my suspicions.

    Thanks for pointing out the falling recruitment among African-Americans. It also makes sense that few of the West Baltimore kids would be interested in the military.

  6. Comment by: po\'blackn\'gay

    Mar 17th 2009 at 02:03

    I’ve watched all 5 season’s of The Wire and there are a lot of things I really like about it. However, I’m not too happy with what I perceive to be a lack of rigorous criticm of the show and it’s underlying assumptions.

    For example, the show assumes that the crumbling American institutions it examines ever functioned for anyone other than salaried, homeowning, white, hetersexual, middle- and upper- income males.

    The (season 3?) scene where a Black woman tells Carcetti about the “good old days” when she liked seeing the local beat cop stop by just to talk was laughable. When were Blacks in America *ever* happy to see a cop? Not in my 45-year, Black lifetime. I’m afraid that me and mine don’t describe the McNulty-types of our police forces as “magnificently flawed” or “maverick.”

    Or when the (woman of color) newpaper reporter who’s disappointed that her story got cut down and buried is surprized to be told that the victims were from the “wrong zip code,” as if that had ever been the “right” zip code. Newspapers have never told the truth about the rest of us.

    Racial/ethnic minorities, immigrants, underclass, marginalized Americans have never been served by American institutions.

    If The Wire is so “real life” why is every Black male in the criminal justice system actually guilty of something? There’s an accidental shooting of a cop, but not a single case of an unarmed, Black male citizen being executed by a cop who will not be held accountable. That’s not the result of a recent breakdown in American institutions, that’s real life where I’m from.

    That’s not David Simon’s real life. His real life is that of a suburban, white, heterosexual male who’s angry that tacit promises haven’t been kept. The Wire is an excellent examination of issues from *his* perspective, which is not the same thing as evidence of improved race relations in America.

  7. Comment by: Seanachie

    Mar 19th 2009 at 13:03

    @ po\’blackn\’gay

    You make some valid points and yes, The Wire is obviously skewed from a certain perspective but such is the case for any show/film/work of art.

    As to its realism, there are a number of places where it falls down, and even the former Baltimore cop who featured in one of the links above said it was about ‘80%’ true, as opposed to most cop shows or films which are generally closer to ‘30%’. I can’t gainsay you on the credibility of the woman’s remarks to Carcetti in season three but I do agree that season strains credibility in parts.

    I may not have been very clear on the matter of improved race relations. I meant that the Baltimore of *the show* (as opposed to the real-life one, of which I have little first-hand experience) appears to bother itself less with racial conflict than it might have in the past. But the reality is, of course, that the co-ordinates of the conflict have merely shifted, and racism is sublimated and informs inequality and economic repression every bit as powerfully as ever. Not for a moment do I think racism is gone away or likely to do so any time soon.

    As for McNulty, I wouldn’t expect you - or I, either - would see him as ‘magnificently flawed’ if we knew him in real life. I was talking about his character from an objective point of view rather. Interesting characters are rarely the sort that we would wish to encounter in real life, not least if they are womanising, alcoholic cops. And I *did* remark upon the fact the cops in The Wire are unusually benevolent though I think that might have been for dramatic reasons.

    It’s good to hear some dissenting views though; I’m usually sceptical of anything that provokes blanket praise.

  8. Comment by: po'blackn'gay

    Mar 19th 2009 at 14:03

    Seanachie,

    Thanks for the post!

    I’m all about the open discussion that a show like The Wire should be fostering. When I wrote my post, it came from frustrations that I had as a viewer of the show and not from any reaction to the things that you had said in your article.

    This forum was the first time that I bothered to voice any of my opinions as your article was smarter than anything else I’ve read about the show. Typically, people are just fawning all over the show without any analysis at all. And like you, that makes me wonder why such a “smart” show for such a “smart” audience is not provoking deeper discussions.

    For example, this is the first place I’ve read a reaction from the Irish vs. Irish-American perspective. You mentioned several things that I hadn’t been aware of. That’s what these discussions are about for me. Not, if The Wire is good or bad or right or wrong, but what are we talking about and what should be included in the discussion.

  9. Comment by: Conor McCabe

    Mar 28th 2009 at 01:03

    Just to let you know that in order to read this post - put off as I was by the spoiler alert - I sat down last Friday evening (c.8pm) to start watching The Wire for the first time. I just finished watching episode ten, season five, about ten minutes ago (c.12.55am). It is brilliant. and the article is pretty good as well. :) I loved the character of Omar, I thought he was the moral centre of the series (”every man needs a code”), and was shocked when he was killed, even though for the story to work it had to happen.

    As regards whether the series was 80% right or 30% right, etc. Well, it’s not a documentary, nor was I expecting to watch one. The thing about fiction I think is that a work of fiction can have a truth-value, without necessarily being, well, “true” - in the usual sense of a true story being a linear list of accurate descriptions of events.

    Anyway, great post, and you can chalk up one more person who has watched the Wire because of you.

    Cheers.

  10. Comment by: blacknIrish

    Jun 6th 2009 at 17:06

    Found your article very interesting & disagree with po\’blackn\’gay. I worked a schedule that I watched The Wire during its run maybe once or twice - realized it was serious and required focus and I didn’t have time to be faithful. But I did see the realism & was terrified when my daughter was considering doing social work in Baltimore. People with no respect for life scare me. Last year I came across a DVD set of series 1 & decided to buy. Got hooked on the writing and character development - the rest is history. Introduced to my brother - a cultural anthropologist Ph.D. Yale - who said he didn’t know whether to curse me or thank me - he couldn’t work until he finished the series. Surprisingly, his favorite character was “McNutty” as he called him. The writers had a purpose when they dissected an American city in a very entertaining, thought-provoking way. It should be part of orientation for every city worker, government worker, college student, etc. Best piece I ever saw on television - wish I could write like that. Everything made sense. Now to learn from it and figure out what to do.

  11. Comment by: bmoregirl

    Jul 6th 2009 at 02:07

    I’m a social worker in Baltimore City (not related to blacknIrish, though!) and work with people just like the characters in The Wire. Regarding the absence of the Iraq war: it is just not on the radar of the people living in the ghettos of West (or East) Baltimore. There’s a way going on in their own neighborhood that is much more urgent than a far off place like Iraq or Afghanistan. There are some ROTC programs in the high schools and some kids definitely do go into the military, but those aren’t generally the kids that are on the streets.

    As for the reality of the show, I’d say at least 80%. Everything except McNulty’s crazy serial killer plot rang very true to me.

    blacknIrish, it really isn’t that scary working in the City. The clients are generally very welcoming of social workers. People understand that we’re here to help and we’re almost always left alone. On one occasion, someone approached me to try to sell drugs to me but then asked if I was a social worker. When I answered that I was, he and his buddy backed right off and let me get to where I was going.

    Baltimore is a dangerous place if you’re committing crimes or are a police officer, but the regular people are generally respected and left alone. I’ve never had any problems in the 5+ years of working in some of the worst neighborhoods in the city. (Including a time when my car broke down at 10 pm in the middle of a housing project.) It sounds like your daughter isn’t here, but if she was, it wouldn’t be as bad as you imagine!

  12. Comment by: Donagh

    Jul 13th 2009 at 14:07

    Thanks very much for the comment bmoregirl. Ever since I heard about The Wire (around the time when series two was airing in the States) I knew it was something I’d really like, but for one reason or another I didn’t follow a whole series - just epidodes here and there. So patchy was my viewing that I never managed to watch episodes sequentially. However, last week I watched three in a row on BBC2 and was so mad that I hadn’t just done the deed and bought the box set. It’s really interesting hearing about your experiences of Baltimore from your perspective as a social worker - Baltimore is not a unique city, in that The Wire is not about Baltimore specifically. It’s just the city that Simons has such an intimate experience of I guess.

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Mar 12th 2009

  2. Mar 13th 2009

  3. Aug 28th 2009

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »
  • Is Ireland really the role model for austerity? | Stephen Kinsella | Cambridge Journal of Economics

    Abstract
    This paper describes the causes and consequences of Ireland’s economic crisis in the context of the policy solution implemented to contain that crisis: protracted fiscal austerity. I describe the causes of the recent crisis in Ireland and look at the logic of austerity with a simple model. I compare the current crisis to the crisis of the 1980s, when fiscal austerity was touted as the trigger for the Celtic Tiger. I discuss the measures implemented to date in the current crisis, tracing their effects on sectors of Ireland’s macroeconomy. I show that Ireland is not the role model for austerity policies.

    =======
    The full content of the January 2012 issue of the Cambridge Journal of Economics is available free online here. It is a special issue on the theme “Austerity: Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?”

    Contents
    Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?
    Lawrence King, Michael Kitson, Sue Konzelmann, and Frank Wilkinson

    Financial crisis and global imbalances: its labour market origins and the aftermath
    Pasquale Tridico

    Dangerous interconnectedness: economists’ conflicts of interest, ideology and financial crisis
    Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth and Gerald A. Epstein

    Commentary: Contradictions of austerity
    Alex Callinicos

    The great austerity war: what caused the US deficit crisis and who should pay to fix it?
    James Crotty

    The end of the UK’s liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the coalition government’s policy during the austerity crisis
    Damian Grimshaw and Jill Rubery

    Iceland’s rise, fall, stabilisation and beyond
    Robert H. Wade and Silla Sigurgeirsdottir

    Commentary: Dire consequences: the conservative recapture of America’s political narrative?
    David Coates

    A note on America’s 1920–21 depression as an argument for austerity
    Daniel Kuehn

    US government deficits and debt amid the great recession: what the evidence shows
    Robert Pollin

    Fiscal deficits, economic growth and government debt in the USA
    Lance Taylor, Christian R. Proaño, Laura de Carvalho, and Nelson Barbosa

    The tragedy of UK fiscal policy in the aftermath of the financial crisis
    Malcolm Sawyer

    Is Ireland really the role model for austerity?
    Stephen Kinsella

    The macroeconomic stabilisation effects of Social Security and 401(k) plans
    Teresa Ghilarducci, Joelle Saad-Lessler, and Eloy Fisher

    The basic paradigms of EU economic policy-making need to be changed
    Kazimierz Laski and Leon Podkaminer

    Building faith in a common currency: can the eurozone get beyond the Common Market logic?
    Pascal Petit

    The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: the lost Keynesian legacy
    Robert Boyer

    Russia: austerity and deficit reduction in historical and comparative perspective
    Vladimir Popov

    Commentary: Austerity and fraud under different structures of technology and resource abundance
    Jing Chen and James Galbraith

    No comments »
  • The Newsfakers | Patrick Cockburn

    I enjoyed this nuanced article by Patrick Cockburn about journalism, accuracy, modern media, blogging, black propaganda and the use of social media by authoritarian regimes and advanced capitalist ‘democratic’ ones too. It also reminded me of this excellent review of Net Delusion by Oliver Farry that we published a while back.

    “So technical advances have made it more difficult for governments to hide repression. But these developments have also made the work of the propagandist easier. Of course, people who run newspapers and radio and television stations are not fools. They know the dubious nature of much of the information they are conveying. The political elite in Washington and Europe was divided for and against the US invasion of Iraq, making it easier for individual journalists to dissent. But today there is an overwhelming consensus in the foreign media that the rebels are right and existing governments wrong. For institutions such as the BBC, highly unbalanced coverage becomes acceptable.

    Sadly, al-Jazeera, which has done so much to shatter state control of information in the Middle East since it was set up in 1996, has become the uncritical propaganda arm of the Libyan and Syrian rebels.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors