Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Delicious button

Skip to content

Wednesday, May 16th 2012


March 25th Evening: The Recession Diaries

Sinn Fein has produced a substantial and positive contribution to the debate on creating and saving jobs in our recessionary economy. Getting Ireland Back to Work’ contains more than 80 proposals covering a range of employment-related subjects: job retention, investing in our indigenous base, education and training, consumer spending, etc. If there’s a bit of ‘everything and the kitchen sink’ about the document, that is no bad thing. It shows that the kitchens of progressives are large and have many implements to cook up plentiful economic meals (contrast that with the small kitchens of the orthodoxy - they have only one implement: the cleaver).

I don’t intend to summarise the whole document. Rather, I will pull out, for me, highlights.

First, job retention: that they have listed this first is absolutely correct. It is cheaper to save jobs than it is to create them. Sinn Fein proposes to establish a €300 million jobs retention fund to subsidise enterprises that are struggling to retain their workforce. The subsidy would be capped at no more than €200 or 20 percent of the wage, would last six months, and would be targeted at firms that would be profitable if it weren’t for the recession. Sinn Fein estimates that this could save 90,000 jobs over a six month period. One could quibble with this but for my part, it matters not whether it costs €300 or €400 million, whether it save 90,000 or 70,000 jobs. It is still sound.

Second, credit: Sinn Fein proposes to establish a state bank, along the lines of the old Industrial Credit Corporation (amazing how all those public enterprises that were privatised or abolished are coming back into vogue), to provide credit to enterprises that are being squeezed by the credit crunch. Even if the current Government strategy to recapitalise private banks succeeds (long odds, very long odds), no one has copped on that the long-term process of deleveraging will continue to act as a drag on new credit lines. So simply short-circuit the whole thing by establishing a bank with just that remit. This would hold even if the banks were brought into public ownership.

Third, green technology: the party calls for the establishment of Eolas Glas Éireann, a new national green technology body for research, promotion and funding of green energy and environmental technologies. There is certainly a need to coordinate the various different inputs into a strategic coherence in order to achieve an epochal shift in the way we generate energy. This will be no easy process - and for my part I don’t think it can rely on market signals and tax inducements. It will need agencies working to a national, integrated agenda.

Sinn Fein spends considerable time canvassing the ground of how we can get our indigenous sector kicked into gear: ICT investment, fast-track business start-ups, Sales Ireland and Export Ireland strategies, innovation initiatives, cluster and hub supports, integration of foreign direct investment, regional strategies, etc. It is an exhaustive list with a confident grasp of details. Yet, there is a sense that, in this area, the whole is less than the sum of its parts.

For instance, the document refers positively to the Telesis Report - a controversial report commissioned by the NESC back in the 1980s:

‘ . . the 1982 Telesis Report concluded that no country had ever succeeded in achieving sustained economic growth except on the basis of native industry.’

Sinn Fein correctly identifies some of the flaws in our indigenous base (e.g. lack of scale, the trend of selling successful Irish businesses to multi-nationals) and then claims that Enterprise Ireland - the agency charged with promoting indigenous enterprises - is in ‘desperate need of an overhaul’. But I’m not sure they adequately addressed what that overhaul should be.

In any event, the failure does not lie at the agency level but rather in the lack of a strategic framework; that is, a political failure. Had they followed through on the Telesis reference, they might have updated and reworked the report’s main recommendation: that the State actively intervene in the market and support ‘winners’ - 75 to 150 indigenous companies which have the capability to build a strong export presence.

In the absence of such a framework - one capable of actively intervening with high-road companies at the sectoral level - there is a danger that mere inducements in the forms of supports and tax-breaks will not maximise our indigenous potential.

The document is on safer ground when it comes to front-loading job creation initiatives in the infrastructural field - school building, home insulation and reframing procurement procedures to allow smaller, indigenous companies to compete. These initiatives - some of which have been championed by the Labour Party - can work as vital stop-gaps while waiting for long-term job creation initiatives to come on stream.

What is really useful are some of the detailed proposals which have the capacity to catch the public eye:

  • A GI-type bill for the unemployed to support them returning to education. For Sinn Fein, this would entail waiving fees and maintaining social welfare payments. This could be extended into something much more far-ranging - including ‘living income’ provisions which would negate the need to prematurely re-enter the market before obtaining diplomas, degrees or skills.
  • A cost-of-living package which would identify the high costs of particular goods and services and create policies to lower them - a useful policy tool that could be targeted, in the first instance, at those on low incomes. For instance, in 2007 slashing Dublin Bus fares by 50% would have cost the state less than €80 million and would save a daily commuter on low wages €400 a year, equivalent to a 2 percent pay rise (my own example and calculation).
  • A once-off household debt package whereby people could roll up credit card and other accumulated debts into mortgages. For instance, a €10,000 credit card debt could be extended into a 15-year mortgage with a monthly payment of €67 per month (again, my own example and calculation).

Such proposals are not intended to address all issues in an all-encompassing way. But they can serve as provocative snapshots, inviting people to look at the full album.

This is the first of a number of documents Sinn Fein will be publishing on the economy (public finances and reports into specific areas such as farming and tourism will follow). If their subsequent policy documents can reach the same high level of in-depth analysis and considered proposals as ‘Getting Ireland Back to Work’, the debate over the economy will have been considerably strengthened.

And Sinn Fein will have done itself (and all progressives) a considerable favour.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Jer

    Mar 26th 2009 at 11:03

    What I find frustrating is that the consensus is moving so slowly towards the creation of nationalised banks, in some form, so as to avoid the dangers of having well capitalised banks that refuse to lend a la the Japanese zombie banks.

    A good bank will be able to operate commercially quickly and ensure that sound business models can continue to draw credit lines rather than liquidating, defaulting on loans, forcing more people into default on housing and of course driving down the govt.’s take of ad valorem taxes.

    Fianna Fail have said lets bail out the big bankers like Seanie and its to Sinn Fein’s credit that they are saying fine the banking system needed to be stabilised but we also need to bail out the small businesses and the consumers that are key to our economy maintaining some momentum.

    Good plan so lets get it implemented.

  2. Comment by: alec

    Mar 27th 2009 at 10:03

    I cannot see where Gilmore would have major problems withthis document, yet last weekend he ruled out working with SF. This leaves Fine Gael as his only likely partners and what is the point of a labour/Fine Gael government. We must break the right wing stranglehold and build a coalition of the left.

  3. Comment by: eldorado

    Apr 3rd 2009 at 08:04

    This is terrible document. I haven’t the time to explain why but it entirely misses the extent and scale of the crisis. But maybe to labourites it looks decent - but completely inadequate imho.

  4. Comment by: HeartofDarkness

    May 7th 2009 at 08:05

    Why do you support this anti-immigrant fascist party Sinn Fein? This is not a left organization at all. Sinn Fein wants to ship back all the immigrants

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • On ABC Radio National, PM program: ‘Stupendously idiotic’ policies for Greece can’t work.

    Good answers….

    MARK COLVIN: Well it’s being imposed effectively from Germany, isn’t it? What are the chances that Germany is going to have any patience with a Greece which has failed to form a coalition, which is going into uncharted territories, as you say, with a new election?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: It’s like asking the question, what kind of patience am I going to have with gravity? It doesn’t matter.

    (sound of Mark Colvin laughing)

    Gravity is a law of nature and I cannot do anything about it. Similarly, Germany at some point, and I think that that point has already come, Germany will realise that it is absolutely impossible to, for a country like Greece, or for Spain for the matter, to exit this debt deflationary spiral, through cutting. This cannot be done even if every single Greek and Spaniard and Italian wants to do it.

    Even if God, his angels and, you know, every good man and woman on this planet wanted to implement this German prescription on the European periphery, it cannot be done for the same reasons why I can’t fly without an aeroplane.

    MARK COLVIN: So what’s the alternative? Where’s the money going to come from for pump priming?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: Well, I don’t think we should have pump priming. What I think we should have in Europe is a little modicum, tiny whiff of rationality.

    No comments »
  • Video: David Graeber and David Harvey in Conversation

    David Graeber and David Harvey discuss their new books, Debt: The First 5000 Years, and Rebel Cities, respectively.

    25 April 2012 at The CUNY Graduate Center

    No comments »
  • Choonara, McNally and the US rate of profit | Michael Roberts

    As readers of my blog will know, ad nauseum

    Oh go on then, say it again, once more with feeling….

    I think there has been a secular downtrend visible in the US rate of profit, but there is also a profit cycle in the US capitalist economy that lasts from trough to trough about 32-36 years.  I reckon that the last peak year of 1997 set the marker for the end of the ‘neoliberal’ up phase from 1982.  The down phase then began to exert pressure on the US capitalist economy.  It forced an even bigger switch from productive investment in manufacturing, transport and communications into financial and property sectors to maintain profits through the expansion of what Marx called fictitious capital, or credit.  That laid the basis for the crisis in 2007 and the ensuing major slump.  In that sense, Marx’s law of profitability did operate to cause the crisis.  The great up phase in profitability after 1982 had finished in 1997, some ten years before the Great Recession.  We are still in the down phase, which will last for at least another three to seven years, on my reckoning, in what is really a long depression like the 1880-90s in the US and the UK.

    But remember the data for these arguments are for the US only.

    No comments »
  • Owen Jones: This austerity backlash across Europe could transform Britain

    But, along with the booting out of France’s Nicolas Sarkozy, the Greek elections could mark the beginning of the end for Europe’s Shock Doctrine. “This is a message of change, a message to Europe that a peaceful revolution has begun,” declared Alexis Tsipras, the leader of radical left coalition Syriza, which trebled its seats in Parliament and came second. Given the failure of any party to form a government, new elections beckon, and Syriza can expect to do even better. But, already, the results have boosted the confidence of all those taking on the austerity offensive across Europe. In the Netherlands, the anti-austerity Socialist Party looks set to stage a breakthrough in the upcoming elections. Those calling for a “No” in the upcoming Irish referendum on the EU Treaty - slammed as an “Austerity Treaty” by opponents - feel momentum is on their side, too. “The people of France, the people of Greece are against the policies of austerity and it is now the moment for Ireland to add our voice to that,” declared Mary Lou McDonald, a leading anti-Treaty politician.

    No comments »
  • UK’s poorest families face tightest squeeze on income, figures show

    Austerity and class war in the UK

    The UK’s poorest families are facing the tightest income squeeze of any group due to higher rates of inflation and lower wage boosts, according to new analysis of official figures conducted by the Trades Union Conference (TUC).

    The bottom 10% of the country by income are facing effective inflation rates of 4.1% versus just 3.3% for the richest, while official Office for National Statistics (ONS) statistics from 2011 show the wages of the bottom 10% of earners rose just 0.7% compared with increases of 1.6% for the richest.

    Taken together, the two measures suggest real wages for low-income families in Britain are falling twice as fast as those of their richer counterparts. In real terms, the bottom 10% of wage earners are 3.4% poorer than they were a year before versus a 1.7% drop for the top 10% year-on-year.

    Some stuff on how the effective inflation rate for the UK is calculated:

    The UK’s official measure of inflation, the CPI, stands at 3.5% and is calculated by measuring changes in prices of thousands of items from different categories: food, utility bills, recreation and more.

    New research by the TUC has re-calculated this figure from 2010 to February 2012 using data showing how each group spends its money. Families in the bottom 10% spend a much higher proportion of their income on food and household costs such as utility bills than the richest 10%, and owing to lower levels of spending do not benefit nearly so much from smaller increases in recreation, clothing, restaurants and other leisure activities caused by the stagnant economy.

    No comments »
  • The Art of War | Frieze

    The Benjamin of Battles, the flâneur of warfare.

    The attack conducted by units of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) on the city of Nablus in April 2002 was described by its commander, Brigadier-General Aviv Kokhavi, as ‘inverse geometry’, which he explained as ‘the reorganization of the urban syntax by means of a series of micro-tactical actions’.1 During the battle soldiers moved within the city across hundreds of metres of ‘overground tunnels’ carved out through a dense and contiguous urban structure. Although several thousand soldiers and Palestinian guerrillas were manoeuvring simultaneously in the city, they were so ‘saturated’ into the urban fabric that very few would have been visible from the air. Furthermore, they used none of the city’s streets, roads, alleys or courtyards, or any of the external doors, internal stairwells and windows, but moved horizontally through walls and vertically through holes blasted in ceilings and floors. This form of movement, described by the military as ‘infestation’, seeks to redefine inside as outside, and domestic interiors as thoroughfares. The IDF’s strategy of ‘walking through walls’ involves a conception of the city as not just the site but also the very medium of warfare – a flexible, almost liquid medium that is forever contingent and in flux.

    No comments »
  • Treaty not a safe option but a perilous experiment | Terrence McDonough

    “There will be no disaster in the event of the need for a second bailout. It is the adoption of the budget provisions of the treaty which is a risky and perilous experiment”, says  NUIG professor of economics Terrence McDonough.

    He points out that alternative funding options will be available if Ireland votes no, while voting yes, rather than being the safe, conservative course ensuring ‘stability’ as those advocating a yes vote in the Fiscal Compact Treaty Referendum say, will lead to unprecedented situation which could lead to economic disaster.

    “Take a country at the bottom of a depression. Force it to run budget cuts and tax increases year after year after year. Force this same policy on its neighbours and trading partners. Run this into the foreseeable future and hope it results in stability, confidence and recovery. This is emphatically not the safe option. This is a dangerous experiment, completely without historical precedent.”

    No comments »
  • The “Stability Treaty” Video | A CounterSpin Collective Remix

    A CounterSpin Collective remix of the Irish Government’s information video on the upcoming referendum on the so called “Stability Treaty”. We reject the idea that any copyright laws apply to government propaganda or other publication paid for exclusively by people’s taxes. This applies to works of fiction like the original video.

    Via Soundmigration

    No comments »
  • It’s a No vote until Ireland starts to support the development of the indigenous sector

    Commenter on the Irish Times website, leaves this below the article where Barry O’Leary, chief executive of IDA Ireland calls for a yes vote in the Austerity Treaty. I’m including it here because he makes an essential point about what is wrong with industrial policy in Ireland.

    Barry,
    you are a State Appointed executive on a comfortable salary with possibly a decent pension. You are NOT like other men (quote from the Pharisee and the Publican).

    You have come trotting out to tell us mere mortals that your future is best served by being pro Treaty.

    I work for a brilliant Irish company that is in wonderful growth for the past 3 years in the midst of the deepest downturn and your kind (Enterprise Ireland) allowed us to be taken over by a foreign multinational. We had a market leading product set designed here at home and you allowed the cream of Irish invention fall into foreign ownership. We are profitable and still growing (from 230 to 600). This could have been a model of how Irish design and technology can succeed. Yes the Irish owners needed out but there could have been a way of keeping the profits generated in Ireland. Ours was a situation where the GNP and the GDP converged as there was no profit repatriation…… .THERE IS NOW……… clowns running the show again.

    Your kind of leadership is NOT PATRIOTIC when you let things like that happen. You represent the Inferiority Complex of the Irish State in one aspect.

    Please trot off back into your leather boardroom chair and plan your next trip to Venice, and let the rest of us get on with reviving this country’s self respect. Europe will just have to know that we were once a very brave people who could put our country first against great odds…. Now we have your cabal of well paid public Quango drivers “educating us”……. that is REALLY how far we have fallen……..
    NOT ME, NO FURTHER. and NO FISCAL COMPACT.

    No comments »
  • Without state spending there’d be no Google or GlaxoSmithKline | Mariana Mazzucato

    Where would Google be today without the state-funded investments in the internet, and without the US National Science Foundation (NSF) grant that funded the discovery of its own algorithm? Would the iPad be so successful without the state-funded innovations in communication technologies, GPS and touch-screen display? Where would GSK and Pfizer be without the $600bn the US National Institutes of Health has put into research that has led to 75% of the most innovative new drugs in the last decade?
    The state’s role in each of these cases was not just about correcting “market failures”. What the state did was to take on the greatest risk, before the private sector dared to enter - acting as an “entrepreneurial” state. In biotech, venture capital entered 15 years after the state invested in the biotech knowledge base. In nanotech, scientists in the NSF coined the term before business understood its potential returns.

    Even modern-day Keynesians have not recognised this enough. The state is not only important to kickstart the economy during recessions through fiscal stimulus, but also to lead the way during boom periods that coincide with the beginning of new technological and market opportunities. In such periods, the private sector waits for the state to first make the heavy and risky investments. Indeed, Keynes himself indirectly recognised this in a letter to Roosevelt in 1927 when he described business as “domesticated animals” that needed the state to become lions.

    However, typically state investment rarely sees any return on this - certainly nothing close to what those who put money in later on in the process get.

    To end this parasitic situation, it is important to think creatively how the returns from state investments can be retained to benefit the public that has funded them, and be reinvested in the next round to generate more. This could include “income contingent loans”, where state investments in particular companies and technologies reap a return if/when the companies make it big. Or also in the form of a public investment bank or fund, which retains equity in such investments. The Brazilian development bank (BNDES), which provides long-term “patient” finance to Brazilian industry - a key source of its success today - makes a 20% return on equity from its direct investments in high-growth sectors like biotech and renewables. A large percentage of this return is redistributed into the economy by the treasury. And one of the sources of Germany’s “competitive” position in Europe is due to its system of public investment banks that creates a virtuous circle of investment in the regions. Invest, reap a return, and reinvest.

    1 comment »

Link Archives »

Authors