Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010

How To Be A Far Left Polemicist

Author: ejh of A Few Words Before We Go

Published: June 17th, 2009

Section: Articles, Satire

Discussion: 14 comments ↓

Possibly Related: , ,

One of the most encouraging signs in these days of a fractious, fractured Left is the success of a small number of websites devoted to fraternal discussion among socialists. These include Dave’s Part, Socialist Unity, and Liam MacUaid’s web page as well as at least one fan site.

This could surely be a momentous moment for the Left. So in the spirit of the new but guided by the wisdom of the old, let ILR provide you with eleven theses as guidelines for those of you - those many of you - considering taking up the historical torch. Don’t let it be Year Zero when you begin. Learn from the very best our class has been able to produce.

  • 1. The purpose of polemic is political clarification. This means exposing the bankrupt politics of your opponents. Your opponents are the people who sound a lot like you but are in fact completely different. Stress these differences. Always. And then a bit more.

  • 2. Your most important ideological tool is the concept of hegemony. This means “although my opponents are not only wrong in every way but also treacherous and morally repugnant, they have more supporters than I do”. It is crucial to realise and explain - always - that your opponents are the main reason why your own ideas are not more widely accepted.
  • 3. Always see things from the perspective of the international working-class. The perspective of the international working-class is - regardless of superficial appearances - the same perspective as your own.
  • 4. Observe that your opponents are incapable of fulfilling this role, being students and members of the middle class. It should not trouble you that attacking them on this basis may appear - but only appear - to be endangering yourself. Your politics are working-class, and theirs are not.
  • 5. Your contributors are important to you. They possess an enormous range of knowledge and experience - especially about one another. Collectively they possess an enormous quantity of knowledge. Indeed, many of them, individually, know almost everything there is to be known.
  • 6. Because you represent the most advanced section of the international working-class, you have a great, indeed historical, responsibility. This responsibility is the responsibility to be always in the right. This must be your guide. To ever admit that you are in the wrong would weaken your political authority among the working-class. Fortunately, you are never in the wrong, because you have a correct political analysis.
  • 7. Your opponents are dogmatic and sectarian, unless they are not, in which case they are opportunists. Accuse them of creating illusions in whatever it is they are creating illusions in.
  • 8. Moreover, being anti-working class, your opponents always act dishonestly, in bad faith and with a hidden agenda. You must be sure to expose that agenda in your replies to them. Any point they make on any subject will be accompanied by their silence about another. Always refer to something they are not talking about and ask them why they are not talking about that instead. Find their silence very revealing.
  • 9. What people say is less important than what they imply. What they imply is what the correct political analysis leads you to decide that they imply. Don’t take their account as to what they are saying: tell them what they are saying. Be abusive if necessary. You have been provoked.
  • 10. Welcome the new audience for socialism and always remember what they find of interest. What they find of interest is minutae, because they are interested in political clarification and to that end the smallest details are important. Do not neglect the political ferment inside Skegness SWP, a council byelection in Oxford or what was on the front of Socialist Worker in 1969. This should fascinate a younger audience who missed the discussion the first time around (or the first two hundred). Nothing can do more to encourage new people to join the left than to see far leftists screaming at one another: they will surely understand that we need to achieve political clarification before we can really achieve anything. And political clarification, like tomorrow, never comes.
  • 11. Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways. The point is to shout at it.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Wally

    Jun 17th 2009 at 14:06

    And if you can’t convince ‘em confuse ‘em. They’re all wrong except me. As the good book says, Lord make me proud of my humility. Or as Rev. Dr. Ian Paisley said about loving one’s enemies: I have hated God’s enemies with a righteous hate.

  2. Comment by: Obnoxio The Clown

    Jun 17th 2009 at 14:06

    “It is crucial to realise and explain - always - that your opponents are the main reason why your own ideas are not more widely expected.”

    I assume you mean “accepted”. I find your silence on the importance of accuracy very revealing. :o)

  3. Comment by: modernityblog

    Jun 17th 2009 at 14:06

    Very funny, and you might think that the students, ex-students, lecturers and assorted academics which comprise a large chunk of the Left would know better than to argue in bad faith or assume everyone else is, but no.

    Probably explains why, in parts, the British Left are not too good at connecting with real peoples’ existences?

  4. Comment by: Andrew Coates

    Jun 17th 2009 at 15:06

    This vile and disgisting so-called ‘parody’ (more like imperialists on parade) will get a new footnote on this:

    http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2009/04/23/the-spirit-of-factions-and-sects-2/

  5. Comment by: WorldbyStorm

    Jun 17th 2009 at 16:06

    I feel strangely… betrayed… ;)

  6. Comment by: ejh

    Jun 17th 2009 at 16:06

    Obnoxio — thanks for that. I’m sure I used to do that sort of thing a lot less before I entered middle age.

    I also used to be (re: Andrew’s link) a little better at reading small type…

  7. Comment by: Darren

    Jun 17th 2009 at 18:06

    #4 screams you know who.

  8. Comment by: ejh

    Jun 17th 2009 at 20:06

    #4 screams a lot of people, Darren.

  9. Comment by: Mick the Lecturer

    Jun 17th 2009 at 21:06

    Lecturers have a hard enough life. Where do these ‘real people’ live?

  10. Comment by: Liam

    Jun 17th 2009 at 22:06

    er, I think you are mixing up the people who leave comments with the humble scribes who give them somewhere to express themselves.

  11. Comment by: ejh

    Jun 18th 2009 at 06:06

    Somtimes, Liam, sometimes not. But as I always say about the Harry’s Place comments boxes, it can be worth asking oneself why these sort of people choose a given place to come.

  12. Comment by: Andrew Coates

    Jun 20th 2009 at 12:06

    All these faults are all too true. Unless one is a member of the newly formed, Harry Pottter Tendancy!

    http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/harry-potter-politics-and-iran/

  13. Comment by: D_D

    Jun 22nd 2009 at 14:06

    ‘A Few Words Before We Go’ uses a few words like ’socialism’, and ‘working class’, which we have not heard from this ‘alliance’ before. This is a new and welcome departure but it still remains to be seen if the PWS which controls this Popular Front has really abandoned electoralism and opportunism and their pursuit of the middle class vote. However, this is not quite a momentus moment for the left as the objective conditions have not yet arrived.

  14. Comment by: rootless_e

    Jul 27th 2010 at 15:07

    An attempt at translating this into American

    here

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Jun 20th 2009

    ‘How to be a far left polemicist’ « Frank Owen’s Paintbrush

  2. Jun 23rd 2009

    Rules for Agitators. « Tendance Coatesy

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »

  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »

  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »

  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »

  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »

  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »

  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »

  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »

  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »

  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »