Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 9th 2012


Call Centre Workers in Northern Ireland, Stream and Invest NI

The news that between 450 and 600 jobs are to go in Derry at call centres operated by US-owned outsourcing firm Stream has come as another blow to the economy of Northern Ireland. According to the local press, Stream’s decision to cut back on its Derry operation stems from the loss of an important Post Office contract to rival firm Convergys. Stream Northern Ireland’s Managing Director Jeff Jennings told the BBC that these are “tough times for the call centre sector”. The illusion is maintained that in the cut and thrust of the open market Stream had no choice but to “shed” jobs in Derry.

According to the Derry Journal, Stream International have received £2.32 million worth of Invest NI assistance since 2000, including £1.2 million in taxpayer’s money which was paid to the company for several projects, including a number of job creation programmes.

The most recent payment was a £60,000 award in 2007 £32,000 of which was used to hire a “Business Improvement Agent”, who by all accounts saved Stream £1 million.

In the light of Stream International’s recent decisions Alastair Hamilton, Chief Executive of the neo-liberal quango, Invest NI, confirmed to SDLP leader Mark Durkan, that Stream was in a position to apply to the EU-funded Short-term Aid Scheme which, according to Durkan, “can assist a small number of core staff to be retained by companies facing severe short-term difficulties, as a bridge out of those”. (Incidentally, Hamilton’s predecessor as Chief Executive at Invest NI earned £160,000 in 2008.)

Should Stream International fail to hold to its promises of job creation, Invest NI is in a position to claw back some of the public money that has been thrown at the company but according to the quango this option is not yet on the table.

Call Centres in Northern Ireland

In the UK an estimated 750,000 people work in call centres and over 17,000 workers are employed in the sector in Northern Ireland constituting 2 per cent of the population.
http://www.callcenterscript.com/uploads/Call-center-comic-thumb.JPG

Call centres are notoriously exploitative and authoritarian working environments. Research has shown that call centre work is more stressful than work in other fields. In early 2001, the TUC set up a short-term hotline for call centre workers. Among the 500 staff who called many spoke about bullying, long hours, impossible sales targets and general job dissatisfaction. The calls documented employers in the industry using various techniques to drive up the exploitation of staff. Some call centre workers are forced to work under constant surveillance. Workers also complained of suffering from “acoustic shock” (damage to hearing caused by sudden loud noises during calls) that had left them suffering from depression and other health problems. The most stressful aspect of the job is on the caller operator’s emotions. Workers are required to remain constantly pleasant and attentive callers while under intense pressure to meet sales targets within strict time limits. Only Union activism has tempered exploitation and even humiliation by management in Call Centres. One Union activist in England tells of how in one company sales and service mangers and team leaders came up with “this wonderful idea of making dunce’s hats for sales and service advisers which they were forced to wear if they did not make a sale within an hour’s period.”  Pressure on the part of the Union ensured that the hats were gone within 24 hours.

In relation to salaries, conditions in Northern Ireland call centres are the worst in the UK. Northern Ireland call centre workers receive salaries over 26 per cent below the overall average. Wages in call centres in Northern Ireland are 15 per cent lower than Wales, 14 per cent lower than Scotland and 13 per cent lower than the lowest English region. Even the East Midlands, England’s lowest paid region, has salary levels more than 14% higher than Northern Ireland’s. According to International recruitment firm Beeswax, the average salary paid to an entry-level customer service agent in Belfast, for example, is £13,000 per annum, while a team leader would expect £19,000. In 2008 R. Scott Murray, CEO of Stream International earned $418,923.00 (£253,000), including bonuses and other compensation.

Stream International (Again)

While Mark Durkan may believe that Stream is “facing severe short-term difficulties” and Stream NI’s Jeff Jennings bemoans the current state of the sector, Stream’s US-based headquarters is much more upbeat about the business. In mid August Stream Global Services, Inc., and EGS Corp., the indirect parent company of eTelecare Global Solutions, jointly announced that they have combined. The deal will be completed later this year. As a result of this combination, Stream Global Services expects to generate revenues approaching $1 billion for the year ending December 31, 2010 and maintain financial sponsorship from a group of equity and hedge funds - institutions that collectively manage over $50 billion in investments.

Call Centre Jobs - the Way Forward?

Beyond crucial questions of terms and conditions of work, there is the broader question of whether the setting up of call centres should be touted as a model of economic development, here and around the world.

According to the Communist Party of the Philippines, call centres “cannot help develop the economy, and in fact worsen … imperialist exploitation … , mainly through the exploitation of cheap labor. They thwart genuine economic progress founded on the development of the country’s basic industries. Just like the massive exodus of migrant workers to other countries, rising employment in call centres merely obscures a backward economy, the lack of genuine national industrialization and widespread unemployment in the country.”

Although the issues here are somewhat different to those of a third world country like the Philippines, we also have to ask whether call centres should be encouraged to set up here by quangos such as Invest NI, which are in the business of giving tax payers’ money to fantastically rich multinationals.

Justin O’Hagan is a a member of the Workers’ Party’s Ard Comhairle and Northern Regional Executive

Photo of a Newry Call Centre courtesy of the BBC

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Terence Whelan

    Mar 9th 2010 at 19:03

    I currently work in one of these call centres and have done so for two years now. The stress of dealing with difficult customers is a hard thing to control but what gets to me is the treatment of staff by the employers. Unrealistic expectations and extra pressure are loaded on staff and being polite & solving the issues is never enough. The support agent is at the cold front and should be supported well in their job. Support agents are expected to subject customers to a barrage of questions and extract every detail possible from them before they can even ask a question!!.
    But the worst element by far is the ‘Feedback’ sessions’ , here is where any illusions you had about your proficiency are torn to shreds. The criteria by which the calls and emails are judged are ridiculous and often times demoralising. The criteria for the call\email scoring is changed on a regular basis causing stress and confusion for the support agents. It seems like there are a group of people who in order to justify their jobs have to constantly chop & change the rules. These rules are often extremely unrealistic and despite the customer being very satisfied and having given them the right answer you can still fail the call\email!!. Non compliance with these silly rules could see you singled out and possibly layed off. There was also a recent case where an employee almost lost their job based on a complaint from a customer when there wasn’t even a recording of the call to verify what was said!!.
    All this and the fact that the company have used the recession as an excuse to skip a pay review in 2009 makes staying on very hard. Given that the wages are so meagre in the first place this was doubly insulting. Were it not for the fact that work is so scarce I’d be out the door in the morning. The work contract also states that they don’t recognise unions. It’s like they never want you getting too ahead of yourself. For the sake of my mental and physical health I might have to leave soon enough.

  2. Comment by: Justin

    Mar 11th 2010 at 17:03

    Thanks for sharing this Terence. Your description of your working environment makes it easy for me to understand why you might have to leave.

    Your contract may say that the company doesn’t recognise unions but there is a mechanism which forces them to do so.

    According to the statutory trade union recognition provisions of the Employment Relations Act 1999. where a union claim for recognition for collective bargaining purposes cannot be resolved bilaterally with the employer concerned, the union may refer the matter to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) for determination.

    The CAC is a statutory body organised on a “tripartite” basis with a chair (and a number of deputy chairs who are academics or lawyers, and two groups of members with experience as employer or worker representatives respectively. The role of the CAC is to declare whether the union should be recognised on the basis that a majority of the workers concerned are members of the union or that a (qualified) majority support recognition in a ballot.

    In other words, if a majority of the workers in a workplace become members of a union, the CAC may force the owners to recognise Unions. And, of course, unionised workers tend to gain better pay and conditions.

    The Communication Workers Union has some information on Call Centres on its website at
    http://www.cwu.org/11875/call-centres.html, includuing occupational health risks associated with the job.

    And the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) has a charter for Call Centre workers’ rights at http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/resources/call-centre-charter/

    Best wishes to you.

  3. Comment by: John Malone

    Aug 10th 2011 at 22:08

    I work in a call center. Everthing is as the previous comment. We are also expected to pull in x number of £ per day even when the calls we get the customers do not have outstanding ballances, This makes no difference to the employer, if you do not get x nomber of £ per day then you will have no job!!

  4. Comment by: Justin

    Aug 22nd 2011 at 16:08

    Hi John,

    I know from experience that is very hard to organise in a demoralised, exhausting, regimented and relatively low-paid work-place. I can imagine that this is especially true when pay is related to performance and they threaten you with the dole if you don’t meet their targets.

    And yet, apart, perhaps, from sabotage, humour and subversion, the only positive response is to organise. As a political person - a member of the Workers’ Party - I think that the left needs to do more to analyse and agitate on work-place issues which directly affect the lives of workers by day and may keep them lying awake worrying at night.But the key point is that for the sake of their sanity and their rights, workers need to organise in their places of work.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

    I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

    We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

    Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

    We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

    No comments »
  • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

    Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

    No comments »
  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors