Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Friday, Feb 3rd 2012


An historic defeat for Fianna Fáil, an historic victory for Fine Gael… but what of Labour?

There’s a certain notion in the air that an election is near inevitable now. And, in one sense hasn’t that always been the case. But, it is correct that the chances of an election this year are better now than they have been. So, with that in mind what are the rumours swirling about out there and what possibilities can we extrapolate from them? Granted none of this is scientific. All is hearsay, but, let’s consider this exercise as a thought-experiment and perhaps in the days and months to come we will have the opportunity to see how closely it aligns or diverges with reality. Also it raises some of the issues that will be central to government formation in the relatively near future.

Recently a colleague was talking to a member of the parliamentary Labour Party and was surprised to hear the belief expressed that the Labour Party had peaked too early in the current crisis. Indeed the idea was raised that Fine Gael might well be now in such a commanding lead that there was a distinct fear amongst some in the Labour Party that it would be in a position to more or less ‘go it alone’. This last term wasn’t defined in any detail and obviously could cover a multitude. Perhaps a Fine Gael so large in terms of numbers returned to the Dáil that it could ignore whatever representation the Labour Party returns. Or perhaps in a slightly less dramatic context an Fine Gael that needs only a small number of Labour Party TDs, and/or others to make up numbers.

I’ll return to that latter scenario in a moment. But there are some curious straws in the wind. Not least a piece by Stephen Collins recently which argues something not entirely dissimilar. Now, when I hear that sort of rumour from the LP and read an accompanying piece by the redoubtable Collins alarm bells tend to go off in my mind, for one wonders whose benefit this concept is being put into the public sphere for. But, even so, we are currently in a vacuum between serious polling data. As of yet we have no sense of the shape of the political landscape we are about to enter this late Summer and Autumn.

So, what does Collins say? Well, he’s far from coy about raising the possibility, as his headline puts it that a Sudden election could spell political meltdown for FF”

And his reasoning goes something like this.

“Following the drubbing which both parties received in the local and European elections last June, the assumption in Fianna Fáil is that the party will almost certainly lose power and a significant number of seats.

However, the scale of the electoral disaster facing the party is still not widely appreciated within Fianna Fáil or even outside it. The common assumption is that it will drop from the 78 seats it won in the last election to somewhere around 60, or a even a bit lower on a very bad day. In fact, the odds are that the outcome will be far, far worse than that.”

He continues:

“Everything hinges on whether the Fianna Fáil share of the vote is in the high 20 per cent range or down closer to 20 per cent. The difference between the two positions amounts to 30 seats, or even more. An outcome at the higher end would represent defeat, but one from which a recovery could be planned; if it was to be at the lower end, the rout would transform the nature of Irish politics.

In June, Fianna Fáil won 25.45 per cent in the local elections and 24 per cent in the European elections. If the party slipped a couple of percentage points lower in a general election it would be in a disaster zone, facing an electoral wipe-out. On the other hand, if it gained two or three points it would be back in respectable territory.”

Which is to say that it could go either way. But, he has a point. He maps this to the Fine Gael record.

“One of the anomalies of our electoral system is that a shift of a few percentage points in the 20 per cent range makes a huge difference to the result. This comes about because our system of proportional representation (PR) is tied in with a mix of three-, four- and five-seat constituencies.

On a national average, with 27 per cent or so of the vote, a party will win one seat in every three-seat constituency, one in every four-seater and two in some five-seaters where the party exceeds its national average. This is because a quota in a three-seater is 25 per cent, it is 20 per cent in a four-seater and 16.6 per cent in a five-seater.

On the other hand, if the national share of the vote slips to around 22 per cent, a party will win one seat in many but not all three-seaters, one in most four-seaters and just one in every five-seater.

A classic illustration of the effect is provided by the recent electoral performance of Fine Gael. In 1997 the party won 28 per cent of the vote and 54 seats. Five years later its vote share dropped to 22.5 per cent and the party lost almost half its Dáil seats, ending up with just 31. In 2007 it was back up to 27 per cent and 51 seats.”

And he posits that if there is a further attrition of the Fianna Fáil vote then from the June percentage that would return about half its current Dáil representation. Let’s remember that currently it has 75 TDs (with one byelection yet to be held). So, to be charitable we could say that Collins is looking at a level between 35 to 45 Fianna Fáil TDs. This would, it hardly requires saying, be unprecedented in the history of that party.

And as an additional snippet, consider this from Deaglán de Bréadún also of the Irish Times on his blog where he notes that…

“More narrowly, I discussed the likely outcome of the next election with two FF backbenchers who have been through many a battle. “Where we have two seats, we’ll come back with one; where we have three, we’ll come back with two.”

Startling in its honesty an starkness. Another interesting comment, concerning the state of things in Teach Laighean: “When this place gets into a wobble, it hardly ever gets out of it.”

That’s a fascinating thought, and not I would think beyond the bounds of possibility. Indeed if one goes through the constituencies, an exercise which I have done, and makes a crude tally one will discover that if these nameless backbenchers are correct then Fianna Fáil could expect to return a cohort of TDs somewhere in the 40s.

A word of caution. Who knows how this is all being spun. We haven’t had a poll in months, although some party polling is being conducted. There are good reasons why - for example - both Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil might wish this sort of message to get out at this point. Fine Gael would see it as assisting their project to achieve dominance as the major opposition party, Fianna Fáil could well be happy sowing mischief between the two potential coalition partners.

And this is, obviously, back of an envelope stuff and subject to local and national issues in the run up and on the day of any possible election. But… if we burrow into individual constituencies there seems to be some justification for the numbers, or more usefully, the broad bands within which parties will return numbers of TDs… 30s, 40s and 50s. For example, does it seem likely that in Mayo that Fianna Fáil will retain two seats? Which begs the question will their famously formerly Independent Fianna Fáil member rue the day she returned to the fold? And what then of, say, Clare, where Timmy Dooley and Tony Killeen must be wondering if James Breen, also once of that parish, might be in line to retain the seat he lost as an Independent in 2007. And even the big hitters would make you wonder. How is Dublin Mid West going to pan out, even if John Curran is sitting on a massive pile of first transfers. I’d say he’ll keep his seat, but I wouldn’t think that the Mary Harney seat will transfer to Fianna Fáil. Or Dublin Central? Bertie Ahern is about to pass into parliamentary history. It seems unlikely that Cyprian Brady will be the man, given his first preference vote last time out, to retain the residual aura of the Ahern machine. One FF seat in what was once one of their greatest redoubts.

But given the antipathy to Fianna Fáil it is more than possible that the kicking the Green Party was given at the local elections will be but a precursor of a dismal showing for Fianna Fáil at the next General.

And these figures tally, albeit less optimistically for Fianna Fáil, with an analysis made by Shane Coleman and Conor McMurrow in the Sunday Tribune earlier in the Summer where they predicted Fianna Fáil would only hold 52 seats. Somewhere in the 40s, somewhere in the early 50s? Only FF TDs will have any particular concerns about the divergence between the two projections. But if Fianna Fáil does dip into the 40s then they’re in awful trouble (in truth, if they dip below 65 they’re in desperate trouble).

Now, I have to admit, when I originally read those projections I was a bit dubious. But I’m much less so now. I think the next election will be disastrous for Fianna Fáil, not necessarily Canadian Conservative style disastrous, but pretty bleak all the same. Although, it is true that Coleman and McMurrow were willing to offer a small degree of hope for FF

“However, if it is still in place come Christmas, then there is every reason to believe the coalition will then last until 2012.

That could mean no general election for three years - an eternity in politics and, perhaps more significantly, a long, long time in economics. Certainly, really tough times lie ahead - unemployment is going to continue to rise for some time and our national debt will continue to soar. But in three years’ time, the global economy should have recovered and it is very possible that people here will be able to feel an improvement on the ground. If that is the case, Fianna Fáil probably won’t be at 25% in the opinion polls.”

I think the first part of that is very possible, but I think that it is likely that that will merely delay Fianna Fáil’s appointment with a profoundly ungrateful electorate just waiting for a chance to put the boot in.

But while contemplating the collapse, or near collapse, of Fianna Fáil is highly entertaining as a sort of political blood sport the left should have bigger fish to fry. And in that context it is necessary to try to determine how we could expect matters to pan out for Fine Gael. Because that will give an hint as to the sort of ground left for Labour and beyond it the left.

The Coleman/McMurrow piece suggested that Fine Gael would gain 69 seats with Labour on 30. It also suggested that between SF, the SP and various other left and further left formations there might be 10 or so seats. Beyond that there would also be a number of independents including Noel Grealish, formerly of the PDs amounting to about 7 in total. It is possible that of that group of Independents two will be of the left. I’m very suspicious of those numbers, particularly at the lower end of the scale. Far too much would depend on events on the ground (albeit the election of Maureen O’Sullivan and George Lee suggests that the antagonism to Fianna Fáil is deep-rooted and can result in voting mobilisations that are positive for all others). But, let’s for the sake of this exercise posit that the category of ‘Others’ will be above 10.

However, if Fianna Fáil is beaten down to the 40s then would presumably result in an increase in numbers for Fine Gael pushing them past the psychologically important 70 mark and their best previous result of 70 in the 24th Dáil in 1982. The magic figure is, of course, the mid-80s in order to achieve a majority in the Dáil, a dream beyond the capacity of Fine Gael, even at this juncture. If it is correct that Labour has peaked then there might be another four or five seats going begging. Would they go to Fine Gael? It is impossible to say. But it does seem to me that Fine Gael has, whether through a process of simple default, assumed a commanding position as the alternative pole for those seeking a replacement to Fianna Fáil.

If this were even close to the result and it obviously comes with huge caveats, in relation to Labour that would leave Fine Gael in an excellent position. A Labour Party with a Dáil representation lower than 30 will - from the perspective of FG - be a much more manageable formation than the alternative. And it would also allow for considerably greater stability for a potential coalition than a Fine Gael dependent upon whatever remains of the Green Party and the formerly PD and other Independents (indeed the history of the current coalition may well make future governments considerably more leery about incorporating Independents).

And what of the Labour Party? I think Collins is correct in so far as their vote appears softer than some of the poll results earlier in the year indicated. And that would seem to align with the idea that they peaked early. The Summer hasn’t helped with this process and Gilmore has appeared to drift somewhat out of public view. Fine Gael is making the running in relation to NAMA and other issues. That the public pronouncements they make are arguably contradictory and muddled is of less relevance than that they are afforded a degree of legitimation by the media.

Which leads us inexorably to the question as to what Labour would do if this, or some approximation of same, is the result and the further question which is what should Labour do?

In doing so I am not dismissing the further left, whose possible future under these projections is the work of another day. The reality is that at this moment there is no chance that Fine Gael will deal with Sinn Féin, although I have heard some who might know of such matters argue that if push came to shove the Labour Party might enter coalition with a profoundly weakened Fianna Fáil. In part this would be because Labour could then maximise their influence on the government through Ministers, or perhaps even the legendary rotating Taoiseach. Ironically, though, the numbers could predicate against it. A Labour Party on 30 or less, and a Fianna Fáil on 50 or less would still require at least one additional partner to do business. Sinn Féin? Perhaps. Perhaps not. All other formations appear profoundly suspicious or antipathetic if not outrightly hostile to coalition and therefore are unlikely to be swayed by the blandishments of larger parties, even were such parties willing to try to convince them to participate.

But try as a I might I cannot see any circumstance in which the Labour Party would eschew participation in a Fine Gael led coalition. Having been out of office since 1997 the calls for them to be ‘relevant’ would be, I would hazard, overwhelming. Indeed it is only if the Labour Party were to return a larger cohort of TDs would there be any chance that they might be swayed otherwise or push towards the sort of alliances that would even slightly refashion the Irish political system.

That being the case the influence of the Labour party, such as it is, on shaping even the mildest of centre left policy approaches on the next government appears to be limited. Indeed I would argue that it may be no exaggeration to propose that they will fulfill a function not dissimilar to that of the Green Party in the current administration, crucial to government formation and longevity, but locked due to numbers into a subordinate role.

It’s not a happy thought, even for those who hold only a residual hope that the Labour Party as an entity, however much one acknowledges the sincerity and energy of its membership, will significantly progress the situation for the left. And perhaps the central question, and this is one that must also be addressed to the further left - another days work, is what the function of the Labour Party in the next Dáil, not to mention the broader society, should be?

Okay. Exercise over. Thought experiment concluded. The numbers will, almost certainly, diverge from those proposed by the wise heads quoted above. But that central question remains.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

This article is, however, being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Sep 1st 2009

  2. Sep 3rd 2009

  3. Jan 12th 2010

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »
  • Is Ireland really the role model for austerity? | Stephen Kinsella | Cambridge Journal of Economics

    Abstract
    This paper describes the causes and consequences of Ireland’s economic crisis in the context of the policy solution implemented to contain that crisis: protracted fiscal austerity. I describe the causes of the recent crisis in Ireland and look at the logic of austerity with a simple model. I compare the current crisis to the crisis of the 1980s, when fiscal austerity was touted as the trigger for the Celtic Tiger. I discuss the measures implemented to date in the current crisis, tracing their effects on sectors of Ireland’s macroeconomy. I show that Ireland is not the role model for austerity policies.

    =======
    The full content of the January 2012 issue of the Cambridge Journal of Economics is available free online here. It is a special issue on the theme “Austerity: Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?”

    Contents
    Making the same mistakes again - Or is this time different?
    Lawrence King, Michael Kitson, Sue Konzelmann, and Frank Wilkinson

    Financial crisis and global imbalances: its labour market origins and the aftermath
    Pasquale Tridico

    Dangerous interconnectedness: economists’ conflicts of interest, ideology and financial crisis
    Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth and Gerald A. Epstein

    Commentary: Contradictions of austerity
    Alex Callinicos

    The great austerity war: what caused the US deficit crisis and who should pay to fix it?
    James Crotty

    The end of the UK’s liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the coalition government’s policy during the austerity crisis
    Damian Grimshaw and Jill Rubery

    Iceland’s rise, fall, stabilisation and beyond
    Robert H. Wade and Silla Sigurgeirsdottir

    Commentary: Dire consequences: the conservative recapture of America’s political narrative?
    David Coates

    A note on America’s 1920–21 depression as an argument for austerity
    Daniel Kuehn

    US government deficits and debt amid the great recession: what the evidence shows
    Robert Pollin

    Fiscal deficits, economic growth and government debt in the USA
    Lance Taylor, Christian R. Proaño, Laura de Carvalho, and Nelson Barbosa

    The tragedy of UK fiscal policy in the aftermath of the financial crisis
    Malcolm Sawyer

    Is Ireland really the role model for austerity?
    Stephen Kinsella

    The macroeconomic stabilisation effects of Social Security and 401(k) plans
    Teresa Ghilarducci, Joelle Saad-Lessler, and Eloy Fisher

    The basic paradigms of EU economic policy-making need to be changed
    Kazimierz Laski and Leon Podkaminer

    Building faith in a common currency: can the eurozone get beyond the Common Market logic?
    Pascal Petit

    The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: the lost Keynesian legacy
    Robert Boyer

    Russia: austerity and deficit reduction in historical and comparative perspective
    Vladimir Popov

    Commentary: Austerity and fraud under different structures of technology and resource abundance
    Jing Chen and James Galbraith

    No comments »
  • The Newsfakers | Patrick Cockburn

    I enjoyed this nuanced article by Patrick Cockburn about journalism, accuracy, modern media, blogging, black propaganda and the use of social media by authoritarian regimes and advanced capitalist ‘democratic’ ones too. It also reminded me of this excellent review of Net Delusion by Oliver Farry that we published a while back.

    “So technical advances have made it more difficult for governments to hide repression. But these developments have also made the work of the propagandist easier. Of course, people who run newspapers and radio and television stations are not fools. They know the dubious nature of much of the information they are conveying. The political elite in Washington and Europe was divided for and against the US invasion of Iraq, making it easier for individual journalists to dissent. But today there is an overwhelming consensus in the foreign media that the rebels are right and existing governments wrong. For institutions such as the BBC, highly unbalanced coverage becomes acceptable.

    Sadly, al-Jazeera, which has done so much to shatter state control of information in the Middle East since it was set up in 1996, has become the uncritical propaganda arm of the Libyan and Syrian rebels.”

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors