Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 9th 2012


Greek Elections: The Social Democratic Party PASOK’s Victory is a Major Defeat of New Democracy - the Neo-Liberal Right

In last Sunday’s elections, Greece’s major social-democratic party PASOK has been returned to power, while the governing New Democracy, the traditional right wing party, suffered its worst ever defeat in its 25-year history. PASOK leader George Papandreou, son of Andreas Papandreou, becomes Prime Minister, while Kostantin Karamanlis, only two years since his re-lection, is dealt a devastating blow - he has immediately resigned from the leadership of his Party.

The Left comes out with a slightly reduced parliamentary power, as the two main left - wing organisations, the Greek Communist Party (KKE) and SIRIZA lose about half a percentage point each, compared to their 2007 results. On the contrary, the more right-wing LAOS registers a very significant increase in its power, gathering a substantial part of the disaffected ND voters. The Ecology Party, despite its recent success in the Euro elections, not having reached the legally necessary national quota of 3% does not enter parliament.

There are two striking elements of last Sunday’s election:

    • The unexpected slump of New Democracy whose popular support of 33.5% is the lowest ever in the Party’s 25 year history. Kostantin Karamanlis, Greece’s Prime Minister till Saturday, immediately accepted full personal responsibility and resigned from the leadership of his Party, calling for an Extraordinary Congress in 4 weeks’ time.
    • The totally unexpected increase in the voting power of PASOK, only two years after its electoral defeat in the last elections. This is one of the most striking victories of Greek social democracy, akin to the historic victories of Andreas Papandreou in 1981 and 1993. PASOK managed to get its highest ever percentages in a number of rural constituencies, despite many pre-election polls indicating that the two main parties were very close.

      George Papandreou becomes Prime Minister in his fifth year of leading PASOK and following two consecutive electoral defeats. It is, however, the extent of the social democratic victory that gives him a clear parliamentary majority which will allow him and his party to govern unencumbered without the stress, worry and give-and-take that would have followed if he had to rely on other more-to-the left parliamentary organisations for his governance.

      PASOK’s pre-election manifesto focussed on five major political issues and the party is expected to table immediate and specific legal proposals in the new parliament:

      • A new electoral law increasing the proportionality of the system and incorporating strict provisions for expenditure and transparency of elected officials,.
      • A new law supporting the real income of citizens,
      • A new law protecting mortgages and establishing anti-inflationary provisions,
      • Incorporating legal provisions for State support of middle-scale enterprises and the real economy, and,
      • Supporting enterprise and defence of workers rights.

      The Party is also expected to reduce the number of Ministries down to 14 and cap the number of ministerial portfolios to half the previous size. Papandreou also mentioned yesterday that half of his ministerial team would be made of women.

      The Election Results and Their Effect on the Left

      The two-Party system that ruled over Greek politics since WWII saw its electoral strength reduced somewhat, compared to the 2007 elections. It is significant, however, that this reduction did not directly benefit the two left organisations. It was the right party of LAOS that primarily benefited from the drift of New Democracy voters. Let us focus briefly on the situation that pertains to the parties of the Left:

      • The Greek Communist Party (KKE) sees its electoral strength losing ground, albeit slightly, for the first time in recent years. The Party had increased its percentages both in the 2000 and 2007 elections as well as the Euro elections last June.
      • Percentages of SIRIZA, an alliance of left-wing and progressive organisations, have also registered a slight drop. The Party, however, analysed last Sunday’s results almost as if was a victory, as pre-election polls indicated that it may not reach the 3% minimum and be excluded from parliament
      • Finally, the Ecology Party came very close, reaching almost the 3% minimum, having led a very active and popular campaign

      Let me conclude this article with a personal thought. There is no question in my mind that the results of the election show that Greece’s forgotten and marginalized sections of its people were instrumental in the heavy defeat of the governing New Democracy Party. The big loser in this election was the neo-liberal politics of the government that brought about a serious economic crash - a politics that increased poverty, unemployment, insecurity in labour and further extension of social inequalities.

      As these lines are being written, there will be a new government in place by tomorrow morning. But for a modern society like Greece, as much as in our land here, the key question is not a change in government  and  personalities but a change of political direction. To this extent, the situation in Greece opens a new optical angle where European citizens can watch and analyse social democratic politics in power for the first time in a mainstream European country after a long period of monetarist and neo-liberal political dominance.

      Greeks in their land and abroad are smiling today. Some may even celebrate. The real issues and struggle, however, will be hard and difficult in the days to come. To follow closely.

      Michael Youlton is co-chair of the IAWM and was involved in the say NO to Lisbon Campaign.

      Discussion

      We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

      1. Comment by: Dimitris Tsouros

        Oct 6th 2009 at 15:10

        Congratulations Michael on your initiative to publish this very interesting article on the Greek election results which is a sourounding victory not only to Democracy and progress for the Greek citizens but an eye opening to the rest of the European citizens for a change of direction for the benefit of its people and peace.
        This is a great Victory for PASOK and its principles and in particuolar a great victory and thanks to its Leader and Priminister Mr. George Papandreou who has with dignity patience and beleive for the betterness of his beloved Country and Europe has succeeded to overcome every obstacle especially since 2007 and reach the present stage of a tremendous Victory.
        I specially loved his offer for the unity of the Greek people and equal treatment for all pros and against…
        Thank you Mr. Priminister..
        d.tsouros

      2. Comment by: Michael-as-well.

        Oct 6th 2009 at 19:10

        You guys have missed the point. Laos is not only a right wing party but a far right where the leader George Karatzaferis and his right hand Plevris had spread anti-immigrant and anti-semitist statements in the past but due to their entrance in the parliament they have been forced to become more “political correct”. So the party LAOS (Popular Orthodox Rally) is a far right party and even under the parliament pressure Karatzaferis supports the “Greek superiority”. There is also a video where he declares that he wants the extreme nazi party “xrisi avgi” which has been blamed for anti-immigrant violence and the EON (organization of people who support the fascist junta of the 70’s) to work together with him in a super right wing coalition. He has been forced also to accept the Jewish Holocaust which was denying in the past. The party has been benefited also from the uprising xenophobia especially in Athens due to the new waves of Asian immigrants.

        New Democracy also is responsible for the uprising police brutality, the secretly collaboration of the Greek authorities with the nazi “Xrisi avgi”. Members of the New Democracy party have expressed very right wing ideas in the public in the past. There is not a huge different between the two major parties anyway.

        Regards
        Michael

      Leave a Comment

      (required)

      (required, will not be published)

      Sins of the Father

      Sins of the Father:

      Tracing the Decisions

      That Shaped the Irish Economy,

      by Conor McCabe

      from The History Press

      Now Available as an e-Book.

      Subscribe by Email

      Enter your email address:

      Delivered by FeedBurner



      Irish Left Review on Facebook

      Best of the Web

      • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

        I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

        We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

        Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

        We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

        No comments »
      • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

        Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

        No comments »
      • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

        Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

        Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

        2 comments »
      • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

        The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

        Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

        The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

        Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

        Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

        Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

        Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

        No comments »
      • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

        David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

        So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

        This is what I came up with:

        Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

        1 comment »
      • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

        Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

        FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

        In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

        This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

        For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

        But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

        The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

        3 comments »
      • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

        The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

        The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

        Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

        And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

        No comments »
      • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

        Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

        No comments »
      • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

        Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

        MP3 Link.

        [display_podcast]

        No comments »
      • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

        Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

        At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

        The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

        No comments »

      Link Archives »

      Authors