Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010


Book Review: Le Monde Selon K. by Pierre Péan

When newly elected French president Nicolas Sarkozy named Bernard Kouchner Minister for Foreign Affairs in May 2007 there were few eyebrows raised. It had been an open secret in French political circles for weeks beforehand and it later transpired that Sarkozy had offered Kouchner the job before the election – an election during which Kouchner had endorsed Sarkozy’s Socialist opponent Royal. Rony Brauman, director of Médecins sans frontières, the NGO Kouchner is so often erroneously reported as being the founder of (he was, in fact, one of a dozen or so co-founders), snapped at a reporter when asked for his opinion on Kouchner’s ascension to France’s top diplomat’s job. Brauman, who, like MSF, has had an uneasy relationship with Kouchner since they parted ways in 1979, said ‘that’s what Kouchner always wanted to be.’ It was a curt, almost weary, dismissal by one of the few public figures in France who openly holds a jaundiced view of the doctor-turned-politician.

Another man who has a far from sanguine view of Kouchner is Pierre Péan, whose Le monde selon K. is a lusty, acerbic and often wildly funny take-down of the man who, in the eyes of the French public, seems to be incapable of doing wrong. In the annual poll conducted by Paris Match where French people vote for their favourite French personality (there is indeed a bewildering strain of innocence among the French that only people who have lived in France can truly detect), Kouchner is regularly in the top five, often kept off the top only by the later Abbé Pierre, the Catholic priest, who for fifty years campaigned on behalf of France’s homeless. Kouchner and Abbé Pierre even collaborated on a book a few years before the priest’s death. It may be this glaring popularity that irks Péan so much and he spends much of the book trying to redress this perceived injustice. The book can get wearisome at times as further examples of Kouchner’s mendaciousness pile up; if one is looking for an impartial biography of Kouchner, this is not it. There is precious little shade in Péan’s account; it is rather an attempt to provide an antidote to the overly saccharine public image of his subject.

For this reason, it is a book unlikely to ever be translated into English. It is, as Anglophone journalists based in Paris tend to say, a bit too ‘franco-français’. Péan’s assumes a background knowledge of Kouchner’s career that few English speakers would have. Kouchner is only vaguely known internationally. Many would now be able to pin him as France’s foreign minister but previously it has been his association with Médecins sans frontières and a flurry of pseudo-diplomatic activity in the early 1990s in Somalia, Bosnia and Rwanda that put him in the international spotlight. But if the assault on Kouchner’s character conducted by Péan (for that is what it is, however righteous it may be) might elude international readers this does not make the book less pertinent for all that.

It is pertient because Kouchner has had a profound impact on shifts in foreign policy among western powers over the last twenty years. He has, in effect, willed his own take on world affairs into the corridors of power. And Péan, like many French advocates of traditional diplomacy, does not like this. At the centre of Kouchner’s creed is the ‘droit d’ingérence’, the ‘right to interfere’, which he views as an essential retainer for strong powers. It is primarily formulated as the right to interfere for humanitarian reasons and was something that was a casus belli for many on the liberal left during the Bosnian war, the Rwandan genocide and which finally triggered a war in 1999 when NATO bombed Yugoslavia, ostensibly to prevent massacres in Kosovo. And in all three cases, Kouchner was a key player. He promulgated points of view in the press that were quickly relayed by well-meaning but ill-informed journalists; points of view that were on the face of it, born of decency and humanitarian concern but usually a gross simplification of complex political struggles.

Kouchner had already behaved in a dubious fashion at the time of the international intervention in Somalia in 1992 when, as Minister for Health, he organised a ‘Sacks of Rice for Somalia’ drive to send rice to needy families in the war-torn country. At first glance a laudable intention but not really one that should fall under the remit of a government ministry and certainly not one such as Health. Defence minister, Pierre Joxe was furious at Kouchner’s interference and was only dissuaded from resigning by a President François Mitterand who was already beginning to fall under Kouchner’s spell. Teachers in France’s state schools were also indignant that their places of work should be used for media-friendly government-run charity drives. As Joxe said, there were dozens of Somalias around the world and all should be treated with the same diplomatic rigour and neutrality.

It was in Rwanda that Kouchner’s Manichean mindset fatally coloured his calls for an intervention. Péan does not deny the extermination of 800,000 or so Tutsis by Hutu militants but he disputes the claims by Kouchner and others that it was a premeditated genocide. He also points out that some 40,000 innocent Hutus were similarly slaughtered by troops loyal to the Rwandan Patriot Front of current Rwandan President Paul Kagame. He also points out Kagame’s probable guilt in the shooting down of the plane carrying President Juvenal Habyarimana and the president of Burundi Cyprien Ntaryami (both Hutus) on the 6th of April 1994, which triggered the genocide. Kagame and eight of his inner circle were issued arrest warrants in 2007 by French investigating magistrate Jean-Louis Bruguière for their alleged role in the attack, which claimed the lives of three French nationals.
Kouchner and Sarkozy have both stymied the investigation since then, even allowing one of the suspects, Rose Kabuye, a Kagame aide to walk free on bail after her orchestrated arrest last summer (orchestrated to have access to the prosecution files).

Péan’s scepticism about Kouchner’s motives is well-founded; in one chapter he demolishes Kouchner’s proprietorial attitude towards Rwanda (the minister is fond of repeating ‘I was there’). He provides ample evidence that Kouchner allowed himself to be dangerously taken in by Kagame even as the latter was ordering massacres of civilians and even ordering the shooting on a UN vehicle carrying Kouchner himself, something Kouchner inexplicably blamed on government troops despite knowing the contrary was true. Kagame in particular is accused of ordering the massacre at Kibagabaga, just north of Kigali, the discovery of which so marked Kouchner’s spirits, but which he assumed was the work of the Hutus. Roméo Dallaire, the Canadian UN commander who later wrote an anguished account of his time in Rwanda, is similarly scathing of Kouchner.

Kagame’s track record as President since 1994 further belies his image nurtured in the west by fools and knaves alike as a benign resistance fighter who has succeeded in reunifying post-genocide Rwanda. He has rather been the motor for the most destructive war of contemporary times in eastern Congo, which has claimed the lives of an estimated 5.4 million people. He has variously played off the rebels led by Laurent Nkunde and the Congolese army against one another and also carried out raids on Congolese territory ostensibly to pursue renegade Rwandan Hutu rebels but which has ensured Rwanda has been able to control eastern Congo’s rich mineral wealth. It is also estimated by Howard French in a recent essay in the New York Review of Books that the forceful displacement of Hutu refugees could have contributed to the deaths of up to 600,000 people, the vast majority of whom had no hand in the 1994 genocide.

Kouchner is not alone in this almost criminal negligence of the facts; the Clinton regime was wilfully dismissive of reports of a humanitarian crisis. Howard French even singles out current American ambassador to the UN Susan Rice for saying that the Americans were choosing to look the other way. But Péan is galled by Kouchner late-formed interest in Rwanda. The minister, it seemed showed no interest in the east African country in the four years preceding the genocide when the government he was part of was engaged in talks aimed at averting an armed Tutsi rebellion. It was only when things got nasty on the ground that he made the trip to Kigali, where he all too willingly surrendered himself to as dubious a character as Kagame. Kouchner appears to be more at ease with the cut-and-thrust of humanitarian outrage, where black and white are clearly defined. In some respects he views such crises as football matches. He showed little interest in the mundane diplomatic niceties of the impending crisis and was presumably unaware that an earlier, forgotten genocide in 1972 resulted in the slaughter of 300,000 Hutus by Tutsi extremists in neighbouring Burundi, which has an ethnic divide of similar proportions.

Kouchner’s wordview of heroes and villains similarly coloured his take on the ethnic conflict in former Yugoslavia, where, as Péan charges, Kouchner and his allies undertook a shocking mass demonisation of the Serbian nation. As with Rwanda, this is not to ignore the crimes committed by Serbia and its satellites in Bosnia, Croatia or Kosovo but it demonstrates a disturbing tendency to take sides on the part of a man who would later be given an arbitrating role as UN Special Representative in Kosovo in the years following the 1999 war. His extra-marital relationship with a Kosovar woman also brought into question his impartiality in presiding over Kosovar and Serb populations, not least when International Criminal Tribunal Prosecutor Carla del Ponte complained of being frustrated by Kouchner’s office in her attempts to bring alleged Kosovar war criminals to justice.

One of the most troubling legacies of Kouchner’s diplomatic influence has been this conflation of humanitarian concerns and governmental responsibilities. It is something that Kouchner first got a taste of during the Biafran war when he worked as a doctor tending to the secessionist Biafrans in their struggle against the Nigerian federal government. Kouchner bewailed the treatment of the Biafrans yet was himself flown into the territory on planes containing arms provided by the de Gaulle government of the day. France supported Biafra at the time, but for reasons of cold realpolitik rather than the worthier ones espoused by Kouchner.

Péan has little time for this morphing of diplomacy and geostrategy into the service of humanitarianism. Not because he is unfeeling but he realises the primal need to keep both separate in the service of each (and NGOs such as Médecins sans frontières and the Red Cross agree). But Péan does ascribe Machiavellian motives to Kouchner nonetheless. Kouchner and a cohort of French intellectuals such the nouveaux philosophes André Glucksmann, Bernard Henry-Levy and Alain Finkielkraut are seen as card-carrying Atlanticists intent on undermining French diplomatic influence. Péan used ill-advised language in desribing this coterie (all Jewish) as ‘cosmopolitan’, which the media-savvy Kouchner latched on to deflect many of the salient charges levelled at him by Péan. Kouchner, aware of the anti-semitic connotation of the word ‘cosmopolitan’ as used by anti-Dreyfusards, said to the National Assembly, ‘when you are called “cosmopolitan” in difficult times, you know what you are dealing with’. Never mind that there is little that can be even construed as anti-semitism in Pean’s book. But his tone can sometimes get the better of him. Such as when he misjudges the US political landscape by labelling Kouchner a neocon. But Kouchner is more the wide-eyed ‘Quiet American’ archetype, almost a Candide figure in his shambling across the world.

This is not to dismiss him as an innocent – he certainly isn’t – but it places him rather in the camp of the interventionist US Democrat, a man who has always used the media to maximum effect (and ignored certain conflicts that he considered of lesser media interest) in much the way a war was generated over the news in Barry Levinson’s Wag the Dog. Kouchner’s wife is Christine Ockrent, one of France’ most influential journalists and his access to the airwaves has always been eased by this relationship as has his ability to intimidate journalistic opponents. Ockrent has been accused of sacking a number of journalists at the international news channel France24 and the radio channel Radio France International, both of which she is the director of, who have displeased Kouchner, including one who did so during a live interview. Péan devotes a chapter to this episode and he has an axe to grind, as a number of the principals are close personal friends of his. But the tone notwithstanding the account does provide a disconcerting catalogue of strong-arming by a man who likes so much to play the nice guy.

Péan’s book grates from time to time with the stridency of its tone and his rather silly anti-Americanism (he gleefully refers to Kouchner again and again in English as the ‘French doctor’ even though I have never heard anyone in the English-speaking world call him this). But it provides a stern and vital corrective to the media soft-pedalling that Kouchner is so often the beneficiary of. We may not agree entirely with Péan’s stance that Kouchner as Foreign Minister is a grave danger to France but his analysis has particular resonance following Kouchner’s breathtaking remarks on Israel and Iran last week, which amazingly drew little fire internationally. Kouchner attempted to play good cop to Israel’s bad one, saying that time was running out for Iran, and that ‘Israel will react as soon as they know clearly that there is a threat’. It’s a familiar reworking of traditional diplomacy but nonetheless an alarming escalation in tone. Who knows, maybe he will in time morph into Péan’s necon, dispensing tough medicine to chosen victims rather than intervening to help them?

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Niall

    Aug 5th 2010 at 13:08

    Why do you attribute Anti-American sentiment to calling Kouchner the ‘French Doctor’?
    In the English speaking world MSF is sometimes referred to as French Doctors. In referring to Kouchner as ‘the french Doctor’, I would see it as being a reference to the fact that Kouchner may, as you claim above, be mistaken by Anglophones as being the sole founder of MSF.

    Would you recommend buying (I speak french) it to a prospective student of Humanitarian Aid?
    Cheers

  2. Comment by: seanachie

    Aug 5th 2010 at 13:08

    That’s true but the tone of Péan’s prose, particularly when using the term, suggests a withering attitude towards Kouchner’s Atlanticist sentiments.

    I definitely would recommend the book, even if only half of it pertains directly to humanitarian aid itself. Kouchner’s influence in the field and also in the modern doctrine of military humanitarian intervention is immeasurable.

    Thanks for the comment.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »
  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »
  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »
  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »
  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »
  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »
  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »
  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »
  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »