Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010

FT Energy Source | Did oil cause the latest recession? IEA weighs into the debate

Author: donagh of Dublin Opinion

Published: November 9th, 2009

Section: Best of the Web

Discussion: 5 comments ↓

FT Energy Source | Did oil cause the latest recession? IEA weighs into the debate

Though it’s universally viewed as a crisis of the financial sector’s making, several voices (notably James Hamilton) have argued the recession that began last year had a lot to do with the sharp rise in oil prices over the preceding months and years.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Pope Epopt

    Nov 11th 2009 at 10:11

    We’re well over the peak of oil production and sliding down the other side. That’s why, financial instability aside, no recovery of growth can be sustained, despite the asset bubble de jour. The first sign of a real ‘recovery’ will be a sharp rise in oil prices.

    It’s also, incidentally, why the reformist left is barking up the wrong tree in trying to restart growth in order to ameliorate social conflict. That is a strategy of the past, and the sooner we abandon the growth fetish and concentrate on the redistribution of power and resources, the better.

    The IEA has been cooking the books on fossil fuel reserves and the cost of extraction almost since it was set up.

    The decline in fossil fuels could be seen as a huge opportunity for a lightly populated country with plenty of renewables, but instead we’ve got NAMA and na Glasraí in a government who will borrow to bail out a bankrupt financial system, rather than reflating by spending what’s needed on a renewables infrastructure.

    Tragic.

  2. Comment by: Donagh

    Nov 11th 2009 at 11:11

    Thanks for that Pope. I think though you have to look to what sort of growth is suggested. As David Harvey has pointed out:

    “A healthy capitalism has to grow at 3 percent per year; the problem is to find where you can achieve that 3 percent growth.cThere are various blockages. For instance, if capital is confronting labour problems, then it is hard for it to find an outlet and over-accumulation occurs. If it faces problems in the market, the same issue arises. Over-accumulation is any situation in which the surplus that capitalists have available to them cannot find an outlet, whether through labour constraints, market constraints, resource constraints, technology constraints or whatever.

    It is far too simplistic to say that the left is trying to “restart growth in order to ameliorate social conflict”. What is social conflict if not the class dynamics behind this crisis. The situation must be rectified by dealing directly with the way that class and power are at heart of the conflict and that can only be done, as you say, by some form of redistribution.

    I too would see the decline in fossil fuels as an opportunity to boost sustainable alternatives, but we also have to acknowledge that given the propensity of financial capital to invest in bubbles, it seems that any news of scarcity might also spur on price speculation. However, rather than investing in biofuel from Brasil, another boon for the speculators no doubt, we should concentrate on the resources we have.

  3. Comment by: Pope Epopt

    Nov 12th 2009 at 10:11

    Agreed on bubbles, and of course we’re not talking about biofuels from Brazil, or biofuels in general for that matter.

    Energy sources should be ranked by their EROI (Energy Return on Investment) i.e energy extracted divided by the total energy to produce, to assess their viability.

    The ranking by the way, goes 1. hydro (by a big margin), 2. onshore wind, 3. offshore wind and then 4. nuclear fission (although uranium supplies available and energy costs of extraction are highly disputed). All the fossil fuels have a declining EROI (ignoring their greenhouse gas emissions) and biofuels (with the exception of low-energy-input forestry) are right down the bottom of this league. Google the work of Charles Hall and his collaborators for more on this.

    My point is that we are suffering two types of systemic crises - intrinsic and extrinsic. Perhaps the crisis intrinsic to capitalism is one of over-accumulation. But it strikes me as a non-expert that attributing the intrinsic crisis to a single contradiction may arise from a doctrinaire desire to make the facts fit the texts. I’m probably caricaturing much more nuanced positions, but I can’t help thinking that were Marx alive today his analysis would be significantly different from that in the canonical texts.

    What the neo-Marxist left fails to realise is that the extrinsic crisis of fossil energy scarcity and the decline in the societal EROI is at least as serious as the intrinsic crisis, and applies whatever the relations of production. There is an interplay between the intrinsic crisis and the external crises of peak fossil fuels and climate change. Unless the two types of crisis are addressed simultaneously and given equal weight (as some eco-socialists are attempting to do) we’re being dishonest about the world.

    The neo-liberal greenery espoused by the Greens in government has been so counter-productive for progressives in this country because, through their policies, citizens are coming to associate action on energy use and production with the savage class war being conducted by the elite against the rest of us. Carbon taxes are going to be seen as attacks on the poorest and progressive proposals like Feasta’s Cap and Share, are being ignored.

  4. Comment by: Pope Epopt

    Nov 12th 2009 at 10:11

    More on the IEA shenanigans

  5. Comment by: Donagh

    Nov 13th 2009 at 12:11

    Thanks for the great comment Pope. I saw that Guardian report in the Print edition. I almost entirely agree with you here and there is much I’d like to comment on and will when I have the time. On the Feasta Cap and Share scheme see a similiar idea proposed in the early days of ILR by Damian O’Broin.

    http://www.irishleftreview.org/2008/06/11/left-climate-change-green-red/

    Also, wasn’t that being examined by an Oireachtas committee last year? They seemed enthusiastic about it. How come its not in the program for government?

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »

  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »

  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »

  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »

  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »

  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »

  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »

  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »

  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »

  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »