Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 9th 2012


It could have been a screenplay: An interview with Meletios Apostolides

The following is my translation of an interview with Mr. Meletios Apostolides, the Greek Cypriot architect whose family had been forced to abandon their house, orchard and land in Lapithos, north Cyprus in the wake of the Turkish military operation in 1974. Mr. Apostolides recently won the case against the Orams, a British couple who had built a holiday home on the land. This interview was published in Cyprus last Thursday, the 28th of January.

In a Cypriot village a young boy, our hero, is looking at his neighbours, families and kids, squeezing into some old buses and escaping/fleeing the village. Houses are left empty and after a while they’re pillaged, their contents stolen and slowly destroyed. As our hero is gradually grows to become a young man, he hears there is a war about to break out . Out of nowhere, some of the ‘neighbours’, among those who had left, return, armed to the hilt. This time it is our hero’s family that is forced to leave. The young man is enlisted and fights in this war….many of his friends and comrades die….our hero, disgusted with it all, leaves the island and goes to London. To study and to forget…..

There, in the University, he meets some of the neighbours’ kids - those who had fought on the other side….those who had left the village and then came back and took it over.

Discussion brings thoughts and memories….our hero and a young man become friends and attempt to understand how and where all this hate came from….that venom that divided the village but also the entire island.

Time passes. Attitudes soften. Roadblocks come down and people can circulate a bit more. Our hero, a grown up now, visits his village and discovers that some of his old neighbours are living in his old house, while in the land with the lemon trees around it there are now foreigners who have taken over and built a lovely villa. They’re British - English in fact. Frothing in the mouth he decides he is going to chase them away. Not with guns or bullets but legally - through the courts.

People laugh at him. You can’t win this one, they tell him. The English settlers have plenty of money and employ the British PM’s wife, Cherie, as their attorney. Another David v Goliath situation on the cards. But as it happens in some movies, there is an upset - David wins. The foreigners are instructed to leave the village and our hero becomes front-page material even in the UK. And funny thing, instead of punching the air and somersaulting two or three times, as millionaire footballers do, our hero starts thinking, which brings back memories. He thinks of his family and his neighbours and starts responding to this interview by saying things only real heroes ever dare to point out:

You were a soldier during the war?

Yes, I had just finished my third year in the Higher Technological Institute, I was about to graduate as a civil engineer, when I was conscripted. And enlisted in the 70th Mechanised Division

Tell us about the war…

There were fifty men in my section. When the war was over, there were 18 of us left. Most of them perished around Liapithos - my very own village.

What was your relations with Turkish Cypriots till then?

Nothing in particular…..It was a mixed village but not much interaction. Anyway, I was very young when the Turkish Cypriots packed up and left in 1963.

What do you mean by ‘mixed’ village?

From the 4,500 inhabitants in Liapithos, 250 were Turkish Cypriots.

Did you start hating them after the invasion?

There was no time to even think about hating…..In a war you fight. We hardly knew who was on the other side or why we were fighting. I went through so many nightmarish situations I began to believe that I would never be able to laugh again. It was much later, when I was in London studying, in a student gathering…I was sitting lonely and quiet in a corner and saw another young fella also sitting quietly full of his thoughts. I discovered he was a Turkish Cypriot. We started talking and tried to answer each other’s question. We became friends.

Were you very suspicious towards each other?

We discovered we had been 200 metres from each other in the war. He was inside Ammohostos defending it -  me outside. We were both slightly wounded. But we kept asking each other what was it that divided us…. so that we understood each other.

In London, did Greek and Turkish Cypriots hang together? Were there mixed groups?

No, such groups were not very popular. Some thought that mixing with the other side was almost being a traitor. We wanted though to understand what had happened. There is always truth on your side but the other side may also have some truth in their arguments.

Would it have been possible for one community to listen to each other and discuss things before 1963 or before the war started?

I think yes. I will describe for you an event that took place in 1963. I was a young fella. The Turkish Cypriot had squeezed themselves in two old decrepit busses and were preparing to leave. One of their hotheads was directing operations and asking them to hurry up and get out as quickly as possible. And I can see a Turkish Cypriot lady, arm in arm with my aunt, Areti, cuddling each other. My aunt was given the Turkish lady’s house keys promising her she would look after the house.

“Everything will be in order as you left when you come back” my aunt told her. Of  course, we all discovered that in 3 months there were no doors or windows in those houses while all the contents had vanished.

Are you saying the Greeks behaved horribly then?

Yes. But the pain we all suffered should have allowed the two communities to understand each other. The question is why we failed to achieve that.

Who was to blame. The leaders? Athens and Ankara?

All of them but, of course, the people’s inability to act correctly was also important. I remember some old fellas talking in the bar of the village saying that all this nonsense and the destruction of the Turkish Cypriot houses by 5-10 hotheads, we will pay dearly one day.

So, in your opinion, it was not only the leaders but the citizens too….?

Yes, a lack of maturity at every level led us to these cul-de-sacs. I believe we should have supported and protected our Turkish Cypriot neighbours in 1963.  We didn’t and our silence was a guilty one. We have a saying here in Cyprus: ‘Human beings constitute a place but a place is empty’……if you disrespect people you disrespect the place.

A Turkish Cypriot politician was saying recently that we must build high walls - that there isn’t any other solution.

I say that we must find solutions to co-exist. There is no point sharpening our knives until we, or they, find an opportunity to sort out our differences. That’s not the spirit of either the Greek or the Turkish Cypriots who are looking at the European Union. The people of Europe, after rivers of blood, have reached a level of civilisation allowing them to sort out their differences in a peaceful way. Why not us?

Would you be prepared, however, to accept, a Turkish Cypriot to become a President of the country, even temporarily, and decide matters on your behalf? Would you ever accept that?

I say we must have confidence in each other. We must find ways to make each other feel that we have a future ahead of us and not look always at the past.

Isn’t co-existence, however, a very brittle process? Isn’t it a fact that a small event could allow conflict to flare up again?

I don’t know - nobody knows the answer to that question.  I believe we have to try and take risks to build a common future together. For me, it’s worth the risk attempting to discover the possibility of co-existence. Let’s hope that as laws and structures are now determined by Brussels, and not Nicosia, that we will be able to overcome our past experiences.

What position did you adopt on the Annan Referendum?

Allow me to say that both ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ belong to the past. What is important is to look forward and find a common denominator.

What are you going to do with your land now that it may be returned to you?

To begin with, I don’t believe that the occupying regime will allow me to get my land back - especially as they now have more than 10,000 foreigners who have acquired land in this illegal way and are waiting to see what’s going to happen. They will be given some kind of document that is going to say that they won’t be allowed to get rid of the buildings. They will be probably be given funds to pay the fines and thus dispose of the implications of the UK Appelant Court.

If there ever was a solution found would you be prepared to live in your village along with Turkish Cypriots?

That would be the best outcome - to be able for everybody to live securely anywhere on the island

Why did you decide to start the legal battle and confront the Blairs?

When we were finally allowed to go back and visit our village, in early 2003, and I saw the villas built on Greek Cypriot land, I decided that this monstrosity had to stop. This process had not only taken our properties but had increased the divisions.

Some people say that Cypriot Greeks have also taken over Turkish Cypriot properties?
It is true that a number of Greek Cypriots are using and managing Turkish Cypriot properties. However, the legal situation is that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Cypriot Republic, is, technically, in charge of those properties. If the original owners of those properties request it, these properties will be legally returned to them.

How much money have you spent on this case?

Nearly £1 million. From the moments the Orams employed high level attorneys such as Cherie Blair, I was forced to involve the big legal outfits in London too.

Did Mrs Blair’s presence scare you?

Yes, I was scared. Yet, employing Cherie Blair boomeranged on them. The case assumed an unbelievable importance and I don’t think there is anybody in the occupied territories now who doesn’t understand and recognise the implications of the Appelant Court decision.

What are your feelings towards the Orams?

I don’t know them. I met them for 5 minutes in the courthouse and then watched them from afar as the case unfolded. I am not happy they lost but I’m delighted my human rights have been vindicated. It’s the European Union values that carried the day - so, to that extent, it’s a victory for Turkish Cypriots as well. Ms Linda Orams herself accepted at the witness box that she was fully aware that the property on which they were building their villa belonged to Greek Cypriots but added that she thought the risk of losing it was small!

Have you ever considered starting a case to sue the Turkish Cypriots who are living in your old family home?

I understand them to a certain degree - I don’t like it but there is a logic there…but I will never understand and accept the existence of foreigners on my land.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Leyla

    Feb 3rd 2010 at 21:02

    I say that Apostolides lies! He does not know the Orams and yet spent a million euros to get them out of the land that he can neither live on nor enjoy in any way. This is not about the Orams or foreigners; it is about the desperation of the Greek side who feel things are slipping out of their control and cannot accept that they have no sovereignty over the north of the island. Despite the embargos and difficulties the Turkish Cypriots have had to endure, they have survived and continue to be self supporting and building their lives. The property mess in the south of the island is worse than the north. Take a look at the man’s case
    who is permanently camping outside the Greek Cypriot embassy in London!
    Apostolides may have won the war but he has certainly lost the battle for his side. He has put the peace process for the island back a decade!
    He is lucky his old house is still standing; at least
    he has a link with the past when he visits. Some of us don’t have this luxury. When I visited my parents’
    property in Tera, near Paphos recently, not only our house but the entire village had been burnt to the ground.
    Perpaps your newspaper should interview a prominent
    Turkish Cypriot landowner with property in the South to give your readers a more balanced viewpoint of the Cyprus property problems.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

    I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

    We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

    Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

    We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

    No comments »
  • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

    Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

    No comments »
  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors