Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010


Stormont’s Sectarian Squabbles Hides Failure to Run the Economy

While DUP and Sinn Fein politicians in the Stormont coalition argue about policing and parades the economy of Northern Ireland is worsening by the day. Twenty thousand people lost their jobs in Northern Ireland 1n 2009.You’d think that our elected representatives might want to discuss that instead.

Last week while political leaders from the DUP and Sinn Féin were in Hillsborough Castle arguing over the small print of an agreement on policing and justice and parades, US companies Avaya and Baker Hughes announced hundreds of job losses.

And this is only the latest of Northern Ireland’s economic woes. Figures indicate that by the middle of this year, there will be fewer people in employment in Northern Ireland than there were 13 years ago. While the unemployment rates have fallen elsewhere in the UK, this hasn’t happened here.  Last month, the number of people claiming unemployment benefits climbed to a new high of 54,500 on top of which we must add 49,000 people on the economically inactive register who are still looking for work.

The current manufactured crisis in Stormont shows how little the coalition parties care about the real crisis on the streets of our towns and cities. Perhaps they prepare the comfort of sectarian squabbling to running an economy. After all, they’re good at sectarianism but not so good at creating lasting jobs and economic well-being.

Of course, part of the blame can be placed on the ill-winds of the world economy. But the approach towards economic development taken by then Stormont coalition partners has been deeply flawed, not to say suicidal. It is true that jobs have been growing since the early 80s but, as the recently published Independent Review of Economic Policy (DETI and Invest NI) [the Barnett Report] into economic practices in Northern Ireland makes clear, many of these jobs, especially those in the retail and construction sectors, reflected the extreme bubble in the housing market that was more pronounced in NI than elsewhere in the UK, and also a ‘post-troubles’ catch-up in retail provision as major retail groups moved into the region.

The government in Northern Ireland had little part to play in this job growth. Apart from putting much of its faith in construction and shopping as engines of growth, the only other string to its bow was manifested in the attempts by the publically funded Thatcherite quango, Invest NI, to lure multinationals here. Both Avaya and Baker Hughes are huge Multinational companies. In 2006, Avaya posted a net profit of $201 million on revenue of $5.12 billion and Baker Hughes is an equally huge concern. In 2009 revenue in the company came to $2.43 billion, a 24% drop on the 2008 profit .Of course, they’ve lost out in the recession and they want to be richer, but they can hardly be described as poor. Yet in 2007 when Baker Hughes took over the firm in East Belfast that it is currently in the process of abandoning, it received £900,000 in money from Invest NI. In fact, Invest NI have admitted that the company had received millions of pounds in grants since 1995, of which only £500,000 may be clawed back

Speaking at the opening of the Hughes Christensen plant in 2007, Invest NI’s Chief Executive, Leslie Morrison said that ‘the establishment of this new facility further establishes Northern Ireland as a prime location for high value added product design and manufacture.’ This didn’t prove to be the case and again and again we have seen local investment in multinational companies which run off when it suits them. After all, the bottom line for these companies is the profit margin. Nothing is more important to them. As Unite regional organiser Sean Smyth, put it: ‘Our politicians need to stop messing about and wise up so that we make sure companies are not coming here for a quick buck but are here to stay’ . And in order to do that they have to rethink their investment policy. Since it was established in 2002 Invest NI has spent in the region of £1 billion and, as the Barnett Report admits, it has not succeeded in raising productivity levels here. What could a government focused on the needs of our people instead of luring multinationals have done with that £1 billion?

The Barnett Report found that the main differentiating factor between NI and other regions is wages. On average, private sector weekly wages in NI are almost 20% below the UK average, and are lower than every other UK region. The Stormont parties are attempting to build a low-wage economy to suit the interests of multinational capitalists. The people of Northern Ireland - the victims of the recession and the cutbacks and privatisations which will follow it -should consider their options.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

No comments so far

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »
  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »
  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »
  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »
  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »
  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »
  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »
  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »
  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »