Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Wednesday, Feb 8th 2012


A Greek Tragedy

“All euro area members must conduct sound national policies in line with the agreed rules”.

This was the opening line in a statement from EU heads of government made in Brussels on 11 February. The statement was about Greece and it welcomed the austerity measures being introduced by the errant EU member in an attempt to meet the EU’s demand to bring its budgetary deficit down by 4% in 2010. In other words - commit economic sabotage on itself to fulfill the wishes of an outdated and outmoded economic big brother.

Unlike the Irish government, who are part of the vanguard in the EU cheering on a move to the right in these troubled times - Sinn Féin does not support the actions Greece is being asked to take. Nor for that matter do we support the Irish government’s analysis and approach to our own economic woes. Sinn Féin believes there is a fairer way, a better way, out of the global and domestic recessions.

Let’s examine the opening line of the statement. What is a ‘sound national policy’? The EU, and unfortunately our own government, would have us believe that a sound national policy is one that deflates an economy to the point of depression - imposing serious hardship on its people, curtailing workers’ rights so they cannot infringe on economic decisions and steadily eroding public services so that people are pushed into consuming private services. These private services are usually bought from the state cheaply in a sell-off initiated by ‘sound national policy’.

The Irish government pursued its own brand of ‘sound national policy’ in the Budget when it cut workers’ wages, cut social welfare, health and education funding and in total took €4 billion out of the economy. Both Fine Gael and Labour supported the government’s plans to do this. And here we are now, three months later and the live register is still growing, house prices are still falling, the banks still aren’t lending and our consumption sector is in freefall.

This is the same medicine now being passed onto Greece.

In the financial world’s analysis of this Greek tragedy, a few sound voices are pointing out the lunacy of what is happening. It was the EMU’s one-rule-fits-all policy that caused much of the smaller European economies’ problems in the first place. The access to easy credit by these developing economies, like Ireland and Greece, combined with the loss of monetary control, all fed the bubbles that arose in the PIIGS countries (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain). The command that every economy stay within the 3% Stability and Growth pact, when different countries have different needs, further damaged economic development. It wasn’t true anyway - the larger countries, for example France and Germany, broke the pact on occasion and suffered no real consequences.

The insistence now that economies bring their domestic deficits back to within this 3% is utter madness. Attempting to reduce a deficit in a time of recession is counterproductive. Deficit reduction should be counter-cyclical (reduced in time of growth and allowed to grow in times of borrowing need) to allow governments the sovereign decision making needed to right an economy in decline. Borrowing for investment should be allowed, if that investment is designed to stimulate an economy and therefore grow it.

Of course, there are always exceptions made by the EU. In the Irish case, workers must suffer pay cuts and those who have lost their jobs must live on less, because we are not allowed borrow to pay for a jobs strategy or societal needs. But we can borrow €54 billion to give to banks for toxic loans as long as we place that borrowing through a Special Purposes Vehicle and keep it off the General Government balance sheet.

The EU and this government have turned Ireland into a debt-servicing vehicle so we can protect the euro. Never mind that we are going to continue to see unemployment rise along with emigration and our public services fall into disarray. And because we have no monetary control over the euro and our main trading partners are non-euro members, they want us to further deflate our economy to make ourselves cost competitive - which means more hardship for people across the country.

Greece faces these measures now and ironically, they are less worse off than we are with regards to debt, when we include NAMA. The problem for the Greeks is that they have become, in economist Joseph Stiglitz’s words, a victim of a speculative attack against their economy. The eyes of the predatory finance markets have fallen on the Mediterranean country and their possible failure to refinance sovereign debt means they are now reliant on the EU to back them up. Which suits the EU just fine because now as well as protecting and preserving the euro, they can decide Greece’s budget decisions and hence political decisions too. Once again we witness a right wing solution to a right wing-caused mess.

Joanne Spain is economic advisor in Sinn Féin.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Michael Youlton

    Mar 3rd 2010 at 12:03

    Good article Joanne,

    If it was a comedy first time round, it has now become a real tragedy.

    PASOK, the ruling social-democratic party in Greece, plans new spending cuts worth an expected €4.8 billion, reducing bonus pay for civil servants and ratcheting up VAT from 19 to 21%

    PM George Papandreou, addressing the Greek Parliament in Athens, on Tuesday, March 2, 2010, said the country is grappling with an acute debt crisis that unfolded after the conservatives lost the general election . The government is set to announce more severe economic austerity measures on Wednesday, following EU demands for deeper spending cuts. (AP Photo / Thanassis Stavrakis)
    Prime Minister George Papandreou saID the country is in a “state of war” and was fighting for its national survival. Government officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because it was ahead of the official spending cuts announcement, said the measures would save the government €4.8 billion.
    They said the measures would include cuts in civil servant annual pay through reducing their Easter, Christmas and vacation bonuses by 30 % each, and a 2% increase in VAT
    The new austerity package comes after European Union officials bluntly told Athens to make deeper spending cuts. Ratings agencies have also warned of more damaging downgrades if Greece is unable to rein in its debt.
    Greeks have their annual salaries split into 14 monthly payments with the last two considered holiday bonuses. Trade Unionists have said abolishing the 14th salary would be tantamount to a “declaration of war.”
    In a dramatic speech to his Socialist party deputies Tuesday night, Papandreou said all Greeks would have to accept painful sacrifices, and he warned of “catastrophic” consequences unless the country can borrow on international markets at lower lending rates.

    Unions strongly condemned the cuts.
    “It is a very difficult day for us … These cuts will take us to the brink,” said Panayiotis Vavouyios, the head of the retired civil servants’ association. “Brussels is demanding cuts and the government is doing nothing to stop them. To make poor pensioners pay for this crisis is a disgrace.”
    About 200 pensioners protested Wednesday in central Athens, scuffling with riot police and breaking through a police cordon to get to Papandreou’s office and official residence, where they stood outside chanting “Money for the rich, but none for us!”
    The new measures are to be officially announced after Papandreou briefs the country’s president following a Cabinet meeting.
    The country’s civil servants’ umbrella union has declared its third nationwide strike for March 16, while tax officials walk off the job for 48-hours on March 8. Taxi drivers were on strike Wednesday for the second straight day.
    “People are under a very heavy burden and they do not have enough to get by. I wonder after these measures are implemented, what will be left? At some point, you have to say that this is enough,” said Ilias Iliopoulos, general secretary of the civil servants’ union. “If the country asks us to contribute a month’s wage we will give it. But we cannot be the only ones who are made to pay.”
    Greece has already imposed a hiring freeze in the civil service and raised taxes on fuel, cigarettes and alcohol as part of an existing austerity plan.
    “We would have liked to have had more time for the results of our big structural reforms to become apparent,” Papandreou said Tuesday night. “But … our creditors, on whom we unfortunately depend, won’t give it to us.”
    Greece says it wants EU help to borrow money at lower rates, but European officials have remained tightlipped over any potential bailout plan, insisting Athens must first improve its finances.
    Papandreou is scheduled to meet German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin on Friday, French President Nicolas Sarkozy in Paris on Sunday and U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington on March 9, in talks also expected to focus on the financial crisis.

    The Greek national debt has reached €300 billion ($405 billion). Greece plans to borrow some €54 billion through sovereign debt issues this year, and has so far raised around €13 billion, including Government bond sales. Some €20 billion ($27 billion) worth of government bonds mature in April and May.
    Athens has promised to reduce its budget deficit from 12.7 % of gross domestic product in 2009 to 8.7 % this year but many economists consider that goal unrealistic.
    The European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund are helping the EU assess Greek finances after Athens revealed a major budget shortfall last year and was accused of issuing misleading financial data for years.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

    I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

    We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

    Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

    We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

    No comments »
  • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

    Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

    No comments »
  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors