Skip to content

Thursday, Sep 2nd 2010


Minimum Wage Next in Line for Chop

And so the battle is on. The cuts to social welfare and child benefit in Budget 2010 saw the government cross the Rubicon to a place where no ‘right’ is safe anymore. That means that the long-time target of employers’ groups, business lobbies and vested interest politicians - the minimum wage - is back on the table for discussion.

Followers of economic news will tell you they are surprised we have gotten this far with the wage (€8.65 an hour) intact. The first real public salvo against it came in 2008.

Patricia Callan of the Small Firms Association baldly stated that Ireland had ‘lost the plot’ on competition and should immediately reduce the wage to €7.65. She was roundly dismissed at the time by union leaders as having lost the plot herself and no more was said on the matter. But these were union leaders safely ensconced in social partnership - any notion of cuts to the minimum wage could be dismissed out of hand.

2009 was a new year and with unemployment growing at an exponential rate, and a public seeking answers and solutions, the race was on to attribute blame. Questions are still being asked. Why are we losing jobs and why aren’t we competitive anymore? It can’t be that we have a government more interested in investing billions into a failed financial system than into saving and creating jobs (think Waterford Crystal and SR Technics). It can’t be that that same sector ceased almost all lending to business last year. It can’t be that local service costs and rates were allowed to balloon in the boom years to accommodate a lack of central government funding.

It can’t be the lack of physical infrastructure across the state, from half built motorways to a lack of broadband. It isn’t the failure of the government to put conditions on the enormous grants paid to the likes of Dell and other multinationals to stop them pulling out of Ireland after receiving millions in taxpayers’ money. And it certainly cannot be the out-of-this-world salaries and bonuses CEOs and top managers decided to pay themselves when the going was good.

All or none of these may have factored in the 200,000 job losses from 2008 to 2009, but you’d never guess if you listened to the employers’ groups.

The fault lies at the door of the minimum wage. €8.65 an hour. €346 a week. Even the government has jumped aboard the reduce-the-gravy train and are spouting the same ‘facts’ as Callan and ISME. These are that Ireland’s wages are among the highest in the world, that our minimum wage is the second-highest in Europe (after Luxemburg), that Irish employers have it the hardest of everywhere and really, we the workers, should be paying them for the privilege.

The dirty little secret is that the ‘facts’, the real facts, do not support these assertions and never have. In 2008 when the claims were kindled, UNITE the union did a good job of looking at the actual statistics. They found the following:

  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Found that in the private sector, Irish wages rank in the bottom half of the EU-15, lying 11th and falling nearly 11% behind the average EU wage.
  • EU AMECO: In this database, maintained by the EU’s Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate, Irish industrial wages lie 11th as well, nearly 7% behind the EU-15 average.
  • The US Bureau of Labor Statistics: The American database shows that Irish manufacturing wages are over 17% below the EU-15 average (and an incredible 42% below Norway’s average manufacturing wage).

The reports dig deeper, looking at Irish purchasing power, or living costs. When this analysis is applied in the OECD examination, Irish wages end up barely higher than Spain, falling from 11% behind the average EU15 to 20%.

Percentages and facts have all been deliberately confused by government and business groups and repeated, mantra-like, to drive home the fact that Irish wages are too high.

An employee studying all the information about their alleged high wages would be astonished to discover that not only are their wages not that high, but that Irish employers contribute among the least to their workers’ social security payments in Europe.

For good measure, the UNITE study found that in competitiveness reports, Ireland sat behind nine other countries in the EU 15 and that they all had higher wage levels than Ireland.

The problem is, the same people who have targeted social welfare also have the minimum wage in their sights and they have just been waiting for an opportunity to push their agenda down our throats. The recession has afforded them that chance. In a time of full employment and high revenue, the line ‘we need to make poor people live on less’ would not be well received. In a recession, that can be dressed up as ‘we need to make poor people live on less so we can keep people in jobs and save the country. Be patriotic - take a minimum wage cut!’

It’s not naïve nor economically illiterate to want to safeguard this wage and social welfare. Speaking purely economically, cutting the spending power of those who consume the most in a society dependent on consumption taxes, is utter madness. It will further contract a contracting economy. Speaking from a societal perspective, it is just so damaging. €346 a week is not a lot of money for 40 hours work.

Take the cost of living. The average mortgage is €200 a week and rent for a two-bed apartment the same. Childcare in Dublin is on average €150+ a week. Gas/ESB bills run at about €150 a month. Bus travel, €20+ a week. Grocery bills, €100+ a week. These are just a small sample of every day expenses faced by people. They’re not scientific by any means, but a rough and perhaps cautious approximation. Nobody on the minimum wage could cope with these expenses and that is why the state runs the Family Income Supplement (FIS) scheme - effectively a state run subsidy for low paying employers. If the minimum wage was to drop to the Small Firms Association’s demand of €7.65 an hour, applications to FIS could end up through the roof.

It doesn’t take a genius either to realise that if the minimum wage comes down, that gives the government license to again reduce social welfare rates. Welfare rates that fall just short of the basic working week’s pay are not sustainable. And that’s before we deal with the reductions in minimum wage that are already allowed for under-18s and trainees.

These effects are not being talked about. These groups have an agenda and their goal is to make sure that coming out of this recession, with a broken social partnership, low wages will be a feature for years to come. That’s why this battle is so important. If the minimum wage goes, we can be sure of one thing - it will only be the start of the erosion of workers’ rights in Ireland.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: McTavish

    Mar 4th 2010 at 17:03

    …indeed and watching the mainstream media, supporting the government, who are watching us (just in case we take to the streets; which is unlikley…”listen out…” can you hear the Greeks chanting “we are not Irish…we will resist…”) and including the national broadcatser RTE, who are really giving the minimum wage a hammering… well sure it’s a great a great spectator sport.

    My difficulty is that whilst I want to support the civil servants on their go-slow, I am unable to square this with the thought that there are hundreds of people standing in dole ques (how do ya spell queuuu??) in the snow and rain who would gladly take one of those public sctor jobs…’cuts’ & all…is this niave??

    And one wonders about the top paid civil servants, including those in charge of the Garda etc who have had their ‘cuts’ reinstated? Now call me a conspiricy theorist but I wonder is this the last thing the government wants to do…undermine the morale of the ’sbordinates but not ‘those in charge’, particularly if citizens do decide to take to the streets??

    As for Patrica Callan…well don’t get me started…she seems to be Pat Kenny’s favourite guest at the moment; appearing far too often for my liking on his Radio show; and on the Frontline programme twice as in as many months…not that I’m trying to prop up my assertion that that the mainstream media, including RTE, are supporting the government in their drive to cut wages, and race us, no drag us all (not screaming & kicking because we have had the fight drained out of us it seems…) to the bottom???
    No, Patrica, not only has she a skinny neck…(apologies for being personal here, its just that I’m a man and I notice the shape of a lady’s neck), she has a brass neck… to sit there and pontificate about the minimum wage in this country affecting competitiveness, when clearly, if she read some of the many credible peices of research, such as Micheal Taft’s et al reports in the Irish Left Review she would see that not only has she a brass neck, she has a bloomin cheek , and I don’t mean that she has a bloomin cheek in an attractive bloomin cheek way, such as those blushing maidens who I fell in love with, in Pride & Predjudice (the book not the movie… though Keira Knightly & Kate Winslett are quite bloomin beautiful…), no Patrica Callan has a bloomin cheek taking the line she does.

    To be fair though I’d rather listen (or rather look at) Patricia Callan than some fat beardy bloke in a shiny arsed suit spouting the benefits of unfettered capitalism…particularly when she is wearing a ‘red’ (get it??) scarf around her brass neck.

    Cheers.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Newspaper Circulation Figures

    CIRCULATION FIGURES:
    Jan - June 2010

    Irish Independent 144896
    Irish Examiner 46687
    The Irish Times 105742
    Irish Daily Star 93729
    Irish Daily Mirror 60460
    The Irish Sun 86064
    Irish Daily Mail 51338
    Weekend Herald 40933

    No comments »
  • EAPN Ireland | Workfare Won’t Work for the Unemployed

    Excellent blog post from Aiden Lloyd, on EAPN’s On the Line blog. This pretty much nails the governments ‘thinking’ behind the workfare scheme. It wants to be seen to be doing something, while doing absolutely nothing. The economic structure of the country is based on attracting foreign capital, aka laundering profits, which only really benefits a small minority. Everything else is supposed to ‘trickle down’ from this. They’re not interested in restructuring the economy to boost indiginous growth.

    Minister O’Cuiv aims to use these schemes to provide unemployed people with short-term work activity, to up-skill them and ‘get them back into the mainstream workforce as speedily as possible’. He further contends that ‘maintaining people’s employability through regular work activity will be important for getting people back into the competitive economy’. This stance is revealing and is indicative of government thinking in terms of job creation for unemployed people. It would appear that the decision has already been made that any recovery will be dependent on a general improvement in the global economy and that the immediate priority is to manage matters until this recovery comes about.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Anglo Grinder

    Hugh Green, on foot of the largest profit loss in Irish history - the 8.2 bn lost by Anglo Irish Bank in six months - has started to look at the figures and its eye watering.

    Grants to Enterprise was ticking over nicely all the way through the boom, making up 5-7% of capital expenditure. Then bam! 2009 we’re up to nearly 25% of capital expenditure. Only problem is that in 2009, it’s mostly down to Anglo Irish Bank.

    And

    But seeing as we’re heading into the propaganda season leading up to the budget, talking about the ‘savings’ that will have to be made, what with the ‘fiscal austerity’ being demanded by the ‘markets’, in the form of cuts to welfare, education and health, consider austerity in relation to spending on Anglo Irish Bank.

    See chart for details.

    No comments »
  • Slavefare: government proposal is a sham

    This comment from an anonymous punter on progressive economy sums up many of my thoughts on the matter
    "The thing that annoys me most about this is that it's not a real proposal. The Department can't provide any detailed proposals because there aren't any!

    The Minister appears to have thrown a (bad) idea out there to convey the impression that something's being done to tackle our unemployment problem when the reality couldn't be further from the truth.
    He's accused unemployed people of widespread fraud, without offering them any hope of getting a real job.

    We've seen the biggest recorded job losses in the history of the state, and Minister O'Cuiv thinks the numbers are high because people are refusing jobs, or working and claiming - what jobs does he think are out there? Employers are complaining because they're inundated with applications for any job advertised, not because no-one's applying!

    No comments »
  • Social Europe Needs a New Economic Model | John Palmer at Social Europe Journal

    There is however, a deep issue at stake if defence of decent European social standards is to be placed at the heart of policy making and not to become an increasingly powerless lobby at the margins of the debate. For that to happen the European Union must surely break with an almost exclusive emphasis on GDP as the be all and end all of economic policy objectives. The time has come to replace GDP with a far wider, more socially and environmentally responsible measure of economic progress.

    No comments »
  • Michael Burke’s common on Michael Taft’s post on progressive-economy@tasc re Service exports

    In the late boom year of 2005 the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the building and construction sector was €12.9bn and industry ex bulding was €33.6bn (2009 National incomes and Accounts, Table 4). By contrast the GVA of 'Other services', which includes financial services was €67.6bn.

    If we turn to the separate Input-Output tables, the 3 categories of financial services (finance, insurance and related) comprised €32bn.

    These are very large numbers and they are based on a fiction.

    The CSO link provided by Michael Taft shows Ireland has a trade deficit in services with the US of some €17.4bn, whereas services trade with the Europe and the rest of the world is in surplus.

    1 comment »
  • New Left Project | NLP Blog

    Good post on the BBC's official response to criticism of their Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla
    The BBC has, predictably, “dismiss[ed]” claims that a recent Panorama documentary on the Gaza flotilla was biased towards Israel. But its response itself illustrates the crux of the problem:

    “Israel has been accused of breaking international law by seizing a Turkish ship. Israel says they were terrorists. Turkey insists they were innocent victims.”

    That same opposition was proposed throughout the documentary on the flotilla: were the activists terrorists, or were they innocent peace activists?

    No comments »
  • Companies Dodge $60 Billion in Taxes Even Tea Party Condemns - BusinessWeek

    The Double Irish’

    On advice from Ernst & Young, Forest Laboratories Ireland reorganized that year, dropping the country from its name. The newly dubbed Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. established a registered office in Hamilton, Bermuda, declaring the island its tax residence. This unit took control of licensing the patents.

    A second subsidiary in Ireland inherited the old name. It handled the manufacturing, sublicensing the rights to the patents, according to a corporate disclosure and an internal Forest flow chart tracing the arrangement that was reviewed by Bloomberg.

    The change helped the Irish subsidiary cut its effective tax rate to 2.4 percent from 10.3 percent the year before the reorganization, according to its annual reports. It did so by deducting from its taxable income the fees that went to Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax. Charlie Perkins, a spokesman for Ernst & Young, one of the so-called Big Four, declined to comment on its work for Forest.

    No comments »
  • Ireland: A recession of the banks, by the banks, and for the banks | afoe | A Fistful of Euros | European Opinion

    And yet it’s not clear that the worst is over. The banks haven’t yet made a big move on distressed home mortgages and no one is clear what will happen when forebearance is no longer a viable strategy. Notwithstanding the government’s attempts to compare tax revenue to “profile” (i.e. a very recent projection), the fact is that tax revenue is stagnant at last year’s depression-like levels despite an apparent recovery in economic statistics. And while there are those desperate hotels, the tourists will still find fussy and expensive restaurants (plus VAT).

    Are there any tricks left in the bag? The government is looking at privatization, most likely as a way to realize a large amount of cash at fairly short notice — essentially a portfolio switch of state-owned companies for all the bank liabilities it has taken on. And there are some bizarre Thatcherite echoes in the possible appearance of a poll tax by the end of the year (dressed up as a “flat rate” water charge or property tax)

    No comments »
  • How Much Did Eurozone States Spend On Bailing Out Private Banks? | Irish Public Policy

    As a percentage of GDP the Euro-area average is 25.4%, the EU 27 is 31.2%. This is about 1,870 billion for the entire Eurozone. Nothing compared to what has been allocated to the Greek government. But, get this, Ireland spent a whopping 231.8% of its GDP, massively above any other country. Most of this is accounted for by the blanket guarantee of bank liabilities.

    No comments »

Link Archives »