Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 9th 2012


Scream Blue Murmur Interview and Tracks!

The performance troupe Scream Blue Murmur, formerly known as the Belfast Poets’ Touring Group, are pathbreakers in Ireland’s currently burgeoning live arts scene. Here they are interviewed by fellow poet and performer Dave Lordan of Irish Left Review on the eve of setting off on their latest North American Tour with their new show ”Something’s Gone Wrong in the Dreamhouse”. Two exclusive tracks from the show are available to download below.

How challenging is it to combine political principle with artistic rigour?

I think this group starts with the idea that, in writing, sincerity, honesty and passion should be the driving force. To write well, in whatever form you choose, is a challenge. Whether you want to convey your message in traditional or slam poetry, multiple voice performances or songs, sometimes even combinations of all these at once, the choosing of a form is almost as important as the message.

The political side of the equation comes in when the issues or ideas that need to be expressed have to be formulated in such a way that they don’t fall into the trap of pamphleteering, basically the writing of a political treatise in poetic form.

If there is a challenge, it is the challenge of writing interesting political or historical material that can be conveyed to a world-wide audience in a relatively accessible format. The political equation is whether or not you can find an angle to illuminate the issues that interest you without being reduced to sloganeering.

You’ve recently incorporated a DJ, a human beatbox, and former Stiff Little Fingers Brian Faloon drummer into your group. Why, and has it had the effect you expected?

The group is going into its fifth year and we are continually developing the Scream Blue Murmur style and method.

Basically, we take all our external influences (music, comedy, writing, poetry, art, film) stick them in a blender on high speed and what comes out is our sound, sometimes surprising even to ourselves.

Everything stems from the writing, the added instrumentation supports what is spoken or sung.

In a traditional musical group the tendency is for the singer or performer to follow the music and fit in the words with the tune or rhythm. Alternatively you see poets read or perform over music which, unfortunately, has no connection to the written words. For us, it is the other way round, the musical accompaniment follows the words but we aim to find a connection between the two things.

Our drummer, Brian Faloon, has a substantial impact on the way the music wraps around the words and rehearsals are an experimental process where we each contribute to the overall sound. In our musical numbers we juxtapose harsh lyrics with sweet melodies and tight harmonies, we add to the percussion backing and we make our own dubstep or dance backing tracks. The Scream Blue Murmur sound is constantly evolving so we have the opportunity to develop our strengths.

Tell us about your collective artistic process? How do you deal with disagreements?

We are a completely harmonious group, so we never have any disagreements. Any tensions are resolved physically. Usually whoever is left standing at the end wins; similar to a wrestling match in a cage. Aisling Doherty bites and fights dirty - usually the biters win but some of us have been practising our moves off the top rope.

Your new show is about the American Dustbowl disaster of the 1930s. Why choose to remember this catastrophe over so many others?

The new show “Something’s Gone Wrong in the Dreamhouse” is our fourth touring show and it is based on, not only the Dustbowl disaster, but the entire decade of the 1930s.

After much research, we have written material on the interwar period and the impact of the war on people’s lives. We have written about the aftermath of the roaring twenties and the stock market crash, the dustbowl, the rise of fascism with Hitler, Mussolini and Franco, about Cable Street and about the fightback, things like the Bonus Marches, the Unions and the Auto Lite strike in the US.

We have a dance music version of the Billie Holliday anti-lynching song “Strange Fruit” with an accompanying poem about lynching, and there is also material about some of the icons and the pastimes of that period. We have tried to cover as much as possible that is still of (sometimes regrettable) relevance in the world today.

We aim to come at these issues ‘from angles’ so we don’t aim for a linear or straight up historical reporting element in the writing.

With “Strange Fruit” for example, the aim was to investigate the attitude towards lynching. How it became commonplace in some places, so much so that postcards were produced of people picnicking under lynched bodies.

We approach the Dustbowl in the same way. There are a series of arguments around the cause. Some argue that it was caused by an unexpected and lengthy drought, others by the move towards monoculture and intensive capitalist agriculture. It would be easy just to write about that argument, but our work looks at the religious ideas in people’s heads at the time and how that impacted on their attitude to the Dustbowl, and also the turmoil that the Dustbowl caused in forcing people off the land.

A very important question, I think, for all austerity artists is how do you fund yourselves? Any tips for those disheartened by lack of funding?

There are two elements to this question and there is a fair bit of discussion and debate about the financial situation for art and artists at the moment.

It seems that public funds are normally only divided out amongst the same small, select group of artists, whether they are working in poetry, music or theatre.

The end result of this is other writers, poets and artists give up because it just isn’t financially viable to write or perform. There doesn’t seem to be a desire to support the next generation of artists financially.

In the US and Canada they have opened the door for a middle ground where circuits exist for writers, musicians, artists and poets to produce shows cheaply and make money, enough in some instances to live reasonably well on.

We think though, that we could really just take about 10 per cent of the military budget and there would be enough to fund hundreds of thousands of up and coming writers, musicians, poets and artists.

In terms of funding ourselves the sad thing is that a group like ours is forced to operate like a small business when public funding really isn’t available. We have always worked hard to find money to fund our tour, by gigging constantly through the year and taking workshops. We are coming ever closer to covering all costs, which would be an ideal situation.

You have had a very positive reaction in the states. Tell us about that and your next tour.

The group has generally had a good reaction wherever we have performed. Since the beginning we have had audience members who have seen us, enjoyed what we do and become bridge builders between us and a wider audience by encouraging other people to come and see us. Given that we have had hardly any press or TV coverage locally, this has been essential. In Kuala Lumpur one person heard of us, but we went over there anyway and thanks to their enthusiasm we played to a packed house. We have kept in touch with many of the people we meet on our travels and always look forward to catching up on our return visit.

We have had an exceptionally good response to our work in the US, particularly New York and Minneapolis. The most interesting thing about the scene in the US is the level of discussion about writing, music and art. There is a serious critical dialogue between audiences, critics, reviewers and performers.

This seems to us much more substantial than what we witness here. In Northern Ireland in particular there seems a real fear to engage in debate about the ideas that are being expressed; so most discussions, critiques or reviews avoid ideas, relying on description or reporting of events rather than looking over the underlying ideas being presented.

Our experiences in the US are that we are challenged much more thoroughly on both the performances and the ideas being expressed, which has led to us constantly developing both our written work and performance style.

It is worth noting that the performance standards in the US appear to be more responsively developed than almost anywhere else we have performed, perhaps as a result of that circle of critical investment made by audiences.

Will you be touring Ireland?

We have found that for our group is it far less draining artistically and financially to tour overseas than it is to tour and perform in Northern Ireland & Ireland.

A group like ours doesn’t fit easily into a simple categorization. We are not simply a poetry group, nor are we a standard musical group. We are a combination of writing and performance styles. We look for unique ways to convey the work to an audience. We like to keep it interesting for ourselves as well as those who have come to see us.

Our experience is that in the US, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and Europe this need for categorization just doesn’t matter. They appear to take you on face value. That means that groups like ours get a hearing and can build an audience.

It is much harder for a group like ours here. In Ireland and Northern Ireland there appears to be a savage demarcation of styles, therefore music groups play only in pubs, dance music in clubs. The two extremes of the poetry scene are found either in back rooms of old pubs with damp carpets and disgusting toilets or in plush venues like universities with tiny numbers of people in attendance.

What do make of the poetry scene in Ireland at the moment? Anything interesting going on?

As with any art form there is an ebb and flow in the themes, performance styles and audience reception of work.

A few years ago we would have said that the poetry scene here, both performance based and literary based was blazing a trail in the world of words. However, recently there seems to be an air of stagnation, with themes becoming more introspective and performances less inviting to the passerby. Whether this is due to the weight of the world’s issues becoming too much to bear for the “sensitive artiste”, or due to the pay packets of the established poets making their garrets a little more comfortable, remains to be seen.

However, when communities are in turmoil or conflict, artists inevitably respond with a creative surge. Given the current economic and political climate, we would anticipate that creativity will again bloom and that recent political apathy will be forced into submission.

Perhaps then that momentum will return and bring about the beginning of the next phase in Irish and Northern Irish poetry.

Tracks:

Sing To Me Billy Sunday

Strange Fruit Hi Honey

Right-click and select Save As to download. Unfortunately, only in .m4a format at the moment.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Damo

    Jun 22nd 2010 at 17:06

    Lovely article, Dave. I saw these guys at E.P. a few years back now and thought they were great - good to see they’re still pushin forward and keepin the live scene in Ireland interestin :)

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

    I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

    We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

    Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

    We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

    No comments »
  • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

    Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

    No comments »
  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors