Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 9th 2012


Recognising and responding to racism experienced by migrant workers

Ireland is changing and along with it the many ways oppression including racism manifests in society.  The past few years has seen a marked denial of the very existence of racism with the language of diversity and integration dominating the policy and public discourse.

The only formal structure with an exclusive focus on racism, the National Consultative Committee on Racism and Interculturalism, was unceremoniously closed in 2009, the National Action Plan Against Racism was ground to a halt and Anti-Racism in the Workplace Week was renamed Workplace Diversity Week.

Support for action on diversity, interculturalism and integration whilst important will not generate positive results without equal weight and attention being given to the more difficult and challenging work of countering racism.

Racism has always been and continues to be a contested concept. While accepted that the concept of ‘race’ has no scientific basis, nevertheless, it is still used in everyday life to demarcate groups largely according to physical appearance and skin colour, but also in terms of ethnicity, culture and national origin.

Debates about cultural ‘fit’ and practices have intensified in recent times across Europe.   Debate is, of course, healthy but when it involves stigmatizing or stereotyping the cultures and ways of life of black and ethnic minorities as inferior, or deeming them to be a threat to the dominant culture, what we are really seeing  is a particular manifestation of contemporary racism.

To understand racism we need to recognise that one of its main functions is the generalisation of human characteristics of a certain group. In fact, cultural differences tend to be generalised in the same way as the traditional biological racial hierarchies, for example the tendency to behave in a certain way or live according to certain moral values.  

Racism operates at both an individual and an institutional level. Individual or direct forms of racism can range from verbal name calling to violent physical abuse.  By contrast, institutional forms of racism refer to the effects of institutional actions i.e. policies and practices that are discriminatory towards or indifferent to the needs and requirements of minority ethnic groups including migrant workers. 

There is a direct link between individual and institutional racism. Individuals are either enabled or excluded by the way a society and its institutions operate.  Individuals are racist consciously or unconsciously, mainly as a result of acting on a belief system where certain people are considered superior or inferior based on their membership of a particular group.

Central to discriminatory relations between those who do and those who do not experience racism is a difference in power status.  The role played by the state, politicians and the media (through banner and sensationalist and inflammatory headlines) is of paramount importance. These groups have the power to define the social world and impose a framework within which migrants are perceived ie legally or illegally resident, citizen or non citizen.

Racial discrimination both in terms of everyday abuse and discrimination and exclusion within Irish institutions is becoming more widespread. In a survey carried out by Amnesty in 2001, almost 80% of individuals from black or ethnic minority groups living in Ireland claimed they had experienced some form of racism or discrimination.

A recent report by the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency found that Ireland was among the worst five countries in the EU when it came to racial discrimination and abuse. 73% of those surveyed from Sub-Saharan Africa stated they had experienced racism in Ireland as did 25% of those from central and Eastern Europe.

The incidence of recorded racist crime fell by 21% to 180 incidents in 2008 when the estimated number of non Irish nationals (aged 15 years and over) was 476,100.   Rather than this indicating decreasing levels of racism NGO’s report significant difficulties in reporting incidents of racism to the Gardai.

In practice the majority of racist incidents fall into the category of verbal harassment which are difficult to verify.   In addition many migrants are reluctant to report racist incidents to guards who also act as immigration officers.

Across the world considerable attention has been given to the practice of ethnic profiling.  To date no such examination of ethnic and racial profiling has been undertaken in Ireland (MRCI has commenced exploratory research in this area). Police and law enforcement officers, including immigration officers, are using ethnic profiling when they view people as suspicious because of who they are, what they look like, or where they pray, rather than because of what they have done.

Justification for ethnic and racial profiling is often made on the basis of countering terrorism, criminality and irregular immigration. Worryingly, the European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey published in 2009 identified that the stop rate in Ireland for people from Sub Saharan Africa was the highest for any ethnic minority in the EU.

The effectiveness of ethnic profiling has been seriously questioned by various studies including the excellent work undertaken by Open Society International.  Irish people know only too well the racist effects of ethnic profiling.  Ethnic profiling of the Irish community during the 1970’s and 80’s by the police in the UK and when travelling to and from the UK has been well documented as having led to discriminatory outcomes not least the very high number of Irish people arrested and imprisoned during that period.

Unequal treatment in the access of public services also has a direct bearing on the lived experiences and social status of any community.  While many frontline service providers are respectful and aim to deliver services without prejudice, direct experiences of racism are unfortunately a reality for many migrant workers. This can take many different forms i.e. the manner and tone used, prejudiced behaviour, being denied services.

Racism in the delivery of public services is evident too in the policies shaping services and access to services.  The Habitual Residency Condition is of particular concern for migrant workers as their eligibility for essential supports and services is predicated on meeting a number of restrictive criteria and not on their economic need.

Sufficient evidence exists that migrant workers experience difficulties asserting their employment rights and are vulnerable to discrimination and racism in the workplace.   The way the work permit system operates by binding a migrant worker to a particular employer, exacerbates this vulnerability.  80% of work exploitation cases in the MRCI involve people on work permits.

Racism can range from being treated less favourably to fellow employees in terms of pay and associated work privileges to scenarios of extreme exploitation and forced labour. Work environments that are unwelcoming and are sharply divided on ethnical lines fuel racial tension and generally mean that migrant workers have more negative experiences.

Migrant workers have also been hindered from accessing employment and certain occupations because of racism and discrimination. The ESRI in 2008 found that Non-Irish nationals are three times more likely to experience discrimination while looking for work, while black people are seven times more likely.

For migrant women there is the additional concern of gender discrimination, such as experiences of unequal pay, sexual harassment, and pregnancy related discrimination.   Migrant women, like women in all parts of society, are in an unequal position at an individual, community and societal level. This combined with racism experienced in the workplace and in accessing services places them at a much greater risk of discrimination.

Growing hostility towards migrants is a worrying development in times of recession.  The impression that migrant workers were no longer welcome is reinforced by contradictory political and policy statements.  The unfounded perception created by certain politicians that migrant workers are more disproportionally involved in ‘frauding’ the social welfare system is a good example of the type of dangerous political opportunism that is creeping into our political processes.

In conclusion, countering racism requires a comprehensive and strategic policy and legislative approach.  A plan of action to follow on from the ending of the National Action Plan Against Racism in 2008 would be an important step in the right direction.

A legislative basis for recognising racism as a crime and ensuring that the racially aggravated dimension of crimes committed are considered in sentencing is absolutely necessary.  So too is a national racist reporting and monitoring system that is independent of the Gardai and enables reporting of racist incidents other than those currently defined as crimes.

Without improving access to redress for victims of racism, policies and law will remain severely inadequate and finally communities who experience racism require the supports and resources to become empowered and fully participate in advocating for the rights of their communities.

Siobhán O’ Donoghue is Director of the Migrant Rights Centre Ireland, a national organisation concerned with the rights of migrant workers and their families since 2002. She has worked for many years in community sector organisations in Ireland, ranging from local grass roots to national policy organisations and structures.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Charlie

    Jul 6th 2010 at 10:07

    I spoke to a native Irishman some time ago.
    He told me, “I hate two things on this planet.”
    I asked him, “What’s that?”
    “The first is bloody racism,” he said,
    “And the second is f***ing ‘n***ers’!”
    That explains it all, doesn’t it?

  2. Comment by: Khmer movies

    Jul 7th 2010 at 19:07

    Racism is a natural outgrowth of cultures and societies that promote racial consciousness. It’s a painful experience to be a target of racial profiling and discrimination when you’re part of the oppressed minority.

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Jul 6th 2010

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • The Greek debt workout will establish a benchmark for sovereign debt haircuts across the Eurozone

    I tried to reduce the size of this quote, but I kept on leaving important stuff out. The whole article is a must read, particular the point made earlier that the negotiations being finalised now between the ECB and private bond holders will ‘establish benchmark terms for other struggling Euro sovereigns as well. Thus, it is possible that the valuation of sovereign debt across all Euro nations will be established in relatively short order’. Anyway, this article by a couple of ‘humble investors’ provides plenty of clarity.

    We have not reached the end of history. Mankind evolves, as does capitalism and its many brands. But not that much. An objective look at our modern economic ecosystem shows clearly one unified global banking system that is actually made stronger by predictable, publicly aired tensions among competing political and economic theorists and practitioners. As long as lawmakers and we, the people that must obey them, continue quarrelling among ourselves, those that control money are free to do as they like. When the people revolt against the symbols of political power (storm the Bastille, storm the winter palace), then the people succeed in forcing those that control money to alter the political structure. Only when lawmakers take steps to limit bank system access to the nation’s resources by indenturing the factors of production (dumping tea overboard, storming the Eccles Building), can the nation’s capital shift back to the people.

    Today we have an oligopoly of central banks issuing the world’s baseless currencies and, by having successfully promoted substantial household and sovereign debt assumption, can now dictate resource allocation and fiscal policy terms. Against this power there is fragmentation - (mostly) democratically elected officials overseeing republics of generally obedient populations. Lenin knew; “by continuing the process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens”. John Maynard Keynes himself agreed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

    We argue that indebted governments have ceded that power to banking systems without conscience or public accountability. If the global banking system has ultimate power over how global wealth is perceived, (as it does), and it is the only institution powerful enough to keep indebted governments in control of their societies, (which it is), then the only reasonable strategy for an independent investor is to think like a Rothschild. Don’t fight the Fed - bet on it.

    No comments »
  • Protest at cuts in small rural schools Dublin, 1st February 2012

    Hundreds of teachers, parents and school children came from all over Ireland to protest at Minister Ruairí Quinn’s proposed cuts to small schools in Dublin when the Dáil was debating the bill.

    No comments »
  • Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for fracking companies in the world

    Very important point made by Natural Gas Europe here (posted on Shell to Sea) about the licencing agreement around Shale Gas (Fracking) and needs to be understood in the context of the news today that Tamboran Resources initial exploration in  north Leitrim has found that they could ultimately reach 2.2 trillion cubic feet of gas, worth $55 billion at today’s prices. Meanwhile Pat Rabbitte has asked the EPA do an environmental study, but this is very, very unlikely to veer from the assessment of the European Commission consultancy study on licensing hydraulic fracturing which found that there is no need for specific new legislation governing the mining activity.

    Besides the environmental impact, the financial cost of both that gas line and the potential shale gas excavation has caused consternation. Currently, Ireland has one of the most attractive tax rates for companies in the world. Companies in Ireland are, in most cases, required to pay only 25 per cent corporation tax, a much lower rate than most other countries with possible shale gas reserves; Ireland also does not require companies to pay any royalties to the government on saleable gas. Tamboran, Lough Allen Natural Gas and Enegi may be required to pay between five and fifteen per cent over this rate, but, even at a higher rate, the gain for the government will be lower than for most other countries in comparable situations. Pundits and protestors alike say that the government is effectively giving away a valuable resource, owned by the Irish people, to outside companies, for very little in return.

    2 comments »
  • Conflict of interest is so deeply embedded in Ireland, no one seems to notice

    The cops were very swift to close down the demonstration in the NAMA building that  Unlock NAMA occupied on Saturday the 28th. They haven’t been as swift though to investigate Anglo Irish Bank. A big blow to that investigation is due, apparently, to the fact that the cop leading it went to work for Bank of Ireland. It is not unusual for people from the fraud squad to move into the private banking sector, we are told, just as we were told that it isn’t unusual for people to move from the regulators office or the Central Bank (when they were separate bodies) to the boards of private banks. Unlock NAMA revealed that the building they occupied was in a very bad state of repair. Add to that the difficulty in establishing that it was a NAMA building at all, considering that it was added to the foreclosure list incorrectly. This should open up discussion on what is happening to all the other NAMA buildings, at the very least. At the most there should be uproar about the massive stock of properties that NAMA controls the loans of which is being allowed to rot and devalue. These properties are being held on to simply to try and artificially hold the price on property and provide the means for future speculation.

    Senior garda fraud specialist retires to work for Bank of Ireland

    The senior garda detective who was in charge of the Anglo-Irish investigation for 18 months took early retirement at the end of last year and is now working with Bank of Ireland, it has emerged.

    Former detective superintendent Pat Collins, 52, was regarded as the Garda’s top expert in corporate fraud investigation. He spent much of his career in the Fraud Squad and before taking charge of the Anglo investigation he spent time on secondment with the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement working with its director, Paul Appleby.

    Former colleagues say his departure — on full pension after having served 30 years in the force — will be a major blow to the investigation.

    Coveney adviser’s patriotism stressed to secure special pay

    Elsewhere, Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney is in the news for asking for a €130,000 salary for his special advisor Fergal Leamy, a former chief executive of Greencore USA. The cap as we are well aware after all the breeches of it is €92,672. Leamy didn’t last long, despite Coveney pleading that he was desperate to do the state some service he left after four months. He got an offer from an equity firm in the London that he couldn’t refuse. However, the story also reveals that Simon  Coveney’s brother, Patrick Coveney is chief executive of Greencore. Of course Greencore has a long and controversial history, which Shane Ross referred to as a template for the worst excesses of corporate Ireland, a close rival to DCC.

    No comments »
  • Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books? | David Graeber

    David Graeber and the model of his ‘popular’ yet scholarly book Debt: The First 5000 Years

    So: what was to be the model for a big questions sort of book, and how to write a book that would still be scholarly, but not academic?

    This is what I came up with:

    Of all the models I considered, the most amenable turned out to be the approach adopted by Marcel Mauss. This might seem odd. especially because Mauss never actually wrote a book; he’s mainly famous for a series of essays. Yet many of these essays-not just the Gift, but his essay on the person, techniques of the body (where he coins the term “habitus”), sacrifice and magic-really have had a profound effect both on all subsequent scholarship, and, to differing degrees, political and social debates ever since. Mauss had an uncanny ability to ask the right questions-often, questions he was the first to pose, and which have become mainstays of theoretical debate ever since. His was also an appealing model because Mauss was both a serious, committed activist (he was especially active in the French cooperative movement), and a scholar of remarkable erudition. His problem-and this, I suspect, is why he never did write a proper book, despite numerous attempts-was that he was also almost unimaginably disorganized, and therefore, terrible at exposition. I suspect if alive today he would have been quickly diagnosed with severe ADD.

    1 comment »
  • Irish ‘SOPA law’ another under the radar attack on digital rights by a craven government pandering far too easily to corporate interests

    Very strong and accurate piece from Karlin Lillington in the Irish Times today, making no bones about the motivations behind the changes in copyright law that Sean Sherlock and the Irish government are trying to sneak in. It’s odd at a time when the SOPA law in the US, which is similarly motivated to the Irish law, has just been dropped.

    FOR THREE governments in a row, “short-sighted” and “sneaky” seem to have become the relevant terms in operation when bringing in controversial, high-impact legislation on digital issues.

    In the past, from the government’s perspective, this approach has worked well in shoving in poorly drafted, unscrutinised law on the controversial area of data retention, giving the Republic one of the most severe, internationally criticised, anti-business retention regimes in the world.

    This time around, the Government is trying again to use secondary legislation - a statutory instrument requiring no discussion and no debate in the Oireachtas - to (supposedly) protect intellectual property for a narrow band of hard-lobbying entertainment industries.

    For despite what the ‘hard-lobbying entertainment industries’ might say internet piracy is not killing off its profits. That assumes for a start that the amount produced is static, which given the amount of ‘content’ flooding towards us each day is absurd.

    But more importantly, there is evidence (from numerous mainstream studies and reports) that industry claims about piracy decimating revenue, jobs and creativity are vastly overstated. A careful analysis of such claims by Julian Sanchez on Ars Technica ( iti.ms/wT8l02), picked up and further discussed by Forbesiti.ms/xQJXhg), indicates piracy has actually had only a minor impact on these industries.

    The record industry in the US, for example, has about double the new releases it had a decade ago, when piracy was barely on its radar. The film industry also has more releases now than in pre-piracy days and its most pirated movies are also those that made staggering box office profits. Sanchez cites evidence that the music industry is making back profits lost to piracy through “complementary purchases” such as concert tickets. And a recent report issued by a US anti-piracy lobby group rather farcically indicates its clients are doing quite well, thank you.

    3 comments »
  • Davos dilemma | Michael Roberts

    The majority of those at Davos think that Capitalism isn’t working, but don’t feel there is a need to change anything because its working rather well for them. It’s up to those not in the 1% then to change it.

    The strategists of capital are attending their annual jamboree in the snow playground of the super-rich in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Many of the top 0.1% of income earners are there. And this year the main theme is whether capitalism works and is fair.

    Capitalism is in crisis - and this time the word ‘crisis’ is not hyperbole. Even the 2600 attendees at Davos recognise that. According to a survey by the financial broadcaster, Bloomberg, almost 70% of those asked believed that the capitalist system is in trouble, with 32% saying it needs “radical reworking”. Less than 20% reckoned ‘free enterprise’ is working. Most Davos 0.1 percenters are really worried that this failure of capitalism to work could lead to ’social instability’ in one form or another.

    And more than half who were asked at Davos thought that inequality of income and wealth under capitalism was damaging economic growth. But only one in five wanted any urgent action on the issue! It seems that greed triumphs over economic logic - or should we say, class interest rules

    No comments »
  • The Promissory Notes | Tom McDonnell

    Economist Tom McDonnell of TASC provides a brief primer on IBRC promissory notes, which is available on Slideshare. Click here to view it in it’s own web page.

    No comments »
  • Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Left Business Observer about the Irish Economy| 7th of January

    Michael Taft talks to Doug Henwood of Behind the News in a detailed 30 minute discussion about the Irish economy which was posted on the 7th of Jan. The second half of the show is given over to a discussion with Jodi Dean about Occupy Wall Street and ‘demands’. It’s also worth reading Jodi Dean’s article on Occupy Wall Street and the Left which was published today on Critical Legal Thinking.

    MP3 Link.

    [display_podcast]

    No comments »
  • What are bankers doing inside EU summits? | Corporate Europe Observatory

    Important information here on the extent of bank lobbies influence in the resolution of the Greek debt crisis, particularly when it comes to plans which require ‘private sector involvement’.

    At the Euro Summits in July and October 20111, crucial decisions “to save the Euro” and “to save Greece” were made. It was agreed to restructure Greek debts and banks were asked to accept a ‘haircut’ to their profits to avoid a Greek default and the risk that some banks might default as a result. In Summer 2011, the press was full of stories about the informal negotiations between EU leaders and the banks about the level of private sector involvement in restructuring Greece’s debts.

    The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a lobby group established in 1983 by the biggest banks and financial institutions in the world to deal with the question of sovereign debt2, became the EU’s interlocutor on the Greek debt issue. Its proposals -described as ”offers”- received red carpet treatment.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors