Inside the Trojan Horse
Book Review:Yeats and Violence: Michael Wood (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Violence moves restlessly through Yeats’ poetry. It is there in ‘The Magi‘ (written in 1913) with its Three Kings who ‘Being by Calvary’s turbulence unsatisfied’ wait for something more, another disturbance of the world order, a revelation of sorts, intimating an appetite for violence.
The violence in question is the kind which takes us by surprise: it is rational at one level — there are always ways to explain violence, sociologically, politically, psychologically, whatever - but it remains deeply irrational at some more mysterious level. What is this dimension to the possibility of violence that can make it attractive and even compelling? A thriller movie or crime fiction without violence is rare; we await its arrival. Such questions in Wood’s opening chapter and the reader looks forward to seeing how they will be answered as he embarks on a close reading of the six short poems by Yeats that first appeared as ‘Thoughts upon the Present State of the World‘ but later became ‘Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen‘.
Wood, treading familiar critical ground, reads the early parts of ‘Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen‘ as a lamentation over the collapse of a misguided dream on the part of the Anglo-Irish Ascendancy if not Europe’s intelligentsia as a whole. This misguided dream comforted itself with notions of progress and the law, the delusion that violence could be contained, that armies and guns could be kept only for showy displays — as if the enemy soldiers inside the shell of the Trojan horse had quietly retired there, not lying in wait for the right moment to reappear and take up killing once more.
Yeats had always believed in keeping the mind open to the possibility of miracles and ‘Easter 1916‘ is brilliant testimony to the magic that transformed ordinary men who ‘I have passed with a nod of the head / Or polite meaningless words’ into revolutionaries; just reciting their names enacts the aura they now possess (‘I write it out in a verse / MacDonagh and MacBride / And Connolly and Pearse’). ‘Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen‘, however, is full of anxiety, disappointment and sense of loss, devoid of the comfort that Yeats thought he had found in spirituality. He defended his mysticism as ‘stylistic arrangements of experience comparable to the cubes in the drawing of Wyndham Lewis and to the ovoids in the sculpture of Brancusi.’ It is tempting to equate this with Eliot’s misunderstanding of Homeric myth in Joyce’s Ulysses as ‘simply a way of controlling, of ordering, of giving a shape and significance to the immense panorama of futility and anarchy which is contemporary history.’ Both Yeats and Eliot gave powerful and moving expression to their struggle to make sense of their world before lapsing, respectively, into fascism and royalism. Both writers believed the impossible could happen but, responding to the antinomies of the age in a different way, so too did Lenin (‘in some respects a revolution is a miracle’ he said in 1921).
For Yeats, the antinomies are just there. Contraries exist but ‘I had never put the conflict in logical form, never thought with Hegel that the two ends of a see-saw are one another’s negation.’ He said that he wrote only for the ear and this may be the best way to read him:
Now days are dragon-ridden, the nightmare
Rides upon sleep: a drunken soldiery
Can leave the mother, murdered at her door.
To crawl in her own blood, and go scot-free;
Michael Wood, adept at showing how the poetry works, listens to these lines about a drive-by shooting by the Black and Tans: ‘D’s give way to r’s, now is picked up by nightmare, which also conceals another r; the l’s in sleep and soldiery and leave produce a slackness of sound within these very tight lines, the two s’s add to this effect and then the d’s return us to drama, the thudding of -dered at her door almost silencing what seemed to be the central alliteration of the passage: mother, murdered.’ Wood is good at paying attention to the subtle shifts in sound and meaning in ‘Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen’ and, in ways that are often though not always illuminating, allies the poem’s sentiments with thoughts expressed by writers as different as Henry James and Paul Muldoon.
Much of what we make of the poem as a whole depends on our response to the eighteen lines that make up the final section:
Violence upon the roads: violence of horses;
Some few have handsome riders, are garlanded
On delicate sensitive ear or tossing mane,
But wearied running round and round in their courses
All break and vanish, and evil gathers head:
By 1919, the carnage of the European war just over, the Anglo-Irish War had begun. The drive-by shooting by the Black and Tans occurred in November 1920 and Yeats’ poem was composed the following year. It was published in September, two months after the truce of July 1921, in a period of respite before the unleashing of the civil war. Yeats draws his poem to an end - a conclusion? - with a disturbing and enigmatic scene: the wind has dropped, dust settles, an evil spirit from 14th-century Kilkenny, one Robert Artisson, ‘lurches past’:
To whom the love-lorn Lady Kyteler brought
Bronzed peacock feathers, red combs of her cocks.
These terminal images of an ‘insolent fiend’ and a depraved witch, not slouching towards Bethlehem but on a similar kind of journey, indicate a prescient awareness of more violence to come, an evocation of civilization at the end of its tether, the return of another cycle of violence.
Wood’s own conclusion to his understanding of the poem is to draw a family resemblance between Yeats’ vision of violence with Walter Benjamin’s ‘divine violence’, a Brecht poem and Alexander Blok’s ‘The Twelve’. What they share, according to Wood, is the feeling of ‘a new disorder, the condition of a world that can only think of its ending, and can picture that ending only as a violent and desperate imitation of a promise.’ Yeats himself would probably be happy with this as a comment on his own poem but such a likelihood may be the source of a problem with Wood’s concluding chapter. The fatalism, the vague and vatic quality discernible in Yeats’ poem cannot be simply transferred to Benjamin, Brecht and Blok (who are writing of different revolutionary moments and from perspectives where the differences from Yeats are just as, if not more, important than the similarities) without losing precious possibilities along the way - no matter how many delicate qualifications and polite modals find their way into Wood’s prose (‘perhaps’, ‘although’ ‘seems’ risk becoming his signature style). He is to be praised for his conversational, easy-on-the-eye style of writing: it is mercifully free of convoluted literary jargon, full of engaging ruminations, knowledgeably suggestive, a leisurely approach that generously extends a spacious comfort-zone to the reader. As his best, the gyroscopic turns of Yeats’ poetry are shown in slow motion and we are gently tutored to hear and appreciate its wobbles and equivocations, the fine differences in tone and meaning that define the subtlety of Yeats’ verse.
In a review of Frank Kermode’s Bury Place Papers, Wood described Kermode as ‘too multifarious a writer to have anything as dogged as a theme for his critical work; too sane and stealthy to boast of anything as limiting as an obsession.’ Kermode’s admirable grittiness, though, goes west when Wood is tempted to generalize and draw in the likes of Brecht and Blok to illuminate Yeats. All three of them may share what Badiou called a ‘passion for the Real’ but this would require a different kind of book to Yeats & Violence, one that would begin where Wood’s book ends. What’s needed is a touch of William Empson as well as Frank Kermode. A bit more violence in other words.
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
Comment by: William Wall
Sep 10th 2010 at 08:09
‘A new disorder, the condition of a world that can only think of its ending, and can picture that ending only as a violent and desperate imitation of a promise.’ - Ireland 2010?
I like Wood. His The Road To Delphi: The Life and Afterlife of Oracles is superb.