Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Delicious button

Skip to content

Tuesday, May 22nd 2012


Why Are We Being Forced Into It?

Last Friday afternoon the Irish Independent published a story about a potential Greek-style EFSF-IMF bailout for Ireland which seems to have been based entirely on the section in the Barclay’s report that first made the suggestion the previous day. As reported in the Irish Times:

“If there are additional financial sector losses or the economy worsens, “The Government may need to seek outside help from either the European Union or International Monetary Fund in such circumstances,” said Barclays. “At this juncture”, given the comfortable near-term liquidity position of the Irish treasury, there isn’t a need to draw on financial assistance, they said.”

The Irish government and the IMF moved speedily to quash the suggestion that any bailout was imminent, as they were critically aware that such a rumour could have even worse effect on a bond yield price that was increasing at a frightening pace throughout the day. Yet, the opinion that it might yet be on the cards remained - even if its imminence was postponed.

After the auction on Tuesday, an article in the Financial Times noted:

Although the auctions saw strong demand with the four-year bond more than five times covered and the eight bond nearly three times covered, analysts warned that the Irish may be “on the slippery slope” towards a Greek-style bail-out.

Padhraic Garvey, global head of rates strategy at ING, said: “Ireland will fight tooth and nail to avoid going to the eurozone bail-out fund, but the cost in terms of yield they are paying is a worry. However, yields will have to rise to around 7 per cent or 8 per cent before it is game over and Dublin will have to follow Greece.”

In the past, of course, the treat of having to rely on money from IMF was used as a stick to beat the Irish electorate into accepting austerity measures, now we find out that those austerity measures themselves are what has caused the increased chance of needing to accept a EFSF-IMF bailout.

Reacting to the financial situation in Ireland yesterday two editorials in British newspapers spelled this out in a way that contradicted Central Bank Governer Patrick Honohan’s view that the only way to stop the increase in the cost of borrowing was to increase public spending cuts.

The Financial Times editorial chided Brian Cowen for the open-ended support of the Irish banking sector and for cutting money out of the economy when the means to pay the constantly increasing level of debt was being undermined by the exacerbated fall in taxes.

“The Irish public has already taken plenty of pain in the form of spending and wage cuts. Before asking for more, Mr Cowen should change a perverse policy that pushes up interest rates and crimps growth. Ireland was not highly indebted before the crisis, with sovereign borrowings of just 25 per cent of GDP. Private sector analysts now fear that gross public debt may reach up to 136 per cent in 2014, once Dublin’s guarantees and estimated losses are added to its sovereign borrowings. Much of this reflects the state’s acceptance of open-ended exposure to private liabilities across the banking sector - a policy that unnerves markets and jacks up sovereign rates.”

As Ireland was the first to implement swinging government spending cuts The Guardian, more concerned perhaps with the expansion of the Con/Lib program to slash and burn the public sector, sees Ireland as lab experiment gone badly wrong:

The most sobering thought for Mr Osborne (if not Mr Cowen) should be that after all the Irish cuts made and announced, and amid double-digit unemployment, the governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, Patrick Honohan, is now arguing that the punishment being meted out by the markets must be met with fresh cuts. Cuts may curb the deficit but they also weaken the economy that must sustain it, and so they can become self-perpetuating.

Of all the dilemmas in macroeconomics, the most important - and least understood - is what a sustained slump in actual output does to productive potential.

The evidence for that has been mounting all week. The Quarterly Household Survey showed the continuing rise of unemployment, the doubling of long-term unemployment, and the increasing in emigration.

And then today, the Q2 GDP data shows that we are indeed experiencing a sustained slump, as Michael Burke points out on Progressive Economy:

“GDP has now contracted in 11 of the last 14 quarters, while GNP has contracted for 9 consecutive quarters, that is, the domestic economy has begun its third straight year of contraction. This compares to an Euro Area average contraction of ‘only’ 4 quarters, which ended a year ago.

The scale of the decline is also well above that in the Euro Area, where the economy contracted by 4.4%. From its peak in 2007, this GDP has contracted by 13.4% in real terms while GNP has fallen by a staggering 17.3%. Worse, in nominal terms GDP has declined by 19.5% and GNP by 24.1%. This measure, GNP at current prices, is decisive with regards to taxation revenues, whose slump is the overwhelming source of the widening public sector deficit. Taxes are paid in cash terms, unreflective of real terms changes in the price level.”

So it is no longer possible for the Irish economy to simply hold its nerve and wait that much vaunted upswing to occur because this news is already making another negative impact on the cost of Irish borrowing,  leading it in the direction of the ‘7 per cent or 8 per cent mark that would mean game over’.

So, while the potential plays that are available are reducing rapidly, with our ability to borrow for investment being undermined by government policy formulated in the interests of the very rich, it’s time to demand a new strategy, but one that address the structural weakness of the Irish economy and to make up for those shortcomings.

As Michael Taft points out we have to put together several principles around which this alternative strategy should be based. The first, and as Anne Costello for Community Platform argued in ILR last week, is taxation.

Our current tax system does not generate sufficient revenue to fund employment, public services and infrastructure. It is also grossly unfair and reinforces inequality.

There is an alternative. Progressive tax reform will promote economic activity. It will retain consumer demand, protect jobs and protect low and middle income earners.

Michael outlines his suggested five principles as:

    • Stop digging. Public spending cuts and taxes on low-average incomes are making things worse
    • Reverse the rise of unemployment
    • Investment in physical infrastructure, public services, poverty and low incomes, and repairing the defects in our indigenous enterprise base and carbon-heavy economic activity
    • Increase taxation, which must impact primarily on high-income groups
    • Save, reinvest and remove the deflation from the economy

      Arguments against these measures maybe presented by the right in the coming months, but it is more likely that they’ll be ignored in the clamour to reinforce the governments arguments that only more public service cuts and flat taxes which impact low-average incomes more, and bringing those on low incomes into the tax net are needed are need to encourage growth in the future. This imagined growth is expected to come from our “dynamic exports”, almost all of which are based on the output of FDI company’s that pay little tax and provide only marginal employment. As Conor McCabe illustrates lucidly in his forthcoming book:

      Since the 1970s the majority of exports emanating from Ireland have been produced by multinationals; in 2008 they accounted for 88 per cent of all merchandise export sales. Yet the amount of people employed by IDA-supported companies in 2008 is only around 7 per cent of total employment.[1] These companies paid €2.8 billion in corporation tax in 2009, and direct expenditure in the Irish economy via payroll costs, Irish materials and services amounted to €19.149 billion. However, total sales amounted to €109.64 billion. Around 80 per cent of the money generated by IDA-supported companies completely by-passes the Irish economy. The profits are repatriated to the country of origin. In 2009 chemical products made up 51 per cent of all merchandise exports from Ireland, the bulk of which were made with imported materials. The chemicals come in via containers, and go out via containers. Irish economic policy has developed exporters, but not exports.

      It is time for us to do a Mary Harney and say that this policy is disastrous and will increase the chance of having to accept an EFSF-IMF bailout, after which our chances of reforming the Irish economy and fixing the structural weakness that have been in place for many decades will be remoter than ever and then it may well be game over.


      [1] IDA, Annual Report 2009 (Dublin: IDA Ireland, 2010), p.20.

      Discussion

      We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

      1. Comment by: William Wall

        Sep 23rd 2010 at 20:09

        Fine but frightening piece of work. We need a new government fast before we reach the point of no return - a new government with guts that’s prepared to change the way we think. The quote from Conor McCabe is astonishing. We’re really nothing but a clearing house for goods and money (the vatican to the multinationals’ mafia?). What a witless gutless shower of bastards we’re governed by.

      2. Comment by: Donagh

        Sep 24th 2010 at 12:09

        I thought my point was rather heavy-handed, then I read this in the scurrilously Tory anti-EU think tank Open Europe:

        Analysts encourage Ireland to tap eurozone bailout fund;
        Economy faces double dip recession

        The Times reports that analysts have suggested that Ireland should seek an immediate €80 billion bailout from the EU-IMF eurozone rescue fund to tackle its “unsustainable” government debts. The article quotes James Nixon, Chief European Economist at Société Générale, saying that failing to act soon could condemn Ireland’s public finances to a “long, arduous, slow death”.

        It also highlighted news about proposed sanctions for eurozone member states that break budget and deficit rules. But note too what it says about the Growth and Stability pact, those Maastrict guidelines that simply have to be meet by 2014.

        The FT reports that Rehn will next Wednesday outline proposed sanctions for eurozone member states that break budget and deficit rules. In addition to fines for countries that break EU budget rules, further penalties could be imposed on member states that failed to keep their annual spending under control and those that failed to improve competitiveness. The fines would be “quasi-automatic”, meaning they could only be stopped if the European Council voted to veto them by qualified majority within 10 days. The proposals still have to be agreed by member states.

        A comment piece in the FT Deutschland further notes: “With the proposed instruments it will be hard to solve the fundamental problems of the [Stability and Growth] pact. If a larger number of states - as it is currently the case - violate the rules, majorities will be found in the future to stop the penalties”.

        Meanwhile, Handelsblatt notes that Rehn has, for the moment, rejected Germany’s demands for the introduction of an “orderly default procedure” for debt-laden eurozone countries. “We first want to let the existing [eurozone] rescue package work and gather experience from its effects on the market”, he argued.

        Also, Conor pointed out to me that his quote relates onto IDA support foreign companies. The IDA doesn’t have an exact number of the non-indiginous companies set up in the country, only for those companies its supports.

      3. Comment by: Donagh

        Sep 24th 2010 at 12:09

        I missed this….thanks John
        Pulling the stuffing out of the celtic tiger

      Leave a Comment

      (required)

      (required, will not be published)

      Sins of the Father

      Sins of the Father:

      Tracing the Decisions

      That Shaped the Irish Economy,

      by Conor McCabe

      from The History Press

      Now Available as an e-Book.

      Subscribe by Email

      Enter your email address:

      Delivered by FeedBurner



      Irish Left Review on Facebook

      Best of the Web

      • 97% Owned | Documentary on Money

        This looks good…

        When money drives almost all activity on the planet, it’s essential that we understand it. Yet simple questions often get overlooked - questions like:

        • where does money come from?
        • Who creates it?
        • Who decides how it gets used?
        • And what does that mean for the millions of ordinary people who suffer when money and finance breaks down?

        97% Owned is a new documentary that reveals how money is at the root of our current social and economic crisis. Featuring frank interviews and commentary from economists, campaigners and former bankers, it exposes the privatised, debt-based monetary system that gives banks the power to create money, shape the economy, cause crises and push house prices out of reach.

        Fact-based and clearly explained, in just 60 minutes it shows how the power to create money is the piece of the puzzle that economists were missing when they failed to predict the crisis.

        Produced by Queuepolitely and featuring Ben Dyson of Positive Money, Josh Ryan-Collins of The New Economics Foundation, Ann Pettifor, the “HBOS Whistleblower” Paul Moore, Simon Dixon of Bank to the Future and Sargon Nissan and Nick Dearden from the Jubliee Debt Campaign, this is the first documentary to tackle this issue from a UK-perspective, and can be watched online now.

        No comments »
      • Greek leftist brings message to Europe - “Let’s talk”

        “The first reason we are taking this trip is because we want the governments of these important European Union countries, France and Germany, to see what we stand for: what is being transmitted in Europe about us is not what we represent and want,” Tsipras told Reuters at the office of his SYRIZA party.

        He will not be meeting government officials, but will see fellow leftists in France and Germany, including former French presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon and Klaus Ernst and Gregor Gysi of Germany’s The Left. He will hold news conferences in both capitals to get his message to a wider audience.

        “We are not at all an anti-European force. We are fighting to save social cohesion in Europe. We are maybe the most pro-European force in Europe, because its dominant powers will lead the union into instability and the euro zone to collapse if they insist on austerity,” he said.

        While he repeated his assertion that the terms of a 130 billion bailout agreement Greece signed with international lenders in March are now a “dead letter”, he said that if he comes to power he will seek a new policy mix to keep Greece in the euro.

        “Yes, we do want Europe’s support and funding, but we don’t want the money of European taxpayers to be wasted. Two bailouts in a row went into the dustbin, into a bottomless barrel. If this continues we would need a third package in six months. Europeans and their leaders must realise this,” he said.

        No comments »
      • Damien Dempsey calls for a No vote in the 31st of May Fiscal Compact Treaty Referendum

        No comments »
      • Mandate: Vote No to the Austerity Treaty

        No comments »
      • Étienne Balibar: ‘Ejecting Greece from the eurozone would be a moral failure for Europe’ - video

        French Marxist philosopher Étienne Balibar discusses European identity amid the financial crisis. Using ideas explored in his 2002 book Politics and the Other Scene, he argues that the continent still has some way to go to rid itself of xenophobia.

        Guardian Comment is Free Video Interview

        No comments »
      • Greece: when the lights go out

        Ireland is not Greece, Michael Noonan has said. The two countries are so far apart that the only thing that reaches us is feta for our fancy salads. Yet, Phil Hogan is planning to use details from electricity bills to go after those who haven’t paid their household charge, just like they tried in Greece. Let’s see how that goes…

        The desperate cunning scheme to get Greeks to pay property taxes by bundling them with electricity bills didn’t last long. You guessed it, people stopped paying their electricity bills and now it looks like the power company - which had to be bailed out last month - has stopped even trying to collect the levy.

        No comments »
      • Greece: heading for the exit? | Michael Roberts

        There is a way out of this. But it’s not on the basis of the pro-banking, pro-capitalist policies of the Euro leaders. Greek state finances would be fine if the richest Greeks paid taxes and did not spirit their money offshore to buy property in Kensington, London or Monaco, with the connivance of Greek banks and politicians granting their wealthy friends and multinationals all kinds of tax advantages and favours that have diluted tax revenues to the point where there is not enough in the kitty to maintain public services.  According to the Tax Justice Network, over a trillion dollars lie in offshore banks and companies in tax havens (not all Greek money of course).  Recover this money and governments could not only reduce their debts but pave the way for a lowering of taxes across the board to encourage investment and growth and increase spending power for the majority.

        Capital controls, public ownership of the banks and major corporate sectors to organise a plan for investment and growth: this is not just an alternative programme for Greece but for all of Europe.

        No comments »
      • On ABC Radio National, PM program: ‘Stupendously idiotic’ policies for Greece can’t work.

        Good answers….

        MARK COLVIN: Well it’s being imposed effectively from Germany, isn’t it? What are the chances that Germany is going to have any patience with a Greece which has failed to form a coalition, which is going into uncharted territories, as you say, with a new election?

        YANIS VAROUFAKIS: It’s like asking the question, what kind of patience am I going to have with gravity? It doesn’t matter.

        (sound of Mark Colvin laughing)

        Gravity is a law of nature and I cannot do anything about it. Similarly, Germany at some point, and I think that that point has already come, Germany will realise that it is absolutely impossible to, for a country like Greece, or for Spain for the matter, to exit this debt deflationary spiral, through cutting. This cannot be done even if every single Greek and Spaniard and Italian wants to do it.

        Even if God, his angels and, you know, every good man and woman on this planet wanted to implement this German prescription on the European periphery, it cannot be done for the same reasons why I can’t fly without an aeroplane.

        MARK COLVIN: So what’s the alternative? Where’s the money going to come from for pump priming?

        YANIS VAROUFAKIS: Well, I don’t think we should have pump priming. What I think we should have in Europe is a little modicum, tiny whiff of rationality.

        No comments »
      • Video: David Graeber and David Harvey in Conversation

        David Graeber and David Harvey discuss their new books, Debt: The First 5000 Years, and Rebel Cities, respectively.

        25 April 2012 at The CUNY Graduate Center

        No comments »
      • Choonara, McNally and the US rate of profit | Michael Roberts

        As readers of my blog will know, ad nauseum

        Oh go on then, say it again, once more with feeling….

        I think there has been a secular downtrend visible in the US rate of profit, but there is also a profit cycle in the US capitalist economy that lasts from trough to trough about 32-36 years.  I reckon that the last peak year of 1997 set the marker for the end of the ‘neoliberal’ up phase from 1982.  The down phase then began to exert pressure on the US capitalist economy.  It forced an even bigger switch from productive investment in manufacturing, transport and communications into financial and property sectors to maintain profits through the expansion of what Marx called fictitious capital, or credit.  That laid the basis for the crisis in 2007 and the ensuing major slump.  In that sense, Marx’s law of profitability did operate to cause the crisis.  The great up phase in profitability after 1982 had finished in 1997, some ten years before the Great Recession.  We are still in the down phase, which will last for at least another three to seven years, on my reckoning, in what is really a long depression like the 1880-90s in the US and the UK.

        But remember the data for these arguments are for the US only.

        No comments »

      Link Archives »

      Authors