Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Delicious button

Skip to content

Tuesday, May 22nd 2012


THE WHITTAKER/LEMASS REVOLUTION: PUSHING ON AN OPEN DOOR AND CALLING IT INNOVATION

Despite the popular perception of Ireland as a closed, backward economy until the arrival of Whittaker and his economic program, the State had always had a relatively open economy. Even in the 1950s, the value of its imports and exports was between between 66 and 70 per cent of GDP. The problem was the nature of those exports, and the destination. Ireland exported, but it exported mainly to Britain, and mainly livestock.

Nor did the pursuit of foreign investment begin with Whittaker and Lemass. The First and Second Inter-Party governments made the attraction of foreign investment to Irish shores a core element of economic policy.

In January 1956 the Minister for Industry and Commerce, William Norton, undertook a tour of the United States in an effort to secure foreign investment for Ireland. Later that month the Taoiseach, John A. Costello, said in a speech in Cork that ‘it was the desire to increase investment, more particularly in export industries which prompted the government to send [the Minister] on a number of missions abroad to induce foreign capitalists to invest in such industries.’

investment.jpg

The trip was a cause of some concern in Irish business circles, and led the government to offer reassurances. The Taoiseach told a meeting of the Federation of Irish Manufacturers in February 1956 that ‘foreign industrialists… were to be encouraged to start factories here for the production of goods not already produced in Ireland, or which were being produced in insufficient quantity, and also, and perhaps more especially, for the production of goods for export.’

In August 1955 Norton visited West Germany where he stressed to German officials that ‘that Ireland’s existing trade agreement with Britain allowed large varieties of goods to be imported into Britain from Ireland duty free and that Ireland had similar arrangements with Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.’ ‘Germans industrialists’ he said, ‘would be able to export to these countries free of tariff if they set up plants in Ireland.’

As with the Taoiseach in 1956, William Norton stressed that ‘the object is not to encourage people to come in and compete with existing industries which are supplying the market, but to come in and make commodities which are being imported.’ This move towards foreign investment was also pushed by the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC), which said in its 1955 report on Ireland and Portugal that ‘greater attention might be directed towards encouraging an increase of foreign direct capital investment in Ireland.’

In October 1955 the Irish and American governments signed an agreement which allowed Ireland to take part in the United States Investment Guarantee Programme, which was set up to encourage production and trade by means of American foreign investment abroad. In November the head of the Irish Development Authority (IDA), Dr. James Beddy, said in Bonn, Germany, that Ireland ‘was interested in the establishment of any and every industry.’ He told a reporter that ‘many towns, particularly in the West of Ireland, were willing to supply new industries with free building sites and grant them 33 per cent exemptions from rates for seven years.’

At a meeting of the Boston Chamber of Commerce in January 1956, William Norton said that Ireland had ‘an intelligent and adaptable labour supply, an advantageous position for international trade, generous tax and import regulations designed to stimulate industry, easy conversion of Irish earnings into dollars, and stable political and economic conditions.’ He added that ‘capital directly invested may be freely repatriated at any time.’

Foreign investment as the path to economic and industrial growth was firmly at the heart not just of Irish government policy, but also of European and American policy as well.

I’ll be dealing with this more in the book I’m working on, but as an example here’s an article from the Irish Times, dated 6 February 1956.

The key part of the article is from the summary of Taoiseach Costello’s speech in Cork:

Foreign industrialists… were to be encouraged to start factories here for the production of goods not already produced in Ireland or which were being produced in insufficient quantities, and also, and perhaps for especially, for the production of goods for export.

This was not only a key part of Irish economic policy in the 1950s, it remains so to this day.

And what was one of the key elements of the Whittaker-penned First Programme for Economic Expansion? Well, more cattle.

1958.jpg

The 1956 article on foreign investment.

TAOISEACH STRESSES NEED TO CATCH TIDE OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT.

investment-cut-01.jpg

investment-cut-02.jpg

investment-cut-03.jpg

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Aidan R

    Sep 24th 2010 at 21:09

    Excellent article and a much needed analysis.

  2. Comment by: William Wall

    Sep 26th 2010 at 09:09

    Looking forward to that book, Conor. I expect to see a few of our most cherished fictions exploded.

  3. Comment by: Conor McCabe

    Sep 26th 2010 at 09:09

    Thanks William. there’s a body of work out there which I’m drawing from and which casts a cold eye on 20th c. Irish history and society. People like Ruth McManus, Paul Rouse, Chris Eipper, Ray Crotty, and John Feehan. All are well worth reading for what they can tell us about Ireland and Irish history.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • 97% Owned | Documentary on Money

    This looks good…

    When money drives almost all activity on the planet, it’s essential that we understand it. Yet simple questions often get overlooked - questions like:

    • where does money come from?
    • Who creates it?
    • Who decides how it gets used?
    • And what does that mean for the millions of ordinary people who suffer when money and finance breaks down?

    97% Owned is a new documentary that reveals how money is at the root of our current social and economic crisis. Featuring frank interviews and commentary from economists, campaigners and former bankers, it exposes the privatised, debt-based monetary system that gives banks the power to create money, shape the economy, cause crises and push house prices out of reach.

    Fact-based and clearly explained, in just 60 minutes it shows how the power to create money is the piece of the puzzle that economists were missing when they failed to predict the crisis.

    Produced by Queuepolitely and featuring Ben Dyson of Positive Money, Josh Ryan-Collins of The New Economics Foundation, Ann Pettifor, the “HBOS Whistleblower” Paul Moore, Simon Dixon of Bank to the Future and Sargon Nissan and Nick Dearden from the Jubliee Debt Campaign, this is the first documentary to tackle this issue from a UK-perspective, and can be watched online now.

    No comments »
  • Greek leftist brings message to Europe - “Let’s talk”

    “The first reason we are taking this trip is because we want the governments of these important European Union countries, France and Germany, to see what we stand for: what is being transmitted in Europe about us is not what we represent and want,” Tsipras told Reuters at the office of his SYRIZA party.

    He will not be meeting government officials, but will see fellow leftists in France and Germany, including former French presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon and Klaus Ernst and Gregor Gysi of Germany’s The Left. He will hold news conferences in both capitals to get his message to a wider audience.

    “We are not at all an anti-European force. We are fighting to save social cohesion in Europe. We are maybe the most pro-European force in Europe, because its dominant powers will lead the union into instability and the euro zone to collapse if they insist on austerity,” he said.

    While he repeated his assertion that the terms of a 130 billion bailout agreement Greece signed with international lenders in March are now a “dead letter”, he said that if he comes to power he will seek a new policy mix to keep Greece in the euro.

    “Yes, we do want Europe’s support and funding, but we don’t want the money of European taxpayers to be wasted. Two bailouts in a row went into the dustbin, into a bottomless barrel. If this continues we would need a third package in six months. Europeans and their leaders must realise this,” he said.

    No comments »
  • Damien Dempsey calls for a No vote in the 31st of May Fiscal Compact Treaty Referendum

    No comments »
  • Mandate: Vote No to the Austerity Treaty

    No comments »
  • Étienne Balibar: ‘Ejecting Greece from the eurozone would be a moral failure for Europe’ - video

    French Marxist philosopher Étienne Balibar discusses European identity amid the financial crisis. Using ideas explored in his 2002 book Politics and the Other Scene, he argues that the continent still has some way to go to rid itself of xenophobia.

    Guardian Comment is Free Video Interview

    No comments »
  • Greece: when the lights go out

    Ireland is not Greece, Michael Noonan has said. The two countries are so far apart that the only thing that reaches us is feta for our fancy salads. Yet, Phil Hogan is planning to use details from electricity bills to go after those who haven’t paid their household charge, just like they tried in Greece. Let’s see how that goes…

    The desperate cunning scheme to get Greeks to pay property taxes by bundling them with electricity bills didn’t last long. You guessed it, people stopped paying their electricity bills and now it looks like the power company - which had to be bailed out last month - has stopped even trying to collect the levy.

    No comments »
  • Greece: heading for the exit? | Michael Roberts

    There is a way out of this. But it’s not on the basis of the pro-banking, pro-capitalist policies of the Euro leaders. Greek state finances would be fine if the richest Greeks paid taxes and did not spirit their money offshore to buy property in Kensington, London or Monaco, with the connivance of Greek banks and politicians granting their wealthy friends and multinationals all kinds of tax advantages and favours that have diluted tax revenues to the point where there is not enough in the kitty to maintain public services.  According to the Tax Justice Network, over a trillion dollars lie in offshore banks and companies in tax havens (not all Greek money of course).  Recover this money and governments could not only reduce their debts but pave the way for a lowering of taxes across the board to encourage investment and growth and increase spending power for the majority.

    Capital controls, public ownership of the banks and major corporate sectors to organise a plan for investment and growth: this is not just an alternative programme for Greece but for all of Europe.

    No comments »
  • On ABC Radio National, PM program: ‘Stupendously idiotic’ policies for Greece can’t work.

    Good answers….

    MARK COLVIN: Well it’s being imposed effectively from Germany, isn’t it? What are the chances that Germany is going to have any patience with a Greece which has failed to form a coalition, which is going into uncharted territories, as you say, with a new election?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: It’s like asking the question, what kind of patience am I going to have with gravity? It doesn’t matter.

    (sound of Mark Colvin laughing)

    Gravity is a law of nature and I cannot do anything about it. Similarly, Germany at some point, and I think that that point has already come, Germany will realise that it is absolutely impossible to, for a country like Greece, or for Spain for the matter, to exit this debt deflationary spiral, through cutting. This cannot be done even if every single Greek and Spaniard and Italian wants to do it.

    Even if God, his angels and, you know, every good man and woman on this planet wanted to implement this German prescription on the European periphery, it cannot be done for the same reasons why I can’t fly without an aeroplane.

    MARK COLVIN: So what’s the alternative? Where’s the money going to come from for pump priming?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: Well, I don’t think we should have pump priming. What I think we should have in Europe is a little modicum, tiny whiff of rationality.

    No comments »
  • Video: David Graeber and David Harvey in Conversation

    David Graeber and David Harvey discuss their new books, Debt: The First 5000 Years, and Rebel Cities, respectively.

    25 April 2012 at The CUNY Graduate Center

    No comments »
  • Choonara, McNally and the US rate of profit | Michael Roberts

    As readers of my blog will know, ad nauseum

    Oh go on then, say it again, once more with feeling….

    I think there has been a secular downtrend visible in the US rate of profit, but there is also a profit cycle in the US capitalist economy that lasts from trough to trough about 32-36 years.  I reckon that the last peak year of 1997 set the marker for the end of the ‘neoliberal’ up phase from 1982.  The down phase then began to exert pressure on the US capitalist economy.  It forced an even bigger switch from productive investment in manufacturing, transport and communications into financial and property sectors to maintain profits through the expansion of what Marx called fictitious capital, or credit.  That laid the basis for the crisis in 2007 and the ensuing major slump.  In that sense, Marx’s law of profitability did operate to cause the crisis.  The great up phase in profitability after 1982 had finished in 1997, some ten years before the Great Recession.  We are still in the down phase, which will last for at least another three to seven years, on my reckoning, in what is really a long depression like the 1880-90s in the US and the UK.

    But remember the data for these arguments are for the US only.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors