Are Irish Taxpayers About To Bail Out Goldman? Is Peter Sutherland Stealing From His Own People To Give To The Vampire Squid?
Are Irish Taxpayers About To Bail Out Goldman? Is Peter Sutherland Stealing From His Own People To Give To The Vampire Squid?
Zero Hedge follows Guido Fawkes revelation of the list of Anglo Irish bondholders with a questions about how much the reluctance to negotiate with senior Anglo bondholders in order to reduce the liabilities accruing to the state is actually being done in the interests of Goldman Sachs.
“Yes, nested quietly inbetween the €4,034,756,880 in face value of Anglo Irish bondholders is the name that managed to pull the strings (via its puppet Hank Paulson) and get bailed out when AIG threatened to make Goldman management and investors insolvent. Is Goldman, via its UK-based Goldman Sachs Asset Management Intl. subsidiary, currently petitioning Brian Lenihan to be the only US-based bank to receive a direct bailout on its Anglo bond position? Or is it, as always behind the scenes, negotiating on behalf of 80 other European banks, among which Lombard Odier, Rothschild, and Deutsche, and achieve what it always succeeds in: escaping scott free, and stuffing taxpayers with the bill? We are confident Irish taxpayers, and drivers of cement trucks, would be fascinated in getting the correct answer.
Jim Stewart in a very revealing post on Progressive Economy makes the argument that the reluctance to “burn the senior bondholders” is down to avoiding a ‘default’ on Credit Default Swaps, the counterparties that are used as insurance against losses should the borrower default on the original level of debt.
As reported by the Financial Times, typically, a voluntary negotiation with bond holders is done to ensure that it does not constitute a default as regards credit default swaps - instruments which apart from enabling speculation in bond values may also provide insurance in the event of default. This raises the issue of why holders of such bonds who have also purchased Credit Default Swaps on those bonds, would enter into negotiations which would result in a diminution of the value of their investment without recourse to the guarantees given by the counterparties of credit default swaps. In this case, in the event of ‘default’, the counterparties of credit default swaps would make large losses. Who are they? Most likely Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, etc. Hence we can expect representatives of such institutions to be vociferous in their condemnation of burden-sharing policies with owners of bank bonds, and rather emphasise ‘austerity’ (see reports of speech by Peter Sutherland to the Irish Institute of Directors).
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
This article is also being discussed on the following websites:


Comment by: Pope Epopt
Oct 19th 2010 at 08:10
A very informative post over at the Progressive Economy. The role of CDS exposure in driving austerity policy extends to the UK at least, where the City of London is in government.
A good point is also made about the National Pension Fund. It is insane that it is ‘invested’ in the equity and other portfolio casinos rather than used to rebuild the domestic economy here.
Comment by: LeftAtTheCross
Oct 20th 2010 at 14:10
Pope, it may be insane for the NPF to be invested in that manner, but it’s consistent with the bubbleology and the buy in to that which underpins the entire pyramid scheme of financial capitalism.
Could “we” (in the sense of us being the state acting in the best interests of the citizenry) decide to call the bluff, to say that actually you know what, we think financial capital is just smoke and mirrors and we’re going to accept the fact that we get a poorer nominal return by switching our investment to the production of goods and services for the good of society, but at least we’ll get a return, whereas the rest of you are on a hiding to nothing! What would happen then? We won’t be let do that. Because nobody is allowed call the bluff.
I’m investing my hopes in the Chinese. Hopefully they’re playing a patient game and will turn out to be true socialists after all by pulling the rug out from under the pyramid. They’re the only ones who can. Ok, I’m not really that hopeful about China, but I’m not sure how it can happen without their participation, willingly or otherwise.