Four-Year Plan Will Damage Economy and Society


0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 0 Flares ×
Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Dan O’Brien argues that abandoning the four year plan to reduce the deficit to 3% of GDP by 2014 would be insanity (Irish Times Oct 21 2010). He is wrong.

The cosy policy consensus that Dan shares with Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and Labour, if implemented, will damage our economy and society. Ironically it will also do nothing to reduce the deficit.

To date the government has introduced three austerity budgets. On each occasion they have argued that we are living beyond our means and that they have no option but to cut public spending.

We are now being told that the real target for this December’s budget could be in the region of €7billion.

Cutting spending, they say, will reduce the states borrowing requirement. Fiscal rectitude will also convince the markets that the Irish state is a sound investment and in turn reduce the cost of borrowing.

Unfortunately none of this is supported by the facts.

With each austerity budget the government has pushed the economy further into recession. Cuts to wages and social welfare mean less money in people’s pockets. Less money in people’s pockets means less money spent in the real economy. Less money spent in the real economy means more people out of work.

As unemployment rises tax revenues plummet –from €47.8b in 2007 to an estimated €30b in 2010- pushing up the deficit and the states borrowing requirement.

Despite calls from Sinn Fein, the trade union movement, the community and voluntary sector and independent economists the government has refused to investment in job creation, opting instead to invest heavily in recapitalising the banks and cutting public spending.

While the deficit is officially 19% of GDP the real cost of the governments failed economic policies can be seen when you add the cost of the ban bailouts, revealing a staggering deficit of 32%.

It is this profligacy with the banks and the governments drive to drain money from the real economy through cuts to capital and current expenditure that have made the international money markets so nervous, pushing up the cost of borrowing to unsustainable levels. And it is this policy that runs the risk of bankrupting the state.

Rather than realise the error of its ways, the Government, supported by Fine Gael and Labour are determined to continue cutting public spending in order to reduce the deficit to the agreed 3% of GDP by 2014.

That this policy is being supported by intelligent and considered economists like Dan O’Brien beggars belief.

Even worse, the scale of the cuts being proposed, if Michael Noonan is to be believed, may be as high as €7billion.

While we will not know the scale of the adjustment until budget day, we already have a good sense of the options being considered.

On the tax side it is likely that low and middle income earners will bear the brunt. On the current side social welfare and front line services will be hit hardest. Reductions in capital spending will also form part of the picture as will new service charges or property taxes.

These kinds of policies squeezed into a four year time frame will have a devastating impact on both our economy and society. Unemployment will continue to rise. Tax revenues will continue to fall. The deficit will grow larger. The cost of borrowing will increase. And hundreds of thousands of people will be pushed further into poverty.

Ultimately such policies will jeopardise the economic viability of the state itself.

If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting to get different results then this is it.

Despite claims to the contrary there are alternatives. In the coming weeks Sinn Fein will launch a detailed and costed pre budget submission which will outline a credible alternative to the failed policy consensus of Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and Labour.

It will argue for a longer timeframe for achieving the 3% of GDP deficit target. It will outline how we would reduce government borrowing by €4billion in 2011 through reforming our tax system and reducing waste in public spending. And crucially it will outline how we would get the country back to work, investing in job creation and returning the economy to positive growth.

Austerity doesn’t work. The 2014 deadline can not be met. The government’s policies are failing. We need a better way, one that stimulates the economy and reduces the deficit while protecting low and middle income households from a crisis that they didn’t create.

The following two tabs change content below.

2 Responses

  1. Robert

    October 30, 2010 5:41 pm

    Its a strange time we live in, it seems that the government blinkered by ideology are just unable to move beyond notions of austerity and bank-bailouts. Its as if they are lost in a desert and not knowing wether they should turn back, keep going, or stand still?

    Well, if they keep going they will surely perish through a lack of ideas, both ideologically and economically. And they’ve gone too far into the economic wasteland to turn back. Like any good survial advice maybe they should stop for a while. Help will come. But they must want it. And if they want it they need to stop. Now!!

    The only problem is that it may be IMF Bandits who kidnapps them and holds them ransom. No they need to put out an SOS signal and hope that it is the European Union that rides to their rescue,and one can only hope that there does not linger the taste of sour grapes because we glued ourselves previously to Boston rather than Berlin.