Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 23rd 2012


Underhand way of attempting to cut the minimum wage

It appears that the government, in what can only be considered as a deeply undemocratic and unjust move, will attempt to legislate for a €1 cut to the minimum wage over the coming days.  This will most likely happen in the form of an amendment tacked on to legislation such as the Social Welfare (Miscellaneous Provisions) (No.2) Bill, the Financial Emergency  Measures in the Public Interest (No.2) Bill or other legislation to be rushed through in the coming days.

The manner in which the cut to the minimum wage is apparently to be legislated for is seriously flawed and undermines democratic principles of accountability and process.  Rushing a decision by including this in other legislation will deny TDs the right to properly consider and debate this critical issue.

There is no rationale for this draconian move other than the obvious intent of this government to embed a low-waged labour market strategy, and to ensure that the ‘race to the bottom’ is actively facilitated.

Approximately 5% of the working population survives on an income of €8.65 per hour.  Fianna Fáil and the Green Party are hell bent on pushing the poorest paid workers in this country deeper into poverty.  Ordinary people know that generating greater security and stability in society and in our economy can only really be achieved by a bottom-up approach, i.e. by protecting low paid workers.  We, to our detriment, know that the approach of protecting those at the top does not work in society’s favour.

Cutting the minimum wage at this time will not only hurt workers surviving on a shoestring but will also damage consumer spending and the economy.  It will not generate any new jobs, nor will it help to reduce the government deficit.

It will disproportionately impact on women, who represent six out of ten minimum wage workers, and will substantially increase the gender pay gap. Young people will also be disproportionately hit by such a move.

This government does have other options to address the constraints being faced by small and medium enterprises, such as tackling the fixed costs that are crippling businesses.

We refuse to accept that this unnecessary and savage attack on the lowest paid will be allowed to become law in this country. The public at large is appalled by the announcement that this was the government’s intention. There is a threshold of decency that we will not allow our society to cross.

Sign the Claiming Our Future petition to protect the minimum wage here. The hope is to collect 5,000 signatures in 72 hours. Please sign if you want the measure to be stopped.

MANDATE
MIGRANT RIGHTS CENTRE IRELAND
NATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL OF IRELAND
NATIONAL WOMEN’S COUNCIL
THE POOR CAN’T PAY
SIPTU
UNITE
COMMUNITY PLATFORM, which includes:
ATD 4th World,
Age Action Ireland,
Community Action Network,
Community Workers Cooperative,
Cairde,
Debt & Development Coalition, Ireland,
European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland,
Focus Ireland,
Gay and Lesbian Equality Network,
Immigrant Council of Ireland,
Irish Association of Older People,
Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed,
Irish Penal Reform Trust,
Irish Refugee Council,
Irish Rural Link,
Irish Traveller Movement,
Migrant Rights Centre Ireland,
National Adult Literacy Agency,
National Traveller Women’s Forum,
National Women’s Council of Ireland,
Older Women’s Network,
OPEN,
Pavee Point,
Rape Crisis Network Ireland,
SAFE Ireland,
Simon Communities of Ireland,
Threshold,
Voluntary Drug Treatment Network,
Vincentian Partnership for Justice,
Women’s Aid.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Tomboktu

    Dec 8th 2010 at 19:12

    A cut in the minimum wage does not need to come in any of the legislation mentioned by Siobhán O’Donoghue.

    11.(1) The Minister shall, by order, after taking into account the impact the proposed rate may have on employment, the overall economic conditions in the State and national competitiveness, declare a national minimum hourly rate of pay for the purposes of this Act.

    (2) A national minimum hourly rate of pay may include an allowance for board with lodgings, board only or lodgings only at such rates as the Minister may specify in the order under subsection (1).

    (3) Subject to sections 12 and 13, the Minister may, by order and after taking into account the matters referred to in subsection (1), amend or revoke an order made under this section, including an order made under this subsection.

    The procedures require the following:

    4.—Every order (other than an order made under section 1 (2)) or regulation made by the Minister under this Act shall be laid before each House of the Oireachtas as soon as practicable after it is made and, if a resolution annulling the order or regulation is passed by either House within the next subsequent 21 days on which that House has sat after the order or regulation is laid before it, the order or regulation shall be annulled accordingly, but without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under the order or regulation.

    Sections 12 and 13 don’t provide a mechanism for stopping the change either:

    12.—(1) The Minister shall, from time to time in accordance with this section or section 13 , review the national minimum hourly rate of pay.

    (2) Where in the opinion of the Minister there is in existence or proposed a relevant agreement (“national economic agreement”) among economic and social interests in the State which includes a recommendation in relation to the national minimum hourly rate of pay of employees for the duration of the agreement, the Minister shall, within 3 months after being advised of the recommendation, and taking into account the matters referred to in section 11 (1)

  2. (a) accept or vary the recommendation and declare the national minimum hourly rate of pay under section 11 accordingly or amend the order, or
  3. (b) reject the recommendation.
  4. (3) If the Minister varies or rejects a recommendation under subsection (2), the Minister shall, as soon as practicable, make a statement to the Oireachtas giving his or her reasons for that variation or rejection.

    13.—(1) Any organisation claiming to be substantially representative of employees or employers in the State may apply to the Minister for his or her opinion as to whether a relevant national economic agreement exists for the purpose of section 12 .

    (2) Where in the opinion of the Minister there is no relevant national economic agreement as referred to in section 12 or, if there is such an agreement, it makes no recommendation in relation to the national minimum hourly rate of pay of employees that should obtain for the duration of the agreement, the Minister shall, in writing, advise the applicant accordingly.

    (3) Any organisation which the Labour Court is satisfied is substantially representative of employees or employers in the State may separately or jointly, not earlier than 12 months after the Minister has last declared a national minimum hourly rate of pay of employees under section 11 , request the Labour Court to examine the national minimum hourly rate of pay of employees and make a recommendation to the Minister.

    (4) The Labour Court in undertaking an examination as the result of an application under subsection (3), shall consult with such persons, including representatives of employers and employees in the private sector and public sector of the economy, as it thinks appropriate and if it is satisfied that general agreement is reached between the parties as to the appropriate hourly rate of pay of employees, recommend in writing to the Minister that rate accordingly.

    (5) If, after the consultations referred to in subsection (4), the Labour Court is satisfied that general agreement between the parties cannot be reached, it may still make a recommendation to the Minister, but in doing so it shall have regard to the following matters:

  5. (a) the movement in earnings of employees since the Minister last declared the national minimum hourly rate of pay under section 11 or amended the order;
  6. (b) relevant exchange rate movement;
  7. (c) the likely impact of any proposed change on—
  8. (i) the level of unemployment and whether it is increasing or decreasing,
  9. (ii) the level of employment and whether it is increasing or decreasing,
  10. (iii) inflation in the economy, and
  11. (iv) national competitiveness.
  12. (6) The procedures of the Labour Court in relation to an application or hearing under this section shall be as determined by the Labour Court.

    (7) The Minister shall, within 3 months after receiving a recommendation of the Labour Court under subsection (4) or (5), and after taking into account the matters referred to in section 11 (1), accept or vary the recommendation and declare the national minimum hourly rate of pay under section 11 accordingly, amend the order or reject the recommendation.

    (8) If the Minister varies or rejects a recommendation under subsection (7), the Minister shall as soon as practicable make a statement to the Oireachtas giving his or her reasons for the variation or rejection.

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Dec 8th 2010

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens

    The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.

    The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.

    How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.

    That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.

    No comments »
  • Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves

    The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.

    The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.

    On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.

    No comments »
  • S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012

    Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.

    The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.

    There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.

    Please share the link to this video

    No comments »
  • Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts

    Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”

    But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt.  The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.

    No comments »
  • Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?

    This table comes via  the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.

    No comments »
  • Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece

    Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.

    1 comment »
  • Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom

    [...]

    During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”

    Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.

    No comments »
  • Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash

    In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012

    Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.

    The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.

    No comments »
  • Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts

    In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:

    Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels.  Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering.  Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not.  The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece  (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding).  So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope).  Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.

    No comments »
  • As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis

    Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.

    The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors