
Industrial Employment and the Celtic Tiger Years
Kevin Doogan in his excellent book, New Capitalism? correctly points out that employment is the achilles heel of right-wing economic analysis.
You can’t model jobs - either they are there or they are not.
If you follow work, and keep focused on the jobs, then more realistic appraisals of the actual dynamics of the economy start to emerge.
[Taken from Census Reports, 1926-2006. Excel file here. PDF here.]
With regard to Ireland in the 1990s, a credit bubble is a handy shorthand, but nonetheless misleading.
It gives the impression that a bubble formed on the back of wealth creation in the real economy. This is not quite the case.
There has been a fundamental shift in wealth creation in the past thirty years. Once upon a time, banks and financial institutions made their money by leaching off the real economy. They used people’s savings to make loans to people and businesses that needed money, and received a handsome cut for their troubles.
Today, banks and financial institutions are the real economy, with financial innovations treated with the same awe and wonder as the light bulb and the automobile a hundred years ago.
In other words, the current crisis is not part of a business cycle; the way business does business these days is what is causing the edifice to crumble.
This is why the bank bailouts are nothing more than a glorified mugging.
The banks have not received billions of euro in taxpayers’ money so that they can act as conduits for industrial and service-based investment.
They have received billions of euro because their own private money - the money they use to fund their business strategies - is a phantom, without substance, devoid of any actual value.
They are robbing us to make their private money real, because their business strategies are absurd.
The greatest single product created in Ireland in the 1990s was credit, as was the case in other parts of the western world.
Not computers. Not chemicals. Not cattle.
Credit making credit and modelled as a business plan.
The levels of credit generated in the 1990s did not emerge out of the workings of the real economy - that is, financial surplus put to work by banks and financial institutions.
The credit was created through financial innovations which were created by the banks themselves with little relation to the actual wealth production in the rest of the economy.
In 1994 Paul Sweezy gave a talk to Harvard economics graduate students where he pointed out the changing nature of economic conditions. The following quote is taken from The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences by John Bellamy Foster and Fred Magdoff.
In the old days finance was treated as a modest helper of production. It tended to take on a life of its own and generate speculative excesses in the late stages of business cycle expansions. As a rule these episodes were of brief duration and had no lasting effects on the structure and functioning of the economy.
In contrast, what has happened in recent years is the growth of a relatively independent financial sector, not in a period of overheating but on the contrary in a period of high-level stagnation… in which private industry is profitable but lacks incentives to expand, hence stagnation of private real investment.
But since corporations and their shareholders are doing well and, as always, are eager to expand their capital, they pour money into the financial markets, which respond by expanding their capacity to handle these growing sums and offering attractive new kinds of financial instruments.
Such a process began in the 1970s and really took off in the 1980s.
By the end of the decade, the old structure of the economy, consisting of a production system served by a modest financial adjunct, had given way to a new structure in which a greatly expanded financial sector had achieved a high degree of independence and sat on top of the underlying production system.
That, in essence, is what we have now.
Sweezy was talking about the States, but the idea of finance not as the facilitator of growth and late business cycle bubble creator, but as the primary engine of growth itself, has a lot of relevance to Ireland in the late 1980s and 1990s.
The idea that Ireland went through such levels of industrial expansion through foreign investment as to create an economic miracle labelled the Celtic Tiger, which was followed by a financial bubble brought on by the exuberance of the real expansion - a bubble which has finally burst - is common among the Left in Ireland.
Yet the expansion of the Irish economy in the 1990s cannot be separated from the financialisation of the economy itself. The IFSC did exist, even if the profits didn’t.
The Communist Party of Ireland have produced a great little pamphlet which places financialisation front and centre in its analysis of Ireland over the past thirty years.
It is well worth checking out, as is Monthly Review and, of course, The Great Financial Crisis which should be on the bedside table of every Irish left-winger worth he/r salt.




We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.