The OECD Goes to Clown College
Cut people’s dole to reduce unemployment - did the people who write these OECD policy prescriptions learn their craft at Krusty’s Clown College? Of course, we’ve run into some curious analysis from the OECD before - especially their argument that Ireland’s housing boom was ok, it was just a product of demographic trends. So what should we expect?
Well, we should expect them to look at past experience and see what worked. In fact, all they had to do was look at Ireland. If they did, they might find a clue as to how to solve - or at the very least, reduce to extremely low levels - long-term unemployment.
We can see that Ireland, suffering from a very high long-term unemployment rate in the mid-1990s, managed to cut this rate by nearly 9-fold, falling to one of the lowest levels for a large part of the first decade of this millennium. The EU-15 average and German rates were consistently higher than Irish rates after 1998 while we managed to fall to persistently low Denmark and Austria levels. How did we do that?
- Did we cut social welfare payments for the lazy and indolent? No, they were increased year on year with no penalties or time-limits.
- Did we export our labour in time-honoured emigration fashion? No, we had just the reverse - one of the biggest influxes of labour in the EU.
So how did we manage this considerable achievement?
Oh. Let’s see if we can find some cause and effects:
- Employment grew every year up to 2007
- Long-term unemployment fell to very low levels and remained there up to 2007
- Employment growth fell substantially in 2009 and 2010
- Long-term unemployment rose substantially in 2009 and 2010
Now call me simplistic but I’m starting to see a pattern here:
When employment grows, unemployment falls
When employment falls, unemployment grows
Readers will rightly claim that many of those jobs created in the early part of the century were asset-bubble jobs. But the point here is that people will work when employment is available. They don’t need OECD incentives; they don’t need threats to their social welfare income. They may need re-skilling, they may need job-search assistance. But the bottom line is that if jobs are provided, the Live Register will shrink.
In 2010 there were 2,153,000 in the labour force. There were 1,859,000 jobs. When I take my calculator out, the difference is 294,000. And guess what? In 2010, there were 294,000 unemployed. This is the equation that the OECD either ignores, find inconvenient of just plain don’t get.
LF - J = U
Where LF = Labour Force, J = Jobs, and U = Unemployment.
Instead, the OECD and other Clown College alumni believe that if the long-term unemployed send out more CVs, knock on more doors, shine up their ol’ brown shoes and get on their bikes - jobs will suddenly appear. They believe that:
U + EW = -U(ew)
Where U = Unemployment, EW = Economic water-boarding practiced on long-term unemployed and -U(ew) = the Fall in unemployment in proportion to the EW applied.
There is something more insidious here. Donagh Brennan rightly points out that threatening the long-term unemployed with social welfare penalties will drive people to compete in the labour market which will drive down wages and boost profits. And it is an article of faith, with a smidgen of ideological bias, that profits derived from wage suppression will somehow create employment.
The next proposal from the OECD will be to televise the long-term unemployed in Gladiator-type pay-for-view contests to see who can drive down wages the most. The winner gets a poverty-line job. The owner gets the profits. We all get entertained by other people’s misery. Win-win-win.
And if you think this is an outrageous proposition, then you have not been exposed to the curriculum at Krusty’s Clown College.
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
Comment by: Des Derwin
May 28th 2011 at 13:05
More good stuff, Michael.
The publication on the same day of the Bruton report for attacking JLC pay rates and the OECD report for (inter alia) cutting the dole led me to draw connections like Donagh and yourself have done. As I commented in another place:
“Pincer move this morning? Bruton cutting EROs and the OECD cutting the dole. What would result? These then shittier jobs would need a more desperate workforce to get taken and, on the other hand, some of the unemployed would have to take up any job even these newly shittier ones.”
Well, there’s no need for conspiracy theories. As Michael says there’s a shared ideology.
Comment by: Thomas Berry
May 28th 2011 at 15:05
There is only one reason for cutting wages to the low paid and it’s not to create jobs. It’s to create more profits for greedy employers.
Comment by: tom
May 28th 2011 at 21:05
perhaps next week we’ll see the FG/OECD plan to deal with sick people by denying them medical help and throwing them out of hospitals: it would after all provide a similar incentive to stop being sick.
Comment by: William Wall
May 29th 2011 at 09:05
Tom, that’s no joke. They’re already doing that and guess what - the number of sick people has not fallen. It’s shocking, I know. In fact, there’s even a suggestion that making people sleep on trolleys, or wait months or years for treatment makes them sicker. Who would have thought it!
Comment by: tom
May 29th 2011 at 15:05
But William, The reason we have so many on people on trolleys is because we have too many trolleys!
Why would anybody bother getting better when they have a trolley to lie around on all day? They have no incentive to get well. Ordinary decent people who work for a living and don’t get sick aren’t getting any trolleys from the state, so why should the sick?
Comment by: William Wall
May 30th 2011 at 06:05
Ok Tom, I’m getting this. It’s a brilliant piece of science. We reduce the number of trolleys by privatising them (you’d need to make a wild guess at a suitable percentage). We then make the patients compete for the trolleys (because competition is good for you). Here’s my suggestion around how we think about that, going forward: We place the trolleys in the basement and switch off the lifts (thus saving electricity costs and the environment). The patients engage in a race to the basement. Obviously we’ll lose some along the way. Only the fittest will survive the race to the bottom. This will have the beneficial effect of improving the survival rates of those we do bother to treat. A secondary bonus will be an improvement in sales in the undertaking business and a new business in renting private-sector trolleys back to us.