Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button

Skip to content

Thursday, Feb 23rd 2012


Intern Boom Just Gets Boomier - Intern Nation: How to Earn Nothing and Learn Little in the Brave New Economy

Book review: Intern Nation: How to Earn Nothing and Learn Little in the Brave New Economy by Ross Perlin

Not since Monica Lewinsky has the intern received as much attention as in recent months. Since the practise of auctioning off prestigious internships to the highest bidders at the Conservative Ball became public knowledge and David Cameron admitted that he is ‘very relaxed’ about giving his friend’s son an internship, Nick Clegg has waged a stagey and rather anaemic war against the toffs, saying “For too long, internships have been the almost exclusive preserve of the sharp-elbowed and the well-connected”. And he should know because he was one himself.

Groups like Carrotworkers’ Collective and Intern Aware are keen to draw attention to the plight of the intern and some commentators have called the unpaid internship boom “monstrous exploitation” while others see it as a challenge, which graduates should rise to rather than whinge about. Unpaid labour and precarious labour are nothing new and in its broadest definition everything from prison systems to web content relies upon it, but in recent years it has become such a norm in white collar professions and in university education, with its insatiable logic extending, multiplying and normalising itself, that it has started to look absurd even to interns themselves. Ross Perlin’s Intern Nation: How to Earn Nothing and Learn Little in the Brave New Economy is not going to turn young careerists into revolutionaries but it will provide informed and thoughtful analysis of the phenomenon, often with startling statistics and real insight.

Of the 9.5 million students attending four-year university programs in the US, around 75% undertake at least one internship after graduation. Disneyworld’s boot camp style internship program, an inexplicably popular choice among these students, saves hundreds of millions in would-be labour costs. In 2006 alone it saved $20 million and as a knock on effect, $23.4 million was lost in the local economy of Orange and Osceola counties through job losses, depressed wages and lower tax receipts. It is estimated that around 50% of internships in the US are unpaid, with more accurate figures of 51% in Germany and 37% in the UK. Tracing the history of the rise of the internship and the decline of the apprenticeship, Perlin shows the stark drop in the value of labour that has accompanied the glamorisation and increased precarity of youth labour in seemingly unrelated professions. For example, in 1976, 57% of TV and 81% of radio interns got paid; by 1991 those numbers had shrunk to 21% and 32% respectively.

In Ireland there has yet to be a comprehensive study of the phenomenon or a legal framework put in place to specifically deal with interns but ICTU’s Esther Lynch called the internship boom a “worrying trend”. She urged interns to come forward, citing a claim taken by an intern in Ireland against his employers in which the man, who was from Mauritius, showed that he was doing exactly the same work as his colleagues but was working for free and was not given an opportunity to advance to paid employment. He won the case and kept his job, with the full pay and benefits of his colleagues. Based on the International Labour Organisation’s legislation the intern was able to prove that his work was of benefit to his employer and that it could no longer be described as “training”. Perlin also cites legal cases made and won in the US on the grounds of unpaid interns doing profitable work for free. However, with the second highest unemployment rate in the EU and an economy dependant on the whim of global capital, this litigious approach to precarious labour falls short of dealing with the problem.

It is not just young graduates and white-collar professionals who have been affected. Work practices normalised in this area of the economy have trickled down so that jobs like window cleaning, forklift operating, town planning and working as a shop assistant now openly demand an internship period, often months long, through the government work agency, FÁS. During the recession the Irish government has been deeply complicit in this degradation of labour value through its creation of thousands of internship places in lieu of real and viable job opportunities. This  allows them to give middle class voters their pound of flesh by forcing the unemployed off the couch and give the appearance of offering solutions to an unemployment problem that is demonstrably getting worse under austerity measures.

In the London Review of Books, Andrew Ross called the internship phenomenon “a capitalist’s dream” but interestingly Perlin doesn’t attack the heads of corporations, but the heads of universities. He considers them to be much more influential in the rise of precarious unpaid youth labour, which is motivated by a cynical calculation that the outsourcing of education while students are still paying fees is quite a substantial money spinner.

“In response to a roiling debate over unpaid internships, no business lobbyists were seen trying to pre-empt normal enforcement of the law. Instead it was a group of thirteen university presidents who recently wrote to the Department of Labour, complaining that protecting interns might get in the way of their brisk trade in academic credit and their cosy employer relationships.”

It was the academy and liberal ideas that grew out of the academy in the 60s and 70s, he claims, which “helped to prepare the cocktail of ideological motivations, justifications, and half-hearted excuses behind the internship boom”.

Throughout the Celtic Tiger, Irish universities sold exactly the same dream as everything else in the boom economy. A Dublin City University ad campaign boasted “you can go anywhere from here”. Today, with bus routes to universities being cut and student unions not bothered to do anything about it, students are likely to find their ability to “go anywhere from here” increasingly hindered. With graduate emigration constantly rising, many graduates are in fact forced to “go anywhere”; anywhere but here, that is. To a generation of young people whose parents may not have attained a leaving cert let alone a degree, who found themselves educated and full of prospects, in a prolonged adolescence without the traditional expectations of marriage and family, a kind of cultural snobbery about work practices set in. It was in this potentially radical space, the university, and among this potentially radical group, individuals with more freedom and flexibility than any other Irish generation before them, who had rejected the values and work practices of their parents that this dream was bought into without question. Today it is this demographic who find themselves stapling things for successful people for free, with the prospect of real work slipping further and further away.

Perlin’s book opens up a vital debate and he has given us some hard facts to work with, but the feeble Cameron-Clegg dichotomy is likely to continue to characterise, and even shape, public discourse on the intern boom on this side of the Atlantic. Clegg’s Victorian approach to “the poor”, enabling “young people from disadvantaged backgrounds” to do internships while unemployment continues to rise merely patches up the problem and creates a slightly more diverse but ever-growing bottleneck of young people being trained in professions in which they will simply never find work. The idea that “letting” a more diverse group do internships means that you’ll get a more diverse elite is glaringly incorrect even on its own shallow terms. 77% of interns are female according to Perlin but the elite professions that avail of their free labour remain overwhelmingly male.

The internship question should not be reduced to these petty terms or exclusively to law and economics, which Perlin primarily looks to. No amount of fairness legislation is going to bring jobs back. Graduates and young people have to ask themselves if they have anything other than short-term individual self-interest to offer to this debate. If the economy recovers and jobs for a larger proportion of young white-collar professionals return, will the debate disappear until the next downturn? These graduates are not looking back fondly to Keynes or Ford because they know that if you take the gamble and win, the kind of flexible work practices and cultural capital that internships promise are a dream come true.

The logic of the approach of Clegg, Perlin and the intern lobby groups is based ultimately on faith in meritocracy and upward mobility, which would eventually lead, if taken to its logical conclusion, to a global economy in which nobody made anything useful ever again. If we can all be flexible, self-actualised and upwardly mobile workers in an immaterial economy, then the end point of this dream would seem to be a world populated by six billion people sending spam to each other from a café in South America. To borrow a horribly chirpy knowledge economy sentiment, let’s see this as an opportunity to imagine something more than state equality schemes, legislation and keeping our fingers crossed for an upturn and let’s start with an optimistic and aspirational public debate about what we really want the future of work to look like.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Di

    Jun 14th 2011 at 23:06

    Would you have a link to the legal case (or more information on it) mentioned by Esther Lynch. I phoned NERA to ask them about the legal position of interns and they told me that as there is no employment contract, the relationship is not covered by employment law. It would be interesting to see what the finding in that case had to say about that.

  2. Comment by: conor McCabe

    Jun 16th 2011 at 07:06

    They said what?

    That is a lie. A verbal agreement stands as a contract of employment.

    what they told you is an absolute lie. Can you ring them back and get the name of the person who told you that?

  3. Comment by: Angela Nagle

    Jun 16th 2011 at 23:06

    Di, I’ll try to find out some specifics for you in the coming days.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens

    The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.

    The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.

    How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.

    That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.

    No comments »
  • Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves

    The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.

    The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.

    On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.

    No comments »
  • S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012

    Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.

    The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.

    There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.

    Please share the link to this video

    No comments »
  • Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts

    Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”

    But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt.  The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.

    No comments »
  • Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?

    This table comes via  the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.

    No comments »
  • Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece

    Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.

    1 comment »
  • Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom

    [...]

    During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”

    Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.

    No comments »
  • Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash

    In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012

    Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.

    The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.

    No comments »
  • Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts

    In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:

    Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels.  Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering.  Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not.  The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece  (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding).  So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope).  Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.

    No comments »
  • As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis

    Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.

    The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors