Critiquing Brian Lenihan…
It’s fascinating to see the dynamic of the critique of Brian Lenihan that has been offered over the last few days.
We started early over on the CLR, granted, though neither Garibaldy or myself in the day of and after Lenihan’s death did more than note firstly that this was a tragedy for him and his family and friends before reference briefly our sense that his policies were catastrophic and positioned this within a broader framework of criticising capitalism and engaging with the political ramifications of his death. Some comments went further, others suggested we were premature. Perhaps so, but we’re not a mass media organ, those who come here choose to do so and know that we will try to be fair as best we can.
But you’d think that Vincent Browne, writing in the Irish Times yesterday, would be able to write a column critiquing Lenihan’s policies without it being considered too soon.
Not a bit of it. While most comments are supportive and suggest that it is was long past time for such a critique, there’s still quite a few berating him for analysing the man’s politics and policies - despite a warm word by Browne about Lenihan.
And what’s interesting to me is that where in some contexts blunt outspokeness is seen as defying ‘political correctness’ in this case even Browne’s fairly emollient and focused words are seen as out of order. Perhaps that’s a function of his age, there’s no doubt that it is a personal tragedy for him and his family that he was taken so relatively young.
But the problem is that whatever Lenihan’s personal virtues they are if not entirely irrelevant, largely so in the context of his politics and his approach to politics. Or to put it a different way, on that level it’s simply not an issue if he was courageous - which he most certainly was in personal terms, or courteous to those who met him - which he appears to have been, or highly intelligent - and again there’s a consensus that he was, when set against the policies he implemented and the decisions took.
To suggest otherwise is toytown analysis where the kind word is more important than the action that accompanies it. Because Lenihan was political, intensely political, and how could it be otherwise? The man had been a Minister in the Irish government in various areas across a decade, had been a full time politician for a decade and a half or more and was a party member for longer again.
To say that his personal qualities were somehow more important than what he did is to misrepresent political dynamics. It’s rather like those analyses of Ian Paisley back in the day when one would hear that he was very kind to all his constituents and looked after them all without fear or favour. Sure, no doubt, but there was a lot more to Paisley’s political actions than what he did on that level. And this isn’t to suggest that Lenihan was malign, though I think it’s fair to say that he was in no sense a radical figure and appeared to have little even of the fairly residual social democratic instincts that apparently informed the politics of his father and a certain strand that was once extant within Fianna Fáil.
His courage on the personal level of remaining at work throughout a horribly debilitating illness is unquestionable. When, though, that personal courage is translated without qualification by some into a political courage there is a problem. The political decisions he took weren’t anywhere near as courageous as is proposed. Years ago on this site I made the point that if one were to look at the experience of the Progressive Democrats then coalition with Fianna Fáil should be the goal of all small parties because that larger party will always bear the imprint of whichever smaller party is in government with it. There’s a degree of truth in it, but, as was pointed out to me, the PDs were different - say to the GP - in that they were pushing an open door with FF. It was considerably easier for them to push a low tax pro-business agenda with the larger party than say for a smaller party of the left to push an higher tax agenda. And this is true of the talk about Lenihan dealing with the public sector, imposing cuts and so on.
Truth is in this society that’s actually a lot more straightforward than - for example, raising tax rates or increasing spending. Almost all the media are in concert in support. Bien-pensant opinion is in lockstep on the matter. Politically it’s an easy meme to transmit.
It’s worth adding that arguably he and the government he represented, and this is true as well of the Green Party, were responsible for some of the most divisive and unnecessary rhetoric ever heard in Irish political life in reference to the public sector, amongst other areas. FF was content to allow its proxies in the media to make the running for it, but that this was more often a sin of omission than commission in no way negates their responsibility for not quashing it.
That Fianna Fáil crashed is more a function of the crisis being extravagantly greater in scale such that the measures taken to ameliorate it, arguably any measures proposed, were going to prove ineffective and indeed did so. Fianna Fáil failed because Fianna Fáil failed, despite the ‘turn the corner’ rhetoric there was no recovery, and let’s be honest here, Brian Lenihan, the man who denied that the IMF-ECB were being called in even after everyone else knew they had been called in, was central to that failure.
Now, one can argue that he himself was blind to this, so much so that he genuinely thought he had a shot at the Fianna Fáil leadership earlier this year. Small wonder though that FF chose someone who while close to the top had at least a small psychological space between himself and the decisions taken by the Cowen/Lenihan axis over the past three years, or at least the primary decisions.
But then that’s the other side of this equation of which we’ve heard remarkably little. For all the efforts to reify Lenihan it is impossible to do so unless one ignores the fact that he was in cabinet with Brian Cowen - a man who it is near unthinkable will have anything like the same approach in the media when he passes - proximity to the crisis and Lenihan’s age not withstanding.
Will history be kind to him as Christine Legarde suggested this weekend? Perhaps, but history - and the Irish media - might well reflect on this fact noted by EamonnCork here, that he was an integral part of the leadership which even by its own lights - putting aside the economic approach as best one can - saw the Irish electorate remove 3/4ths of Fianna Fáil’s support and saw Fianna Fáil essentially wiped clean from the capital city. That wasn’t unconnected with the economic approach and crisis, but it is failure on an epic scale.
Whether these issues achieve a prominence in the public imagination remains to be seen.
Discussion
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.