Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Delicious button

Skip to content

Wednesday, May 23rd 2012


The Irish entrepreneur as middleman is firmly, and fatally, entrenched in the way the economy functions

Conor McCabe has a new article on Journal.ie. It’s broadly based on Sins of the Father, but provides a very good summary of how power works in Ireland, how the economy was kept as an agricultural exporter to Britian for so long only to be replaced as an importer of FDI where the only benefit came to those who provided contruction, financial and legal sercies. It also explains why the banks failed to provide credit to help develop indiginous industry, (including a proper argicultural industry) and why instead banking got on the back of the only commercial enterprise that was encouraged, property speculation. As Conor points out, it’s the legacy of the middle man as entrepenure which has been so firmly entrenched in Irish commerical life that has us in the current crisis.

I gather that the title of the Journal piece belongs to the journal.ie rather than Conor, before people start to complain about the use of the royal ‘we’. Here’s an extract.

***

THERE HAVE BEEN more than a few attempts to explain why the Irish banking crisis developed the way it did, and the argument that it was due to a breakdown in moral standards is quite a popular one.

The Irish Times talked of a “frightening lack of morality” within Anglo Irish Bank, the most indebted of the Irish institutions, and how the actions of its chairman “cast a shadow over the ethical culture of the bank he ran for most of the past 33 years.” The newspaper’s senior business correspondent, Arthur Beesley, said that the directors of Irish Life and Permanent inhabited an “ethical cocoon in which the sense of right and wrong is at odds with standards in the outside world”, while the economist Brian Lucey talked of the immorality of the Government’s actions in pouring money into Anglo Irish Bank in a desperate attempt to keep it going as a business concern.

Yet, the banking crisis in Ireland was not caused by pockets of immorality in an otherwise reasonably well-functioning system. The ruthless pursuit of profit is not personal; that is the way business works. And what is condemned as immoral in times of crisis, is often praised as savvy and pragmatic in times of prosperity.

You can read the full article here.

Discussion

We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Eoin O'Mahony

    Jul 13th 2011 at 10:07

    If might be a little off topic but it struck me this morning that, with the establishment of the state in 1922, this particular group of people were joined by professionals who acted as mediators state power in place of Catholic priests, who had considerable power in state mediation in the latter part of the 19th century. Chapter 4 of Taylor’s “Occasions of faith: an anthropology of Irish Catholics” lays it out reasonably well. Secularisation then is as much about this displacement as any narrative of ‘the decline of faith and practice’ that is written so much about.

  2. Comment by: Donagh

    Jul 13th 2011 at 13:07

    I don’t think its off topic at all. I’m not as versed in this as Conor, but I’d recommend you read Ruling Trinity, Chris Eipper’s book that Conor has mentioned a number of times as being a big influence on his analysis.
    http://dublinopinion.com/2011/07/11/sins-of-the-father-b-sides-and-out-takes-the-ruling-trinity-a-community-study-of-church-state-and-business-in-ireland-by-chris-eipper-1986/

    It talks directly about the role the church as part of the trinity of power blocs within Ireland. As the book deals with a community study of Bantry Bay, it looks at the relationship between the Church, state and business at the micro level, but there’s a very interesting chapter on the role of the church and their relationship with government at the national level too.

    It’s possible that there is a displacement, and this might be reflected in the tensions that existed between the church and state. This part from the introduction of Ruling Trinity might be relevant:

    In practice, the main outcome of this sequence of processes was that the church, state and business became the major supports of a new class field of force in Éire. Because of the interlocking of the nationally autonomous institutions of church, state and business, class power in Éire became inextricably tied up with the dominant position of the bloc itself. That is to say, since classes always wield power through key institutions - remaining beholden to these institutions and dependent upon their successful functioning - the reproduction of the bloc itself became central to (though not necessarily essential for) the maintenance of class power.

    Contrary to what social scientists sympathetic to theories of power elites might want to argue, the autonomy exhibited by church, state and business in Éire does not necessarily indicate a weak form - let alone an absence - of class domination. Indeed, it may well be a measure of its strength. Given that this domination has been structured institutionally as a trinity, we would not expect relations within the bloc to have been necessarily harmonious. Rather, we might expect them to be tension-ridden and constantly renegotiated as changing circumstances have had differential effects upon the members of the bloc and the society over which it has ruled.”

    Also, I’d refer to you page 4 of the Just Society document written by Declan Costello that WorldbyStorm put up the other day.
    http://dublinopinion.com/2011/07/11/fine-gael-and-the-just-society-1965/

    I’m pasting in an image of the section here which outlines what informed FG’s social and economic thinking (apparently).

  3. Comment by: Eoin O'Mahony

    Jul 13th 2011 at 15:07

    Thanks Donagh for that considered reposonse. I remember that D.O. post very well and I’m hoping to get to Eipper’s work this summer. That jpg above just about captures it: FG technocracy replacing other mechanisms of social control.

This article is also being discussed on the following websites:

  1. Aug 17th 2011

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)

Sins of the Father

Sins of the Father:

Tracing the Decisions

That Shaped the Irish Economy,

by Conor McCabe

from The History Press

Now Available as an e-Book.

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Irish Left Review on Facebook

Best of the Web

  • Enough wrong turns – opt for growth that will lead to quality jobs

    From the European Trade Union Confederation, responding to the informal summit on growth and austerity in Brussels today.

    Bernadette Ségol, ETUC general secretary, stated:

    “We are delighted with the recent interest in growth shown by European leaders. It is now obvious to all that austerity has been a failure. Let us be wary about this reversal in trend, however. Whereas everyone is talking about growth, proposals on how to stimulate growth are conflicting. The new advocates of growth are calling for growth through structural reforms. These reforms are just another word for more deregulation, more flexibility, fewer public services and in short, more insecurity. The growth we recommend is completely different. We want a recovery through investment, through wage rises. The European Central Bank must guarantee the common currency to restore growth and confidence. Finally, new sources of financing must be given serious consideration (tax on financial transactions, Eurobonds). Moreover the May 23rd summit must concentrate on creating sustainable employment. One of the ways to do so would be to approve an ambitious directive on energy efficiency with binding targets at the national and European levels.”

    No comments »
  • 97% Owned | Documentary on Money

    This looks good…

    When money drives almost all activity on the planet, it’s essential that we understand it. Yet simple questions often get overlooked - questions like:

    • where does money come from?
    • Who creates it?
    • Who decides how it gets used?
    • And what does that mean for the millions of ordinary people who suffer when money and finance breaks down?

    97% Owned is a new documentary that reveals how money is at the root of our current social and economic crisis. Featuring frank interviews and commentary from economists, campaigners and former bankers, it exposes the privatised, debt-based monetary system that gives banks the power to create money, shape the economy, cause crises and push house prices out of reach.

    Fact-based and clearly explained, in just 60 minutes it shows how the power to create money is the piece of the puzzle that economists were missing when they failed to predict the crisis.

    Produced by Queuepolitely and featuring Ben Dyson of Positive Money, Josh Ryan-Collins of The New Economics Foundation, Ann Pettifor, the “HBOS Whistleblower” Paul Moore, Simon Dixon of Bank to the Future and Sargon Nissan and Nick Dearden from the Jubliee Debt Campaign, this is the first documentary to tackle this issue from a UK-perspective, and can be watched online now.

    No comments »
  • Greek leftist brings message to Europe - “Let’s talk”

    “The first reason we are taking this trip is because we want the governments of these important European Union countries, France and Germany, to see what we stand for: what is being transmitted in Europe about us is not what we represent and want,” Tsipras told Reuters at the office of his SYRIZA party.

    He will not be meeting government officials, but will see fellow leftists in France and Germany, including former French presidential candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon and Klaus Ernst and Gregor Gysi of Germany’s The Left. He will hold news conferences in both capitals to get his message to a wider audience.

    “We are not at all an anti-European force. We are fighting to save social cohesion in Europe. We are maybe the most pro-European force in Europe, because its dominant powers will lead the union into instability and the euro zone to collapse if they insist on austerity,” he said.

    While he repeated his assertion that the terms of a 130 billion bailout agreement Greece signed with international lenders in March are now a “dead letter”, he said that if he comes to power he will seek a new policy mix to keep Greece in the euro.

    “Yes, we do want Europe’s support and funding, but we don’t want the money of European taxpayers to be wasted. Two bailouts in a row went into the dustbin, into a bottomless barrel. If this continues we would need a third package in six months. Europeans and their leaders must realise this,” he said.

    No comments »
  • Damien Dempsey calls for a No vote in the 31st of May Fiscal Compact Treaty Referendum

    No comments »
  • Mandate: Vote No to the Austerity Treaty

    No comments »
  • Étienne Balibar: ‘Ejecting Greece from the eurozone would be a moral failure for Europe’ - video

    French Marxist philosopher Étienne Balibar discusses European identity amid the financial crisis. Using ideas explored in his 2002 book Politics and the Other Scene, he argues that the continent still has some way to go to rid itself of xenophobia.

    Guardian Comment is Free Video Interview

    No comments »
  • Greece: when the lights go out

    Ireland is not Greece, Michael Noonan has said. The two countries are so far apart that the only thing that reaches us is feta for our fancy salads. Yet, Phil Hogan is planning to use details from electricity bills to go after those who haven’t paid their household charge, just like they tried in Greece. Let’s see how that goes…

    The desperate cunning scheme to get Greeks to pay property taxes by bundling them with electricity bills didn’t last long. You guessed it, people stopped paying their electricity bills and now it looks like the power company - which had to be bailed out last month - has stopped even trying to collect the levy.

    No comments »
  • Greece: heading for the exit? | Michael Roberts

    There is a way out of this. But it’s not on the basis of the pro-banking, pro-capitalist policies of the Euro leaders. Greek state finances would be fine if the richest Greeks paid taxes and did not spirit their money offshore to buy property in Kensington, London or Monaco, with the connivance of Greek banks and politicians granting their wealthy friends and multinationals all kinds of tax advantages and favours that have diluted tax revenues to the point where there is not enough in the kitty to maintain public services.  According to the Tax Justice Network, over a trillion dollars lie in offshore banks and companies in tax havens (not all Greek money of course).  Recover this money and governments could not only reduce their debts but pave the way for a lowering of taxes across the board to encourage investment and growth and increase spending power for the majority.

    Capital controls, public ownership of the banks and major corporate sectors to organise a plan for investment and growth: this is not just an alternative programme for Greece but for all of Europe.

    No comments »
  • On ABC Radio National, PM program: ‘Stupendously idiotic’ policies for Greece can’t work.

    Good answers….

    MARK COLVIN: Well it’s being imposed effectively from Germany, isn’t it? What are the chances that Germany is going to have any patience with a Greece which has failed to form a coalition, which is going into uncharted territories, as you say, with a new election?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: It’s like asking the question, what kind of patience am I going to have with gravity? It doesn’t matter.

    (sound of Mark Colvin laughing)

    Gravity is a law of nature and I cannot do anything about it. Similarly, Germany at some point, and I think that that point has already come, Germany will realise that it is absolutely impossible to, for a country like Greece, or for Spain for the matter, to exit this debt deflationary spiral, through cutting. This cannot be done even if every single Greek and Spaniard and Italian wants to do it.

    Even if God, his angels and, you know, every good man and woman on this planet wanted to implement this German prescription on the European periphery, it cannot be done for the same reasons why I can’t fly without an aeroplane.

    MARK COLVIN: So what’s the alternative? Where’s the money going to come from for pump priming?

    YANIS VAROUFAKIS: Well, I don’t think we should have pump priming. What I think we should have in Europe is a little modicum, tiny whiff of rationality.

    No comments »
  • Video: David Graeber and David Harvey in Conversation

    David Graeber and David Harvey discuss their new books, Debt: The First 5000 Years, and Rebel Cities, respectively.

    25 April 2012 at The CUNY Graduate Center

    No comments »

Link Archives »

Authors