Public Spending Cuts are a Political Choice
A neighbour described to me a local community meeting where it was announced that the local Garda station would be closed. Why, the residents asked? A local councillor answered: ‘Because of the EU-IMF bailout.‘ Of course, closure of Garda stations are not in the EU-IMF Memorandum of Understanding. But that’s not the point, is it?
It is convenient for Ministers to hide behind the EU-IMF deal. Special Needs Assistants? EU-IMF. Cutting fuel allowances? Flat-rate household charges? Cutting low-paid wages? Shoving people off the dole? EU-IMF. EU-IMF. EU-IMF.
No need to defend such actions on efficiency grounds, or as a result of choice. Just blame someone else. In this way, the Government hopes to avoid debate. For if there is no choice, what’s the point of the debate (if it’s raining, what’s the point of debating which condiments to bring to the barbeque).
So, when the Tanaiste warns that the cuts to come in the next two Budgets are going to be “painful” for ordinary people, claiming ‘We don’t have a choice as a country‘, he is using an argument of convenience. But is he correct, that there is no choice?
Not according to the Minister for Finance. Minister Noonan recently told the Dail:
‘ . . the IMF and the European partners made it quite clear, and we assented quite willingly, that whatever changes we made to the conditions in the memorandum of understanding would be fiscally neutral. In other words, if we substituted a range of measures, whether taxes or expenditure savings, by another range of measures, the fiscal impact would be the same. That is the position. . . . We will not resile from any commitment we made given that one set of measures will be substituted by another set of measures of equal value or, to put it more correctly, equal fiscal impact.’
This is an important statement in two respects while flatly contradicting the ‘we-have-no-choice’ argument put forward by other Ministers.
First, the Finance Minister refers to ‘changes we made’, not changes agreed with what are called ‘our paymasters‘. As long as the condition of fiscal neutrality is maintained, the Government has choices - considerable choices. For instance, it could avoid spending cuts next years of €2.1 billion by simply introducing less deflationary tax measures on high-incomes and capital (thus allowing public sector savings to be reinvested into expanding public services at no extra cost to the Exchequer, as argued here).
The Government has already exercised considerable discretion under this heading. In the Jobs Initiative the Government cut employers’ PRSI and VAT, abolished the travel tax and increased (marginally) capital spending. This extra expenditure was balanced by the pension levy. None of this was in the EU-IMF deal. Nor was reversing the minimum wage cut. And while the EU-IMF deal specifically stipulates income tax increases in this budget and the next, the Government has announced it will not be bound by this provision.
All this was done in the first few weeks of office - so much for the claim that the Government has no choice.
The second important point the Minister makes is that the substitution of fiscal measures (e.g. taxation for spending cuts) does not need to be of equal ‘value‘ but, rather equal ‘fiscal impact‘. In other words, as long as the substituted measures reduce the deficit by an equal amount, the value is not important. Let’s take an example from the ESRI:
- Cutting public sector employment by €1 billion (i.e. 17,000 jobs) will reduce the deficit by 0.2 percent of GDP
- Raising €400million through a property tax will reduce the deficit by 0.2 percent of GDP
So even though the value of the property tax consolidation is substantially less than the spending cut (€600 million), this doesn’t matter because the impact on the deficit is the same. Therefore, the Government need not bring in a fiscal consolidation package of €3.6 billion next year. It only need bring in a package that will reduce the deficit to the same extent.
What it also means is that the Government is in charge of this process - that it can make alternative choices outside the EU-IMF memorandum of understanding. It can choose to raise taxes, it can choose to cut spending, it can choose to increase investment (for investment is a tool of fiscal consolidation). The only condition is that the fiscal impact remains the same.
This is not to say that the Government has limitless choices - but this is a truism at any time. All governments operate under limitations. The point is to explore what those limitations are, to measure them and to find the most fiscally efficient and least economically damaging. In a nutshell:
Cutting public spending is a political choice.
It is not an economic or fiscal necessity.
Nor is it required under the EU-IMF deal.
Cutting fuel allowances, increasing public transport fees,introducing flat-rate household charges - these are political choices that the Government can make or not make. So the next time you hear a Minister insisting on ‘savage‘ cuts, ‘deep, painful and unpalatable cuts’, they have decided to do it that way.
They do, after all, have a choice to do something different. And far, far better.
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
Comment by: William Wall
Jul 18th 2011 at 15:07
Michael, the narrative of ‘no choice’ is part and parcel of the neoliberal hegemony. Long before we had the crash we had ‘this is reality’, ‘in the real world’(as contrasted, for example, with the ‘unreal world’ of public service), ‘there is no choice’, ‘we’re a small open economy and therefore…’, etc. The success of neoliberalism has been predicated on convincing people that it is the only way - it’s not necessarily the nicest way, but ‘we have no choice’. Every newspaper, TV station and radio station in the country assents to this narrative. The real ‘reality’ is that this is all ideological. There are always political choices.
When Joan Burton uses the term ‘lifestyle choice’ in relation to social welfare, she’s making a political choice - the same one FG, FF or the late-unlamented PDs would make in the same circumstances.
Neoliberalism is not just dominant here, it’s overwhelming.But a small crack in the glazing has begun, fostered by people like yourself. It may be enough to crack the whole thing open.