Shut Up, Sit Down and Act Like Fianna Fail
It didn’t take long. Patrick Nulty, TD voted against the budget on Tuesday night. Suddenly, on Thursday morning an op-ed appears in the Irish Times attacking the young TD. And not just ‘attacking’ - it is one of the most vicious attacks on an individual TD you’ll read on an issue of policy. After all, Nulty is not a Michael Lowry or an Ivor Callely. He took a political position, regardless of whether one agrees with it or not. It is incredible that the Irish Times would give space to such a rant.
And an ill-informed, confused rant at that. Here I just want to examine the economic issues that the author raises.
Billy Linehan claims that ‘ideology is for yesterday’. Now when you hear something like that you should ready yourself for an ideological onslaught. And Linehan doesn’t disappoint. What does he demand?
‘Why isn’t he (Pat Nulty) addressing the salaries above EU norms paid to doctors, nurses and teachers? Or the bizarre issues of increments in the public service or the featherbedding of staff salaries in the ESB and other semi-States?’
Notice how Linehan doesn’t demand that Pat address unemployment (projected to rise next year by the ESRI). Or the growing levels of deprivation as measured by the CSO (affecting nearly one-in-four). Or that workers are, on average, are trying to get by on €693 a week.
No, Linehan fixates on public sector pay - which he claims is above EU norms. Maybe he should read the OECD’s Government at a Glance which shows public sector pay in the largest categories to be below the EU norm. Clerical workers would need a 10 percent increase just to reach the average pay advance economies- and that’s before the pay cut in Budget 2010.
Or from the same source - that nurses pay is average by ‘EU norms’; and that’s before both the pension levy and the Budget 2010 pay cut.
Or that utility labour costs are below the EU-15 average; as are education labour costs.
It is surprising that someone described as a ‘management consultant’ would not be familiar with basic facts that so many managers are acquainted with. Ignoring such basic facts is so ‘yesterday’.
But Linehan goes on. Instead of asking hard questions and assessing whether policies are working, individual representatives should start:
‘ . . . telling the unpalatable truth to constituents - that we spend more than we earn as a nation - with the result that service restrictions and cutbacks are inevitable.’
Where has our management consultant been for the last three years? That’s exactly what Government backbenchers have been saying since the crisis has begun. ‘Spend more than we earn’ . . . ‘cutbacks are inevitable’. What Linehan actually wants is for individual representatives not to face up to the unpalatable truth - that austerity policies are not working. He doesn’t want individual representatives to reflect on this.
See a pattern? As growth projections fall, the level of debt rises (notably after the April projections, when the public finances should have benefitted from the reduction in EU-IMF borrowing costs). Linehan doesn’t want individual representatives to reflect on the relationship between falling growth and rising debt, between austerity and depressed growth; between rising debt and austerity. Linehan doesn’t want individual representatives to reflect on any of that. He just wants them to sit down and shut up.
Linehan claims that:
‘Fianna Fáil set up a national economic model which has failed. It cannot pay for itself. Is this the economic standard that Nutty supports?’
This is rather amusing for Linehan demands that individual representatives say the same thing as Fianna Fail backbenchers were required to repeat, to follow the same policies as the Fianna Fail government put forward (cut spending on public services and social protection, increase tax on low income earners, deflate the economy).
At the end of the day, Linehan wants Labour backbenchers to act like Fianna Fail backbenchers. And woes betide if they don’t - they will be accused of opportunism and puppy-beating.
Of course, in the broader politics, this is not just an attack on Pat Nulty or, by implication, Tommy Broughan. This is a warning to any Labour backbencher who is even thinking of stepping out of line. If you do, you will be subjected to a virulent attack in the pages of the Irish Times and other fora.
Dissent will not be tolerated, there is no vacancy for independent thought, whippings will continue until loyalty is resumed. I know this because I read it in the paper.
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
Comment by: vincent wood
Dec 8th 2011 at 18:12
I wonder would the IT print this article is you sent it in?
Comment by: CMK
Dec 8th 2011 at 19:12
Vincent, I think we all know the answer to that…..
Comment by: Tomboktu
Dec 8th 2011 at 21:12
I was wondering if they might, because the new editor does seem to have a policy of publishing stuff from bloggers. (That can be a pain for a newspaper because opinion and feature pages try to run to standard lengths, bloggers don’t write to length, and high reliability in space usage often trumps less reliable but better content .)
Comment by: CMK
Dec 9th 2011 at 10:12
They’ve published a, sort of, rebuttal by Nulty himself. Can’t say, having read it, that there’s any evidence of a profound rupture with the Labour Party and it looks like once Nulty does his penance he might be let back in. Certainly, it doesn’t seem like Nulty is looking to hook up with the ULA, which is probably all for the best.
Comment by: Des Derwin
Dec 9th 2011 at 18:12
As I said in another place:
The emergence of three TDs (well, two to the left) from the fold of the Labour Party should give the ULA pause for thought on how to relate to them, besides dismissing them. They are not going to join the ULA but some association or co-operation with them might be possible and desirable. Helena Sheehan’s suggested Forum of the Left could take shape here. There’s also the consideration that being closer to some trade union leaders, and being looked up to by some lay functionaries in the unions, they might add leverage to getting some shift from the union leadership. Some from this small corner of the left already have feet in both the Alliance Against Austerity and the proposed conference by the Dublin Council of Trade Unions in the New Year.
Comment by: vincent wood
Dec 10th 2011 at 09:12
Agree that Nulty’s reply was watery. He had an open goal and plenty of ammo if required. The Forum of the Left is probebly the only way to go to be honest. Perhaps all interested parties should be canvassed to coincide with the DCTU conference.
I realise thst the IT would be unlikely to re publish an artile like this, but it has to be worth a try. Its all very well sharing this among ourselves, but it is basically confirming our own views. Its a clear enough piece to get out there, so the chalange is to find the wider forum. Perhaps we should ‘friend’ more widely and take a chance on a wider circulation. Nothing ventured…