2011 – An Interesting Year for the Left
2011 has been a very interesting year for the southern Irish party political left.
The general election in February brought the largest number of left wing deputies into the Oireachtas in its 90-year history. Sixty-three TDs were elected on a variety of social democratic, left republican, revolutionary socialist and independent left platforms.
The combined left vote broke the 40% barrier for the first time in general election history.
Significantly the electorate was offered three very distinct left electoral platforms, in the forms of Labour, Sinn Féin and the United Left Alliance.
Labour, Gilmore for Taoiseach rhetoric not withstanding promised to meliorate the worst excesses of a centre right Fine Gael government. The party’s horizon, supported by the main players in the trade unions movement -ICTU and SIPTU- was limited to making a bad government better.
Sinn Féin, for the first time in recent history, promised not to support either a Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael government. The party called for an alliance of the left with Labour and failing that promised to offer a radical and credible alternative from the opposition benches.
The United Left Alliance, a new electoral coalition of the Socialist Party, the Socialist Workers Party and the Workers and Unemployed Action Group, rejected the reformism of both Labour and Sinn Féin and promised to use the Dáil chamber to promote a mass movement of working people in support of socialism.
Labour were the clear winners in this battle for left wing votes, securing 19.5% of the popular vote and 37 seats in the parliament. Sinn Féin secured 9.9% of the vote and 14 seats, while the ULA secured 2.6% of the vote and 5 seats.
A further 7 progressive independent deputies were elected on a variety of issue and locality based platforms.
Mainstream media coverage of the election focused on the collapse of the Fianna Fail vote and the formation of the Fine Gael-Labour coalition. In doing so it missed the more significant long-term shift that was taking place in electoral behaviour.
The combined Fianna Fáil/ Fine Gael vote fell to an historic general election low of 53%, down from an average of 70% during the 1990s and 80s, and an average of 85% in the 20 years previous to that.
The Labour Party was faced with a decision of unique historic significance. Should they fulfill their historic role as the state’s third party, propping up successive centre right governments? Or should they refuse to play this minor role and in doing so force Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael into a grand coalition?
The consequences of the first course of action -significant electoral decline for Labour- are well documented. The consequences of the second course will remain unknown as party strategists and in turn party members voted overwhelming in favour of entry into yet another right wing government.
The Programme for Government agreed by the new coalition partners was as much a Fianna Fáil document as it was a Fine Gael one. It accepted the parameters of both the Fianna Fáil National Recovery Plan and the EU/IMF/ECB austerity programme.
Its adherence to the FF/EU/IMF/ECB deficit reduction timetable would mean at least four consecutive austerity budgets.
Significantly any counter-balancing fiscal stimulus and investment in job creation would come from sale of state assets via Fine Gael’s New Era Programme, subject to Troika approval. It was hard to see any Labour Party fingerprints in the economic policy content of the Programme for Government.
During the following ten months the Labour Party were hit with a series of political setbacks as Government settled down to business.
The much hyped jobs budget was emasculated into a €40m jobs initiative with little investment in job creation. The JLC/ERO wage setting mechanisms were attacked, first by Fine Gael’s Jobs Minister Richard Bruton and then by the High Court.
Bank-bailouts continued with €3.1bn given to Anglo Irish Bank in March and €20bn given to Irish banks in total. Bondholders were paid in full, even those without state guarantees. And in one of the years most dramatic u-turns, the Labour Party voted to extend the Eligible Liabilities bank guarantee, despite having opposed its introduction in 2009 and its extension in 2010.
Meanwhile unemployment, emigration, mortgage distress and poverty levels all increased.
Advocates of Labour’s participation in Government pointed to a number of policy successes, including the restoration of the minimum wage and the reduction in the EU/IMF interest rate. Labour’s critics pointed out that the first was an election commitment shared with Fine Gael and the latter a consequence of the crisis in Greece.
However with significant electoral successes in October, the Labour Party could be forgiven for thinking that things were going according to plan. Michael D. Higgins 39.6% vote share in the presidential election was impressive. In the Dublin West by-election Labour’s vote was down, but they still won the seat comfortably.
Unfortunately they had little time to savor their electoral gains. Within a month they would lose three deputies to the opposition benches. Minister for Housing Willie Penrose, Dublin North East TD Tommy Broughan and newly elected Dublin West TD Patrick Nulty all withdrew their support from aspects of the governments programme and lost the party whip.
More significantly Labour were also losing the support of the electorate. In the first five months after the general election Labour’s poll average held at 18.5%. In September and October it averaged at 16%. But in the immediate aftermath of the December budget it dropped dramatically to an average of 13%.
Given the scale of the budgets assault on the welfare of low and middle-income families, this drop is hardly surprising.
Labour Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin announced a reduction in public sector numbers for 2012 of 6,000. Labour Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton cut 15 different social welfare benefits including those to older people, people with disabilities and community employment schemes. Labour Minister for Education Ruairí Quinn broke a clear pre-election promise and increased student fees while cutting funding for disadvantaged schools.
A Eurobarometer poll published post budget found that trust in the Government had fallen by a staggering twenty points to 22%, while a Sunday Times/Behaviour and Attitudes post budget poll found that satisfaction in the Government had dropped by ten points to 26%.
On the opposition benches Sinn Féin, the ULA and left independents mounted a sustained assault on the pro-austerity and anti-growth policies contained in the Programme for Government and 2012 Budget.
Without a hint of irony or embarrassment, Fianna Fáil joined them in their efforts.
As a small part of a larger and ideologically mixed technical group of independents the ULA struggled to be heard. Increasingly, liberal and right wing voices dominated such as Wicklow TD Stephen Donnelly and Dublin South TD Shane Ross, while ULA deputies jostled with progressive independents for airtime and column inches.
The real battle for leadership on the opposition benches was between Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil.
With Fianna Fail’s credibility still badly damaged from its 13 years in Government Sinn Féin was emerging as a voice of sustained and credible opposition, opposing bad government policy and proposing detailed alternatives in equal measure.
The party was becoming the leading advocate of an alternative pro-growth, pro-equality platform in opposition to the austerity and bank-bailouts of the EU/IMF programme implemented by Fine Gael and Labour.
.
And the public appeared to respond positively. In the four months after the general election the party’s poll average was 10.7%. This rose to 13% in September. Boosted by the presidential election campaign of Martin McGuinness and strong Dáil performances by Adams, McDonald and Doherty, Sinn Féin’s October poll average was 17%, rising to an average of 18% in December. Eight consecutive polls placed the party above 15%, and on an average score of 17%.
The final opinion poll of the year had Fine Gael on 30%, Labour on 11%, Sinn Féin on 21%, Fianna Fáil on 20% and the independents, including the ULA on 18%. The percentage swing from the general election was Fine Gael -6%, Labour - 8.5%, Sinn Féin +11%, Fianna Fáil +2.5%, and Independents +1%.
At one level this represents significant change. Within the party political left Labour is struggling under the weight of its support for a right wing government. Sinn Féin is gaining ground and not just at Labour’s expense. The ULA are holding their own but finding it difficult to be heard beyond their marginal base of support.
But the overall strength of the left wing vote remains broadly as it was in February, with a December poll average of 43.5%, just above where it was at in the general election.
2012 looks set to be another interesting year. Opposition to household and septic tank charges; the possibility of a treaty referendum on new austerity rules; continuing Euro instability; and the prospect of yet another austerity budget all loom large.
For Labour the challenge is whether or not to remain in government. While party strategists are clearly there for the long haul, the pressures of falling poll ratings and increasing parliamentary party defections could weaken that resolve.
For Sinn Féin the challenge is to displace Fianna Fáil as the largest opposition party in the state while maintaining a radical and credible left republican alternative, alongside bedding down the power sharing arrangements in the North and mitigating British government austerity within the limited powers of the Assembly.
For the ULA the challenge is to decide whether it is a genuinely broad based party of the anti-capitalist left and to increase its electoral strength on this basis or to remain an electoral coalition of the SWP and SP and as such a marginal force in the politics of the state.
But beyond these narrow party political concerns there is a bigger and more urgent challenge; the challenge of building a social and political movement in favour of a left wing Government pursuing a pro-growth and pro-equality agenda.
The conditions for such a movement in southern Irish society have never been greater; growing electoral support and institutional strength for the left; strong evidence based policy alternatives; a growing alternative media.
But significant obstacles remain; a divided party political left; a weak civil society; and a population griped by apathy and fear.
The principle challenge in 2012, for those of us who seek a left alternative to austerity and inequality, must be to present a credible plan to rebuild our society and our economy in an equal and sustainable way; to create new alliances within the existing political and social organisations of the left; to give people hope in order to inspire them to become involved in a movement for real change.
Discussion
We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.
This article is also being discussed on the following websites:
Leave a Comment
Sins of the Father
Subscribe by Email
Best of the Web
EU Should Admit Greece is Bankrupt | Christian Rickens
The unvarnished truth - the second Greek Bailout should not have happened.
The mistake isn’t the size, but the construction of the bailout package. It isn’t geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks.
How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won’t even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country’s international creditors? The holders of Greek government bonds are to get some €30 billion as an incentive to convert their old paper into new bonds. The aim is to keep alive the illusion that Greece isn’t bankrupt — after all, the creditors are voluntarily forgiving part of the debt. The financial sector is cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction.
That leaves €100 billion. But that too isn’t geared to what Greece needs in order to get back on its feet. It’s linked to an estimate of how much debt the Greek economy can bear without collapsing. International technocrats agree that with debts amounting to 120 percent of gross domestic product, the country can just about go on servicing its debt. That’s the level at which the cow can go on supplying milk without dying of exhaustion. So 120 percent became the goal.
Collaboration, with our European partners | Cunning Hired Knaves
The European project was supposed to be a bulwark against the dangers of fascist ambition, but now it is the instrument used to dismantle European democracy in the interest of the risk adverse looking for a steady income stream from the provision of the social net by those who cite the words and actions of old fascists while doing so.
The post Collaboration, with our European partners by Richard of Cunning Hired Knaves summed up in one sentence. For much better sentences and many more urgent points read the post.
On Sunday there were massive demonstrations throughout the Spanish state, with half a million people on the streets of Madrid and 450,000 in Barcelona, protesting against the labour ‘reform’ planned by the Partido Popular, the right-wing party that most closely represents the interests of the power elites that conserved their position when the transition from dictatorship to democracy was undertaken.
S.P.A.R.K. protest at cuts to lone parents, Dublin 18th February 2012
Many families were cut in the last budget but lone parent families were particularly hit by the Fine Gael/Labour Party government.
The key elements are that single parents can’t take advantage of training such as Community Employment (CE) Schemes and when the youngest child turns 7 years old, the parent is declassed as a lone parent but treated as an ordinary worker even though there are few affordable creche places. There is a bill coming up in March which will copper fasten some of the worst elements of government plans.
There is particular anger directed at the Labour Party because they are associated with women’s rights and a more progressive society.
Please share the link to this video
Exiting the euro | Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts argues that those in Greece who cite the example of Argentina when suggesting that Greece should leave the Euro are not necessarily looking at the whole picture. The situations are not the same, Roberts points out, citing Argentina’s former central bank governor at the time, Mario Blejer and his recent piece in the Financial Times. He also points to research based on the the experience of five recent devaluations of economies in crisis (including that of Argentina) which “shows that they lead to a 10-20% fall in real GDP and take five to ten years to recover to previous real GDP levels. But that is not to say that there is no alternative to “lowering wages, privatising the state sector, reducing taxes for the corporate sector (especially big business) and ‘deregulating’ labour markets i.e. the super-exploitation of the Greek people to raise profitability.”
But the left could also find an alternative policy to exiting the euro where Greece negotiates a full default on its debt to private and foreign bondholders; takes over the banks; and uses the savings from bond and interest repayments (€17-20bn a year) to start state directed investment in jobs, technology and funding small businesses, while staying in the euro to protect the savings of the people from destruction, keeping down inflation and avoiding a rise in foreign debt. The question of exiting the euro then becomes an issue for the Euro leaders to impose (and to be resisted by a campaign within Europe), not as the main policy plank of the left.
Corporate tax avoidance: where are the worst offenders?
This table comes via the Tax Justice Network (and Richard Murphy). It’s from a table produced by U.S. researcher Kimberly Clausing and as TJN notes “demonstrates which countries are working hardest to wage economic warfare on the United States (and, by extension, on other countries,) via the global tax system”.
Solidarity campaign to support the people of Greece
Mikis Theodorakis, famous Greek composer of Zorba’s Dance, and Manolis Glezos, veteran resistance fighter against the Nazi occupation, have issued a call for a European Front to defend the people of Greece and all those facing austerity. We have decided to support this call and work with trade unions, campaigns and parties across Europe to establish a European Solidarity Campaign to defend the people of Greece. We will organise solidarity and raise practical support for the people of Greece; they cannot be made to pay for a crisis for which they are not responsible.
Chris Dillow | Capitalism against freedom
[...]
During the Cold War, opponents of communism routinely, and not entirely wrongly, claimed to be champions of liberty. Freedom for capitalists and freedom of speech and thought go together, it was claimed. “Freedom is indivisible” wrote Bruce Winton Knight in 1952. “Economic freedom is…an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom“ wrote Milton Friedman in Capitalism and Freedom. And back in 1944 Friedrich Hayek complained that “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past.”
Today, though, this seems wrong. Many threats to freedom come from capitalists. The story is no longer capitalism and freedom, but capitalism against freedom.
Ian Stewart | The mathematical equation that caused the banks to crash
In The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012
Anyone who has followed the crisis will understand that the real economy of businesses and commodities is being upstaged by complicated financial instruments known as derivatives. These are not money or goods. They are investments in investments, bets about bets. Derivatives created a booming global economy, but they also led to turbulent markets, the credit crunch, the near collapse of the banking system and the economic slump. And it was the Black-Scholes equation that opened up the world of derivatives.
The equation itself wasn’t the real problem. It was useful, it was precise, and its limitations were clearly stated. It provided an industry-standard method to assess the likely value of a financial derivative. So derivatives could be traded before they matured. The formula was fine if you used it sensibly and abandoned it when market conditions weren’t appropriate. The trouble was its potential for abuse. It allowed derivatives to become commodities that could be traded in their own right. The financial sector called it the Midas Formula and saw it as a recipe for making everything turn to gold. But the markets forgot how the story of King Midas ended.
Greece: a Sisyphean task | Michael Roberts
In a Eurozone that is unwilling to share its surplus with weaker, hardest hit economies there is no other option for those economies but default. Despite the agreement of Greek politicians to shorten their political life and accept the deal all that they have done is simply postpone this eventuality once again. However, even that postponement might be shortened by the Greek elections in April where the smaller leftist parties outside the coalition currently have 40% of the vote. Or so says Michael Roberts:
Whatever the Greek coalition leaders agree to and try to implement, such is the weakness of Greek capitalism, it will not be able to meet its fiscal targets or get its debt down to reasonable levels. Before the end of the year, the Troika will have to report that Greece is not delivering. Then the EU leaders will have to decide whether they ‘let Greece go’ or not. The EU leaders have agreed to more money for Greece (or more accurately its bondholders and banks) in return for draconian cuts in living standards in order to provide more time to try and ‘ring-fence’ other vulnerable Eurozone states like Portugal and Ireland (where they are preparing extra funding). So when Greece goes down, it will not affect the rest (or so the EU leaders hope). Of course, the Greek people may force the issue earlier if they vote in an anti-Troika government in April.
As Greece stares into the abyss, Europe must choose | Maria Margaronis
Do we really want to live in an economic union that must destroy the future of millions in order to just tick along? Maria Margaronis points out that the situation in Greece today says little about Greece and everything about the EU.
The trouble with historical metaphors is that they can obscure the present: what’s really at stake here is not Greece’s identity but Europe’s. All eyes are fixed on Athens, but the way out of the crisis requires a choice about what kind of Europe we want. The one we have now, with its deep structural inequalities and its rigid adherence to a failed economic ideology, protects neither democracy nor human rights. Stiff-necked and punitive, it prefers to eat its children.
Comment by: B. Rand
Jan 1st 2012 at 02:01
Time will tell whether Fianna Fail will claw back some of its lost voter base and Irish politics reverts to its fake oppositional politics between the two post-civil war parties. To me it seems obvious that more Labour voters will drift away from their party as they see their living standards continuing to deplete during the coalition rule. Some of these votes are middle class votes, so that’s where FF tacticians will play for opportunist gains. In Dublin there is keen competition between Sinn Fein and the ULA to scoop up the votes of disenchanted working class and public sector salaried employees who voted Labour in the 2011 election. That surely is one lesson from the Dublin West by-election result. Countrywide I’d guess that the Irish people are still conservative muddle-of-the-road in socio-economic outlook. Sorry I can’t be more optimistic.
Comment by: vincent wood
Jan 1st 2012 at 09:01
There would also seem to be about 40% swaying between FG and FF and evidenced by the Gallagher vote in the Presidential election.
FF will eat into more of that over time.
There is the possibility of a broad left platform offering a sufficiently diffirent program to the current paradigm if we accept that the role and actions of ‘the party’ is only one element, that the ULA bite their lips and accept that SF are on the left - or at least contains many good left activists and that SF worry less about coming accross as a responsible opposition with ‘costed’ reposts to every government policy. No time for Labour must wait in this crisis.
Agree the broad progressive socialist principles and advocate them.
Comment by: B. Rand
Jan 2nd 2012 at 02:01
I accept Vincent Wood’s comment on the Gallagher vote in the presidential, and think there is pragmatic wisdom in his call for a ‘broad left platform’ offering a different program to the current FF, FG-Lab consensus.
Comment by: Scáth Shéamais
Jan 2nd 2012 at 16:01
For Sinn Féin the challenge is… bedding down the power sharing arrangements in the North and mitigating British government austerity
Labour Party apologists are making the same argument to support their party propping up the Blueshirts. As a “left republican” party, what’s Sinn Féin’s excuse for, say, quietly voting for the public sector pensions contributions increase in September?
What was interesting about the Dublin West by-election was that, even on a lower turnout, FF got more votes than they did in February. It would suggest that there’s a good chance of a Fianna Fáil resurgence over the next few years, especially as the FG/Labour austerity programme really starts to bite.
The problem, as has been stated before, is that there’s never been a proper chance to develop a left-right politics in the state. This hasn’t been helped by ostensibly leftish parties becoming minority partners to the likes of FF or FG. Sinn Féin are in a position at the minute to take in disillusioned Labour voters as well as those still distrustful of Fianna Fáil, but their past actions, and their current position on coalition, would suggest that they have no problem with being a minor party in government come 2016. Then it’s more of the same for another five years.
Ó Broin has made some good arguments for a left-wing coalition. The problem is that even within his own party it’s a minority position, and there doesn’t seem to be much evidence of that changing anytime soon. Picking a conservative catholic candidate for the Presidential election who could boast of his links with international capital seems a more telling account of where SF are standing.
Comment by: Tomboktu
Jan 2nd 2012 at 17:01
“Minister for Housing Willie Penrose, Dublin North East TD Tommy Broughan and newly elected Dublin West TD Patrick Nulty all withdrew their support from aspects of the government’s programme and lost the party whip.”
Carefully worded and blurs an important distinction between Penrose and the the other two Labour TDs. Penrose has not voted against the government once, and he resigned the whip rather than have it removed.