This article is a response to an Irish Times editorial published on the 3rd of Oct. Apologies to Robert who sent it on the 4th for only publishing it now. It’s appropriate though, seeing as Chavez has won the election to be reminded of what the Irish Times thinks of the current and ongoing Venezuelan President.
The October 3rd Irish Times editorial on the Venezuelan elections is just one more in a long series of unbalanced pieces, critical of President Hugo Chavez. Unfortunately, as well being full of unsubstantiated accusations, it is also inaccurate.
In the first paragraph the author describes the economy of Venezuela as “creaking,inefficient nationalised, Soviet-like with corruption and authoritarianism”. With economic growth of 5.6% in the first quarter of 2012 and expected to be at 5% overall for the year, that’s some “creak”. The charge of corruption is not substantiated by any proof or attempt at same. Would the IT use the same standards when reporting on Irish politicians?
So far, the major corruption item in the lead up to the election is a video which has emerged of a top campaign aide of Venezuelan opposition candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski covertly accepting 40,000 bolivars (US $9,300) and offering to set up a meeting between Capriles and an unknown businessman.
In the next paragraph “A frailer Chavez” is contrasted with the “energetic pragmatic young state governor Henrique Capriles”.This is the same man who was part of an attack on the Cuban embassy in Baruta, in which the ambassador was trapped, during the attempted coup in 2002. He was also mayor of Baruta when the police force and coup backers arrested the democratically elected Minister of the Interior.
In the following paragraph it’s stated that Capriles has made the rampant violence in the country with one of the highest murder and kidnapping rates in the world a central issue. Unfortunately the state of which he was governor happened, during his time in office, to be the state with the worst record for these crimes.
Adding to his problems is an internal document leaked to the Venezuelan press revealing Capriles economic policy. The document by the Roundtable of Democratic Unity (MUD), an alliance of opposition parties, states that should it’s candidate (Capriles) win the presidential elections, it plans the deregulation of banks, opening up the economy to private investment and the reduction of state funding for public services and communal council projects. We in Ireland have first hand knowledge of this sort of programme and where it leads.
The article states that “the Barrio Adentro programme that saw the creation of thousands of free public clinics in poor neighbourhoods, is in trouble”, again an unsubstantiated claim.
I searched the IT in vain for any articles on the coup against the democratically elected president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya in 2009. This country has now joined Colombia at the top of the Latin American league for human rights abuses. My search did, however find a number of articles on the wonderous business advances in Honduras made by Denis O’Brien’s Digicell group.
The editorial ends with the now long disproven lie about Chavez’s association with the Colombian rebels. Then the word “regime” is used in connection with countries such as Iran and Belarus. I’ve never seen this word used in the IT to describe those in charge of the occupation of Palestinian lands. Finally, Brazil’s former president Lula and his economic model is mentioned. Capriles, also tried to enlist Lula’s name in his own campaign. Unfortunately for Capriles, Lula would have nothing to do with him and endorsed Hugo Chavez.
We all know that opinion polls can get things wrong and we don’t know for certain who is going to win this election but I question the source of the IT’s affirmation that this is going to be a close race. The results of 11 polls, all show Chavez having a lead. Some of these are opposition polls and some are showing the lead as high as 10%. Could the IT make public the source of or reasoning for making this statement?
The whole piece seems to rely on hearsay and personal prejudices, which are not the hallmarks of
good journalism. It even seems to be at odds with the IT’s own Latin American correspondent, Tom Hennigan, who in his column on the previous day had been unable to find any trace of food shortages. Maybe the writer should pay more attention to the articles in his own paper.
Latest posts by Robert Navan (see all)
- Continuing Fallout from Venezuelan Election - April 17, 2013
- Progressive Film Club: The Women of Brukman & 161 Days - January 23, 2013
- The Venezuelan Elections and The Irish Times - October 8, 2012
- The Irish Times and Latin America - December 8, 2011
- Some Facts About the “Scholarly Alvaro Uribe” - November 3, 2010