In Search of Those 2,000 Jobs Per Month

, , Comment closed

6 Flares Twitter 5 Facebook 1 6 Flares ×
Print pagePDF pageEmail page

A number of Government Ministers – Richard Bruton in particular – have claimed that the economy is creating 2,000 private sector jobs per month.  This is intended to show their policies are working and that the economy is turning the corner.  2,000 jobs per month – it seems impressive (until you consider the 290,000 unemployed, the nearly 80,000 on labour activation schemes, the 156,000 who are working part-time but want to work more; and until you consider that the Government is actively shedding jobs in the public sector).  Still, creating 2,000 private sector jobs per month is better than losing jobs.

But where does this stat come from? Is it real?   Let’s go searching.   There are two data sources for private sector job creation.

Quarterly Household National Survey

There are two ways to estimate growth:  annually and quarterly year-on-year.  The former estimates the number in a calendar year, the latter estimates the growth in one quarter compared to the same quarter in the previous year.

One problem with the Quarterly National Household Survey (QNHS) is that we don’t have an annual estimate of private sector employment.  They changed their methodology and, therefore, some quarters are missing going back to 2011.

So let’s examine quarterly year-on-year growth in private sector employment.


In the first quarter of 2011, employment in the private sector fell by over 42,000 compared to the first quarter of 2010.  In the first quarter 2012, the private sector registered growth year-on-year– over 11,000.  In the first quarter of 2013, employment in the private sector grew again – by 6,100.

There are two things here:  first, private employment in the first quarter of 2013 grew at a slower pace than in the previous year.  You didn’t hear that from the Government.  Second, 6,100 jobs doesn’t equal 2,000 a month – it equals 500 a month.

But even these 500 jobs a month is subject to a number of caveats:

First, part of this private sector employment increase includes the Agricultural, Fishing and Forestry sector which the CSO has warned us about.  In the first quarter of 2013, employment grew 15,800 over the year in this sector – an amazing result.  But the CSO has started re-adjusting their samples to align them with the 2011 census. They state:

 ‘In the case of the Agriculture, forestry and fishing sector it can be noted that estimates of employment in this sector have shown to be sensitive to sample changes over time. Given the introduction of the sample based on the 2011Census of Population . . . particular caution is warranted in the interpretation of the trend in this sector at this time.’

Most of this 16,000 statistical increase in employment would have been in the private sector (there would be some employed in public enterprises such as Coillte).  We can’t make an estimate, but this could seriously distort the real level of private sector employment.

Second, there are many labour activation schemes that are included in employment numbers (e.g. Jobsbridge, Community Employment Scheme, etc.).  Some of these would be in the public sector – approximately 25 percent of Jobsbridge for instance.  But most would be in the private sector.  Over the year, the numbers on these schemes increased by 2,475.  This, again, would lower the private sector employment increase.

Third, there has been a considerable rise in precarious work, or underemployment – those who are working part-time but want to work more.  A large proportion of these would be in the low-paid sectors.  In the first quarter of this year, under-employment grew by 17,000 on a year-by-year basis – most of these in the private sector.

So where does that leave us?  Private sector employment grew, according to the gross CSO numbers by, 500 a month in the year between the first quarter of 2012 and 2013.  But when you remove the statistical fluke in the agricultural sector and factor in the growth in labour activation scheme participants and under-employment – it is probably the case that employment in the private sector stagnated if not fell over the last year.

Earnings and Labour Costs Survey

The second data source is the CSO’s Earnings and Labour Costs survey (ELC).  This only measures the number of employees; it doesn’t include the self-employed or assisting relatives.  The latest data only goes up the last quarter of 2012 but we can at least make an annual estimate.  What do we find for private sector employment?


The ELC survey shows that on an annual basis (not quarterly as above) the number of private sector employees fell in 2010 and 2011 but starting rising last year – by 7,150.  This estimate excludes agricultural, fishing and forestry employees so we don’t have the problem of the CSO’s statistical realignment issues.  But we still have caveats.

Participants on labour activation schemes, which would be included in these statistics, increased by 6,308 – most of these being Jobsbridge participants.  Not all of these are in the private sector but most are.

The annual increase in under-employment – again, most of whom would be in the private sector – was 9,725.

Though we can’t nail down the number, it is likely that the ELC increase of 7,150 would fall dramatically when labour activation participants and the under-employed are factored in.

* * *

Where does that leave us?  At best, the headline figures show private sector employment growing by somewhere between 500 and 600 a month over the last year.  But when you factor in:

  • The CSO statistical re-alignment in the agricultural, forestry and fishing sector
  • Increase in labour activation participants which are included in employment figures
  • The increase in under-employment

The actual increase in private sector employment is nearly wiped out and could even turn negative over the last year.

In short, the monthly 2,000 private sector job increase claimed by Government Ministers is nonsense. Now can we please have a realistic presentation of what is happening in the labour market?  If we can’t describe the situation accurately, how do we know if what we’re doing is actually working at all?

The following two tabs change content below.

Latest posts by Michael Taft (see all)