Popular desire for political change has become a feature of the current campaign against the water charge. This charge is the last straw in a litany of bank-bailout impositions; and many want an entirely different set of socio-political priorities. Recent months have also shown the power of the mass movement to bring change. The movement now needs to drive home the advantage by making the charge unworkable through mass non-payment and continued mobilization. But this in itself is not enough to create the radical political alternative that would implement the significant change that many in the campaign, and across society, desire.
Such change would require a new left party – committed to a socialist alternative. The imperative for socialism has never been greater given the disastrous impact of the financial crash on working people and impending environmental meltdown due to the failure of the market system to curb fossil fuelled growth.
Is a new left party on the political horizon at present? Clearly not. The closest recent approximation to the start of such a party was the United Left Alliance. While we acknowledge its failure, we think there are some lessons from the ULA experience that can help us today.
At the time when ULA TDs were elected there was little mass challenge to the government: dissatisfaction was expressed through the election and there was no mass movement behind the new political formation. So there was no big growth in the ULA.
But other factors also influenced the difficulties in the ULA. There was insufficient trust between the leaderships of the two main political groups; there was unease at working together in a common organization, while having differences. There was also a failure to prioritise the ULA and build it as a functioning organisation.
But the political conditions for such a formation have changed for the better: there now exists a powerful mass movement against the water charge and other austerity measures – albeit quite fragmented. It has created the conditions for a political alternative to the Troika parties and to Sinn Fein, which is prepared to go into coalition with the Troika parties – with the inevitable political accommodations that preserve inequality such as we have seen Labour and the Greens implement.
Based on the experience of the ULA, we think that any new left formation cannot be based solely on an amalgamation of the current small parties but would have to draw in activists who have mobilised in recent months and who want real change. Relations between these parties are not great at present: witness the electoral competition in the European elections and Dublin South West. But a commitment to develop common work against the water charges and a common electoral project involving many new activists could generate positive working relations and create the momentum and trust required for the construction of a new, anti-austerity political formation after the election.
This however, requires all of the left to act constructively. It requires real priority be given to a process that could lead to a significant breakthrough. There is the potential for an anti-austerity slate, with candidates drawn from the water charge movement and not directly linked to the AAA, the PBPA or other organisations but including them and agreed through a process in which all are involved and based upon specific commitments. This could be presented as the beginnings of an anti-austerity political alternative that will mobilise to defend the interests or ordinary people. Ideally a common name would provide a way to avoid the political confusion created by the need for a ‘technical group’ if enough of such candidates were elected.
The political commitments would include (though not exclusively): explicit opposition to coalition with the parties of the right – FF and FG; a commitment to mass action and democratic accountability; a moratorium on debt repayment pending a public audit of the debt; abolition of the water charge and LPT; tax the rich and big corporations; public works for housing, hospitals, schools, water services, etc; repeal of the 8thAmendment to permit legal abortion; and prioritising the needs of the majority rather than further enriching the few.
We understand that intermittent discussions are taking place between the AAA and PBPA, and between PBPA and others. We understand these are focused on electoral agreements and may evolve to include other groups. But such an approach is too narrow to meet the need for a serious political alternative. The first step for a new process is to take the discussion on how to approach the coming general election out into the open, in front of and involving those active in the movement against the water charges. Non-aligned socialist / anti-austerity activists also need to consider how to engage in this process. This needs to happen over the coming months. An electoral agreement amongst the existing left is not enough: it’s time to think bigger and act accordingly.
Brendan Young was elected as a Community Solidarity Councillor to Kildare Co. Council in May 2014.
Eddie Conlon is a trade union and political activist and was a member of the ULA Steering Committee
Latest posts by Eddie Conlon (see all)
- Solidarity with Syriza: Challenging Austerity at Home - February 9, 2015
- Time for the Left to Act Together - January 19, 2015